J. Lipid Res. Did you know there is a large type edition? Click here.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wu, J.-D.
Right arrow Articles by Bailey, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wu, J.-D.
Right arrow Articles by Bailey, J. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Journal of Lipid Research, Vol. 20, 472-480, May 1979
Copyright © 1979 by Lipid Research, Inc.

Lipid metabolism in cultured cells. XVIII. Comparative uptake of low density and high density lipoproteins by normal, hypercholesterolemic and tumor virus-transformed human fibroblasts

Jiunn-Der Wu , Jean Butler , and J. Martyn Bailey

Department of Biochemistry, The George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC 20037

Serum lipoproteins control cell cholesterol content by regulating its uptake, biosynthesis, and excretion. Monolayers of cultured fibroblasts were used to study interactions with human high density (HDL) and low density (LDL) lipoproteins doubly labeled with [3H]cholesterol and 125I in the apoprotein moiety. In the binding assay for LDL, the absence of specific LDL receptors in type II hypercholesterolemic fibroblasts was confirmed, whereas monolayers of virus-transformed human lung fibroblasts (VA-4) exhibited LDL binding characteristics essentially the same as normal lung fibroblasts. In the studies of HDL binding, specific HDL binding sites were demonstrated in normal and virus-transformed fibroblasts. In addition, type II hypercholesterolemic cells, despite the loss of LDL receptors, retained normal HDL binding sites. No significant competition was displayed between the two lipoprotein classes for their respective binding sites over a 5-fold concentration range. In VA-4 cells, the amount of lipoprotein required to saturate half the receptor sites was 3.5 µg/ml (9 x 10-9 M) for LDL and 9.1 µg/ml (9 x 10-8 M) for HDL. Pronase treatment reduced LDL binding by more than half but had no effect on HDL binding. Chloroquine, a lysomal enzyme inhibitor, stimulated net LDL uptake 3.5-fold by increasing internalized LDL but had essentially no effect on HDL uptake. Further experiments were conducted using doubly labeled lipoproteins to characterize the interaction of LDL and HDL with cells. While the cholesterol and protein moieties of LDL were incorporated into cells at similar rates, the uptake of the cholesterol moiety of HDL was 5 to 10 times more rapid than that of the protein component. Furthermore, the apoprotein component of LDL is extensively degraded following exposure, whereas the apoprotein moiety of HDL retains its macromolecular chromatographic characteristics. These results indicate that HDL and LDL bind to cultured cells at separate sites and that further processing of the two lipoprotein classes appears to take place by fundamentally different mechanisms.—Wu, J-D., J. Butler, and J. M. Bailey. Lipid metabolism in cultured cells XVIII. Comparative uptake of low density and high density lipoproteins by normal, hypercholesterolemic, and tumor virus-transformed human fibroblasts.

Supplementary key words specific receptors • tissue culture • cholesterol uptake mechanism

Submitted on July 28, 1978
Accepted on November 14, 1978


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Journal of Biological Chemistry 
 Molecular and Cellular Proteomics   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1979 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.