Advertisement
J. Lipid Res.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hassan, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Rampone, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hassan, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Rampone, A. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Journal of Lipid Research, Vol. 20, 646-653, July 1979
Copyright © 1979 by Lipid Research, Inc.

Intestinal absorption and lymphatic transport of cholesterol and ßbeta;-sitostanol in the rat

Aslam S. Hassan and Alfred J. Rampone

Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, University of Oregon Health Sciences Center, Portland, OR 97201

The intestinal absorption of cholesterol and ßbeta;-sitostanol (the saturated analogue of ßbeta;-sitosterol) were measured and their absorptions compared in the presence and absence of cholestyramine. After test meals containing [3H]cholesterol and [14C]ßbeta;-sitostanol without added cholestyramine, 4-day fecal collections yielded an average of 51% of the fed cholesterol and 83% of the fed ßbeta;-sitostanol. In separate lymph transport studies without cholestyramine, 36% of the fed cholesterol was recovered in lymph in 24 hours compared to only 2% of the fed ßbeta;-sitostanol. Thus, while total recoveries of the two labeled compounds in feces plus lymph were nearly identical (51% + 36% = 87% for cholesterol and 83% + 2% = 85% for ßbeta;-sitostanol) their distribution in the two compartments was markedly different, reflecting the relative nonabsorbability of ßbeta;-sitostanol. Adding cholestyramine to the test meal caused fecal excretion of cholesterol to increase to 73%, independent of the dose of cholestyramine used. Cholestyramine had no effect on the fecal excretion of ßbeta;-sitostanol (average excretion after cholestyramine, 85%). The relative non-absorbability of ßbeta;-sitostanol compared to cholesterol is clearly evident in this study and leads us to suggest its possible use as a lipid-soluble, nonabsorbable reference compound for measurement of the absorption of cholesterol and other lipids. Further data are presented to justify its use for this purpose.—Hassan, A. S., and A. J. Rampone. Intestinal absorption and lymphatic transport of cholesterol and ßbeta;-sitostanol in the rat.

Supplementary key words plant sterols • cholestyramine • thoracic duct • fecal excretion of sterols

Submitted on September 18, 1978
Accepted on December 29, 1978


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
H. Tomoyori, Y. Kawata, T. Higuchi, I. Ichi, H. Sato, M. Sato, I. Ikeda, and K. Imaizumi
Phytosterol Oxidation Products Are Absorbed in the Intestinal Lymphatics in Rats but Do Not Accelerate Atherosclerosis in Apolipoprotein E-Deficient Mice
J. Nutr., July 1, 2004; 134(7): 1690 - 1696.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
M. Igel, U. Giesa, D. Lutjohann, and K. von Bergmann
Comparison of the intestinal uptake of cholesterol, plant sterols, and stanols in mice
J. Lipid Res., March 1, 2003; 44(3): 533 - 538.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
G. Salen, G. Xu, G. S. Tint, A. K. Batta, and S. Shefer
Hyperabsorption and retention of campestanol in a sitosterolemic homozygote: comparison with her mother and three control subjects
J. Lipid Res., November 1, 2000; 41(11): 1883 - 1889.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Am. Coll. Nutr.Home page
T. A. Wilson, L. M. Ausman, C. W. Lawton, D. M. Hegsted, and R. J. Nicolosi
Comparative Cholesterol Lowering Properties of Vegetable Oils: Beyond Fatty Acids
J. Am. Coll. Nutr., October 1, 2000; 19(5): 601 - 607.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
M. A. Hallikainen, E. S. Sarkkinen, and M. I. J. Uusitupa
Plant Stanol Esters Affect Serum Cholesterol Concentrations of Hypercholesterolemic Men and Women in a Dose-dependent Manner
J. Nutr., April 1, 2000; 130(4): 767 - 776.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
R. E Ostlund Jr, C. A Spilburg, and W. F Stenson
Sitostanol administered in lecithin micelles potently reduces cholesterol absorption in humans
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, November 1, 1999; 70(5): 826 - 831.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
M. A Hallikainen and M. I. Uusitupa
Effects of 2 low-fat stanol ester–containing margarines on serum cholesterol concentrations as part of a low-fat diet in hypercholesterolemic subjects
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, March 1, 1999; 69(3): 403 - 410.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Journal of Biological Chemistry 
 Molecular and Cellular Proteomics   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1979 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement