J. Lipid Res.  Neurobiology of Lipids (ISSN1683-5506)
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Downs, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Downs, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Journal of Lipid Research, Vol. 23, 14-27, January 1982
Copyright © 1982 by Lipid Research, Inc.

A quick and large-scale density gradient subfractionation method for low density lipoproteins

Diana M. Lee and Debbie Downs

Laboratory of Lipid and Lipoprotein Studies, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation and the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK 73104

A quick density gradient-banding subfractionation method has been developed for d < 1.063 g/ml lipoproteins. Up to 324 ml of plasma can be resolved into five distinct layers by a single ultracentrifugation. The separation was achieved with a discontinuous density gradient formed between plasma and a layer of NaCl solution of d 1.080 g/ml in an angle-head rotor during centrifugation at 45,000 rpm for 26 hr at 5°C. VLDL and LDL1 (layer 1, d < 1.020 g/ml) were at the top. Layer 2 (apparent d 1.025-1.028 g/ml), layer 3 (apparent d 1.032-1.043 g/ml) and layer 4 (apparent d 1.046-1.054 g/ml) were subfractions of normal LDL2. Layer 5 (d > 1.071 g/ml) contained HDL and plasma proteins. A second step centrifugation separates VLDL from LDL1. When opaque tubes are used, additional centrifugation is needed to separate layer 4 from layer 5. The subfractionation method was reproducible and was verified by analytical ultracentrifugation, chemical analyses, agarose electrophoresis, and electron microscopy. This method has been applied to plasma of normal males and females of the same age group. The chemical composition of a given subfraction from subjects of the same category was constant. However, compositional differences were found between normal males and females. The triglyceride content was higher in layer 2 and the cholesteryl ester content was lower in layer 4 for normal females than for males. Quantitatively, cholesterol concentration was significantly higher in layer 2 for normal males than for females. Layer 4 and layer 5 were the only fractions containing Lp(a). Applicability of the subfractionation method to studies of dyslipoproteinemia was demonstrated with plasma from patients with type III and type IV hyperlipoproteinemias. Marked differences were found in VLDL and LDL1, both qualitatively and quantitatively, between the two types of patients and between the type III patient and normal subjects. A primarily quantitative difference was found in VLDL between the type IV patient and normal subjects. This isolation method yields concentrated subfractions that reveal the heterogeneity of LDL2 in one spin, and offers quick isolation of narrow density ranges of LDL species, thereby providing better defined molecular entities for structural and/or metabolic studies.—Lee, D. M., and D. Downs. A quick and large-scale density gradient subfractionation method for low density lipoproteins.

Supplementary key words very low density lipoproteins • narrow density range • hyperlipoproteinemia • Lp(a) • electron microscopy • agarose electrophoresis

Submitted on January 22, 1981
Revised on August 12, 1981


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
W. Ensign, N. Hill, and C. B. Heward
Disparate LDL Phenotypic Classification among 4 Different Methods Assessing LDL Particle Characteristics
Clin. Chem., September 1, 2006; 52(9): 1722 - 1727.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
W. H. Capell, A. Zambon, M. A. Austin, J. D. Brunzell, and J. E. Hokanson
Compositional Differences of LDL Particles in Normal Subjects With LDL Subclass Phenotype A and LDL Subclass Phenotype B
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., August 1, 1996; 16(8): 1040 - 1046.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
M. Averna, S. M. Marcovina, D. Noto, T. G. Cole, E. S. Krul, and G. Schonfeld
Familial Hypobetalipoproteinemia Is Not Associated With Low Levels of Lipoprotein(a)
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., December 1, 1995; 15(12): 2165 - 2175.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Journal of Biological Chemistry 
 Molecular and Cellular Proteomics   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1982 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.