J. Lipid Res. Did you know there is a large type edition? Click here.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lafontan, M.
Right arrow Articles by Villeneuve, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lafontan, M.
Right arrow Articles by Villeneuve, A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Journal of Lipid Research, Vol 24, 429-440, Copyright © 1983 by Lipid Research, Inc.

ARTICLES

Preponderance of alpha 2- over beta 1-adrenergic receptor sites in human fat cells is not predictive of the lipolytic effect of physiological catecholamines

M Lafontan, M Berlan and A Villeneuve

Adrenergic control of human fat cell lipolysis is mediated by two kinds of receptor sites that are simultaneously stimulated by physiological amines. To establish a correlation between the binding characteristics of the receptor and biological functions, the ability of physiological amines to stimulate or inhibit isolated fat cell lipolysis in vitro was compared to the beta- and alpha 2-adrenoceptor properties of the same fat cell batch. The beta-selective antagonist (-)[3H]dihydroalprenolol ([3H]DHA) and the alpha 2-selective antagonists [3H]yohimbine ([3H]YOH) and [3H]rauwolscine ([3H]RAU) were used to identify and characterize the two receptor sites. Binding of each ligand was rapid, saturable, and specific. The results demonstrate 1) the weaker lipolytic effect of epinephrine compared with norepinephrine. This can be explained by the equipotency of the amines at the beta 1-sites and the higher affinity of epinephrine for alpha 2-adrenergic receptors. 2) The preponderance of alpha 2-adrenergic receptor sites labeled by [3H]YOH (Bmax, 586 +/- 95 fmol/mg protein; KD, 2.7 +/- 0.2 nM) or [3H]RAU (Bmax, 580 +/- 100 fmol/mg protein; KD, 3.7 +/- 0.1 nM). These two ligands can be successfully used to label alpha 2-adrenergic receptor sites. 3) The beta 1-adrenergic receptor population labeled by [3H]DHA(Bmax, 234 +/- 37 fmol/mg protein; KD, 1.8 +/- 0.4 nM), although a third as numerous as the alpha 2-adrenergic population, is responsible for the lipolytic effect of physiological amines and is weakly counteracted by simultaneous alpha 2-adrenergic receptor stimulation under our experimental conditions. It is concluded that, in human fat cells, the characterization of beta 1- and alpha 2-adrenergic receptors by saturation studies or kinetic analysis to determine affinity (KD) and maximal number of binding sites (Bmax) is not sufficient for an accurate characterization of the functional adrenergic receptors involved in the observed biological effect.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Journal of Biological Chemistry 
 Molecular and Cellular Proteomics   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1983 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.