J. Lipid Res. Please sign the JLR Guestbook
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stange, E. F.
Right arrow Articles by Dietschy, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stange, E. F.
Right arrow Articles by Dietschy, J. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Journal of Lipid Research, Vol 25, 703-713, Copyright © 1984 by Lipid Research, Inc.


ARTICLES

Age-related decreases in tissue sterol acquisition are mediated by changes in cholesterol synthesis and not low density lipoprotein uptake in the rat

EF Stange and JM Dietschy

The present investigation compared plasma cholesterol levels and lipoprotein profiles, and absolute rates of sterol synthesis and low density lipoprotein (LDL) uptake in various organs of immature (4 weeks old) and mature (15 weeks) rats. The plasma cholesterol level and its distribution among the major lipoprotein density fractions were similar in both groups. Using [3H]water as a substrate for measuring sterol synthesis in vivo, the content of newly synthesized cholesterol (3H- labeled digitonin-precipitable sterols; [3H]DPS) was several fold higher in all tissues of the young, compared to the old, rats when normalized per g of tissue. In contrast, whole-body [3H]DPS content was identical at 29.5 and 29.3 mumol/hr in young and old rats, respectively, despite a 4.4-fold difference in body weight (102 vs. 453 g). The importance of different organs to total-body sterol synthesis remained similar with increasing age although the skin (11 vs. 24% of total) rather than the small bowel (15 vs. 8%) became the second most important organ after the liver (49 vs. 45%) in the older animals. When LDL uptake was determined in these same organs, using constant infusion technique, the rates of clearance were higher only in the adrenal glands, adipose tissue, and skin of the young animals; whereas these rates were essentially the same in the liver and gastrointestinal tract, the two organs that are quantitatively most important for LDL catabolism. Even when these clearance rates were normalized to the whole organ or to 100 g of body weight, the differences in LDL uptake in the two age groups were minor compared to the major decrease in rates of cholesterol synthesis that were observed with aging. Finally, calculation of absolute rates of tissue cholesterol acquisition from both sources indicated that, in most organs, the majority of tissue cholesterol was derived from local synthesis rather than from LDL uptake in both age groups and that, with increasing age, total cholesterol acquisition decreased several-fold primarily as a consequence of the diminished rate of sterol synthesis. These studies demonstrate that with growth and aging in the rat there is a dramatic decrease in the rate of tissue cholesterol synthesis while the uptake of LDL-cholesterol remains essentially unchanged.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
P. Parini, B. Angelin, and M. Rudling
Cholesterol and Lipoprotein Metabolism in Aging : Reversal of Hypercholesterolemia by Growth Hormone Treatment in Old Rats
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., April 1, 1999; 19(4): 832 - 839.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Journal of Biological Chemistry 
 Molecular and Cellular Proteomics   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1984 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.