Advertisement
J. Lipid Res.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Armstrong, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Carey, M. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Armstrong, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Carey, M. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Journal of Lipid Research, Vol 28, 1144-1155, Copyright © 1987 by Lipid Research, Inc.


ARTICLES

Thermodynamic and molecular determinants of sterol solubilities in bile salt micelles [published erratum appears in J Lipid Res 1988 Jan;29(1):120]

MJ Armstrong and MC Carey
Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

We examined, by reverse-phase high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), the hydrophilic-hydrophobic balance of cholesterol and 12 non- cholesterol sterols and related this property to their equilibrium micellar solubilities in sodium taurocholate and sodium glycodeoxycholate solutions. Sterols investigated exhibited structural variations in the polar function (3 alpha-OH, 3 beta-OH, 3 beta-SH), nuclear double bonds (none, delta 5, or delta 7), side chain length (C27, C28, C29) and side chain double bonds (none, delta 22, or delta 24). In general, a sterol's hydrophilic-hydrophobic balance became progressively more hydrophobic (as exemplified by increasing HPLC retention values, k') with additions of side chain methyl (C28) and ethyl (C29) groups and with 3 beta-SH substitution of the 3-OH polar function. Side chain delta 22 and especially delta 24 double bonds rendered the sterols appreciably more hydrophilic, whereas a single nuclear double bond had little influence. Sterol solubilities (24 degrees C, 0.15 M Na+) were uniformly greater in 50 mM solutions of sodium glycodeoxycholate (range 0.15 to 2.5 mM) than in equimolar solutions of the more hydrophilic bile salt, sodium taurocholate (range 0.07 to 0.67 mM). For each bile salt system, a strong inverse correlation existed between micellar solubilities of sterols and their HPLC k' values, indicating that more hydrophilic sterols had greater micellar solubilities than the more hydrophobic ones. Based upon the aqueous monomeric solubilities of cholesterol (C27) and beta-sitosterol (C29) at 24 degrees C, we derived free energy changes associated with micellar binding and found that solubilization of both sterols was more energetically favored in glycodeoxycholate solutions. Although cholesterol exhibited a higher binding affinity than beta-sitosterol in glycodeoxycholate micelles, solubilization of beta-sitosterol in taurocholate micelles was more energetically favored than cholesterol by -0.6 kcal/mol. Based upon these results we offer a thermodynamic explanation for the greater micellar solubilities of more hydrophilic sterols and suggest that the high affinity, but low capacity, of a typical phytosterol for binding to trihydroxy bile salt micelles may provide a physical-chemical basis for its inhibition of intestinal cholesterol absorption.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
Y. Lin, G. W. Meijer, M. A. Vermeer, and E. A. Trautwein
Soy Protein Enhances the Cholesterol-Lowering Effect of Plant Sterol Esters in Cholesterol-Fed Hamsters
J. Nutr., January 1, 2004; 134(1): 143 - 148.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
M. Nissinen, H. Gylling, M. Vuoristo, and T. A. Miettinen
Micellar distribution of cholesterol and phytosterols after duodenal plant stanol ester infusion
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, June 1, 2002; 282(6): G1009 - G1015.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
H. Relas, H. Gylling, and T. A. Miettinen
Fate of intravenously administered squalene and plant sterols in human subjects
J. Lipid Res., June 1, 2001; 42(6): 988 - 994.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
L. Normen, P. Dutta, A. Lia, and H. Andersson
Soy sterol esters and {beta}-sitostanol ester as inhibitors of cholesterol absorption in human small bowel
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, April 1, 2000; 71(4): 908 - 913.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
R. E Ostlund Jr, C. A Spilburg, and W. F Stenson
Sitostanol administered in lecithin micelles potently reduces cholesterol absorption in humans
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, November 1, 1999; 70(5): 826 - 831.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Journal of Biological Chemistry 
 Molecular and Cellular Proteomics   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1987 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement