HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Smaby, J. M. Articles by Brockman, H. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Smaby, J. M. Articles by Brockman, H. L. Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Journal of Lipid Research, Vol 28, 1078-1087, Copyright © 1987 by Lipid Research, Inc.

ARTICLES

Acyl unsaturation and cholesteryl ester miscibility in surfaces. Formation of lecithin-cholesteryl ester complexes

JM Smaby and HL Brockman
Hormel Institute, University of Minnesota, Austin 55912.

The surface behavior of a series of cholesteryl esters was studied in mixtures with a model phospholipid, 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl phosphatidylcholine. The cholesteryl esters were representative of the predominant forms occurring naturally and qualitative similarities in their phase behavior permits generalization of their surface properties. Quantitative differences, however, show that the availability of cholesteryl esters in all surface states is dependent on the structure of the acyl moiety. All except cholesteryl stearate were surface-active and formed preferred packing arrays, i.e., complexes, with the lecithin at compositions grouped around cholesteryl ester mol fractions of 0.015. Exceptions were cholesteryl arachidonate and docosahexaenoate, with complex stoichiometries of 0.034 and 0.032, respectively. Lecithin had the same apparent area in all complexes, 56.5 +/- 1.04 A2, which was larger than that of uncomplexed lecithin, 53.3 +/- 0.7 A2. This implies that the conformation or orientation of the two polyunsaturated species in complexes is markedly different than the others studied. The areas and hydrations of all uncomplexed cholesteryl esters were similar. Because mixing of complex with uncomplexed cholesteryl ester deviated positively from ideality, the apparent molecular areas of the uncomplexed cholesteryl esters ranged from 161 +/- 22 (complex-rich) to 107 +/- 15 A2 (cholesteryl ester- rich). The similarity of the monolayer phase complex stoichiometries and the bilayer miscibilities of cholesteryl oleate suggests a correspondence between states. If so, the availability of cholesteryl arachidonate or docosahexaenoate in bilayers should be approximately twice that of other naturally occurring cholesteryl esters.
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Heikela, I. Vattulainen, and M. T. Hyvonen Atomistic Simulation Studies of Cholesteryl Oleates: Model for the Core of Lipoprotein Particles Biophys. J., April 1, 2006; 90(7): 2247 - 2257. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]