J. Lipid Res.  Neurobiology of Lipids (ISSN1683-5506)
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Meneses, P.
Right arrow Articles by Glonek, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Meneses, P.
Right arrow Articles by Glonek, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Journal of Lipid Research, Vol 30, 458-461, Copyright © 1989 by Lipid Research, Inc.


ARTICLES

31P NMR of tissue phospholipids: a comparison of three tissue pre- treatment procedures

P Meneses, PF Para and T Glonek
Magnetic Resonance Laboratory, Chicago College of Osteopathic Medicine, IL 60615.

Extracted tissue phospholipid 31P NMR profiles, obtained from individual porcine lenses subjected to two preservation procedures (acetone desiccation and freeze-drying) and a perchloric acid- extraction procedure, were compared to those from freshly excised lens specimens. Each profile yielded quantitative data on 12 lens phospholipids: PC, LPC, PC plas, PE, LPE, PE plas, PS, SPH, PI, LPI, PG, and CL. A specimen group size of at least 9 lenses was required for secure statistical inter-group comparisons by the Scheffe procedure, due to specimen 31P NMR profile variability, interpreted as arising from specimen biological variability. The phospholipid profiles of lenses preserved by acetone desiccation were essentially identical to those from the freshly excised control lenses. Freeze-dried lens profiles differed significantly in four components, while profiles from perchloric acid-extracted lenses differed in six. It is concluded that specimen preservation by acetone disiccation is a useful method for preserving tissue phospholipids for subsequent 31P NMR profile analysis, while freeze-drying is not. Lipid extraction following a tissue acid extraction is also of little or no value in the determination of tissue phospholipid profiles.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
IOVSHome page
M. Rujoi, J. Jin, D. Borchman, D. Tang, and M. C. Yappert
Isolation and Lipid Characterization of Cholesterol-Enriched Fractions in Cortical and Nuclear Human Lens Fibers
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., April 1, 2003; 44(4): 1634 - 1642.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
B. Moesgaard, J. W. Jaroszewski, and H. S. Hansen
Accumulation of N-acyl-ethanolamine phospholipids in rat brains during post-decapitative ischemia: a 31P NMR study
J. Lipid Res., March 1, 1999; 40(3): 515 - 521.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Journal of Biological Chemistry 
 Molecular and Cellular Proteomics   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1989 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.