J. Lipid Res.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Puppione, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Schumaker, V. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Puppione, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Schumaker, V. N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Journal of Lipid Research, Vol 30, 641-650, Copyright © 1989 by Lipid Research, Inc.


ARTICLES

Low density lipoprotein heterogeneity in the cebus monkey

DL Puppione, RJ Nicolosi, MC Kowala and VN Schumaker
Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Lowell, MA 01854.

In studies of cebus monkey plasma lipoproteins, we have used an ultracentrifugally generated density gradient to isolate two distinct species of low density lipoproteins (LDL). Compositional analyses revealed that each of the ultracentrifugally isolated fractions was enriched in cholesteryl esters and contained a single apolipoprotein which in terms of its mobility on SDS gels corresponded to apolipoprotein B-100, the major apolipoprotein of human LDL. Hydrodynamic measurements carried out in the analytical ultracentrifuge showed that F1.20 values were 30.0 for LDL1 and 23.5 for LDL2. In a solution of density 1.0069 g/ml, the sedimentation rates were 5.9 and 7.2 S for LDL1 and LDL2, respectively. In addition to sedimentation velocity data, we describe a new approach for using these same data to obtain calculated values for molecular weight. The hydrated densities calculated for the two fractions were 1.033 and 1.045 g/ml and calculated molecular weights were 3.08 million for LDL1 and 2.42 million for LDL2. Hydrated density values were in excellent agreement with those calculated from compositional data. Electron microscopy data showed that LDL1 had a larger mean diameter of 26.7 nm than LDL2 which had a diameter of 19.3 nm. Native gel electrophoretic analyses of the two LDL fractions in 3.5% acrylamide showed that, consistent with its size, LDL1 had slower mobility than LDL2.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Journal of Biological Chemistry 
 Molecular and Cellular Proteomics   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1989 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.