J. Lipid Res. Acyl Labeled PIP's available August 1, 2008
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Knipping, G.
Right arrow Articles by Esterbauer, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Knipping, G.
Right arrow Articles by Esterbauer, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Journal of Lipid Research, Vol 31, 1965-1972, Copyright © 1990 by Lipid Research, Inc.


ARTICLES

Antioxidants and resistance against oxidation of porcine LDL subfractions

G Knipping, M Rotheneder, G Striegl and H Esterbauer
Institute of Medical Biochemistry, University of Graz, Austria.

The objective of this study was to determine the level of antioxidants, the content of fatty acids and peroxidation products, and the resistance against oxidation of native porcine LDL1 and LDL2. There were no significant differences in the fatty acid distribution of both native low density lipoprotein (LDL) subfractions, which was similar to that of human LDL. The total amount of alpha- and gamma-tocopherol of pig LDL was significantly lower than in human LDL, and beta-carotene, lycopene, and retinyl esters were totally absent. Levels of thiobarbituric acid-reacting substances (TBARS) and lipid peroxides in freshly isolated pig LDL subfractions were below or only slightly above the detection limit. The susceptibility to oxidation of both LDL subfractions was investigated by addition of Cu2+ as prooxidant. The results show that pig LDL subfractions are much more susceptible to oxidation as measured by the duration of the lag phase preceding the onset of rapid lipid peroxidation. From the low content of vitamin E one would expect even much shorter lag phases. The possibility therefore exists that pig LDL contains additional, and as yet unidentified, antioxidants.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Journal of Biological Chemistry 
 Molecular and Cellular Proteomics   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1990 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.