J. Lipid Res. Did you know there is a large type edition? Click here.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lees, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Lees, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lees, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Lees, R. S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Journal of Lipid Research, Vol 32, 1-8, Copyright © 1991 by Lipid Research, Inc.

ARTICLES

99mTechnetium-labeled low density lipoprotein: receptor recognition and intracellular sequestration of radiolabel

AM Lees and RS Lees
Arteriosclerosis Center, New England Deaconess Hospital, Boston, MA.

99MTechnetium-labeled low density lipoprotein (99MTc-labeled LDL) was developed to detect atherosclerosis by external imaging with the gamma scintillation camera (Lees, et al. J. Nucl. Med. 1985. 26: 1056-1062; Lees, et al. Arteriosclerosis. 1988. 8: 461-470). The present study examined high affinity LDL receptor recognition and intracellular sequestration of 99MTc-labeled LDL by fibroblasts. There were no significant differences between 99MTc-labeled LDL and 125I-labeled LDL in binding parameters or percent inhibition of accumulation, which indicated that 99MTc labeling did not alter receptor recognition of LDL. At 4 degrees C the Kd (+SE) for 99MTc-labeled LDL and 125I-labeled LDL, respectively, was 1.52 +/- 0.24 and 1.45 +/- 0.14 micrograms/ml; Bmax (+/- SE) was 5.45 +/- 0.48 and 4.89 +/- 0.25 ng/well, respectively. Binding was saturated at about 2 micrograms/ml. The complete linearity of 99MTc-labeled LDL accumulation from 0-6 h and the positive slope from 6-24 h indicated that radiolabel that entered cells as 99MTc-labeled LDL was sequestered; pulse-chase experiments, which measured residual cell-associated radioactivity out to 24 h, also showed that radiolabel was trapped. Because radiolabel sequestration was essentially complete, and because 99MTc-labeled LDL was recognized by the LDL receptor equally as well as 125I-labeled LDL, it should be useful not only for imaging atherosclerosis, but also for quantitatively determining sites of utilization and degradation of LDL.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
M. Lougheed, E. D. W. Moore, D. R. L. Scriven, and U. P. Steinbrecher
Uptake of Oxidized LDL by Macrophages Differs From That of Acetyl LDL and Leads to Expansion of an Acidic Endolysosomal Compartment
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., August 1, 1999; 19(8): 1881 - 1890.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Journal of Biological Chemistry 
 Molecular and Cellular Proteomics   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1991 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.