J. Lipid Res.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ceryak, S.
Right arrow Articles by Fromm, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ceryak, S.
Right arrow Articles by Fromm, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Journal of Lipid Research, Vol 34, 1661-1674, Copyright © 1993 by Lipid Research, Inc.


ARTICLES

Comparative binding of bile acids to serum lipoproteins and albumin

S Ceryak, B Bouscarel and H Fromm
Department of Medicine, George Washington University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20037.

Characteristics of the binding of lithocholic acid (LC), chenodeoxycholic acid (CDC), and cholic acid to human plasma proteins were studied. Affinity of the different plasma protein fractions for the bile acids studied decreased with increased polarity of the steroid nucleus of the bile acid. Binding of LC, CDC, and cholic acid to the lipoprotein-free, albumin-rich plasma fraction was characterized by two classes of binding sites with respective KDs of 2, 5, and 51 microM, and of 39, 2,387, and 5,575 microM, while corresponding Bmax values were similar for the different bile acids, at around 6 and 100 nmol/mg protein. Bile acid binding to the different lipoprotein fractions was characterized by a single population of binding sites, with a KD ranging from 47 to 66 microM for LC, 695 to 1010 microM for CDC, and 2,511 to 2,562 microM for cholic acid. Bmax values, at 416-913 nmol/mg protein, were similar among the different bile acids studied. Both glycine- and taurine-conjugated, as well as unconjugated LC competitively inhibited [24-14C]LC binding to low density (LDL) and to high density lipoproteins (HDL) to the same extent, while the more polar LC-3-sulfate, CDC, and cholic acid were increasingly less potent in displacing LC binding from the respective lipoproteins. Furthermore, all bile acids studied shared the same lipoprotein binding site. The lipoprotein fluorescence at 330-334 nm, following excitation at 280 nm, was diminished after incubation with LC, suggesting that the bile acid masks the tryptophan residues of the protein moiety. Finally, the initial rate of uptake of 1 microM LC, in isolated hamster hepatocytes, at around 0.045 nmol.sec-1.mg cell wt-1, was not affected by the protein carrier. However, for the same concentration of LC, bound to either LDL or HDL, LC binding resulted in 75-77% of the total [24- 14C]LC nonspecifically bound to the hepatocyte, compared to 65% when bound to albumin, and 45% in the absence of protein. The studies show that, under conditions when the serum bile acid concentration exceeds the capacity of the high affinity class of albumin binding sites for bile acids, lipoproteins have similar or greater affinity to bind bile acids than does albumin. The ability of lipoproteins to increase the nonspecific association of lithocholic acid with liver cells may also facilitate bile acid association with extrahepatic tissues. As lipoproteins, in contrast to albumin, are targeted to most cells, they may play a major role in the transport of potentially toxic bile acids to peripheral cells.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
P. Qin, X. Tang, M. M. Elloso, and D. C. Harnish
Bile acids induce adhesion molecule expression in endothelial cells through activation of reactive oxygen species, NF-{kappa}B, and p38
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, August 1, 2006; 291(2): H741 - H747.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
M. D. Krasowski, K. Yasuda, L. R. Hagey, and E. G. Schuetz
Evolution of the Pregnane X Receptor: Adaptation to Cross-Species Differences in Biliary Bile Salts
Mol. Endocrinol., July 1, 2005; 19(7): 1720 - 1739.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Gen. Physiol.Home page
A. M. Dopico, J. V. Walsh Jr., and J. J. Singer
Natural Bile Acids and Synthetic Analogues Modulate Large Conductance Ca2+-activated K+ (BKCa) Channel Activity in Smooth Muscle Cells
J. Gen. Physiol., February 22, 2002; 119(3): 251 - 273.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GutHome page
P Ljubuncic, Z Tanne, and A Bomzon
Evidence of a systemic phenomenon for oxidative stress in cholestatic liver disease
Gut, November 1, 2000; 47(5): 710 - 716.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Journal of Biological Chemistry 
 Molecular and Cellular Proteomics   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1993 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.