HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mikami, T. Articles by Hoshita, T. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mikami, T. Articles by Hoshita, T. Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Journal of Lipid Research, Vol 34, 429-435, Copyright © 1993 by Lipid Research, Inc.

ARTICLES

Metabolism of sulfonate analogs of ursodeoxycholic acid and their effects on biliary bile acid composition in hamsters

T Mikami, K Kihira, S Ikawa, M Yoshii, S Miki, EH Mosbach and T Hoshita
Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Hiroshima University School of Medicine, Japan.

The metabolism of sodium 3 alpha,7 beta-dihydroxy-5 beta-cholane-24- sulfonate and sodium 3 alpha,7 beta-dihydroxy-24-nor-5 beta-cholane-23- sulfonate was studied in hamsters. In bile fistula animals these sulfonate analogs of ursodeoxycholic acid were absorbed mainly from the terminal ileum and secreted rapidly into the bile without biotransformation or conjugation. After oral administration, the sulfonate analogs were excreted in the feces at the same rate as chenodeoxycholic acid and its metabolic products. The intestinal microorganisms transformed chenodeoxycholic acid largely into lithocholic acid; the sulfonate analogs were completely resistant to biotransformation. After a 2-week feeding period, the sulfonate analogs of ursodeoxycholic acid accounted for 24.0% and 16.9% of total biliary bile acids. These sulfonates did not affect the proportions of the natural bile acids in the bile, and the ratio of glycine-conjugated bile acids to taurine-conjugated bile acids was not altered by feeding the sulfonates. In contrast, when ursodeoxycholic acid was fed, the proportions of the natural bile acids and the glycine/taurine ratio were changed. These results suggest that the sulfonate analogs had no profound effect on endogenous bile acid metabolism and did not cause a depletion of the hepatic taurine pool during enterohepatic circulation. The sulfonates had no effect on intestinal cholesterol absorption and serum cholesterol levels.
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. Fujino, M. Une, T. Imanaka, K. Inoue, and T. Nishimaki-Mogami Structure-activity relationship of bile acids and bile acid analogs in regard to FXR activation J. Lipid Res., January 1, 2004; 45(1): 132 - 138. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]