J. Lipid Res.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gudmundsen, O.
Right arrow Articles by Nenseter, M. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gudmundsen, O.
Right arrow Articles by Nenseter, M. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Journal of Lipid Research, Vol 34, 589-600, Copyright © 1993 by Lipid Research, Inc.


ARTICLES

Hepatic uptake of beta-VLDL in cholesterol-fed rabbits

O Gudmundsen, T Berg, N Roos and MS Nenseter
Department of Molecular Cell Biology, University of Oslo, Norway.

The hepatic uptake of intravenously injected beta-very low density lipoprotein (beta-VLDL) in rabbits fed 2% (w/w) cholesterol for 3 weeks was investigated. In vitro studies were also conducted to examine the specificity and the capacity of the uptake in isolated liver parenchymal cells. The hepatic uptake of beta-VLDL was 15.8 +/- 6.7% (n = 6) in the cholesterol-fed rabbits as compared to 26.6 +/- 7.5% (n = 6) of the injected dose in control rabbits (P < 0.05). Although this is a fractional reduction, it represents a more than 10-fold increase in absolute hepatic uptake of lipoproteins in the cholesterol-fed rabbits. In these animals the liver parenchymal, endothelial, and Kupffer cells took up 10.2 +/- 2.7%, 3.0 +/- 0.9%, and 1.8 +/- 0.4% of the injected dose, respectively, compared to 25.9 +/- 6.1%, 3.6 +/- 1.6%, and 1.5 +/- 0.8% of the injected dose in chow-fed controls. However, taking into account the high plasma lipoprotein levels in the cholesterol-fed rabbits, the absolute cellular uptake was 10-fold increased in the parenchymal liver cells and more than 20-fold increased in the nonparenchymal cells. In vitro results indicated a 40% down-regulation of the specific receptor for beta-VLDL in the parenchymal cells, and this, together with an increased competition for binding sites in the hypercholesterolemic rabbits, probably explains the reduced uptake of beta-VLDL in terms of % of injected dose observed in vivo. In vitro data suggested that the receptor involved in both hypercholesterolemic and normolipemic rabbits was the apolipoprotein (apo) B,E receptor. On a per cell basis, parenchymal cells from chow-fed control animals took up 2.4 +/- 0.8% of the injected dose per 10(9) cells; this uptake was reduced to 1.1 +/- 0.5% in hypercholesterolemic animals. No differences in uptake of beta-VLDL in nonparenchymal liver cells were observed on a per cell basis between the two feeding groups, indicating that binding sites involved in this uptake are not down-regulated by cholesterol feeding. On the contrary, the absolute uptake in the nonparenchymal liver cells is greatly increased in hypercholesterolemic rabbits as compared to controls. In cholesterol-fed rabbits the three different liver cell types took up approximately the same amount of beta-VLDL per cell. The liver nonparenchymal cells, therefore, assume a prominent role in uptake of beta-VLDL in hypercholesterolemic rabbits, accounting for more than 30% of the total hepatic uptake as compared to 16% in control animals.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Journal of Biological Chemistry 
 Molecular and Cellular Proteomics   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1993 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.