HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Medh, J. D. Articles by Chappell, D. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Medh, J. D. Articles by Chappell, D. A. Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Journal of Lipid Research, Vol. 41, 1858-1871, November 2000
Copyright © 2000 by Lipid Research, Inc.

Original Article

Lipoprotein lipase- and hepatic triglyceride lipase- promoted very low density lipoprotein degradation proceeds via an apolipoprotein E-dependent mechanism

Correspondence to: Jheem D. Medh

Apolipoprotein E (apoE) is the primary recognition signal on triglyceride-rich lipoproteins responsible for interacting with low density lipoprotein (LDL) receptors and LDL receptor-related protein (LRP). It has been shown that lipoprotein lipase (LPL) and hepatic triglyceride lipase (HTGL) promote receptor-mediated uptake and degradation of very low density lipoproteins (VLDL) and remnant particles, possibly by directly binding to lipoprotein receptors. In this study we have investigated the requirement for apoE in lipase-stimulated VLDL degradation. We compared binding and degradation of normal and apoE-depleted human VLDL and apoE knockout mouse VLDL in human foreskin fibroblasts. Surface binding at 37°C of apoE knockout VLDL was greater than that of normal VLDL by 3- and 40-fold, respectively, in the presence of LPL and HTGL. In spite of the greater stimulation of surface binding, lipase-stimulated degradation of apoE knockout mouse VLDL was significantly lower than that of normal VLDL (30, 30, and 80%, respectively, for control, LPL, and HTGL treatments). In the presence of LPL and HTGL, surface binding of apoE-depleted human VLDL was, respectively, 40 and 200% of normal VLDL whereas degradation was, respectively, 25 and 50% of normal VLDL. LPL and HTGL stimulated degradation of normal VLDL in a dose-dependent manner and by a LDL receptor-mediated pathway. Maximum stimulation (4-fold) was seen in the presence LPL (1 µg/ml) or HTGL (3 µg/ml) in lovastatin-treated cells. On the other hand, degradation of apoE-depleted VLDL was not significantly increased by the presence of lipases even in lovastatin-treated cells. Surface binding of apoE-depleted VLDL to metabolically inactive cells at 4°C was higher in control and HTGL-treated cells, but unchanged in the presence of LPL. Degradation of prebound apoE-depleted VLDL was only 35% as efficient as that of normal VLDL. Surface binding of apoE knockout or apoE-depleted VLDL was to heparin sulfate proteoglycans because it was completely abolished by heparinase treatment. However, apoE appears to be a primary determinant for receptor-mediated VLDL degradation.

Our studies suggest that overexpression of LPL or HTGL may not protect against lipoprotein accumulation seen in apoE deficiency. — Medh, J. D., G. L. Fry, S. L. Bowen, S. Ruben, H. Wong, and D. A. Chappell. Lipoprotein lipase- and hepatic triglyceride lipase-promoted very low density lipoprotein degradation proceeds via an apolipoprotein E-dependent mechanism. J. Lipid Res. 2000. 41: 1858;–1871.

Supplementary key words: heparan sulfate proteoglycans, LDL receptors, fibroblasts, apoE knockout mice

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. Wang and R. H. Eckel Lipoprotein lipase: from gene to obesity Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, August 1, 2009; 297(2): E271 - E288. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. K. Pulawa, D. R. Jensen, A. Coates, and R. H. Eckel Reduction of plasma triglycerides in apolipoprotein C-II transgenic mice overexpressing lipoprotein lipase in muscle J. Lipid Res., January 1, 2007; 48(1): 145 - 151. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S.-J. Lee, I. Grosskopf, S. Y. Choi, and A. D. Cooper Chylomicron remnant uptake in the livers of mice expressing human apolipoproteins E3, E2 (Arg158->Cys), and E3-Leiden J. Lipid Res., December 1, 2004; 45(12): 2199 - 2210. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Lee, C. S. Tan, K. S. Chia, C. E. Tan, S. K. Chew, J. M. Ordovas, and E. S. Tai The lipoprotein lipase S447X polymorphism and plasma lipids: interactions with APOE polymorphisms, smoking, and alcohol consumption J. Lipid Res., June 1, 2004; 45(6): 1132 - 1139. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. C. Cheung, S. D. Sibley, J. P. Palmer, J. F. Oram, and J. D. Brunzell Lipoprotein lipase and hepatic lipase: their relationship with HDL subspecies Lp(A-I) and Lp(A-I,A-II) J. Lipid Res., August 1, 2003; 44(8): 1552 - 1558. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Chiba, T. Nakazawa, K. Yui, E. Kaneko, and K. Shimokado VLDL Induces Adipocyte Differentiation in ApoE-Dependent Manner Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, August 1, 2003; 23(8): 1423 - 1429. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. C. R. Hopkins, Y. Huang, J. G. McGuire, and R. E. Pitas Evidence for differential effects of apoE3 and apoE4 on HDL metabolism J. Lipid Res., November 1, 2002; 43(11): 1881 - 1889. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. J. Ryan, J. D. Medh, D. M. McCoy, R. G. Salome, and R. K. Mallampalli Maternal loading with very low-density lipoproteins stimulates fetal surfactant synthesis Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, August 1, 2002; 283(2): L310 - L318. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]