HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Schamberger, B. M. Articles by Parhofer, K. G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Schamberger, B. M. Articles by Parhofer, K. G. Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Journal of Lipid Research, Vol. 41, 727-733, May 2000
Copyright © 2000 by Lipid Research, Inc.

Original Article

Influence of LDL apheresis on LDL subtypes in patients with coronary heart disease and severe hyperlipoproteinemia

Correspondence to: K. G. Parhofer

Epidemiologic studies and in vitro experiments indicate that low density lipoprotein (LDL) subtypes differ concerning their atherogenic potential. Small, dense LDL are more atherogenic than large, buoyant LDL. LDL apheresis is a potent therapeutic modality to lower elevated LDL-cholesterol. It is unknown whether such therapy induces a shift in the LDL subtype distribution. In this study we evaluated the influence of LDL apheresis on the LDL subtype distribution in patients with CHD and familial hypercholesterolemia (FH, n = 22), combined hyperlipidemia (CHLP, n = 6), or Lp[a]-hyperlipoproteinemia (Lp[a]-HLP, n = 4) regularly treated by LDL apheresis (immunoadsorption (n = 14), HELP apheresis (n = 8), dextran sulfate adsorption (n = 7), cascade filtration (n = 3)). On the basis of 6 LDL subfractions (d 1.020;–1.057 g/mL) isolated by density gradient ultracentrifugation the LDL-density profile was determined in each patient before and after apheresis. There was a relative increase of LDL-subfractions 1, 2, and 3 (P < 0.01, P < 0.05, and P < 0.01, respectively) and a concomitant decrease of LDL subfractions 5 and 6 (P < 0.05) after apheresis. Subgroup analysis indicates that the degree of the small, dense LDL reduction was much more prominent in patients with CHLP compared to patients with FH or Lp[a]-HLP, whereas the type of apheresis technique had no effect. The extent of small, dense LDL reduction correlated with the preapheresis concentrations of small, dense LDL and triglycerides but not with the extent of triglyceride reduction.

We conclude that LDL apheresis not only decreases LDL mass, but also improves LDL-density profile, particularly in patients with CHLP.—Schamberger, B. M., H. C. Geiss, M. M. Ritter, P. Schwandt, and K. G. Parhofer. Influence of LDL apheresis on LDL subtypes in patients with coronary heart diease and severe hyperlipoproteinemia. J. Lipid Res. 2000. 41: 727;–733.

Supplementary key words: LDL subfractions, LDL subtypes, LDL apheresis, density gradient ultracentrifugation, small dense LDL

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. C. Geiss, S. Bremer, P. H. R. Barrett, C. Otto, and K. G. Parhofer In vivo metabolism of LDL subfractions in patients with heterozygous FH on statin therapy: rebound analysis of LDL subfractions after LDL apheresis J. Lipid Res., August 1, 2004; 45(8): 1459 - 1467. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]