J. Lipid Res. Did you know there is a large type edition? Click here.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


A more recent version of this article appeared on January 1, 2007

Papers In Press, published online ahead of print October 27, 2006
J. Lipid Res., doi:10.1194/jlr.M600321-JLR200
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Accepted Manuscript)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
M600321-JLR200v1
48/1/104    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Freeman, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Gonzalez-Navarro, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Freeman, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Gonzalez-Navarro, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Submitted on July 20, 2006
Revised on October 17, 2006
Accepted on October 27, 2006

Lipolytic and ligand-binding functions of hepatic lipase protect against atherosclerosis in LDL receptor-deficient mice

Lita A. Freeman, Marcelo J. A. Amar, Robert Shamburek, Beverly Paigen, H. Bryan Brewer Jr., Silvia Santamarina-Fojo, and Herminia Gonzalez-Navarro

Molecular Disease Branch, NIH, NHLBI, Bethesda, MD 20892-1666

Corresponding Author: litaf{at}mail.nih.gov

To elucidate the separate contributions of the lipolytic versus ligand-binding functions of hepatic lipase (HL) to lipoprotein metabolism and atherosclerosis, and to investigate the role of the LDLr in these processes, we compared mice expressing catalytically active HL (HL-WT) to mice expressing inactive HL (HL-S145G) in a background lacking endogenous HL and the LDLr (LDLr-KOxHL-KO). HL-WT and HL-S145G reduced (p<0.05; all) cholesterol (55% vs. 20%), non-HDL-cholesterol (63% vs. 22%) and apoB (34% vs. 16%) by enhancing catabolism of autologous 125I-apoB-IDL/LDL (FCR in d-1; 6.07±0.25, LDLr-KOxHL-WT; 4.76±0.30, LDLr-KOxHL-S145G; 3.70±0.13, LDLr-KOxHL-KO); HL-WT had a greater impact on the concentration, composition, particle size and catabolism of apoB-containing lipoproteins (apoB-Lps) and HDL. Importantly, consistent with the changes in apoB-Lps, atherosclerosis in LDLr-KOxHL-KO mice fed a RCD was reduced by both HL-WT and HL-S145G (by 71% and 51%, cross-sectional analysis, and by 85% and 67%, en face analysis; p<0.05, all). These data identify physiologically relevant but distinct roles for the lipolytic vs. ligand-binding functions of HL in apoB-Lp metabolism and atherosclerosis and demonstrate that their differential effects on these processes are mediated by changes in catabolism via non-LDLr pathways. These changes, evident even in the presence of apoE, establish an anti-atherogenic role of the ligand-binding function of HL in LDLr-deficient mice.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 All ASBMB Journals   Journal of Biological Chemistry 
 Molecular and Cellular Proteomics   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.