J. Lipid Res.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


A more recent version of this article appeared on March 1, 2006

Papers In Press, published online ahead of print January 9, 2006
J. Lipid Res., doi:10.1194/jlr.R500017-JLR200
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Accepted Manuscript)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
R500017-JLR200v1
47/3/467    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leung, K. F.
Right arrow Articles by Seabra, M. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Leung, K. F.
Right arrow Articles by Seabra, M. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Submitted on December 14, 2005
Revised on January 5, 2006
Accepted on January 9, 2006

Geranylgeranylation of Rab GTPases

Ka Fai Leung, Rudi Baron, and Miguel C. Seabra

Biomedical Sciences, Imperial College London, London, London SW7 2AZ

Corresponding Author: m.seabra{at}imperial.ac.uk

Rab GTPases require special machinery for protein prenylation, which include Rab Escort Protein (REP) and Rab Geranylgeranyl Transferase (RGGT). The current model of Rab geranylgeranylation proposes that the Rab protein must bind REP, which presents the Rab to RGGT. Following geranylgeranylation of C-terminal cysteines in Rab, REP delivers the prenylated protein to membranes. The REP-like protein, Rab GDP dissociation inhibitor (RabGDI) then recycles the prenylated Rab between the membrane and the cytosol. The recent solution of crystal structures of the Rab prenylation machinery have helped to refine this model and provide further insights. The hydrophobic prenyl binding site of RGGT is similar to that of geranylgeranyl transferase type-I (GGT-I) but differs from farnesyl transferase (FT). At the bottom of the hydrophobic isoprenyl-binding pocket, a bulky Trp residue in FT prevents binding of the longer geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate group whereas in GGT-I and RGGT this position is occupied by the smaller residues Thr and Ser, respectively. At the REP:RGGT interface, a highly conserved Phe in REP, which is absent in RabGDI, plays a critical role in the formation of the REP:RGGT complex and may explain the inability of RabGDI to complex with RGGT. A geranylgeranyl-binding site in REP and RabGDI has been identified within domain II. However, as most Rabs undergo double geranylgeranylation, it is still unclear how and where the second geranylgeranyl group is stabilised. The post-prenylation events, including the specific targeting of Rabs to target membranes and the requirement for single versus double-geranylgeranylation by different Rabs remain obscure and should be the object of future studies.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 All ASBMB Journals   Journal of Biological Chemistry 
 Molecular and Cellular Proteomics   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.