Advertisement
J. Lipid Res.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nilsson, L.
Right arrow Articles by Eriksson, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nilsson, L.
Right arrow Articles by Eriksson, P.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Lipid Research, Vol. 40, 913-919, May 1999
Copyright © 1999 by Lipid Research, Inc.

Original Article

VLDL activation of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) expression: involvement of the VLDL receptor

Lennart Nilssona, Mats Gåfvelsb, Leena Musakkaa, Katharina Enslerb, Dudley K. Stricklandc, Bo Angelinb, Anders Hamstena, and Per Erikssona
a Atherosclerosis Research Unit, King Gustaf V Research Institute, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Karolinska Hospital, S-171 76 Stockholm, Sweden
b Center for Metabolism and Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, and Molecular Nutrition Unit, Center for Nutrition and Toxicology, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge University Hospital, S-141 86 Huddinge, Sweden
c Department of Vascular Biology, Holland Laboratory, American Red Cross, Rockville, MD 20855

Correspondence to: Lennart Nilsson


  ABSTRACT
TOP
 ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES

The potential role of the very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) receptor in mediating VLDL-induced plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) expression was studied in vitro. Cultured endothelial cells incubated with VLDL showed an increased secretion of PAI-1. This response to VLDL could be completely prevented by the receptor-associated protein (RAP) and partially blocked by rabbit polyclonal anti-VLDL receptor IgG. Furthermore, Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) control cells and cells overexpressing the VLDL receptor were transiently transfected with a PAI-1 promoter–reporter construct and incubated with VLDL. The PAI-1 promoter activity in response to VLDL was significantly higher in the VLDL receptor overexpressing cells compared to the control cells. Addition of RAP completely blocked the VLDL-activated PAI-1 transcription. Electromobility shift assay was performed to investigate whether the enhanced PAI-1 promoter activity seen in the VLDL receptor overexpressing cells in response to VLDL involved induction of the previously described VLDL-inducible factor(s) binding to the -675 to -653 region of the PAI-1 promoter. We found that the binding of the VLDL-inducible factor in VLDL receptor overexpressing cells was markedly enhanced by addition of VLDL as compared to control cells where no increased binding could be seen in response to VLDL.

In summary, these results indicate that the VLDL receptor is a strong candidate for mediating VLDL effects on PAI-1 synthesis and secretion in cells expressing this receptor.—Nilsson, L., M. Gåfvels, L. Musakka, K. Ensler, D. K. Strickland, B. Angelin, A. Hamsten, and P. Eriksson. VLDL activation of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) expression: involvement of the VLDL receptor. J. Lipid Res. 1999. 40: 913–919.

Supplementary key words: atherosclerosis, transfection, VLDL response element


  INTRODUCTION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES

Hypertriglyceridemia is associated with an increased risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) (1). Impaired endogenous fibrinolytic function is a frequent finding in subjects with hypertriglyceridemia (2), and it has been suggested that elevated plasma plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) activity with ensuing attenuation of the fibrinolytic capacity predisposes the hypertriglyceridemic individual to arterial thrombosis and acute CHD (3). Accordingly, in vitro data have shown that triglyceride-rich very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) particles enhance PAI-1 secretion from endothelial cells (4) (5) (6) and liver cells (5) (6) (7). Furthermore, it has been shown that VLDL stimulation of PAI-1 expression in endothelial cells is mediated through transcriptional activation of the PAI-1 gene, and a VLDL response element has been identified in the promoter region (8). Recently, it has also been demonstrated that unsaturated fatty acids stimulate PAI-1 expression and secretion by endothelial cells (9). It can be envisioned that fatty acids derived from VLDL particles are the actual mediators of VLDL-induced PAI-1 secretion. However, the mechanisms by which endothelial cells bind and process the VLDL particles, eventually leading to increased PAI-1 activity, are largely unknown.

Obvious candidates for mediating the stimulatory effect of VLDL on PAI-1 expression are members of the low density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor superfamily. This family has several members: the LDL receptor (10), the vitellogenin receptor (11), the VLDL receptor (12), the LDL receptor-related protein/{alpha}2-macroglobulin receptor (LRP) (13) (14) and gp 330/megalin (15) (16). The LDL receptor, which displays high-affinity binding of LDL containing apolipoprotein (apo) B-100 as well as of apoE-rich lipoproteins, such as VLDL, intermediate density lipoprotein (IDL), and ß-migrating VLDL (ß-VLDL), has previously been implicated in the VLDL induction of PAI-1 in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) (4). Another obvious candidate receptor to mediate this effect is the VLDL receptor, discovered in 1992 by Takahashi and co-workers (12). The VLDL receptor binds VLDL, IDL, and ß-VLDL with high affinity (12) (17) (18) (19) (20), whereas LDL particles containing apoB and no or limited amounts of apoE are weakly bound to the VLDL receptor. Recently, Lp[a] has also been shown to bind to the VLDL receptor via its apo[a] moiety (21). The binding and endocytosis processes of all described ligands of the VLDL and LDL receptors are inhibited by the 39 kDa receptor-associated protein (RAP) (17) (21) (22).

The VLDL receptor is highly expressed in adipose tissue, muscle, and heart (12) (23) (24) (25) (26), tissues that display high metabolism of fatty acids. Certain cell types in the vascular wall, such as endothelial cells, smooth muscle cells, and macrophage-derived foam cells in atherosclerotic plaques, also express VLDL receptors (21) (27) (28) (29) (30). Considering the ligand specificity and tissue distribution, it has been suggested that the VLDL receptor might be of importance for the binding and uptake of triglyceride-rich apoE-containing lipoproteins in extrahepatic tissues. Earlier studies by Desai, Gotlieb, and Steiner (31) have shown that binding of VLDL to vascular endothelial cells could be mediated by an unidentified receptor that is different from the LDL receptor. Whether vascular endothelial VLDL receptors are involved in the binding and processing of VLDL particles that may lead to increased PAI-1 expression in endothelial cells is unknown.

In the present study we investigated the possible role of the VLDL receptor in mediating VLDL-induced PAI-1 secretion from endothelial cells and VLDL-stimulated enhancement of PAI-1 promoter activity.


  MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES

Cell culture
HUVEC were isolated from umbilical cords obtained at normal deliveries. The umbilical vein was cannulated and perfused with 50 ml phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) to remove any blood, whereafter the vein was filled with 20 ml of 0.1% collagenase dissolved in PBS and incubated for 15 min at 37 °C. The collagenase solution was drained from the cord and collected, and the cord was gently flushed with 20 ml PBS, which was added to the collagenase solution. The cells in these pooled solutions were recovered by centrifugation at 200 g for 5 min and seeded on 90-mm culture dishes in M199 medium with 20% fetal calf serum (FCS), antibiotic/antimycotic (Sigma A-9909) and 25 µg/ml endothelial cell growth supplement (Sigma E-2759). When confluent, the cells were subcultured onto 0.2% gelatin (in PBS) coated dishes. Cells from pooled multiple cords were used for experiments up until the fourth passage.

The Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) mutant cell line ldl a-7 (a kind gift from Dr. Monty Krieger, MIT, Cambridge, MA) was used to create a stable cell line overexpressing the human VLDL receptor in the absence of functional LDL receptors. The VLDL receptor overexpressing cell line V7 and the control cells C2 were created as described (32).

The V7 cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM), supplemented with 5% fetal calf serum, streptomycin (100 µg/ml), and penicillin (100 U/ml). To maintain a continuous high expression of receptor protein, 400 µg/ml G-418 (Geneticin, Boehringer-Mannheim) was included in the medium. As control, ldl a-7 cells cultured in identical medium without G-418 were used, as control experiments showed no difference between ldl a-7 cells and C2 control cells stably transfected with empty vector alone. ldl a-7 cells are derived from CHO cells and have a low basal expression of VLDL receptor, LRP and lipoprotein lipase (32) (33). Rabbit polyclonal antibodies directed against the purified VLDL receptor were prepared as described (21).

Preparation of rabbit ß-VLDL and human VLDL
ß-VLDL used for ligand blot determination of LDL receptors were prepared from plasma of rabbits fed a diet rich in cholesterol (34). The lipoprotein particles were labeled with iodine-125 using the method described by McFarlane (35) including purification over PD-10 columns (Pharmacia-Biotech). After purification and dialysis the protein concentration of each batch was determined using the method descibed by Bradford (36). The specific activity obtained was typically around 200 cpm/ng protein.

Human VLDL (Svedberg flotation rate (Sf) 20–400) were prepared by density gradient ultracentrifugation (37). The endotoxin content in the VLDL preparations was tested using a Limulus Amebocyte lysate assay (COATEST Endotoxin, Endosafe Inc.). Endotoxin levels were shown to be lower than 0.1 ng/mg protein.

Solubilization of cells and ligand blotting procedures
To obtain cell membranes for ligand blotting, detergent solubilized cell lysates were prepared by homogenizing cell pellets by a Polytron (Kinematica Co., Luzern, Switzerland) in a buffer containing 50 mM Tris, pH 6.5, 5 mmol/l CaCl2, 1% Triton X-100, 0.02 mg/ml leupeptin, and 1 mmol/l phenylmethylsulfonylfluoride (PMSF). The homogenates were centrifuged at 20,000 g for 15 min, and the clear supernatant was thereafter recovered. Protein concentration was determined according to Bradford (36).

Membrane proteins were separated under non-reducing conditions by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) on a 4–15% gradient gel. A molecular marker (SDS-PAGE Mw standard high range, Bio-Rad, CA) was loaded parallel to the samples. After electrophoresis, the proteins were electrotransferred to a nitrocellulose membrane (BA 85 0.45 µm, Schleicher & Schuell, Germany). VLDL receptor expression in HUVEC was analyzed by ligand blotting using 39 kDa RAP (17) (32). RAP bound to the filter was detected using purified polyclonal anti-RAP IgG (17). As a control for these experiments, membrane extracts from V7 VLDL receptor overexpressing cells were run in parallel. Earlier control experiments had shown that the specific anti-RAP antibody did not react directly with the VLDL receptor. Immunoreactive bands were demonstrated by enhanced chemoluminescence (Amersham). In this type of ligand blot, no binding of RAP to LDL receptors has been demonstrated. Expression of LDL receptors in HUVEC was determined on identical samples ran on the same gel, but the filters were ligand blotted using 125I-labeled rabbit ß-VLDL (32) (34). Bands binding ß-VLDL were demonstrated by autoradiography.

Determination of PAI-1 protein secretion
To analyze the effect of RAP and VLDL receptor antibodies on VLDL-induced PAI-1 secretion, semiconfluent cultures of HUVEC were incubated for 8–10 h in M199 containing 0.1% BSA. The cells were then preincubated with RAP (50–500 nM) or anti-VLDL receptor IgG (100 µg/ml) for 2 h or 1 h, respectively, before VLDL (50 µg/ml) were added and cells were incubated for another 14 h. After collecting the conditioned medium and centrifugation at 9000 g for 5 min, the PAI-1 protein concentration in the medium was quantified using an ELISA (TintELIZE PAI-1, Biopool) which detects active and inactive (latent) forms of PAI-1, as well as t-PA/PAI-1 complexes. The cells were either trypsinized and counted or lysed with 0.01 M NaOH, followed by measurement of total protein according to Bradford (36). PAI-1 secretion was expressed as the percent of control (vehicle containing the same amount of PBS added).

Transfection assay
CHO cells were transfected using a calcium phosphate-precipitation method (38). pRSV-ß-galactosidase control vector (Promega) was cotransfected as an internal control. The construction of the PAI-1 CAT plasmids has been described elsewhere (8). The 4G-PAI-pCAT construct comprises the human PAI-1 sequences -804 to +17 of the 4G allele.

The cells were transfected at 80–90% confluence. At 1–3 h before transfection, the dishes received fresh complete medium. Cells were incubated for 5–6 h with calcium phosphate-precipitated DNAs (15 µg plasmid per 90 mm dish). After a 2-min 15% (vol/vol) glycerol shock, fresh medium containing 0.1% bovine serum albumin was added. After incubation for 14 h, RAP was added to the cells, and 2 h later freshly prepared VLDL were added. Cells were incubated with VLDL for 6 h. After 6 h, the medium was replaced by fresh medium containing 0.1% BSA, and cells were incubated for another 16 h before being harvested for analysis of transient expression. CAT activity was analyzed according to Sambrook, Fritsch, and Maniatis (38).

Electromobility shift assay (EMSA)
Nuclear extracts were prepared according to Alksnis et al. (39). All buffers were freshly supplemented with 0.7 µg/ml leupeptin, 16.7 µg/ml aprotinin, 0.5 mM PMSF, and 0.33 µl/ml 2-mercaptoethanol. The protein concentration in the extracts was estimated by the method of Kalb and Bernlohr (40). For electromobility shift assay, a double-stranded oligonucleotide comprising the -675 to -653 region of the PAI-1 promoter was designed. The probe was end-labeled with 32P-{gamma}-ATP using T4 polynucleotide kinase. Incubation conditions for EMSA were as described (8). To test for specific interaction of the VLDL-induced factor, 50-fold excess of non-labeled specific and nonspecific probes were used as competitors (8).

Statistical methods
Data are shown as means ± SD. Differences in continuous variables between two groups were tested by paired or unpaired t-tests.


  RESULTS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES

Serum regulation of LDL and VLDL receptor expression in endothelial cells
Both LDL and VLDL receptors have previously been shown to be expressed in HUVEC (27) (41) (42). In order to assess how lipoprotein receptor expression in HUVEC responds to different amounts of sterol present in the culture medium, cells were cultured for 24 h with or without 20% fetal calf serum. Membrane proteins prepared from these cells were separated on SDS-PAGE, electroblotted to nitrocellulose filters, and the presence of VLDL and LDL receptors was probed with RAP and ß-VLDL, respectively (see Materials and Methods).

The VLDL receptor was demonstrated as a 116 kDa band, and the majority of receptor co-migrated with the variant corresponding to the exon 16-containing variant expressed in the V7 cells ( Figure 1A). Removal of serum in the incubation medium did not change the abundance of VLDL receptors. HUVEC also contained a 130 kDa band that reacted strongly with ß-VLDL. This main band, which corresponds to the LDL receptor (43), was clearly increased after a 24-h incubation in the absence of fetal calf serum (Figure 1B). These results demonstrate the simultaneous expression in HUVEC of VLDL and LDL receptors, both with a potential for endocytosis of VLDL particles. Furthermore, they show that VLDL receptor expression in HUVEC did not change in response to withdrawal of sterols, whereas LDL receptors were up-regulated in agreement with what has been shown for THP-1 cells (44).



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 1. Ligand blot of VLDL and LDL receptors. HUVEC were cultured for 24 h with or without 20% FCS. Binding of RAP (A) and ß-VLDL (B) to cell membranes of HUVEC (50 mg cell protein per lane). In panel A, cell membranes from V7 cells (see Materials and Methods) were included as a control for the VLDL receptor.

Effect of RAP and VLDL receptor antibodies on VLDL-induced PAI-1 secretion
To test whether lipoprotein receptors mediate the VLDL-induced PAI-1 secretion from endothelial cells, HUVEC were preincubated with RAP (50–500 nM) for 2 h, followed by incubation with 50 µg/ml VLDL for 14 h. As seen in Figure 2A, the enhanced PAI-1 secretion caused by VLDL was counteracted by addition of RAP in a dose-dependent manner. Complete inhibition was obtained at a concentration of 100 nM RAP.




View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 2. A: Effect of receptor-associated protein (RAP) on VLDL-induced PAI-1 secretion. HUVEC were preincubated with RAP for 2 h and then incubated with VLDL 50 µg/ml for 14 h, whereafter the PAI-1 content of the culture medium was determined by an ELISA. Results (mean ± SD) are given as % of control. The results were derived from 6 experiments, all performed in triplicate. B: Effect of anti-VLDL receptor IgG on VLDL-induced PAI-1 secretion. HUVECs were preincubated with anti-VLDL receptor IgG for 1 h and then incubated with VLDL 50 µg/ml for 4 or 14 h. Results (mean ± SD) are given as % of control. The results were derived from 3 experiments, all performed in triplicate.

Furthermore, to study the specific role of the VLDL receptor, HUVEC were preincubated with anti-VLDL receptor IgG (100 µg/ml) for 1 h, and then incubated with 50 µg/ml VLDL for 4 or 14 h. The stimulatory effect of VLDL on PAI-1 secretion (164 ± 6% and 178 ± 16% of control at 4 or 14 h, respectively) was greatly diminished by the addition of anti-VLDL receptor IgG (118 ± 12% and 130 ± 19% of control at 4 or 14 h, respectively; Figure 2b).

Role of the VLDL receptor in activation of PAI-1 gene transcription
To investigate the potential role of VLDL receptors in mediating VLDL activation of the PAI-1 gene, CHO control cells and V7 cells overexpressing the human VLDL receptor cDNA were transiently transfected with a 804 bp fragment of the PAI-1 promoter coupled to a CAT reporter gene. Cells were then cultured with increasing concentrations of human VLDL.

Addition of 25–100 µg/ml VLDL resulted in a dose-dependent increase in PAI-1 promoter activity in cells overexpressing the VLDL receptor as compared to control cells (147% vs. 112% at 50 µg/ml VLDL added, P < 0.05; Figure 3). The VLDL-induced PAI-1 promoter activation could be prevented by inclusion of 250–500 nM recombinant 39 kDa RAP in the culture medium ( Figure 4), indicating that the enhanced PAI-1 promoter activity seen in V7 cells was to a large extent mediated by VLDL receptors.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 3. VLDL activates transcription from the PAI-1 promoter in V7 cells. The transcriptional activity in response to VLDL is significantly higher in the VLDL receptor overexpressing cells ({square}) as compared to control cells ({blacktriangleup}). Data points represent mean ± SD, and the PAI-1 transcription rate is given as % of control after correction for the ß-galactosidase activity. Results are based on 3 experiments, all performed in triplicate; * P < 0.05.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 4. VLDL receptors mediate the enhanced PAI-1 promoter activity seen in V7 cells after VLDL stimulation.VLDL (50 µg/ml) stimulation of PAI-1 promoter activity in V7 cells could be completely blocked by addition of 250–500 nM of RAP. Results (mean ± SD) are given as % of control. The results were derived from 3 experiments, all performed in triplicate.

Electromobility shift assay (EMSA) analysis of the VLDL response element in the PAI-1 promoter
An EMSA was performed in order to investigate whether the enhanced PAI-1 promoter activity seen in the VLDL-receptor overexpressing cells (V7) in response to VLDL involves induction of the previously described VLDL-inducible factor(s) binding to the -675 to -653 region of the PAI-1 promoter (8). CHO V7 cells and control cells were incubated with 0–75 µg/ml VLDL for 6 h, and nuclear extacts were prepared. As shown in Figure 5, the binding of the VLDL-inducible factor in V7 cells was markedly enhanced by the addition of 25–75 µg/ml of VLDL (Figure 5, lanes 6–9) as compared to control cells where no increased binding could be seen in response to VLDL (Figure 5, lanes 2–5). Specificity of the VLDL-inducible factor(s) was demonstrated using non-labeled specific and nonspecific probes as competitors (Figure 5, lanes 10–12).



View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 5. VLDL induction of the VLDL-inducible transcription factor in CHO cells overexpressing the VLDL receptor. A representative autoradiogram of an EMSA using protein extracts derived from control cells (lanes 2–5) and V7 cells (lanes 6–9) which had been incubated with PBS-vehicle (lanes 2 and 6) or 25, 50, or 75 µg/ml of VLDL (lanes 3–5 and 7–9), and bound to the -675/-653 PAI-1 probe. To test for specific interaction of the VLDL-inducible factor, PBS-incubated V7 cell extract (as in lane 6) was incubated without competitor (lane 10) or with 50-fold excess of non-labeled specific (lane 11) or nonspecific probe (lane 12). F denotes free probe, arrow denotes the VLDL-inducible factor.


  DISCUSSION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

In the present study, we have demonstrated that endothelial VLDL receptors are important for mediating VLDL effects on PAI-1 secretion in vitro. The finding that PAI-1 promoter activity in response to VLDL was markedly enhanced in the presence of VLDL receptors further supports this notion. The effect on PAI-1 transcription appears to be mediated by a previously described VLDL-inducible transcription factor.

HUVEC express LDL and VLDL receptors, whereas only trace amounts of LRP have been demonstrated (27) (41) (42). In the present study, we confirm the expression of both LDL and VLDL receptors in HUVEC and also show, in accordance with studies in THP-1 cells (44), that the level of LDL receptors in HUVEC is suppressed in the presence of serum. This finding is clearly in contrast to the expression of the VLDL receptor which is unchanged by this treatment.

Earlier studies by Stiko-Rahm et al. (4) have indicated that the LDL receptor could mediate the effect of VLDL on PAI-1 expression in HUVEC. However, 30 µg/ml of the C7 monoclonal antibody was used by these authors to block VLDL binding. At this concentration, the C7 antibody may bind unspecifically also to other lipoprotein receptors as fibroblasts from FH patients lacking functional LDL receptors also bind this antibody (45). In the present study, pretreatment of HUVEC with increasing concentrations of RAP significantly decreased VLDL-induced PAI-1 secretion. The concentration of RAP that was effective in inhibiting the effect is more consistent with a role for the VLDL receptor rather than the LDL receptor, as RAP binds only weakly to the LDL receptor, and concentrations of 1 µM or greater are required to antagonize the LDL receptor (22). However, because RAP is not highly specific (46) (47), we sought to identify the receptor involved by using highly specific antibodies directed against the VLDL receptor. The blocking effect on PAI-1 secretion seen after addition of rabbit polyclonal antibodies against the VLDL receptor clearly shows the importance of endothelial VLDL receptors in mediating VLDL-induced PAI-1 secretion. At the concentration used in this study, the anti-VLDL receptor IgG binds solely to the VLDL receptor and to no other lipoprotein receptors (21). However, we cannot exclude that the LDL receptor mediates a minor part of the VLDL effect on PAI-1 in HUVEC, as addition of the anti-VLDL receptor IgG did not completely block the stimulatory effect of VLDL.

To study whether the VLDL receptor could contribute to the VLDL activation of PAI-1 transcription, we used CHO cells overexpressing VLDL receptors in the absence of functional LDL receptors (48). We and others have earlier demonstrated that VLDL receptors overexpressed in this context bind and endocytose rabbit ß-VLDL, human VLDL and chylomicron remnants (12) (17) (32) (49). Patel et al. (49) have shown that ß-VLDL has the same apparent affinity to VLDL receptors as LDL receptors and that both receptors stimulate ß-VLDL degradation as well as oleate incorporation. Thus, the VLDL receptor could mediate an increased lipid flow into cells in a mode identical to the LDL receptor. Although the presence of other lipoprotein receptors, i.e., LRP and proteoglycans, as well as the presence of a low activity of lipoprotein lipase in the ldla-7 CHO cells (33) could be responsible for the baseline activation of PAI-1 promoter activity, our results demonstrate that VLDL receptor overexpression potentiates a concentration-dependent activation of PAI-1 promoter activity by VLDL. The stimulatory effect of VLDL could be fully inhibited by RAP, a well-known inhibitor of VLDL binding to VLDL receptors (17). It is not likely that LRP contributes to this stimulatory effect as LRP is only expressed at low levels in CHO cells, and no difference in expression level has been detected in control versus VLDL receptor overexpressing cells. In the VLDL receptor overexpressing cells, VLDL induced a dose-dependent increase of a previously found VLDL-inducible transcription factor. EMSA analysis has previously demonstrated induction of what appears to be the identical transcription factor in HUVEC cells (8). In an earlier study, we have found that fatty acids can induce PAI-1 promoter activity and expression of the VLDL-induced factor. A similar mechanism may be assumed where VLDL receptor binding of VLDL could drive a lipid flux into the cell, subsequently affecting PAI-1 promoter transcription and PAI-1 synthesis.

VLDL receptors have been shown to be expressed in vivo in vascular endothelium as well as in foam cells in atherosclerotic plaques (21) (28) (29). VLDL receptors are markedly up-regulated during atherogenesis in rabbits (50). By its affinity for lipoproteins, lipoprotein lipase and uPA:PAI-1 complexes, the VLDL receptor may therefore serve an important function in regulating metabolic processes relating to lipid homeostasis, atherogenesis, and hemostasis. The relative role of endothelial VLDL and LDL receptors for VLDL effects on PAI-1 in vivo is unknown, however, and should be further studied.

The physiological significance of VLDL-mediated regulation of PAI-1 expression in vivo also needs to be clarified. Currently, the concept that VLDL impair the endogenous fibrinolytic function is based on the striking positive relationship between the plasma VLDL triglyceride concentration and plasma PAI-1 activity (51), and on the consistent, concentration-dependent increase in PAI-1 secretion from HUVEC (4) (5) (6) and Hep G2 cells (5) (6) (7) in culture upon incubation with VLDL. However, fibrate compounds that markedly lower the plasma concentrations of VLDL have shown widely different effects on plasma PAI-1 activity (52) (53) (54) (55) (56). Furthermore, inferences from cell culture studies to the situation in vivo should for many reasons be made with caution. PAI-1 synthesis occurs in a number of different cell types in culture and is regulated by a large number of substances (reviewed in ref. (57)). Needless to say, the behavior of cultured cells may not be identical to that of the same cell type in vivo. Accordingly, studies of PAI-1 expression in the arterial wall and other relevant tissues of hypertriglyceridemic animal models are warranted.

In conclusion, the present work indicates that the VLDL receptor is a strong candidate for mediating VLDL effects on PAI-1 synthesis and secretion in cells expressing this receptor.


  ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This project was supported by grants from the Swedish Medical Research Council (7137, 8691, 9139, 11549 and 11807), the Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation, the European Commission (HIFMECH study, contract BMH4-CT96-0272), the Margret and Axel Ax:son Johnson foundation, the Marianne and Marcus Wallenberg foundation, the Petrus and Augusta Hedlund foundation, the King Gustaf V 80th Birthday foundation, the foundation for Old Servants, and the Professor Nanna Svartz foundation. Dr. Eriksson holds a postdoctoral research fellowship from the Swedish Medical Research Council (12247). We are grateful to Barbro Burt and Kerstin Carlson for excellent technical assistance.

Manuscript received October 26, 1998; and in revised form December 31, 1998.

Abbreviations: VLDL, very low density lipoprotein; LDL, low density lipoprotein; PAI-1, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1; CHD, coronary heart disease; RAP, receptor-associated protein; CHO cells, Chinese hamster ovarial cells; HUVEC, human umbilical vein endothelial cells; CAT, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase; EMSA, electromobility shift assay


  REFERENCES
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES

  1. Austin, M. A. 1991. Plasma triglyceride and coronary heart disease. Arterioscler. Thromb. 11:2-14[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  2. Juhan-Vague, I., Alessi, M. C., Vague, P. 1991. Increased plasma plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 levels. A possible link between insulin resistance and atherothrombosis. Diabetologia. 34:457-462[Medline].

  3. Hamsten, A., Eriksson, P. 1994. Fibrinolysis and atherosclerosis: an update. Fibrinolysis. 8:253-262.

  4. Stiko-Rahm, A., Wiman, B., Hamsten, A., Nilsson, J. 1990. Secretion of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 from cultured human umbilical vein endothelial cells is induced by very low density lipoprotein. Arteriosclerosis. 10:1067-1073[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  5. Mussoni, L., Mannucci, L., Sirtori, M., Camera, M., Maderna, P., Sironi, L., Tremoli, E. 1992. Hypertriglyceridemia and regulation of fibrinolytic activity. Arterioscler. Thromb. 12:19-27[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  6. Kaneko, T., Wada, H., Wakita, Y., Minamikawa, K., Nakase, T., Mori, Y., Deguchi, K., Shirakawa, S. 1994. Enhanced tissue factor activity and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 antigen in human umbilical vein endothelial cells incubated with lipoproteins. Blood Coagul. Fibrinolysis. 5:385-392[Medline].

  7. Sironi, L., Mussoni, L., Prati, L., Baldassarre, D., Camera, M., Banfi, C., Tremoli, E. 1996. Plasminogen activator inhibitor type-1 synthesis and mRNA expression in HepG2 cells are regulated by VLDL. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 16:89-96[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  8. Eriksson, P., Nilsson, L., Karpe, F., Hamsten, A. 1998. Very-low-density lipoprotein response element in the promoter region of the human plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 gene implicated in the impaired fibrinolysis of hypertriglyceridemia. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 18:20-26[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  9. Nilsson, L., Banfi, C., Diczfalusy, U., Tremoli, E., Hamsten, A., Eriksson, P. 1998. Unsaturated fatty acids increase plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 expression in endothelial cells. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 18:1679-1685[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  10. Yamamoto, T., Davis, C. G., Brown, M. S., Schneider, W. J., Casey, M. L., Goldstein, J. L., Russell, D. W. 1984. The human LDL receptor: a cysteine-rich protein with multiple Alu sequences in its mRNA. Cell. 39:27-38[Medline].

  11. Barber, D. L., Sanders, E. J., Aebersold, R., Schneider, W. J. 1991. The receptor for yolk lipoprotein deposition in the chicken oocyte. J. Biol. Chem. 266:18761-18770[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  12. Takahashi, S., Kawarabayasi, Y., Nakai, T., Sakai, J., Yamamoto, T. 1992. Rabbit very low density lipoprotein receptor: a low density lipoprotein receptor-like protein with distinct ligand specificity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 89:9252-9256[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  13. Herz, J., Hamann, U., Rogne, S., Myklebost, O., Gausepohl, H., Stanley, K. K. 1988. Surface location and high affinity for calcium of a 500-kd liver membrane protein closely related to the LDL-receptor suggest a physiological role as lipoprotein receptor. EMBO J. 7:4119-4127[Medline].

  14. Strickland, D. K., Ashcom, J. D., Williams, S., Burgess, W. H., Migliorini, M., Argraves, W. S. 1990. Sequence identity between the alpha 2-macroglobulin receptor and low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein suggests that this molecule is a multifunctional receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 265:17401-17404[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  15. Raychowdhury, R., Niles, J. L., McCluskey, R. T., Smith, J. A. 1989. Autoimmune target in Heymann nephritis is a glycoprotein with homology to the LDL receptor. Science. 244:1163-1165[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  16. Korenberg, J. R., Argraves, K. M., Chen, X. N., Tran, H., Strickland, D. K., Argraves, W. S. 1994. Chromosomal localization of human genes for the LDL receptor family member glycoprotein 330 (LRP2) and its associated protein RAP (LRPAP1). Genomics. 22:88-93[Medline].

  17. Battey, F. D., Gåfvels, M. E., FitzGerald, D. J., Argraves, W. S., Chappell, D. A., Strauss, J. F., III, Strickland, D. K. 1994. The 39-kDa receptor-associated protein regulates ligand binding by the very low density lipoprotein receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 269:23268-23273[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  18. Takahashi, S., Suzuki, J., Kohno, M., Oida, K., Tamai, T., Miyabo, S., Yamamoto, T., Nakai, T. 1995. Enhancement of the binding of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins to the very low density lipoprotein receptor by apolipoprotein E and lipoprotein lipase. J. Biol. Chem. 270:15747-15754[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  19. Kobayashi, K., Oka, K., Forte, T., Ishida, B., Teng, B., Ishimura-Oka, K., Nakamuta, M., Chan, L. 1996. Reversal of hypercholesterolemia in low density lipoprotein receptor knockout mice by adenovirus-mediated gene transfer of the very low density lipoprotein receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 271:6852-6860[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  20. Kozarsky, K. F., Jooss, K., Donahee, M., Strauss, J. F., III, Wilson, J. M. 1996. Effective treatment of familial hypercholesterolaemia in the mouse model using adenovirus-mediated transfer of the VLDL receptor gene [published erratum appears in Nat. Genet. 1996. Jul;13(3):374]. Nature Genet. 13:54-62[Medline].

  21. Argraves, K. M., Kozarsky, K. F., Fallon, J. T., Harpel, P. C., Strickland, D. K. 1997. The atherogenic lipoprotein Lp(a) is internalized and degraded in a process mediated by the VLDL receptor. J. Clin. Invest. 100:2170-2181[Medline].

  22. Medh, J. D., Fry, G. L., Bowen, S. L., Pladet, M. W., Strickland, D. K., Chappell, D. A. 1995. The 39-kDa receptor-associated protein modulates lipoprotein catabolism by binding to LDL receptors. J. Biol. Chem. 270:536-540[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  23. Gåfvels, M. E., Caird, M., Britt, D., Jackson, C. L., Patterson, D., Strauss, J. F., III. 1993. Cloning of a cDNA encoding a putative human very low density lipoprotein/apolipoprotein E receptor and assignment of the gene to chromosome 9pter-p23. Somat. Cell Mol. Genet. 19:557-569[Medline].

  24. Webb, J. C., Patel, D. D., Jones, M. D., Knight, B. L., Soutar, A. K. 1994. Characterization and tissue-specific expression of the human `very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) receptor' mRNA. Hum. Mol. Genet. 3:531-537[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  25. Masuzaki, H., Jingami, H., Yamamoto, T., Nakao, K. 1994. Effects of estradiol on very low density lipoprotein receptor mRNA levels in rabbit heart. FEBS Lett. 347:211-214[Medline].

  26. Jokinen, E. V., Landschulz, K. T., Wyne, K. L., Ho, Y. K., Frykman, P. K., Hobbs, H. H. 1994. Regulation of the very low density lipoprotein receptor by thyroid hormone in rat skeletal muscle. J. Biol. Chem. 269:26411-26418[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  27. Argraves, K. M., Battey, F. D., MacCalman, C. D., McCrae, K. R., Gåfvels, M., Kozarsky, K. F., Chappell, D. A., Strauss, J. F., III, Strickland, D. K. 1995. The very low density lipoprotein receptor mediates the cellular catabolism of lipoprotein lipase and urokinase-plasminogen activator inhibitor type I complexes. J. Biol. Chem. 270:26550-26557[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  28. Multhaupt, H. A., Gafvels, M. E., Kariko, K., Jin, H., Arenas-Elliot, C., Goldman, B. I., Strauss, J. F., III, Angelin, B., Warhol, M. J., McCrae, K. R. 1996. Expression of very low density lipoprotein receptor in the vascular wall. Analysis of human tissues by in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry. Am. J. Pathol. 148:1985-1997[Abstract].

  29. Wyne, K. L., Pathak, K., Seabra, M. C., Hobbs, H. H. 1996. Expression of the VLDL receptor in endothelial cells. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 16:407-415[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  30. Nakazato, K., Ishibashi, T., Shindo, J., Shiomi, M., Maruyama, Y. 1996. Expression of very low density lipoprotein receptor mRNA in rabbit atherosclerotic lesions. Am. J. Pathol. 149:1831-1838[Abstract].

  31. Desai, K. S., Gotlieb, A. I., Steiner, G. 1985. Very low density lipoprotein binding to cultured aortic endothelium. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 63:809-815[Medline].

  32. Niemeier, A., Gåfvels, M., Heeren, J., Meyer, N., Angelin, B., Beisiegel, U. 1996. VLDL receptor mediates the uptake of human chylomicron remnants in vitro. J. Lipid Res. 37:1733-1742[Abstract].

  33. Rojas, C., Enerback, S., Bengtsson-Olivecrona, G. 1990. Synthesis and secretion of active lipoprotein lipase in Chinese-hamster ovary (CHO) cells. Biochem. J. 271:11-15[Medline].

  34. Rudling, M. 1992. Hepatic mRNA levels for the LDL receptor and HMG-CoA reductase show coordinate regulation in vivo. J. Lipid Res. 33:493-501[Abstract].

  35. McFarlane, A. S. 1958. Efficient trace labeling of proteins with iodine. Nature. 182:53-57[Medline].

  36. Bradford, M. M. 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 72:248-254[Medline].

  37. Karpe, F., Steiner, G., Olivecrona, T., Carlson, L. A., Hamsten, A. 1993. Metabolism of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins during alimentary lipemia. J. Clin. Invest. 91:748-758.

  38. Sambrook, J., E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis. 1989. Molecular Cloning: a Laboratory Manual. 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.

  39. Alksnis, M., Barkhem, T., Stromstedt, P. E., Ahola, H., Kutoh, E., Gustafsson, J. A., Poellinger, L., Nilsson, S. 1991. High level expression of functional full length and truncated glucocorticoid receptor in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Demonstration of ligand-induced down-regulation of expressed receptor mRNA and protein. J. Biol. Chem. 266:10078-10085[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  40. Kalb, V. F., Jr., Bernlohr, R. W. 1977. A new spectrophotometric assay for protein in cell extracts. Anal. Biochem. 82:362-371[Medline].

  41. Vlodavsky, I., Fielding, P. E., Fielding, C. J., Gospodarowicz, D. 1978. Role of contact inhibition in the regulation of receptor-mediated uptake of low density lipoprotein in cultured vascular endothelial cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 75:356-360[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  42. van Hinsbergh, V., Havekes, L., Emeis, J., van Corven, E., Scheffer, M. 1983. Low density lipoprotein metabolism by endothelial cells from human umbilical cord arteries and veins. Arteriosclerosis. 3:547-559[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  43. Rudling, M., Norstedt, G., Olivecrona, H., Reihner, E., Gustafsson, J. A., Angelin, B. 1992. Importance of growth hormone for the induction of hepatic low density lipoprotein receptors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 89:6983-6987[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  44. Sakai, J., Hoshino, A., Takahashi, S., Miura, Y., Ishii, H., Suzuki, H., Kawarabayasi, Y., Yamamoto, T. 1994. Structure, chromosome location, and expression of the human very low density lipoprotein receptor gene. J. Biol. Chem. 269:2173-2182[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  45. Beisiegel, U., Schneider, W. J., Brown, M. S., Goldstein, J. L. 1982. Immunoblot analysis of low density lipoprotein receptors in fibroblasts from subjects with familial hypercholesterolemia. J. Biol. Chem. 257:13150-13156[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  46. Herz, J., Goldstein, J. L., Strickland, D. K., Ho, Y. K., Brown, M. S. 1991. 39-kDa protein modulates binding of ligands to low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein/alpha 2-macroglobulin receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 266:21232-21238[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  47. Willnow, T. E., Goldstein, J. L., Orth, K., Brown, M. S., Herz, J. 1992. Low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein and gp330 bind similar ligands, including plasminogen activator-inhibitor complexes and lactoferrin, an inhibitor of chylomicron remnant clearance. J. Biol. Chem. 267:26172-26180[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  48. Sege, R. D., Kozarsky, K., Nelson, D. L., Krieger, M. 1984. Expression and regulation of human low-density lipoprotein receptors in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Nature. 307:742-745[Medline].

  49. Patel, D. D., Forder, R. A., Soutar, A. K., Knight, B. L. 1997. Synthesis and properties of the very-low-density-lipoprotein receptor and a comparison with the low-density-lipoprotein receptor. Biochem. J. 324:371-377.

  50. Hiltunen, T. P., Luoma, J. S., Nikkari, T., Yla-Herttuala, S. 1998. Expression of LDL receptor, VLDL receptor, LDL receptor-related protein, and scavenger receptor in rabbit atherosclerotic lesions: marked induction of scavenger receptor and VLDL receptor expression during lesion development. Circulation. 97:1079-1086[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  51. Hamsten, A., Wiman, B., de Faire, U., Blomback, M. 1985. Increased plasma levels of a rapid inhibitor of tissue plasminogen activator in young survivors of myocardial infarction. N. Engl. J. Med. 313:1557-1563[Abstract].

  52. Avellone, G., Di Garbo, V., Cordova, R., Panno, A. V., Ranelli, G., de Simone, R., Bompiani, G. D. 1993. Fibrinolytic effect of gemfibrozil versus placebo administration in response to venous occlusion. Fibrinolysis. 7:416-421.

  53. Andersen, P., Smith, P., Seljeflot, I., Brataker, S., Arnesen, H. 1990. Effects of gemfibrozil on lipids and haemostasis after myocardial infarction. Thromb. Haemost. 63:174-177[Medline].

  54. Keber, I., Lavre, J., Suc, S., Keber, D. 1994. The decrease of plasminogen activator inhibitor after normalization of triglycerides during treatment with fibrates. Fibrinolysis. 8:57-59.

  55. Broijersen, A., Eriksson, M., Wiman, B., Angelin, B., Hjemdahl, P. 1996. Gemfibrozil treatment of combined hyperlipoproteinemia. No improvement of fibrinolysis despite marked reduction of plasma triglyceride levels. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 16:511-516[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  56. Kockx, M., de Maat, M. P., Knipscheer, H. C., Kastelein, J. J., Kluft, C., Princen, H. M., Kooistra, T. 1997. Effects of gemfibrozil and ciprofibrate on plasma levels of tissue-type plasminogen activator, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 and fibrinogen in hyperlipidaemic patients. Thromb. Haemost. 78:1167-1172[Medline].

  57. Dawson, S., Henney, A. 1992. The status of PAI-1 as a risk factor for arterial and thrombotic disease: a review. Atherosclerosis. 95:105-117[Medline].


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y. Chen, Y. Hu, K. Lu, J. G. Flannery, and J.-x. Ma
Very Low Density Lipoprotein Receptor, a Negative Regulator of the wnt Signaling Pathway and Choroidal Neovascularization
J. Biol. Chem., November 23, 2007; 282(47): 34420 - 34428.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
J. Ruano, J. Lopez-Miranda, R. de la Torre, J. Delgado-Lista, J. Fernandez, J. Caballero, M. I. Covas, Y. Jimenez, P. Perez-Martinez, C. Marin, et al.
Intake of phenol-rich virgin olive oil improves the postprandial prothrombotic profile in hypercholesterolemic patients
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, August 1, 2007; 86(2): 341 - 346.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
T. Kudo, E. Nakayama, S. Suzuki, M. Akiyama, and S. Shibata
Cholesterol diet enhances daily rhythm of Pai-1 mRNA in the mouse liver
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, October 1, 2004; 287(4): E644 - E651.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
M.-C. Alessi, D. Bastelica, A. Mavri, P. Morange, B. Berthet, M. Grino, and I. Juhan-Vague
Plasma PAI-1 Levels Are More Strongly Related to Liver Steatosis Than to Adipose Tissue Accumulation
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., July 1, 2003; 23(7): 1262 - 1268.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
T. Tholstrup, G. J Miller, A. Bysted, and B. Sandstrom
Effect of individual dietary fatty acids on postprandial activation of blood coagulation factor VII and fibrinolysis in healthy young men
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, May 1, 2003; 77(5): 1125 - 1132.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. K. Stannard, D. R. Riddell, S. M. Sacre, A. D. Tagalakis, C. Langer, A. von Eckardstein, P. Cullen, T. Athanasopoulos, G. Dickson, and J. S. Owen
Cell-derived Apolipoprotein E (ApoE) Particles Inhibit Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule-1 (VCAM-1) Expression in Human Endothelial Cells
J. Biol. Chem., November 30, 2001; 276(49): 46011 - 46016.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 NEJMHome page
H. P. Kohler and P. J. Grant
Plasminogen-Activator Inhibitor Type 1 and Coronary Artery Disease
N. Engl. J. Med., June 15, 2000; 342(24): 1792 - 1801.
[Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nilsson, L.
Right arrow Articles by Eriksson, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nilsson, L.
Right arrow Articles by Eriksson, P.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Journal of Biological Chemistry 
 Molecular and Cellular Proteomics   ASBMB Today 
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement