|
|
||||||||
Original Article |
Correspondence to: Gilles Lambert
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Hepatic lipase (HL) plays a major role in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) metabolism both as a lipolytic enzyme and as a ligand. To investigate whether HL enhances the uptake of HDL-cholesteryl ester (CE) via the newly described scavenger receptor BI (SR-BI), we measured the effects of expressing HL and SR-BI on HDL-cell association as well as uptake of 125I-labeled apoA-I and [3H]CE-HDL, by embryonal kidney 293 cells. As expected, HDL cell association and CE selective uptake were increased in SR-BI transfected cells by 2- and 4-fold, respectively, compared to controls (P < 0.001). Cells transfected with HL alone or in combination with SR-BI expressed similar amounts of HL, 20% of which was bound to cell surface proteoglycans. HL alone increased HDL cell association by 2-fold but had no effect on HDL-CE uptake in 293 cells. However, in cells expressing SR-BI, HL further enhanced the selective uptake of CE from HDL by 3-fold (P < 0.001). To determine whether the lipolytic and/or ligand function of HL are required in this process, we generated a catalytically inactive form of HL (HL-145G). Cells co-transfected with HL-145G and SR-BI increased their HDL cell association and HDL-CE selective uptake by 1.4-fold compared to cells expressing SR-BI only (P < 0.03). Heparin abolished the effect of HL-145G on SR-BI-mediated HDL-CE selective uptake.
Thus, the enhanced uptake of HDL-CE by HL is mediated by both its ligand role, which requires interaction with proteoglycans, and by lipolysis with subsequent HDL particle remodeling. These results establish HL as a major modulator of SR-BI mediated selective uptake of HDL-CE.Lambert, G., M. B. Chase, K. Dugi, A. Bensadoun, H. B. Brewer, Jr., and S. Santamarina-Fojo. Hepatic lipase promotes the selective uptake of high density lipoprotein-cholesteryl esters via the scavenger receptor B1. J. Lipid Res. 1999. 40: 1294;1303.
Supplementary key words: SR-BI, HDL, cholesterol, HEK 293 cells
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Several lines of evidence that include epidemiological data, transgenic animal studies (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) and, more recently, prospective human clinical trials (7), indicate that increased plasma high density lipoprotein (HDL) levels protect against the development of atherosclerosis. One of several proposed functions of HDL as an anti-atherogenic lipoprotein is reverse cholesterol transport, a process by which cholesterol is transported from peripheral cells to the liver for excretion (8) (9) (10) (11). HDL-cholesteryl esters (CE) may be transferred directly to the liver via whole particle and/or selective CE uptake (12) (13). Alternatively, CE may be transferred from HDL to apolipoprotein (apo) B-containing lipoproteins as a result of the activity of the cholesteryl ester transfer protein (14). Factors that alter the plasma concentrations of HDL are likely to modulate the process of HDL-mediated reverse cholesterol transport.
Hepatic lipase (HL) is a 66 kDa lipolytic enzyme synthesized primarily by the liver and found attached to the vascular endothelium of the liver, ovaries, and adrenals via heparan sulfate proteoglycans (15) (16) (17) (18). HL hydrolyzes triglycerides and phospholipids present primarily on chylomicron remnants, intermediate density lipoproteins (IDL), and HDL (19) (20). Several lines of evidence support an important role for HL in HDL metabolism. Overexpression of HL using either recombinant adenovirus (21) (22) (23) (24) or genetic manipulation significantly decreases plasma HDL concentrations in several animal models (25) (26) (27). Conversely, HL deficiency in humans (28) (29) as well as HL deficiency in rodents induced by infusion of anti-HL antibodies (19) (30) (31) (32) or by targeted disruption of the HL gene (33), lead to increased plasma HDL concentrations.
In addition to its traditional role as a lipolytic enzyme, recent studies have implicated HL in other aspects of cellular lipid and/or lipoprotein metabolism. HL appears to serve as a ligand that mediates the interactions of lipoproteins with cell surface proteoglycans and receptors, facilitating the cellular uptake of lipoproteins and/or lipoprotein lipids. HL enhances the binding and uptake of chylomicrons, chylomicron remnants, ß-very low density lipoproteins (ß-VLDL), and low density lipoproteins (LDL) by different cell types in vitro (34) (35) (36) (37) (38) (39) (40) (41), a process that appears to require proteoglycans (35) (42) (43). Although most of these studies have focussed on the HL-mediated cellular binding and uptake of apoB-containing lipoproteins, several have suggested a similar role for HL in HDL metabolism. HL has been shown to increase HDL cholesterol uptake in perfused rat livers (31) (44) and in cultured cells (37) (38) (43) (45) (46), but the metabolic pathway(s) by which HL enhances the lipid and/or whole particle uptake of HDL remains to be established.
Recently, Acton et al. (47) described a new receptor, the scavenger receptor class B type I (SR-BI), which mediates the selective uptake of CE from HDL. The human homologue of mouse SR-BI is the collagen type I CD36 receptor and rat lysosomal integral membrane protein II analogous-1 (CLA-1), hereafter designated as human SR-BI (48). In vivo, this receptor is expressed mostly in the liver and steroidogenic tissues (47) (48) (49) (50). Overexpression of SR-BI in transgenic mice (51) (52) or using recombinant adenovirus (53) reduces HDL-cholesterol levels and increases biliary cholesterol secretion, consistent with enhanced reverse cholesterol transport. Conversely, SR-BI knockout mice (54) (55) have increased plasma HDL-cholesterol concentrations. Apolipoproteins A-I, A-II, and C-III are able to mediate the binding of reconstituted HDL to SR-BI (56). A potential interaction between SR-BI and HL has been suggested by a recent study demonstrating that despite increased adrenal SR-BI, female mice with HL deficiency have decreased cholesterol adrenal stores (57). Thus, HL may be required for optimal SR-BI-mediated selective uptake of cholesterol by the adrenals.
In the present study we investigate the potential role of HL in mediating the cellular uptake of HDL-CE via the newly described SR-BI, by expressing human HL and SR-BI in embryonal kidney 293 cells. To distinguish the contribution of the lipolytic and non-lipolytic function of HL in this process, catalytically active as well as inactive HL was co-expressed with SR-BI. Our findings demonstrate that: 1) in the absence of SR-BI, HL does not promote cellular cholesterol uptake in 293 cells, 2) HL enhances the SR-BI-mediated selective uptake of cholesteryl esters from HDL by 3-fold, and 3) the process involves both the lipolytic and non-lipolytic function of the enzyme. This study provides, for the first time, direct evidence supporting a synergistic role for HL and SR-BI in mediating the selective uptake of cholesteryl esters from HDL.
| EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cells
Human embryonic kidney 293 cells (CRL-1573) were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, MD). Cells were grown in 175 cm2 flasks (Costar, Cambridge, MA) and maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) with 10% fetal calf serum, penicillin/streptomycin/glutamine (Gibco BRL, Gaithersburg, MD) at 37°C in humidified 95% air/5% CO2.
Generation of cDNA expression vectors
The expression vector, pcEXV-3 containing the human SR-BI cDNA (a generous gift from Dr. Miguel A. Vega) (58) was used as template to amplify SR-BI cDNA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Specific 5' and 3' oligonucleotides containing Not I restriction sites (5'-TGCGAGCCGCGGGGCGGCCGCAGGCG-3' and 5'-CTGTGGGGCTGGGCGGCCGCCTGCTGGGAG-3') were synthesized on a 380B DNA synthesizer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Human HL and chloramphenicol acetyl transferase (CAT) cDNAs were obtained as previously described (59). Catalytically inactive HL-145G cDNA containing a substitution of the active serine 145 by glycine (AGT to GGT) was synthesized by the overlap extension PCR using pCMV-HL as template (60). PCR was performed in an automated DNA thermal cycler (Perkin-Elmer, Norwalk, CT) using DNA polymerase from Pyrococcus furiosus (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) for 30 cycles with 1 min denaturation at 95°C, 1 min annealing at 50°C, and 2 min extension at 72°C in 1x buffer #2 (Stratagene), 200 µM each dNTP (Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis, IN), and 0.5 µM each primer. The cDNAs were subcloned into the unique Not I site of the pCMV-ß vector (Clontech, Palo Alto, CA) containing the cytomegalovirus (CMV) immediate early promoter and the polyadenylation site of simian virus 40, by replacing the ß-galactosidase cDNA. Plasmid DNA was isolated by minipreparation (Promega Wizard Kit, Madison, WI) and the cDNA sequence was verified by sequence analysis using the dideoxynucleotide chain termination method (61). The recombinant vectors were amplified and purified by double CsCl banding.
In vitro expression of SR-BI, HL, and HL-145G in 293 cells
Costar 6-well plates were seeded with 5 x 105 cells per well 48 h prior to transfection with 1 µg of pCMV-SR-BI and 2 µg of pCMV-HL or pCMV-HL-145G using SuperFect (Qiagen, Santa Clarita, CA). pCMV-CAT was utilized as control as well as to bring the total amount of transfected DNA to 3 µg per well. Twenty four hours after transfection, the cells were rinsed twice with 1x phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and the medium was replaced with DMEM, penicillin/streptomycin/glutamine, containing 10% lipoprotein-deficient serum (LPDS) obtained by ultracentrifugation of fetal calf serum for 72 h at 60,000 rpm (d 1.25 g/ml). Three to five separate transfection experiments were performed with each experimental condition in hexaduplicates.
Immunoblot analysis of SR-BI expression
Cells were harvested in 0.5 ml of a 0.01 M NaOH, 0.1% SDS solution and immediately frozen at -70°C. Cellular proteins (10 µg) were analyzed on Nu-PAGE 4;12% Bis-Tris gels in MES-SDS buffer (Novex, San Diego, CA) under reducing conditions. Proteins were transferred onto an Immobilon membrane (Millipore, Bedford, MA), probed with polyclonal anti-human SR-BI-IgG (a generous gift from Dr. Susan Acton) using Vectastain PK6101 (Vector, Burlingame, CA) and SR-BI expression was quantified on a Personal Densitometer SI (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA).
Determination of HL activity and concentration
Media was harvested 48 h after transfection and supplemented with glycerol to a final concentration of 30% (v/v). Aliquots of media were stored at -70°C. HL activity was assayed in triplicate using 14C-labeled triolein substrate in 1 M NaCl (62). HL concentration was determined in triplicate by a sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (63).
Preparation and labeling of HDL
Human HDL (d 1.063;1.21 g/ml) was labeled with [1
, 2
(n)-3H]cholesteryl oleate (3H-CE) (Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL). HDL was diluted in 1x PBS containing 0.01% Na-EDTA to a final protein concentration of 2.5 mg/ml. The 3H-CE was dissolved in ethanol at 1 µg/µl (~3.5 µCi/µl); 20 µl was added to 1 ml of the HDL solution. The mixture was gently stirred at room temperature for 30 min, centrifuged (40,000 rpm) at 4°C for 18 h (d 1.08) to separate the unincorporated label, and dialyzed against 1x PBS. The purity of labeled HDL preparations was evaluated after gel filtration on two Superose 6 columns in series (absorbance at 280 nm) and aliquots were counted by liquid scintillation detection. The specific activity of the 3H-CE labeled HDL preparations was 17 dpm/ng CE.
Lyophilized human apoA-I (100 µg) was solubilized in a buffer of 6 M guanidine/1 M glycine (pH 8.5) and iodinated with one mCi of 125I (NEN, Boston, MA) by a modification of the iodine monochloride method described by McFarlane (64). 125I-labeled apoA-I was added to the 2 mg HDL solution and dialyzed against 1x PBS to remove free iodine. The specific activity of 125I-labeled apoA-I-labeled HDL was 740 dpm/ng apoA-I. The HDL apoA-I/CE mass ratio was 2.7 ± 0.1 in all the HDL preparations used.
Determination of HDL cell association, selective CE uptake, and apolipoprotein degradation
Twenty-four hours after transfection, the media were replaced with DMEM containing 10% LPDS as described above and 48 h after transfection 10 µg/ml of 125I-labeled apoA-I/[3H]CE-labeled HDL was added to the cells. After a 5-h incubation, the cells were washed three times with PBS (pH 7.4), lysed with 0.5 ml of 0.01 M NaOH and homogenized for 3 sec on a XL2020 sonicator (Misonix, Farmingdale, NY). An aliquot (180 µl) of the cell lysate as well as media were precipitated with 20 µl of 100% trichloracetic acid (TCA) as described (65) (66). TCA-insoluble radioactivity in the cells is assumed to represent 125I-labeled apoA-I internalized and non-degraded or bound to the cell surface whereas TCA-soluble 125I radioactivity in both cells and media represents apoA-I that has undergone internalization and degradation (23) (50). CE was extracted with hexane;isopropanol 3:2 (v/v) and 3H radioactivity was measured by liquid scintillation spectrometry. Cellular proteins were measured using the BCA protein assay (Pierce, Rockford, IL). HDL-CE selective uptake (expressed as ng HDL-CE/mg cell protein) was calculated by subtracting the CE associated with both TCA-insoluble counts in the cells (125I-labeled apoA-I cell associated, undegraded) and TCA-soluble counts in cells and media (125I-labeled apoA-I degraded) from the total [3H]CE uptake (23) (50) (65) (66). The selective uptake of HDL-CE in cells expressing SR-BI, SR-BI + HL, and SR-BI + HL-145G was normalized for SR-BI expression in each experiment as previously described.
Treatment of cultured cells with heparin
In separate experiments, 1 ml of cultured media was harvested 48 h after transfection, the cells were placed on ice for 20 min with 20 U/ml of heparin (Sigma, St Louis, MO), and the remaining 1 ml media was harvested. To determine the amount of HL free in the media and bound to the cell membranes, HL mass was measured by ELISA (63) on both pre- and post-heparin media. To measure the effects of heparin on CE cellular uptake, transfected cells were treated for 20 min with heparin (20 U/ml) before addition of [3H]CE-labeled HDL. The experiment was then performed as previously described.
Statistical analysis
Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. The statistical significance of the differences of the mean between two groups is evaluated using the Student's t -test.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Expression of SR-BI in 293 cells
Figure 1 illustrates the expression of SR-BI and HDL-CE uptake in 293 cells transfected with increasing amounts of pCMV-SR-BI. SR-BI was quantified by immunoblot analysis of transfected cell extracts (inset, Figure 1A) followed by densitometric scanning. Peak expression of the transgene was reached 48 h after transfection (data not shown). Non-transfected 293 cells did not express SR-BI. Transfection of 293 cells with increasing amounts of pCMV-SR-BI resulted in a dose-dependent increase of cellular SR-BI protein, which reached a plateau with 1 µg of plasmid (Figure 1A). The uptake of 3H-CE from HDL by 293 cells transfected with increasing amounts of pCMV-SR-BI was then quantitated. The amount of CE uptake paralleled the level of expression of SR-BI from 374 up to 1229 ng CE/mg of cell protein (Figure 1B). Maximal SR-BI expression and HDL-CE uptake were achieved by transfecting 1 µg pCMV-SR-BI per well. Using these conditions, transfected 293 cells were then incubated with increasing amounts of 3H-CE-labeled HDL. The cellular uptake of CE increased linearly with the HDL concentration ( Figure 2), indicating that under our experimental conditions, the amount of HDL was the limiting factor for SR-BI-mediated uptake of CE. All subsequent experiments were performed by transfecting 1 µg of pCMV-SR-BI DNA per well and adding HDL at a concentration of 10 µg/ml to the media.
|
|
Cell association of HDL by 293 cells transfected with HL and SR-BI plasmids
To examine the effects of HL and SR-BI on HDL cell association, 293 cells were transfected with pCMV-HL either alone or in combination with pCMV-SR-BI. HL expression was quantified by determination of both HL concentration by ELISA and HL activity by the triolein assay in the transfection media ( Table 1). Cells transfected with pCMV-HL alone or together with pCMV-SR-BI expressed similar levels of an enzymatically active lipase with a specific activity of 0.6 nmol/min per ng (Table 1). In contrast, HL was not detectable in the media of cells transfected with either pCMV-CAT or pCMV-SR-BI establishing that 293 cells did not express the lipolytic enzyme.
|
Treatment of the transfected cells with 20 U/ml of heparin released human HL into the media, indicating that a portion of HL was associated with 293 cell surface proteoglycans. The distribution of free (media) and surface-bound (heparin-releasable) HL was determined by ELISA to be 80% and 20%, respectively (data not shown). No significant difference between cells expressing either HL alone or HL and SR-BI was evident.
To determine whether HL mediates the binding and uptake of HDL, transfected 293 cells were incubated for 5 h with 125I-labeled apoA-I HDL and HDL-cell association was determined. As shown in Figure 3A, the amount of HDL bound and internalized by cells transfected with either pCMV-HL or pCMV-SR-BI was approximately 2-fold greater than control pCMV-CAT-transfected cells. Co-expression of HL and SR-BI led to an additive increase in cell association (3-fold compared to controls). Thus, HL further enhances the association of HDL by 293 cells expressing SR-BI.
|
Selective uptake of HDL-CE by 293 cells expressing HL and SR-BI
To examine the effect of expressing HL on SR-BI-mediated selective uptake of HDL-CE by transfected 293 cells, the uptake of 125I-labeled apoA-I/3H-CE-labeled HDL was measured (Figure 3B). Compared to control pCMV-CAT- transfected cells, SR-BI expression resulted in a 5-fold increase in HDL-CE selective uptake. Despite enhanced HDL cell association, the expression of HL alone did not increase the uptake of 3H-CE HDL by 293 cells. However, in the presence of SR-BI, HL further enhanced the selective uptake of CE from HDL by 15-fold compared to controls (Figure 3B, black bars). In contrast, expression of HL and SR-BI, either alone or in combination, did not significantly alter the degradation of 125I-labeled apoA-I HDL (Figure 3B; white bars). Thus, HL enhances the selective uptake of HDL-CE in 293 cells via SR-BI.
Cell association of HDL by cells transfected with catalytically inactive HL-145G and SR-BI plasmids
To determine whether the HL-enhanced selective uptake of HDL-CE via SR-BI requires the lipolytic and/or ligand functions of the enzyme, we generated a catalytically inactive form of HL (HL-145G) and transfected 293 cells with pCMV-HL-145G. As shown in Table 1, the concentration of HL-145G in the media of cells transfected with pCMV-HL-145G alone or in combination with pCMV-SR-BI was similar to that of native HL. As expected, HL enzymatic activity could not be detected in the media of 293 cells expressing the mutant HL-145G. Like native HL, treatment of the transfected cells with heparin released HL-145G into the media, indicating that a portion of HL was associated with cell surface proteoglycans. The distribution of free (media) and surface-bound (heparin-releasable) HL was determined by ELISA to be 80 and 20%, respectively (data not shown). No significant difference between cells expressing either HL alone or HL and SR-BI was evident.
To determine whether the catalytically inactive HL-145G mediates the binding and uptake of HDL, transfected 293 cells were incubated for 5 h with 125I-labeled apoA-I HDL and cell association was determined. As shown in Figure 4A, the amount of HDL bound by cells transfected either with pCMV-HL-145G or pCMV-SR-BI was approximately 2-fold greater than control pCMV-CAT-transfected cells. Co-expression of HL and SR-BI led to an additive increase in cell association (3-fold compared to controls). Thus, like native HL, HL-145G further enhances the association of HDL by 293 cells expressing SR-BI.
|
Selective uptake of HDL-CE by 293 cells expressing catalytically inactive HL-145G and SR-BI
To examine whether HL-mediated enhanced selective uptake of CE via SR-BI requires lipolysis and/or involves the ligand-binding function of the enzyme, we evaluated the effect of expressing HL-145G on 125I-labeled apoA-I/3H-CE labeled HDL uptake (Figure 4B). Like native HL, the expression of catalytically inactive HL-145G alone did not increase the selective uptake of 3H-CE HDL by 293 cells. However, in the presence of SR-BI, HL-145G further enhanced the selective uptake of CE from HDL by 7-fold compared to controls (Figure 4B; black bars). Expression of HL-145G and SR-BI, either alone or in combination did not alter the degradation of 125I-labeled apoA-I HDL (Figure 4B; white bars). Even in the absence of lipolysis, HL-145G further enhanced the selective uptake of HDL-CE in 293 cells via SR-BI, suggesting that the ligand-binding function of the enzyme mediated the effect.
However, maximal uptake of HDL-CE requires co-expression of SR-BI with the lipolytically active enzyme. As shown in Figure 5, at every concentration of HL, the uptake of 3H-CE HDL was significantly greater by cells expressing the native enzyme than by those expressing HL-145G, suggesting that HL-mediated lipolysis and lipoprotein processing play a major role in facilitating the uptake of HDL-CE via SR-BI.
|
The effect of HL on SR-BI mediated-HDL-CE uptake may require proteoglycans which facilitate the interaction of lipoproteins and HL with cell surface receptors. Heparin displaces HL from the cell surface and thus disrupts this interaction. To evaluate the role of proteoglycans in facilitating the HL-enhanced SR-BI-mediated selective uptake of HDL-CE, we measured the HDL-CE uptake by 293 cells expressing CAT, SR-BI, SR-BI+HL, and SR-BI + HL-145G in the presence of 20 U/ml of heparin ( Figure 6). Heparin did not significantly alter the CE uptake in cells expressing SR-BI alone. However, heparin treatment abolished the enhanced uptake of HDL-CE mediated by the catalytically inactive HL-145G and reduced the effect mediated by the native HL by 35% (P < 0.01). Thus, the release of HL from the cell surface prevents the enhanced CE uptake mediated by the ligand-binding function of HL, but does not abolish the effect mediated by lipolysis.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Previous studies have demonstrated that HL plays a major role in HDL metabolism. HL-mediated lipolysis may account for a significant amount of the effect of HL on HDL metabolism. Like lipoprotein lipase (LPL) (67) (68) (69) (70) (71), HL may also serve as a ligand that mediates the interaction of lipoproteins with cell surface proteoglycans and/or receptors, facilitating the uptake of lipoproteins and/or lipoprotein lipids (34) (35) (36) (37) (38) (39) (40) (42). HL has been shown to increase HDL cholesterol uptake in perfused rat livers (31) (44) and in cultured cells (37) (38) (43) (45) (46). More recently, expression of a catalytically inactive HL has shown that in the absence of lipolysis, HL will still reduce the circulating plasma levels of HDL in HL knockout mice (72), suggesting an important in vivo physiologic role for the ligand function of HL. Despite these advances, the mechanism(s) by which HL enhances the lipid and/or whole lipoprotein particle uptake of HDL remains to be established. One potential pathway may involve the newly described scavenger receptor SR-BI that mediates the selective uptake of CE from HDL (47) (48). It is expressed primarily in liver and steroidogenic tissues where HL is also localized (73). Recent studies show that although SR-BI is up-regulated in the adrenals of HL knockout female mice (57), adrenal cholesterol stores are reduced, suggesting that HL may be necessary for optimal SR-BI-mediated HDL-CE uptake.
In the present study we examined the potential role of HL in enhancing the uptake of HDL-CE via SR-BI by expressing SR-BI, native HL, and catalytically inactive HL-145G in human embryonal kidney 293 cells. These cells provide an ideal system to address this question as they do not express HL or SR-BI endogenously. In addition, they display minimal background CE selective uptake as well as HDL degradation. This latter may reflect uptake mediated by cell surface proteoglycans and/or the LDL receptor related protein (LRP), as previously reported (38). Thus, any changes in HDL-CE selective uptake can be attributed to newly expressed HL and SR-BI. The selective uptake of HDL-CE by 293 cells expressing human SR-BI (~1200 ng/mg of cell protein) reaches levels comparable to those previously reported in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells stably transfected with mouse SR-BI (47), as well as in Y1-BS1 adrenal cells (50). In addition, the total HL secreted by the transfected 293 cells (8 ng of HL/mg) is similar to that observed in previous studies (36) (37). The expressed lipase was enzymatically active with a specific activity of 0.6 nmol/min per ng and 20% bound to the cell surface. Previous studies have emphasized the importance of HL-cell binding for cellular uptake of lipoproteins (36) (37).
Our study demonstrates that separate expression of HL, HL-145G, and SR-BI led to a similar, approximately 2-fold increase in HDL cell association, confirming previous data showing that HL enhances the cellular binding of HDL, LDL, ß-VLDL, and chylomicron remnants (36) (37) (38) (39) (41). When HL and SR-BI were co-expressed in 293 cells, an additive increase in HDL cell association was observed, suggesting that the interaction of HDL with SR-BI and HL can occur, at least initially, on separate sites at the cell surface. The binding of HDL to HL associated to the cell surface via proteoglycans may approximate the HDL to the membrane-bound SR-BI, and ultimately facilitate their interaction. A similar mechanism has been proposed for HL (35) and LPL (68) in mediating the interaction of apoB-containing lipoproteins with LRP. Alternatively, HL may bind directly to SR-BI, thereby facilitating the interaction between HDL and SR-BI. Not surprisingly, the HDL cell association was similar in cells expressing native or catalytically inactive HL-145G. These findings are consistent with studies showing that the lipolytic activity of LPL is not necessary for enhanced cellular binding and uptake of apoB-containing lipoproteins (74).
Despite increased HDL cell association induced by HL, expression of the lipase alone did not enhance the uptake of CE from HDL in 293 cells. Compared with controls, the selective uptake of HDL-CE by cells expressing either HL or HL-145G remained unchanged. Previous studies have demonstrated that the selective uptake of HDL-CE in hepatoma cell lines (38) (43) (45) or CHO cells (37) (43) is enhanced by expression of HL alone. However, these cell lines are derived from tissues known to synthesize SR-BI, i.e., liver and ovaries, respectively (47) (48). SR-BI was first cloned from a CHO cell library (75). Our data clearly demonstrate that HL was able to increase the uptake of CE from HDL in 293 cells only in the presence of SR-BI. Like SR-BI, HL enhanced the selective uptake of HDL-CE, rather than the whole particle uptake, providing additional evidence that HL is acting via the selective-uptake receptor.
To further investigate the mechanism by which HL enhances SR-BI-mediated HDL-CE uptake, we studied the effect of expressing the catalytically inactive HL-145G in 293 cells. In the absence of lipolysis, HL-145G is able to enhance the uptake of HDL-CE via SR-BI by 1.4-fold, supporting a role for the ligand-binding function of HL independent of lipolysis in this process. However, at every level of expression studied, HL-145G was less effective than the active enzyme in enhancing the selective uptake of HDL-CE via SR-BI indicating that lipolysis was necessary for maximal HDL-CE uptake. It does not appear that HL-mediated lipolysis enhanced the accumulation of HDL at the cell surface as HL-145G had the same effect on HDL cell association as the native HL. Previous studies have shown that HDL treated with HL have an enhanced ability to deliver cholesterol to perfused rat livers (44) and hepatoma cells (43) (45). HDL remodeled by secreted phospholipase-A2 have an increased capacity to deliver CE to SR-BI stably expressing CHO cells (76). It is possible that the hydrolysis of phospholipids from the HDL surface by HL may enhance the interaction of HDL apolipoproteins with membrane sites or/and facilitate the release of CE from the HDL core for cellular uptake, as previously suggested (45) (46) (77). Thus, HL-mediated HDL lipolysis and subsequent particle remodeling may increase access to the CE core, further enhancing the uptake of CE from HDL. Our findings that the lipolytic function of the enzyme is necessary for maximal stimulation of SR-BI-mediated HDL-CE selective uptake is consistent with data published by Ji et al. (38) suggesting that HL catalytic activity is essential for HDL uptake mediated by LRP and proteoglycans in McArdle cells. We have also recently shown that expression of catalytically inactive HL-145G in HL-knockout mice reduces their HDL-cholesterol by approximately half that of the native enzyme (72). This contrasts, however, with previous data suggesting that the HL-enhanced selective uptake of HDL-CE in CHO and Hep3B cells is independent of lipolysis as it is not altered by inhibition of the HL activity (37) (43). The different findings in these combined studies may reflect the different cell systems as well as the mode of HL inhibition used. Interestingly, the lipolytic activity of LPL is not required for lipoprotein binding and uptake by LRP (74).
The present study also demonstrates that HL bound to the cell surface plays a major role in facilitating the enhanced selective uptake of HDL-CE via SR-BI. Thus, addition of heparin displaced HL-145G from the cell surface into the media and totally abolished the increase in CE selective uptake mediated by the catalytically inactive enzyme. These findings suggest that proteoglycans are required for the HL-145G-mediated effect on CE selective uptake via SR-BI. Our results are in agreement with previous data suggesting that HL-mediated uptake of HDL-CE decreases in proteoglycan-deficient CHO cells (43) and that proteoglycans are required to enhance the uptake of HDL-CE via both an LRP-dependent and -independent pathway in McArdle cells (38). However, our study also demonstrates that the displacement of the native HL by heparin reduced the SR-BI-mediated, HL-enhanced HDL-CE uptake by 35%. Thus, the remodeling of HDL by HL, whether the enzyme is bound to the cell surface or not, enhances the selective uptake mediated by SR-BI of CE from HDL.
In conclusion, our study provides evidence to support an important role for the two major functions of HL in enhancing the selective uptake of HDL-CE via SR-BI. First, the ligand-binding function of the enzyme, which requires interaction of the lipase with cell-surface proteoglycans and is independent of lipolysis, may enhance the interaction of HDL with SR-BI, thus facilitating uptake. Second, HL-mediated HDL lipolysis and particle remodeling may increase access to core CE and/or HDL-apolipoproteins, thereby facilitating the selective uptake of HDL-CE via SR-BI. This study provides, for the first time, direct evidence for a role of HL in mediating the selective uptake of CE from HDL via SR-BI, adding new insights into the mechanism by which SR-BI and HL function in cellular cholesterol metabolism.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This work was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health grant HL 14990. We thank Marie Kindt for her excellent technical assistance and Judy Burk for helping in the preparation of the manuscript.
Manuscript received February 24, 1999; and in revised form March 19, 1999.
Abbreviations:
HDL, high-density lipoproteins; CE, cholesteryl ester; apo, apolipoprotein; HL, hepatic lipase; IDL, intermediate-density lipoproteins; VLDL, very low density lipoproteins; LDL, low-density lipoproteins; SR-BI, scavenger receptor class B type 1; CLA-1, collagen type 1 CD36 receptor and rat lysosomal integral membrane protein II analogous-1; DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; CAT, chloramphenicol acetyl transferase; CMV, cytomegalovirus; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; LPDS, lipoprotein- deficient serum; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; 3H-CE, [1
,2
(n)-3H]cholesteryl oleate; TCA, trichloracetic acid; LPL, lipoprotein lipase; LRP, LDL receptor related protein; CHO, Chinese hamster ovary
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. Grarup, C. H. Andreasen, M. K. Andersen, A. Albrechtsen, A. Sandbaek, T. Lauritzen, K. Borch-Johnsen, T. Jorgensen, O. Schmitz, T. Hansen, et al. The -250G>A Promoter Variant in Hepatic Lipase Associates with Elevated Fasting Serum High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Modulated by Interaction with Physical Activity in a Study of 16,156 Danish Subjects J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2008; 93(6): 2294 - 2299. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. J. F. Tietge, N. Nijstad, R. Havinga, J. F. W. Baller, F. H. van der Sluijs, V. W. Bloks, T. Gautier, and F. Kuipers Secretory phospholipase A2 increases SR-BI-mediated selective uptake from HDL but not biliary cholesterol secretion J. Lipid Res., March 1, 2008; 49(3): 563 - 571. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. E. Rufibach, S. A. Duncan, M. Battle, and S. S. Deeb Transcriptional regulation of the human hepatic lipase (LIPC) gene promoter J. Lipid Res., July 1, 2006; 47(7): 1463 - 1477. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |