J. Lipid Res.  Neurobiology of Lipids (ISSN1683-5506)
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kotzka, J.
Right arrow Articles by Krone, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kotzka, J.
Right arrow Articles by Krone, W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Lipid Research, Vol. 41, 99-108, January 2000
Copyright © 2000 by Lipid Research, Inc.


Original Article

Sterol regulatory element binding proteins (SREBP)-1a and SREBP-2 are linked to the MAP-kinase cascade

Jörg Kotzkaa, Dirk Müller-Wielanda, Gunther Rotha, Lorena Kremera, Martina Muncka, Sandra Schürmanna, Birgit Knebela, and Wilhelm Kronea
a Klinik II und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin at the Center of Molecular Medicine Cologne, D-50924 Cologne, Germany

Correspondence to: Dirk Müller-Wieland


  ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULT S
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The classic sterol regulatory cis element (sre-1) in the LDL receptor promoter mediates sterol regulatory element binding protein (SREBP)-binding and the effects of insulin and platelet derived growth factor (PDGF). To elucidate whether SREBP-1a and SREBP-2 play a direct role in insulin and PDGF action, stable cell lines of HepG2 deficient in either SREBP-1 or SREBP-2 were used. Transfection of these cells with the wild-type promoter fragment of the low density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor gene showed that the effects of insulin and PDGF were significantly reduced in both, SREBP-1- as well as SREBP-2-deficient cells. Insulin and PDGF action could be reconstituted again in these deficient cell lines by reintroducing SREBP-1a or SREBP-2. Preincubation of cells with either the phosphatidylinositol (PI)-3 kinase inhibitor wortmannin or the mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase cascade inhibitor PD 98059 showed that the latter abolished the stimulatory effects of insulin and PDGF on LDL receptor promoter activity completely, whereas wortmannin had no effect. Overexpression of upstream activators of the MAP kinases, like MEKK1 or MEK1, stimulated LDL receptor promoter activity several fold in an sre-1 related manner. These effects could be enhanced by coexpression of the transcriptional active N-terminal domains of SREBP-1a and SREBP-2. Using the heterologous Gal-4 system, we could show that intracellular activation of the MAP kinase cascade by ectopic expression of MEKK1 or MEK1 has a direct stimulatory effect on the transcriptional activity of SREBP-1a and SREBP-2. Experimental evidence for a direct link between MAP kinases and SREBPs was obtained due to the MAP kinases ERK1 and ERK2 phosphorylating recombinant GST-fusion proteins of SREBP-1a and SREBP-2, in vitro.

We conclude that SREBP-1a and SREBP-2 mediate different regulatory effects converging at sre-1 and that they appear to be linked to the MAP kinase cascade, possibly being direct substrates of ERK1 and ERK2.—Kotzka, J., D. Müller-Wieland, G. Roth, L. Kremer, M. Munck, S. Schürmann, B. Knebel, and W. Krone. Sterol regulatory element binding proteins (SREBP)-1a and SREBP-2 are linked to the MAP-kinase cascade. J. Lipid Res. 2000. 41: 99;–108.

Supplementary key words: SREBPs, MAP kinase cascade, transcription factors, insulin, growth factors


  INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULT S
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Alterations of cellular cholesterol homeostasis appear to play a major role in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. A breakthrough in the understanding of cellular cholesterol metabolism was the characterization of the low density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor and its mutations in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia and premature atherosclerosis (1) (2). In accordance with that, several large prospective clinical trials have shown recently that treatment of patients with (3) (4) (5) and without (6) (7) coronary heart disease (CHD) with statins to lower plasma cholesterol levels leads to a significant reduction of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. One key question in the understanding of cellular cholesterol homeostasis is, what happens to cell metabolism when intracellular cholesterol concentration is reduced. In this respect a new and broader perspective in the understanding has been developed by the group of Brown and Goldstein (for review, see ref. (8)). They have identified and characterized a family of cholesterol-sensitive transcription factors, called sterol regulatory element binding proteins (SREBPs). These intracellular proteins appear to transmit the signal of membrane-embedded cholesterol level to the nucleus regulating the expression rate of multiple genes.

The promoter of the LDL receptor gene contains a sterol regulatory element (sre-1/ATCACCCCAC), which is regulated by the intracellular content of sterols. This DNA sequence in the promoter of the LDL receptor gene can bind three transcription factors: SREBP-1a, SREBP-1c, and SREBP-2. These transcription factors are activated by a novel cholesterol-regulated proteolytic mechanism (9) that controls the cytosolic release of these proteins and thereby, for example, the transcription rate of the LDL receptor gene. These transcription factors are localized in the endoplasmatic reticulum. Decrease of intracellular sterol levels can activate protease activities, which cleave these transcription factors in the endoplasmatic reticulum. The N-terminal domains with a molecular mass of approximately 68 kDa translocate by unknown mechanisms into the nucleus. In the nucleus the N-terminal domain of the activated transcription factors binds to sterol responsive elements not only in the LDL receptor gene but also in many others coding for enzymes involved not only in cholesterol metabolism, but also in fatty acid and triglyceride metabolism, and possibly others. It has been shown that beside the LDL receptor gene promoter, SREBPs can regulate transcription of genes, e. g., coding for the HMG-CoA reductase (10), HMG-CoA synthase (11), farnesyl diphosphate synthase (12) (13), acetyl CoA carboxylase (14), fatty acid synthase (15), glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase (16), stearoyl-CoA desaturase 2 (17), and interestingly, the gene of SREBP-2 (18).

Using different deletion mutations of the LDL receptor promoter, we (19) and others (20) could show that the sterol regulatory cis element of the LDL receptor gene promoter sre-1 is also the cis element for insulin as well as insulin-like growth factor (IGF-1) and is part of the regulatory element mediating the effects of platelet derived growth factor (PDGF) as well as epidermal growth factor (EGF). By use of SREBP-1- and SREBP-2-deficient human hepatoma cell lines as well as recombinant glutathione-S-transferase (GST)-fusion proteins we show that SREBPs mediate different gene regulatory effects converging at sre-1 and that they are linked to the MAP kinase cascade, possibly being direct substrates of ERK1 and ERK2.


  MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULT S
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Plasmids and molecular cloning
Construction of the LDLR promoter reporter gene plasmids containing a functional intact sterol regulatory element (sre)-1 flanked by two SP1 elements (phLDL4) or fragments containing an inactivated sre-1 either by mutation (phLDL7) or deletion (phLDL10) were described previously (19). Expression vectors pFC-MEKK for dominant-active MEKK1 (aa 380-672) and pFC-MEK1 for activated MEK1 ({Delta}32-51/S218E/S222E) under control of CMV promoter were purchased from Stratagene. Reporter plasmid pFR-Luc, which contains five Gal4 DNA binding sites cloned upstream of a minimal promoter element and the firefly luciferase gene, was obtained from Stratagene.

Total RNA was isolated from HepG2 cells by guanidine isothiocyanate extraction protocol described previously (19). Using the First-Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Pharmacia Biotech) the RNA was reverse transcribed according to the manufacturers protocol. A cDNA fragment corresponding to the amino acids 1;–460 of SREBP-1a (21) and to the amino acids 1;–468 of SREBP-2 (22), corresponding to transcriptional active aminoterminal domain (NT), was amplified by PCR from this single stranded cDNA using the sequence-specific 5'-primer (GGGGATCCCCATGGACG AGCCACCCTTCA) and 3'-primer (GGAATTCTCAGTCAGGCT CCGAGTCACTGCCA) for SREBP-1a and using the sequence-specific 5'-primer (GGGGATCCCGATGGACGACAGCGGCGG CT) and 3'-primer (GGAATTCTCAGTCTGGCTCATCTTTGAC CTT) for SREBP-2, which contain additional bases (underlined sequence) to generate a BamHI and a EcoRI restriction site, respectively. These fragments were inserted in frame to glutathione-S-transferase into pGEX 3X (Pharmacia Biotech). The SREBP-1a-NT and SREBP-2-NT expression vectors were constructed by ligating the N-terminal domain of SREBP-1a (1380 bp) or SREBP-2 (1404 bp) as a BamHI/EcoRI fragment into the BamHI and EcoRI site of pcDNA3 (Invitrogen). To construct Gal4-SREBP-1a-NT and Gal4-SREBP-2-NT the corresponding fragment was ligated as a BamHI/ EcoRI fragment into the BamHI and EcoRI site of expression vector pFA-CMV (Stratagene) containing the DNA binding domain of yeast transcription factor Gal4 (aa 1;–147). Then, for in frame insertion, the construct was digested with BamHI, refilled with Klenow and religated. PCR-amplified GAPDH fragment (nt 271;–824) was subcloned into pCDNA3 in antisense orientation to the T7 RNA promoter (pcGAPDH(-)). The sequences of the contructs were confirmed by using a model 373A DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystem Inc.).

Construction of a SREBP-2 antisense expression vector
A SREBP-2 cDNA fragment from amino acids 47 to 187 (22) was amplified from HepG2 cDNA using the sequence-specific 5'-primer (GTAGGATCCAGAACAGCTGTGTAGCTCCTTTCCTGC) and 3'-primer (ATTGAAGCTTTGGACTTGAGGCTGAAGGAC) which contain additional bases (underlined sequence) to generate a BamHI or a HindIII restriction site, respectively. This fragment was cloned into the pcDNA3 vector (Invitrogen) using the polylinker HindIII and BamHI restriction sites to generate pcSREBP-2(-).

Stable transfection of HepG2 cells with pcSREBP-2(-)
HepG2 cells were transfected with pcSREBP-2(-) DNA by electroporation as described below. After this, cells were selected by growth in medium containing 800 µg/ml G418 (Sigma-Aldrich). After 20 days, individual G418-resistant colonies were selected and expanded in medium containing 500 µg/ml G418.

RNase protection assay
After linearization of pcGAPDH(-) with NciI and pcSREBP-2(-) with EcoRI, antisense RNA was transcribed with [{alpha}P32]UTP (>800 Ci/mmol) and bacteriophage T7 RNA polymerase (Promega). Specific activities (SREBP-2(-): 5 x 108 cpm/µg, GAPDH(-) 8 x 107 cpm/µg) were mixed with 15 µg total RNA derived from either HepG2/pCDNA3, SREBP-1(-) or SREBP-2(-) cells and subjected to RNase protection assay (RiboQuantTM assay system (Pharmingen)). Each assay tube contained a cRNA probe for SREBP-2 and a cRNA probe complementary to the mRNA of GAPDH with the specific activity adjusted to give comparable signals to the tested SREBP-2 mRNA. After denaturation at 85°C for 5 min, hybridization was performed at 42°C overnight. Samples were RNase digested (12 ng RNaseA, 37.5 U RNaseT1/ reaction; 45 min 37°C) and thereafter reactions were terminated with proteinase K digestion followed by precipitation. The protected fragments were resuspended in loading buffer, denatured at 90°C, and separated on 8 M urea/6.4% PAA gels. Gels were dried and subjected to autoradiography at -80°C.

RT-PCR of the LDL receptor
One hundred ng total RNA of extracted from HepG2/pCDNA3, SREBP-1(-) or SREBP-2(-) cells was reverse transcribed with 0.1 pg d(N)6 oligo in a total volume of 15 µl using the Pharmacia first strand kit according to manufacturer's instructions. Ten µl of each reaction was used for combined PCR amplification of a LDL receptor fragment from nt 1055;–1424 using 30 pmol of the sequence-specific 5'-primer (GCCCAGCGAA GATGCGAAGATAT) and 3'-primer (TGCTGATGACGGTGTCA TAGGAA) and of a GAPDH fragment from nt 462;–815 using 30 pmol of the sequence-specific 5'-primer (CATGTTCGTCAT GGGTGTGAACC) and 3'-primer (CAGGTGAGGTCCACCACTG ACAC). After 30 amplification steps, 10 µl of the PCR products was separated on 3% agarose gels in 1x TAE as running buffer.

Cell culture and transient transfection assay
HepG2 cells were maintained in RPMI 1640 medium (Sigma-Aldrich) supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal calf serum (FCS) (GibcoBRL) and antibiotics (GibcoBRL). HepG2/pCDNA3 cells and HepG2 cells with drastically reduced intracellular mRNA level of SREBP-1 (21) (SREBP-1(-)) or SREBP-2 (SREBP-2(-)) were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% (v/v) FCS, antibiotics and 500 µg/ml G418. Before electroporation, cells were released by trypsinization, washed, and suspended in Opti-MEM (GibcoBRL) supplemented with 10% (v/v) FCS. Cell suspensions (2 x 105 cells/well) were mixed with vectors as indicated in figure legends. Samples were transferred to an electroporation cuvette (interelectrode distance 0.4 cm) and pulsed for 18 msec in GenePulser II (Bio-Rad). Before seeding on 6-well plates (Costar), cell suspension was diluted with RPMI 1640 with 10% (v/v) FCS and antibiotics. For endogenous induction using expression vectors coding for dominant active MEKK1 or activated MEK1, cells were harvested 16 h after electroporation. For the treatment with insulin and PDGF, cells were cultured in serum-free medium on day 2 after electroporation for 16 h. Before harvesting, cells were incubated without or with insulin (10-7 M) or PDGF-AB (3.3 x 10-9 M) (Sigma-Aldrich) for 4 h. Luciferase activity was measured according to the supplier's instructions (Promega). Transfection efficiency was monitored by cotransfection of ß-galactosidase expression vector pSV-ßGal (Promega). ß-Galactosidase activity was determined by galactolight assay (Tropix). The data represent relative luciferase activity as x-fold induction of either endogenous or exogenous stimulation relative to unstimulated cells as indicated in the legends.

Protein kinase assay
The glutathione-S-transferase (GST)-SREBP-1a-NT and GST-SREBP-2-NT fusion proteins were expressed in E. coli strain BL21 and purified according to the manufacturer's recommendations (Pharmacia Biotech). Protein phosphorylations by MAP kinases ERK1 or ERK2 (Upstate Biotechnology) were performed with 10 µg GST-SREBP-1a-NT, 10 µg GST-SREBP-2-NT fusion protein or 0.5 µg MBP (myelin basic protein) and activated GST-MAP kinase ERK1 (400 ng/assay) or ERK2 (100 ng assay) fusion proteins in kinase buffer (5 mM MOPS (pH 7.2), 6.25 mM ß-glycerophosphate, 1.25 mM EGTA, 0.25 mM sodium-orthovanadate, 0.25 mM DTT). The reaction was initiated by addition of 50 µM [{gamma}-32P]ATP (10 Ci/mmol) in a final volume of 40 µl kinase buffer. The reaction was terminated after 15 min at 25°C by addition of Laemmli sample buffer. The phosphorylations of GST-SREBP-1a-NT and GST-SREBP-2-NT were analyzed after sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) by autoradiography.


  RESULT S
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULT S
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

SREBPs are cellular sensors of lipid metabolites and might also integrate endocrine signals.

SREBPs are mediators of insulin and PDGF action
As previously reported (19) (20), SREBP-binding sterol regulatory cis element of the LDL receptor (LDLR) gene promoter sre-1 is also the cis element for insulin as well as insulin-like growth factor (IGF-1) and is the main regulatory element mediating the effects of PDGF as well as EGF. To evaluate a possible direct role of SREBPs in the signal transduction of insulin and PDGF on LDL receptor promoter activity, stable HepG2 cell lines were used having reduced intracellular levels of SREBP-1 (19) or SREBP-2 ( Figure 1A). In SREBP-1-deficient cells, SREBP-2 was moderately reduced, while SREBP-2-deficient cells have unaltered SREBP-1 expression (data not shown). Both cell lines showed reduced expression of the endogenous LDLR, determined by RT-PCR (Figure 1B). Promotor reporter gene analyses using the wild-type LDLR promoter construct phLDL4 showed reduced basal LDLR promoter activity in both SREBP-deficient cell lines (Figure 1c). Transient transfections of these cell lines showed that the effects of insulin and PDGF on LDL receptor promoter activity were significantly reduced in SREBP-1- ( Figure 2) as well as in SREBP-2-deficient cells ( Figure 3). Accordingly, the insulin and PDGF action on LDL receptor promoter activity could be reconstituted by overexpression of the transcriptional active (mature) domain of SREBP-1a or SREBP-2 in the corresponding SREBP-deficient cell lines.




View larger version (86K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. A) Depletion of SREBP-2 mRNA in SREBP-2(-) cells. Fifteen µg total RNA from either HepG2/ pCDNA3, SREBP-1(-) or SREBP-2(-) cells was subjected to RNase protection assay. Each assay tube contained {alpha} 32P UTP [>800 Ci/mmol]-labeled cRNA probes for SREBP2 and GAPDH with the specific activity adjusted to give comparable signals to the tested SREBP mRNA. After RNase digestion, protected fragments were separated on 8 M urea/6.4% PAA gels. Gels were dried and subjected to autoradiography at -80°C. A typical result of three independent experiments is shown. Protected fragments are indicated by an arrowhead; (lane 1: 32P-labeled cRNA probe for GAPDH, lane 2: 32P-labeled cRNA probe for SREBP-2, lane 3: tRNA, lane 4: HepG2/pCDNA3, lane 5: SREBP-1(-), lane 6: SREBP-2(-)). B) Different expression of LDLR mRNA in HepG2 cells deficient for SREBP-1 or SREBP-2 in comparison to HepG2 cells. RT-PCR analyses of 100 ng total RNA of HepG2/pCDNA3, SREBP-1(-) or SREBP-2(-) cells were reverse transcribed and subsequently amplified with combined LDLR- and GAPDH-specific primers. PCR products were separated on 3% agarose gels in 1x TAE as running buffer. The specific products of LDLR and GAPDH are indicated (lane 1: 1Kb DNA ladder (GibcoBRL); lane 2: HepG2/pCDNA3; lane 3: SREBP-1(-); lane 4: SREBP-2(-); lane 5: negative control (PCR without cDNA)). A representative result of eight independent experiments is shown. C) Basal LDLR promoter activity in HepG2 cells deficient for SREBP-1 or SREBP-2 in comparison to HepG2 cells. HepG2/ pCDNA3, SREBP-1(-) or SREBP-2(-) cells were transiently transfected with LDLR promoter construct phLDL4 (1 µg/well). After electroporation cells were placed in 6-well plates and incubated in 10% FCS for 24 h. Then, cells were further incubated for 16 h in lipid- and serum-free medium to induce full endogenous SREBP activity. Luciferase activity (indicated as RLU) was measured as described under Materials and Methods. Results are given as means (± SD) of five independent experiments, each performed in triplicate.



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Role of SREBP-1a in hormonal activation of LDLR promoter activity. HepG2/pcDNA3 cells (A) and SREBP-1(-) cells without (B) or with ectopically expressed SREBP-1a-NT (0.05 µg/well) (C) were transiently transfected with LDLR promoter construct phLDL4 (1 µg/well). Before harvesting as described under Materials and Methods, cells were incubated with insulin (1 x 10-7 M) or PDGF (3.3 x 10-9 M) for 4 h. Transfection efficiency was monitored and normalized by cotransfecting cells with pSV ß-galactosidase vector (1 µg/well). Results are given as means (± SD) of five independent experiments, each performed in triplicate. Insulin and PDGF stimulation was reduced in SREBP-1(-) cells (B vs. A) and significantly reconstituted (B vs. C), the lowest level of significance was P < 0.01. Black bars: noninduced cells; hatched bars: cells induced by insulin or PDGF as indicated. Ectopic expression of SREBP-1a in SREBP-1(-) cells increased basal promotor activity 6-fold.



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Role of SREBP-2 in hormonal activation of LDLR promoter activity. HepG2/pcDNA3 cells (A) and SREBP-2(-) cells without (B) or with ectopically expressed SREBP-2-NT (0.05 µg/well) (C) were transiently transfected with LDLR promoter construct phLDL4 (1 µg/well). Before harvesting as described under Materials and Methods, cells were incubated with insulin (1 x 10-7 M) or PDGF (3.3 x 10-9 M) for 4 h. Transfection efficiency was monitored and normalized by cotransfecting cells with pSV ß-galactosidase vector (1 µg/well). Results are given as means (± SD) of five independent experiments, each performed in triplicate. Insulin and PDGF stimulation was reduced in SREBP-2(-) cells (B vs. A) and significantly reconstituted (B vs C), the lowest level of significance was P < 0.01. Black bars: noninduced cells; hatched bars: cells induced by insulin or PDGF as indicated. Ectopic expression of SREBP-2 in SREBP-2(-) cells increased basal promotor activity 3-fold.

SREBPs are linked to the MAP kinase cascade
As SREBPs mediate the effects of insulin and PDGF on LDL receptor promoter activity, the next series of experiments were designed to identify the intracellular signaling pathway coupling SREBPs to the receptor-associated tyrosine kinases of insulin and PDGF at the cell surface. Major intracellular signaling steps of insulin and PDGF are activation of phosphatidylinositol (PI) 3-kinase or mitogen-activated protein kinases. To elucidate whether one of these pathways mediates the effects of insulin and PDGF on LDL receptor promoter activity, HepG2 cells were preincubated with selective inhibitors ( Figure 4). Wortmannin blocked PI 3-kinase activity under these experimental conditions (25 nM, data not shown), but had no effect on insulin and PDGF-stimulated LDL receptor promoter activity. However, incubation of cells with 75 µM of the MAP-kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitor PD 98059 completely abolished the effects of insulin and PDGF. To further support that the MAP kinase cascade might mediate the effects of insulin and PDGF on LDL receptor promoter activity, endogenous upstream activators of the MAP kinase pathway, i.e., MEKK1 or MEK1, were ectopically expressed. Figure 5 shows that overexpression of MEKK1 and MEK1 stimulated LDL receptor promoter activity (phLDL4) several-fold. These effects were greatly reduced by using LDL receptor promoter constructs in which the SREBP-binding cis-element sre-1 was inactivated by point mutation (phLDL7) or deletion (phLDL10). Cotransfection of HepG2 cells with vectors containing the nucleotide sequences coding either for the transcriptional active N-terminal domain of SREBP-1a ( Figure 6) or SREBP-2 ( Figure 7) enhanced the effects of constitutively active MEKK1 or MEK1 almost 10-fold. To evaluate whether SREBPs were directly activated by MAP kinases in intact cells, we used the heterologues Gal4 system. Cotransfection of HepG2 cells with a vector containing either N-terminal domain of SREBP-1a or SREBP-2 coupled to the DNA binding domain of yeast Gal4 revealed that ectopic expression of constitutively active MEKK1 or MEK1 stimulated the transcriptional activities of SREBP-1a and SREBP-2 ( Figure 8). The stimulatory effect of upstream MAP kinase pathway activators on transcriptional activity of SREBPs was about 2-fold by MEK1 and about 7- to 10-fold by MEKK1.



View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Effects of MAP kinase pathway inhibitor PD98059 and the PI-3 kinase inhibitor wortmannin on insulin or PDGF induced LDLR promoter activity. HepG2 cells were transiently transfected with LDLR promoter construct phLDL4 (1 µg/well) and cultured in 0.5% LPDS medium for 16 h. Before harvesting, cells were incubated with insulin (10-7 M) or PDGF (3.3 x 10-9 M) for 4 h either in absence or presence of 75 µM PD 98059 (A) or 25 nM wortmannin (B) added 45 min prior insulin or PDGF treatment. Transfection efficiency was monitored and normalized by cotransfecting cells with pSV ß-galactosidase vector (1 µg/well). All transfection experiments were carried out in triplicate. Results are given as a means (± SD) of four independent experiments, each performed in triplicate.



View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Effects of MEKK1 and MEK1 converge on sre-1 in the promoter of LDLR gene. HepG2 cells were either transiently transfected with LDLR promoter construct phLDL4 (1 µg/well), phLDL7 (1 µg/well), or phLDL10 (1 µg/well) along with expression vectors (0.05 µg/well) without (black bars) or containing (grey bars) (A) dominant active MEKK1 or (B) activated MEK1, respectively. Conditions and promoter constructs are described under Materials and Methods. Transfection efficiency was monitored and normalized by cotransfecting cells with pSV ß-galactosidase vector (1 µg/well). Results are given as a means (± SD) of three independent experiments, each performed in triplicate.



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. MEKK1 and MEK1 enhance transcriptional activation of LDLR gene by SREBP-1a. HepG2 cells were transiently transfected with LDLR promoter construct phLDL4 (1 µg/well) along with expression vectors (0.05 µg/well) without (black bars) or containing (grey bars) (A) SREBP-1a-NT and dominant active MEKK1 or (B) SREBP-1a-NT and activated MEK1, respectively. Conditions and vectors are described under Materials and Methods. Transfection efficiency was monitored and normalized by cotransfecting cells with pSV ß-galactosidase vector (1 µg/well). Results are given as a means (± SD) of five independent experiments, each performed in triplicate.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. MEKK1 and MEK1 enhance transcriptional activation of LDLR gene by SREBP-2. HepG2 cells were transiently transfected with LDLR promoter construct phLDL4 (1 µg/well) along with expression vectors (0.05 µg/well) without (black bars) or containing (grey bars) (A) SREBP-2-NT and dominant active MEKK1 or (B) SREBP-2-NT and activated MEK1, respectively. Conditions are described under Materials and Methods. Transfection efficiency was monitored and normalized by cotransfecting cells with pSV ß-galactosidase vector (1 µg/well). Results are given as a means (± SD) of five independent experiments, each performed in triplicate.



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 8. Kinases of MAP kinase cascade enhance transcriptional activity of SREBPs. HepG2 cells were transiently transfected with reporter plasmid pFR-Luc (1 µg/well) and an expression vector for Gal4 fusion protein (0.05 µg/well) coding for the binding domain of Gal4 alone (dbd) (A), or the latter fused either to SREBP-1a-NT (B) or SREBP-2-NT (C) along with expression vectors (0.05 µg/well) without or containing dominant active MEKK1 or activated MEK1 as indicated. Conditions are described under Materials and Methods. Transfection efficiency was monitored and normalized by cotransfecting cells with pSV ß-galactosidase vector (1 µg/well). Results are given as means (± SD) of five independent experiments, each performed in triplicate.

SREBPs are substrates of MAP kinases in vitro
To study whether SREBPs might be direct substrates of MAP kinases, we produced and purified recombinant GST fusion proteins of SREBP-1a and SREBP-2. Figure 9 shows that incubation of the N-terminal transcriptional active protein domains of SREBP-1a and SREBP-2 with activated recombinant ERK1 or ERK2 led to a significant phosphorylation in vitro. Phosphoamino acid analysis revealed phosphorylation exclusively on serine residues, which was reversible by alkaline phosphatase treatment (data not shown).



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 9. Phosphorylation of SREBP-1a and SREBP-2 by MAP kinases ERK1 and ERK2 in vitro. Bacterial-synthesized glutathione-S-transferase (GST)-SREBP-1a-NT or (GST)-SREBP-2-NT fusion protein was treated with active GST-MAP kinase ERK1 or ERK2 fusion proteins and separated by SDS-PAGE followed by autoradiography. Conditions are described under Materials and Methods. A representative result from five independent experiments is shown. Myelin basic protein (MBP) served as an internal standard to monitor kinase activity.


  DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULT S
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

SREBPs have been initially identified as transcription factors that modulate the expression rate of the LDL receptor gene, and are regulated by the intracellular levels of sterols. Until now, there appear to exist three SREBPs, SREBP-1a, SREBP-1c, and SREBP-2. Here we demonstrate that SREBPs 1) are a convergence point also for signaling induced by insulin and PDGF, 2) are modulated by MAP kinase-related signaling, e.g., increasing their transcriptional activity, and 3) are phosphorylated by MAP kinases in vitro. In this study we have used the LDL receptor promoter, because this promoter contains the classic SREBP-binding 10 base pair cis element sre-1. However, it must be further investigated whether the transcriptional regulatory activity of SREBPs is similar for other genes also containing sre-1 or sre-1-like element.

SREBPs: a convergence point of metabolic and endocrine signaling
The LDL receptor gene is not only regulated by cholesterol but also by drugs, growth factors, and hormones. It has been shown that insulin and PDGF can induce the number of LDL receptors at the cell surface in hepatic and non-hepatic cells and can elevate the LDL receptor mRNA levels (23) (24) (25) (26). Furthermore, the insulin-induced effect on LDL receptor mRNA levels can even be seen in the presence of LDL cholesterol levels (250 µg/ml) that completely suppress LDL receptor gene expression (19). Experiments using various 5'-deleted and in vitro mutated LDL receptor promoter constructs showed that the insulin-sensitive cis element in the LDL receptor promoter is identical to the sterol-sensitive and SREBP-binding cis element sre-1 (19). Similar experiments have been obtained for PDGF, although in PDGF action the sre-1 flanking SP1 sites are also involved in the gene regulation of the LDL receptor (data not shown). Further direct evidence that SREBPs are involved not only in cholesterol-regulated events, but also in mediating the effects of growth factors and hormones like insulin, was obtained using SREBP-1-deficient cell lines in which the effect of insulin is greatly reduced while there is no alteration of the SREBP-1 cleavage rate (19). To investigate this in more detail, SREBP-1- and SREBP-2-deficient cell lines were generated (Figure 1). The observation that SREBP-1-deficient cells also have a moderate reduction of SREBP-2 mRNA levels is expected, as the promoter region of SREBP-2 contains a functional sre-1 element (18). It is interesting to note that the effects of insulin and PDGF were not only decreased in SREBP-1-deficient cells, but also in SREBP-2-deficient HepG2 cells. Accordingly, the effects of insulin and PDGF could be reconstituted by overexpressing or reintroducing SREBP-1a or SREBP-2 into the corresponding cell lines. These data prove that SREBPs mediate the effects of insulin and PDGF on the LDL receptor promoter and that both transcription factors are needed.

SREBPs are modulated by MAP kinase-related signaling
Major signaling pathways of insulin and PDGF or receptor-associated tyrosine kinases are the PI 3-kinase and MAP kinase cascade. Activation of the PI 3-kinase (27) (28) (29) appears to play an essential role in insulin-mediated action on the translocation of glucose transporters and might have some gene regulatory effects by affecting the activity of the S670 kinase. However, many gene regulatory events induced by receptor-associated kinases are mediated by the MAP kinase cascade (30) (31). There are different families of MAP kinases, but the effects of insulin and PDGF are mostly linked to the ERK-family. MAP kinases ERK1 and ERK2 phosphorylate different transcription factors possibly thereby modulating their transcriptional activity, e.g., Elk-1 (32) or PPAR-{gamma}2 (33). One hypothesis in gene regulation by insulin is that this hormone might modulate preexisting transcriptional complexes of cells and thereby exhibit a pleiotropic hormonal effect on gene regulation depending on the pattern of preexisting transcription factors in a given cell. The fact that the inhibition of the MAP kinase cascade, but not of the PI-3 kinase cascade, completely abolishes the effects of insulin and PDGF on LDL receptor promoter activity indicates that this intracellular signaling pathway might be linked to the SREBPs. This evidence was further substantiated by overexpressing upstream activators of the MAP kinase cascade, like MEKK1 or MEK1. An ectopic expression of these kinases stimulated LDL receptor promoter activity several-fold and these effects were greatly reduced by point mutated or deleted LDL receptor promoter constructs abolishing the ability of the promoter to bind SREBPs. The residual promoter activity observed in MEKK1- or MEK1-activated cells transfected with LDL receptor promoter constructs containing a functionally inactivated sre-1 might (20) indicate that other regulatory promoter elements are involved in activation as it also has been observed for PDGF (20). Furthermore, MEK1, which is a relatively selective activator of the ERK-family of MAP kinases, appears to have always a lower stimulatory effect on LDL receptor promoter activity (see Figure 5 Figure 6 Figure 7) than MEKK1, which as an upstream activator can also stimulate other MAP kinase families, like p38 kinase (34). Recently, evidence has been obtained that modulation of the p38 kinase pathway might be involved in LDL receptor gene regulation by cytokines (35). Direct evidence that endogenous activation of the MAP kinase cascade stimulates the transcriptional activity of the N-terminal bHLH-LZ-containing domain of SREBPs was obtained by using the Gal4 system (see Figure 8). This system is of special value to investigate a possible direct regulatory effect on a given transcription factor independent of its DNA-binding domain or cellular background. The experiments indicate that activation of the MAP kinase cascade increases the transcriptional activity of SREBP-1a and SREBP-2 to a similar degree. Enhancement of transcriptional activity of SREBPs might be caused either by a direct modulation of the protein structure and thereby DNA-binding activity or by regulating possible protein;–protein interactions. We believe that this MAP kinase cascade-related mechanism might be one, which is cholesterol-independent and affects the transcriptional activity of SREBPs directly.

SREBPs are substrates of MAP kinases
The most likely regulatory mechanism by which MAP kinase cascade-related signaling affects transcriptional activity of SREBPs is phosphorylation. The first evidence that MAP-kinase cascade might be directly linked to the SREBPs was proven by the ability of ERK1 and ERK2 to phosphorylate SREBP-1a and SREBP-2 in vitro. Using different protein domains of SREBPs, we could show that only the N-terminal (Figure 9) transcriptional active and not the C-terminal domain (data not shown) of SREBPs was phosphorylated. Potential phosphorylation sites for MAP kinases are threonine or serine residues, which are followed by a prolin (36). Considering this sequence motive, there are 17 potential sites in the N-terminal domain of SREBP-1a and 11 sites in SREBP-2. Future studies should identify the phosphorylation sites and analyze their functional relevance by in vitro mutagenesis.

Taken together, we provide evidence that SREBPs are not only regulated by intracellular sterol levels, but also by phosphorylation. Therefore, there might be signals of metabolic and endocrine parameters converging at transcription factors like SREBPs. This might be of importantance not only for the regulation of the LDL receptor promoter, but also for all other genes affected by SREBPs.


  ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was supported by the German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF/ 01 KS 9502) and the German Research Foundation (DFG-Graduiertenkolleg to G.R.).

Manuscript received January 25, 1999; and in revised form August 9, 1999; and in revised form October 5, 1999

Abbreviations: SREBP, sterol regulatory element binding protein; LDL, low density lipoprotein; LDLR, LDL receptor; PDGF, platelet-derived growth factor; CHD, coronary heart disease; EGF, epidermal growth factor; MAP, mitogen-activated protein; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; FCS, fetal calf serum; IGF, insulin-like growth factor; GST, glutathione-S-transferase


  REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULT S
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

  1. Hobbs, H., Brown, M. S., Goldstein, J. L. 1992. Molecular genetics of the LDL receptor gene in familial hypercholesterolemia. Hum. Mutat. 1:445-466[Medline].

  2. Soutar, A. K. 1998. Update on low density lipoprotein receptor mutations. Curr. Opin. Lipidol. 9:141-147[Medline].

  3. Randomized trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart disease. The Scandinavian simvastatin survival study (4S). (1994) Lancet. 344:1383-1389[Medline].

  4. Sachs, F. N., Pfeffer, N. A., Lemuel, A. M., Rouleau, J. L., Rutherford, J. D., Cole, T. G., Brown, L., Vranica, J. W., Arnold, J. M. O., Wun, C., Davis, B. R., Braunwald, E. 1996. The effect of pravastatin on coronary events after myocardial infarction in patients with average cholesterol levels. N. Engl. J. Med. 335:1001-1009[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  5. Prevention of cardiovascular events and death with pravastatin in patients with coronary heart disease and a broad range of initial cholesterol levels. (1998) N. Engl. J. Med. 339:1349-1357[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  6. Shepherd, J., Cobblin, S. M., Ford, I., Isles, C. G., Lorimer, A. R., MacFarlane, P. W., McKillop, J. H., Peckard, C. J. 1995. Prevention of coronary heart disease with pravastatin in men with hypercholesterolemia. West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study Group. N. Engl. J. Med. 333:1301-1307[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  7. Downs, J. R., Clearfield, M., Weis, S., Whitney, E., Shapiro, D. R., Beere, P. A., Langendorfer, A., Stein, E. A., Kruyer, W., Gotto, A. M., Jr. 1998. Primary prevention of acute coronary events with lovastatin in men and women with average cholesterol levels: results of AFCAPS/TexCAPS. Air Force/Texas coronary atherosclerosis prevention study. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 279:1615-1622[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  8. Brown, M. S., Goldstein, J. L. 1997. The SREBP pathway: regulation of cholesterol metabolism by proteolysis of a membrane-bound transcription factor. Cell. 89:331-340[Medline].

  9. Sakai, J., Nohturfft, A., Goldstein, J. L., Brown, M. S. 1998. Cleavage of sterol regulatory element-binding proteins (SREBPs) at site-1 requires interaction with SREBP cleavage-activating protein. Evidence from in vivo competition studies. J. Biol. Chem. 273:5785-5793[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  10. Vallet, M. M., Sanchez, H. B., Rosenfeld, J. M., Osborne, T. F. 1996. A direct role for sterol regulatory element binding protein in activation of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase gene. J. Biol. Chem. 271:12247-12253[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  11. Yokoyama, C., Wang, X., Brigg, M. R., Admon, W., Wu, J., Hua, X., Goldstein, J. L., Brown, M. S. 1993. SREBP-1, a basic-helix-loop-helix-leucine zipper protein that controls transcription of the low density lipoprotein receptor gene. Cell. 75:187-197[Medline].

  12. Spear, D. H., Ericsson, J., Jackson, S. M., Edwards, P. A. 1994. Identification of a 6-base pair element involved in the sterol-mediated transcriptional regulation of farnesyl diphosphate synthase. J. Biol. Chem. 269:25212-25218[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  13. Jackson, S. M., Ericsson, J., Metherall, J. E., Edwards, P. A. 1996. Role for sterol regulatory element binding protein in the regulation of farnesyl diphosphate synthase and in the control of cellular levels of cholesterol and triglyceride: evidence from sterol regulation-defecitive cells. J. Lipid Res. 37:1712-1721[Abstract].

  14. Lopez, J. M., Bennett, N. K., Sanchez, H. B., Rosenfeld, J. M., Osborne, T. F. 1996. Sterol regulation of acetyl coenzyme A carboxylase: a mechanism for coordinate control of cellular lipid. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 93:1049-1053[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  15. Bennett, M. K., Lopez, J. M., Sanchez, H. B., Osborne, T. F. 1995. Sterol regulation of fatty acid synthase promoter. J. Biol. Chem. 270:25578-25583[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  16. Ericsson, J., Jackson, S. M., Kim, J. B., Spiegelman, B. M., Edwards, P. A. 1997. Identification of glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase as an adipocyte determination and differentiation factor 1- and sterol regulatory element-binding protein-responsive gene. J. Biol. Chem. 272:7298-7305[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  17. Tabor, D. E., Kim, J. B., Spiegelman, B. M., Edwards, P. A. 1998. Transcriptional activation of the stearoyl-CoA desaturase 2 gene by sterol regulatory element-binding protein/adipocyte determination and differentiation factor 1. J. Biol. Chem. 273:22052-22058[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  18. Sato, R., Inoue, J., Kawabe, Y., Kodama, T., Takano, T., Maeda, M. 1996. Sterol-dependent transcriptional regulation of sterol regulatory element-binding protein-2. J. Biol. Chem. 272:26461-26464.

  19. Streicher, R., Kotzka, J., Müller-Wieland, D., Siemeister, G., Munck, M., Avci, H., Krone, W. 1996. SREBP-1 mediates activation of the low density lipoprotein receptor promoter by insulin and insulin-like growth factor-I. J. Biol. Chem. 271:7128-7133[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  20. Basheeruddin, K., Li, X., Rechtoris, C., Mazzone, T. 1995. Platelet-derived growth factor enhances Sp1 binding to the LDL receptor gene. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 15:1248-1254[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  21. Hua, X., Wu, J., Goldstein, J. L., Brown, M. S., Hobbs, H. H. 1995. Structure of the human gene encoding sterol regulatory element binding protein-1 (SREBF1) and localization of SREBF1 and SREBF2 to chromosomes 7p11.2 and 22q13. Genomics. 25:667-673[Medline].

  22. Hua, X., Yokoyama, C., Wu, J., Briggs, M. R., Brown, M. S., Goldstein, J. L., Wang, X. 1993. SREBP-2, a second basic-helix-loop-helix-leucine zipper protein that stimulates transcription by binding to a sterol regulatory element. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 90:11603-11607[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  23. Chait, A., Bierman, E. L., Albers, J. J. 1979. Low-density lipoprotein receptor activity in cultured human skin fibroblasts. Mechanism of insulin-induced stimulation. J. Clin. Invest. 64:1309-1319.

  24. Krone, W., Naegele, H., Behnke, B., Greten, H. 1988. Opposite effects of insulin and catecholamines on LDL-receptor activity in human mononuclear leukocytes. Diabetes. 37:1386-1391[Abstract].

  25. Mazzone, T., Foster, D., Chait, A. 1984. In vivo stimulation of low-density lipoprotein degradation by insulin. Diabetes. 33:333-338[Abstract].

  26. Wade, D. P., Knight, B. L., Soutar, A. K. 1988. Hormonal regulation of low density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor activity in human hepatoma Hep G2 cells. Insulin increases LDL receptor activity and deminishes its suppression by exogenous LDL. Eur. J. Biochem. 174:213-218[Medline].

  27. Pap, M., Cooper, G. M. 1998. Role of glycogen synthase kinase-3 in the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt cell survival pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 273:19929-19932[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  28. Franke, T. F., Yang, S. I., Chan, T. O., Datta, K., Kazlauskas, A., Morrison, D. K., Kaplan, D. R., Tsichlis, P. N. 1995. The protein kinase encoded by the Akt proto-oncogene is a target of the PDGF-activated phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase. Cell. 81:727-736[Medline].

  29. Mendez, R., Myers, M. G., Jr., White, W. F., Rhodes, R. E. 1996. Stimulation of protein synthesis, eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E phosphorylation, and PHAS-I phosphorylation by insulin requires insulin receptor substrate 1 and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase. Mol. Cell Biol. 16:2857-2864[Abstract].

  30. Vojtek, A. B., Der, C. J. 1998. Increasing complexity of the Ras signaling pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 273:19925-19928[Free Full Text].

  31. Davis, R. J. 1995. Transcriptional regulation by MAP kinases. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 42:459-467[Medline].

  32. Yang, S. H., Yates, P. R., Whitmarsh, A. J., Davis, R. J., Sharrocks, A. D. 1998. The Elk-1 ETS-domain transription factor contains a mitogen-activated protein kinase targeting motif. Mol. Cell Biol. 18:710-720[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  33. Hu, E., Kim, J. B., Sarraf, P., Spiegelman, B. M. 1996. Inhibition of adipogenesis through MAP kinase-mediated phosphorylation of PPARgamma. Science. 20:2100-2103.

  34. Elion, E. A. 1998. Routing MAP kinase cascades. Science. 281:1625-1626[Free Full Text].

  35. Kumar, A., Middelton, A., Chambers, T. C., Mehta, K. D. 1998. Differential roles of extracellular signal-regulated kinase-1/2 and p38MAPK in interleukin-1ß- and tumor necrosis factor-{alpha}-induced low density lipoprotein receptor expression in HepG2 cells. J. Biol. Chem. 273:15742-15748[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  36. Davies, R. J. 1993. The mitogen-activated protein kinase signal transduction pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 268:14553-14556[Free Full Text].


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
B. Morin, L. A. Nichols, K. M. Zalasky, J. W. Davis, J. A. Manthey, and L. J. Holland
The Citrus Flavonoids Hesperetin and Nobiletin Differentially Regulate Low Density Lipoprotein Receptor Gene Transcription in HepG2 Liver Cells
J. Nutr., July 1, 2008; 138(7): 1274 - 1281.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Arito, T. Horiba, S. Hachimura, J. Inoue, and R. Sato
Growth Factor-induced Phosphorylation of Sterol Regulatory Element-binding Proteins Inhibits Sumoylation, Thereby Stimulating the Expression of Their Target Genes, Low Density Lipoprotein Uptake, and Lipid Synthesis
J. Biol. Chem., May 30, 2008; 283(22): 15224 - 15231.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Gen. Virol.Home page
J.-K. Oem, C. Jackel-Cram, Y.-P. Li, Y. Zhou, J. Zhong, H. Shimano, L. A. Babiuk, and Q. Liu
Activation of sterol regulatory element-binding protein 1c and fatty acid synthase transcription by hepatitis C virus non-structural protein 2
J. Gen. Virol., May 1, 2008; 89(5): 1225 - 1230.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
G. Waris, D. J. Felmlee, F. Negro, and A. Siddiqui
Hepatitis C Virus Induces Proteolytic Cleavage of Sterol Regulatory Element Binding Proteins and Stimulates Their Phosphorylation via Oxidative Stress
J. Virol., August 1, 2007; 81(15): 8122 - 8130.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
V. Llorente-Cortes, T. Royo, M. Otero-Vinas, M. Berrozpe, and L. Badimon
Sterol regulatory element binding proteins downregulate LDL receptor-related protein (LRP1) expression and LRP1-mediated aggregated LDL uptake by human macrophages
Cardiovasc Res, June 1, 2007; 74(3): 526 - 536.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y. Xiong, Q. F. Collins, J. An, E. Lupo Jr., H.-Y. Liu, D. Liu, J. Robidoux, Z. Liu, and W. Cao
p38 Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase Plays an Inhibitory Role in Hepatic Lipogenesis
J. Biol. Chem., February 16, 2007; 282(7): 4975 - 4982.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
H. V. Heemers, G. Verhoeven, and J. V. Swinnen
Androgen Activation of the Sterol Regulatory Element-Binding Protein Pathway: Current Insights
Mol. Endocrinol., October 1, 2006; 20(10): 2265 - 2277.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
D. Gardan, F. Gondret, and I. Louveau
Lipid metabolism and secretory function of porcine intramuscular adipocytes compared with subcutaneous and perirenal adipocytes
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, August 1, 2006; 291(2): E372 - E380.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
K. J. Nadeau, L. B. Ehlers, L. E. Aguirre, R. L. Moore, K. N. Jew, H. K. Ortmeyer, B. C. Hansen, J. E. B. Reusch, and B. Draznin
Exercise training and calorie restriction increase SREBP-1 expression and intramuscular triglyceride in skeletal muscle
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, July 1, 2006; 291(1): E90 - E98.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DiabetesHome page
L. M. Federico, M. Naples, D. Taylor, and K. Adeli
Intestinal Insulin Resistance and Aberrant Production of Apolipoprotein B48 Lipoproteins in an Animal Model of Insulin Resistance and Metabolic Dyslipidemia: Evidence for Activation of Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase-1B, Extracellular Signal-Related Kinase, and Sterol Regulatory Element-Binding Protein-1c in the Fructose-Fed Hamster Intestine.
Diabetes, May 1, 2006; 55(5): 1316 - 1326.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
P. Abidi, Y. Zhou, J.-D. Jiang, and J. Liu
Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase-Dependent Stabilization of Hepatic Low-Density Lipoprotein Receptor mRNA by Herbal Medicine Berberine
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., October 1, 2005; 25(10): 2170 - 2176.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
D. Ma, C. L. Nutt, P. Shanehsaz, X. Peng, D. N. Louis, and D. M. Kaetzel
Autocrine Platelet-Derived Growth Factor-Dependent Gene Expression in Glioblastoma Cells Is Mediated Largely by Activation of the Transcription Factor Sterol Regulatory Element Binding Protein and Is Associated with Altered Genotype and Patient Survival in Human Brain Tumors
Cancer Res., July 1, 2005; 65(13): 5523 - 5534.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DiabetesHome page
E. M. Allister, N. M. Borradaile, J. Y. Edwards, and M. W. Huff
Inhibition of Microsomal Triglyceride Transfer Protein Expression and Apolipoprotein B100 Secretion by the Citrus Flavonoid Naringenin and by Insulin Involves Activation of the Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Pathway in Hepatocytes
Diabetes, June 1, 2005; 54(6): 1676 - 1683.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
P. S. MacLean
A peripheral perspective of weight regain
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, June 1, 2005; 288(6): R1447 - R1449.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page