HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Asztalos, B. F. Articles by Schaefer, E. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Asztalos, B. F. Articles by Schaefer, E. J. Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Journal of Lipid Research, Vol. 43, 1701-1707, October 2002
Copyright © 2002 by Lipid Research, Inc.

Effects of atorvastatin on the HDL subpopulation profile of coronary heart disease patients

Bela F. Asztalos^1,*, Katalin V. Horvath^*, Judith R. McNamara^*, Paul S. Roheim, Joel J. Rubinstein and Ernst J. Schaefer^*

^* Lipid Metabolism Laboratory, Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Center on Aging at Tufts University and Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism, Diabetes, and Molecular Medicine, New England Medical Center, Boston, MA
Physiology Department, Louisiana State University Medical Center, New Orleans, LA
Cardiology Division, Newton-Wellesley Hospital, Newton, MA

DOI 10.1194/jlr.M200037-JLR200

¹ To whom correspondence should be addressed. e-mail: basztalos{at}hnrc.tufts.edu

	ABSTRACT

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
We investigated the effects of atorvastatin on the lipid and the apoA-I-containing HDL subpopulation profiles in 86 patients with established coronary heart disease (CHD). The entire drug treatment period lasted 12 weeks (4-week periods of 20 then 40, then 80 mg/day). Each dose of atorvastatin treatment resulted in significant reductions in plasma total-C, LDL-C, and triglyceride (TG), and non-significant increases in HDL-C levels compared with placebo treatment. ApoA-I levels did not change significantly during any of the treatment periods. Despite the modest increase of HDL-C (6%, 7%, 5%) and no change in apoA-I levels, the distribution of the apoA-I-containing HDL subpopulations changed significantly during each treatment period. There were significant increases in the concentrations of the large LpA-I -1 (24%, 39%, 26%) and pre-1 (51%, 61%, 63%) subpopulations at the expense of the small lipoprotein LpA-I:A-II -3 subpopulations which decreased on all doses, and the decreases were significant on the 40 and 80 mg/day doses (6%, 5%).

Atorvastatin influences the lipid-related risk for CHD in two ways: first, it significantly decreases LDL-C and TG levels while increasing HDL-C, and second, it significantly shifts the HDL subpopulation profile of CHD patients toward that observed in subjects without CHD.

Abbreviations: apo, apolipoprotein; CHD, coronary heart disease; TG, triglyceride

Supplementary key words CHD • lipids • lipoproteins • apolipoproteins • statin

	INTRODUCTION

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
Many prospective epidemiological studies have indicated that a low level of HDL-C is a significant independent risk factor for coronary heart disease (CHD) (1–6). HDL is composed of a heterogeneous group of particles differing in electrophoretic mobility, size, and chemical composition as well as metabolic function. It is generally accepted that the different HDL subpopulations have different physiological function, therefore, their anti-atherogenic potential and their utility as risk markers may vary (7–11). Evidence is accumulating that the large lipoprotein LpA-I HDL particles play a more important role in reverse cholesterol transport and in the development of CHD than the smaller, LpA-I:A-II HDL particles (7–13). A variety of methods, including analytical ultracentrifugation, differential precipitation, immunoaffinity chromatography, and non-denaturing one- and two-dimensional gel electrophoresis, have been developed to separate HDL subclasses. HDL subspecies differ in apolipoprotein and lipid composition, physicochemical parameters, and have different physiological functions (8, 14–16). Based on the work of Castro and Fielding (15), we have developed a quantitative two-dimensional gel electrophoresis immunoblot image-analysis method for separating HDL subpopulations in plasma (17, 18). The majority of apolipoprotein A-I has mobility and has been classified as -1, -2, and -3 with sizes of 11.2 nm, 9.51 nm, and 7.12 nm, respectively (17). Small amounts of apoA-I are present in preß-1 and preß-2 and in the pre mobility (pre-1–3) subpopulations. We have demonstrated that -1, along with pre-ß and pre- mobility particles, contain only apoA-I; subsequently they are LpA-I particles (18). We also published that apoA-II is present only in -2 and -3 HDL subpopulations, consequently these two subpoplations are LpA-I:A-II particles. Recently, with the use of two different labels (¹²⁵I and fluorescent labels), we have been immunoprobing the same membrane for apoA-I and apoA-II. With this precise new method, we verified this observation in several hundred subjects including control and CHD subjects treated or untreated for lipid disorders with various drugs (unpublished data). However, in this study we immunoprobed the membranes for apoA-I only.

There is a strong positive correlation between HDL-C and the -1 HDL subpopulation (18). The HDL subpopulation profiles of CHD subjects are significantly different from those of controls even after normalizing for HDL-C (12). Namely, the concentrations of the large LpA-I -1 and pre-1 HDL subpopulations are higher, while the concentration of the LpA-I:A-II -3 subpopulation is lower in controls compared with CHD patients.

It is generally accepted that the extent of the reduction in CHD events associated with the use of statin drugs can be explained largely by the reduction of LDL-C levels (19–22). The protective role of raising HDL-C might also be important but this mechanism is not completely understood (23–25). There may be value in determining which HDL subpopulation(s) might be responsible for the protection against CHD and to define which HDL subpopulation(s) are affected by statins. It is worth noting that the -1 subpopulation resembles HDL-2, as previously reported (18).

In the present study, we investigated the effects of atorvastatin on the apoA-I-containing HDL subpopulations and on the lipid and lipoprotein profile of CHD patients. We hypothesized that treatment with statins would normalize not only apoB-containing lipids and lipoproteins, but would also have a beneficial effect on the HDL subpopulation profile.

	METHODS

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
Study population
One hundred and fourteen patients with established CHD participated in this study. Inclusion criteria included: age 21 years or older and established heart disease (post coronary artery bypass grafting, post angioplasty, post documented myocardial infarction, significant coronary artery stenosis as assessed by angiography of greater than 50%, or significantly decreased cardiac perfusion based on cardiac imaging with and without exercise). If female, the subject had to be postmenopausal or surgically sterile. All subjects were required to have LDL-C value of >130 mg/dl and TGs <400 mg/dl both at the time of screening and randomization. Patients had to be free of any clinical event for a period of 6 months before enrollment and they had to agree to discontinuation of any lipid-lowering medication for a period of 6 weeks before the beginning of the study. Exclusion criteria included: unstable/uncontrolled clinically significant disease, uncontrolled primary hypothyroidism (thyroid stimulating hormone > 5.5 µIU/ml), nephrotic syndrome, or renal dysfunction (blood urea nitrogen 30 mg/dl, or 10.5 mM/l; creatinine 2.5 mg/dl, or 220 µM/l; or creatinine clearance <30 ml/min), diabetes mellitus requiring insulin therapy, or uncontrolled diabetes (hemoglobin A1c >10%), a body mass index (BMI) >35kg/m², or clinically significant clinical laboratory/ hematology abnormalities. Additional exclusion criteria were the presence of active liver disease or hepatic dysfunction, CPK levels >3 times the upper limit of normal, uncontrolled hypertension, and a current or recent history of drug abuse or consumption of more than 14 alcoholic drinks per week. Patients were maintained on other medications throughout the study with no change, including calcium channel blockers, ß blockers, diuretics, and other antihypertensive therapy. Patients previously received instruction on a National Cholesterol Education Program Step 2 diet containing less than 30% of calories as fat, less than 7% of calories as saturated fat, and less than 200 mg of cholesterol per day. Plasma samples on each treatment (placebo, 20, 40, 80 mg/day atorvastatin) were available from 86 subjects (77 males and 9 females, mean age 61 ± 9 years).

Study design
The study was designed to compare the effects of five different statins on the lipid and the apoA-I-containing HDL subpopulation profiles of CHD patients (26). In this subgroup analysis, we further analyzed the effects of atorvastatin 20, 40, and 80 mg/day on the HDL subpopulation profiles of CHD patients compared with placebo treatment.

It was a single center, randomized, open label and two-period crossover incomplete block design study. The physician responsible for treatments and the patients were not blinded for treatment, however, our laboratory staff carrying out the analyses were blinded, since they received number coded plasma samples and the code was broken only after completion of all measurements. The study design is summarized in Fig. 1 . After enrollment, there was a four-week diet run-in period to further assess a patient's qualifications for study entry. Qualified patients were randomized to receive atorvastatin or one of the other four different statins (simvastatin, pravastatin, lovastatin, fluvastatin). All treatments started at 20 mg/day and increased to 40 mg/day, and then to 80 mg/day. Each active drug treatment period lasted 12 weeks (three 4-week periods of each dose). After the first 12-week active drug treatment period, patients received placebo (washout) for 8 weeks. After this washout period, those patients receiving atorvastatin first were then placed on one of the other four statins, and patients received any of the other statins first were placed on atorvastatin. Finally, all patients received atorvastatin, placebo, and one of the other four statins. All patients were sampled after a 12 h overnight fast at the end of each study period. The study protocol was approved by the Human Investigation Review Committee of New England Medical Center. All participants of the study gave written informed consent.

View larger version (19K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 1. Schematic representation of study design.

HDL subpopulation analysis
Two-dimensional non-denaturing agarose-polyacrylamide gel-electrophoresis and image analysis for determining the apoA-I-containing HDL subpopulations were carried out on plasma previously stored at -80°C, as described (17, 18).

In the first dimension, HDL was separated by charge, on agarose gel, into preß, , and pre mobility particles. Low endosmosity 0.7% agarose (SeaKem LE, FMC Bioproducts, Rockford, ME) was cast into 3 mm thick vertical glass cassettes and electrophoresed in a Pharmacia GE 2/4 recirculating apparatus (Uppsala, Sweden). Four microliters of plasma per sample channel were electrophoresed at constant voltage (250 V) and temperature (10°C) in tris-tricine buffer (25 mM, pH 8.6) until the endogenous albumin, stained with bromophenol blue, ran 3.5 cm from the origin. Agarose was slipped out of cassettes and individual strips were cut out.

In the second dimension, each sample was further separated according to size by non-denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. After electrophoresis was completed in the first dimension, the agarose strips were placed onto concave-gradient (3–35%) polyacrylamide gels and sealed with agarose. Electrophoresis was performed using a buffer containing 90 mM Tris, 80 mM boric acid, and 2.5 mM EDTA (pH 8.3) in a SE 600 Hoefer unit (Amersham Pharamacia, Piscataway, NJ). Gels were run at constant voltage (250 V) and temperature (10°C) for 24 h. Gels were electro-transferred using Hoefer TE 600 units (Amersham Pharmacia, Piscataway, NJ) to nitrocellulose membranes (0.2 µm, BA-S83, Schleicher and Schuell, Keene, NH) at constant voltage (30 V) and temperature (10°C) for 24 h in buffer containing 20 mM tris and 150 mM glycine (pH 8.4). Membranes were dried at room temperature.

Prior to immunoblot for apoA-I, membranes were completely wetted in 10 mM phosphate buffered saline (PBS) followed by 10 min incubation in PBS containing 0.03% glutaraldehyde for fixing proteins on membrane. After rinsing membrane two times to remove glutaraldehyde, the free protein binding capacity was blocked by incubating membranes in PBS containing 0.05% Tween (PBST) and 5% nonfat dry milk for 10 min. ApoA-I was immunolocalized by incubation with PBST containing 5% milk and monospecific goat human apoA-I antibody for 7 h. The unbound primary antibody was then washed off by rinsing membranes in PBST three times for 3 min followed by incubation with ¹²⁵I labeled secondary antibody (in PBST+5% milk) overnight. Signals were quantitatively determined by image analysis using a FluoroImager (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA) (17, 18). Preß1 and preß2 particles did not overlap with any other HDL particles so they were easily delineated. Designation of the mobility HDL subpopulations were based on integration of -migrating HDL. The integration curve showed three peaks. We delineated each peak area for 1-3. Pre mobility particles have the same size as the mobility counterparts. Finally 10 apoA-I-containing HDL subpopulations were encircled and signals were measured in each area and used for calculating the percent distribution of the apoA-I-containing HDL subpopulations. We pooled some particles and calculated with one preß-1 and one preß-2 HDL subpopulations. Data were expressed as pixels linearly correlated with the disintegrations per minute of the ¹²⁵I bound to the antigen-antibody complex (32). ApoA-I concentrations of the subpopulations were calculated by multiplying percentiles by plasma total apoA-I concentrations. We had a CV of <10% for all of the mobility subpopulations and <15% for the rest of the particles.

In this study, we analyzed data of only those patients whose plasma samples were available on both arms (placebo, atorvastatin 20, 40, 80 mg/day) of the study. ANOVA was used to test the hypothesis of no difference between data obtained on placebo and after each of the atorvastatin treatments. For analysis, non-normally distributed data were logarithmically transformed.

	RESULTS

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
Biochemical parameters of patients (n = 86) on placebo, on atorvastatin treatments, as well as the changes between placebo and treatments are presented in Table 1. As reference, we also present the same parameters from an earlier published healthy male population (n = 79), mean age = 53 ± 6 years (12). The means of the measured lipid parameters of patients on placebo represent unfavorable levels according to the recent NCEP guidelines (33). Total cholesterol, LDL-C, and TG were higher, while HDL-C was lower than the recommended values. The HDL subpopulation profiles of these patients were very similar to those of the CHD patients that were characterized earlier (12). Patients' -1 HDL subpopulations were lower by 37% and the -3 subpopulations were higher by 22% than these values in the reference healthy male subjects.

We investigated whether baseline HDL-C levels interfere with the changes in the concentrations of the -1 subpopulation. We found that the two regression lines were parallel indicating that baseline HDL-C levels do not interfere with response of the -1 subpopulation for treatment (Fig. 2) . We also checked whether the changes in the concentrations of the -1 subpopulation are proportional with the changes in HDL-C levels. It was found that as a result of treatment, the concentrations of the -1 subpopulation increased more than the concentrations of HDL-C, and the difference between the two regression lines were significant (P < 0.001). After 40 mg/day atorvastatin treatment, subjects increased the average concentration of -1 HDL by 2.71 mg/dl at any given HDL-C level.

View larger version (33K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 2. Plots and calculated regression lines of -1-HDL subpopulations versus HDL-C. Because every subject was measured both on 40 mg/day atorvastatin and on placebo treatment, the expected difference in -1 levels for a given level of HDL-C was estimated as the intercept in the linear regression of the difference in -1 on atorvastatin and on placebo on the difference in HDL-C on atorvastatin and on placebo. That is, on atorvastatin, the relation between 1 and HDL-C was assumed to be 1a = ß + HDL-Ca, while on placebo it was assumed to be 1p = µ + HDL-Cp. Therefore, 1a - 1p = ß - µ + HDL-Ca - HDL-Cp, and the intercept of this regression line estimates the difference between the intercepts of the individual regression lines.

When the data were sorted by HDL-C levels on placebo and grouped into "low-HDL-C" (HDL-C 40 mg/dl, mean HDL-C 32 mg/dl) and "normal-HDL-C" (HDL-C >40 mg/dl, mean HDL-C 48 mg/dl) groups, we found differences in response to the treatment between the low and normal groups (Table 2). On placebo, the group with low HDL-C level had higher concentrations of total-C, LDL-C, and TG levels, and lower concentrations of apoA-I. Similar to the difference in HDL-C levels, the mean concentration of the -1 subpopulation was 44% lower in the low-HDL-C group. -2 was also lower (24%) in the low-HDL-C group with no notable difference in the concentrations of -3 compared with the normal-HDL-C group. Concentrations of TC, LDL-C, and TG decreased more while concentrations of HDL-C and the -1 HDL particles increased more in this group.

	DISCUSSION

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

Assessing HDL subpopulation profiles by two-dimensional non-denaturing gel-electrophoresis and image-analysis might improve our ability to predict risk for CHD beyond what can be estimated by traditional risk factors. It has to be noted that this technique measures the apoA-I concentrations of the HDL subpopulations.

The objective of the present study was to examine the effects of atorvastatin treatment (20, 40, and 80 mg/day for 4 weeks each dose) on the lipid, lipoprotein, and HDL subpopulation profiles of CHD patients. We investigated any carryover effects by comparing lipid data obtained at 4 weeks and 8 weeks of the placebo (wash-out) period to data obtained after the 4-weeks diet run-in period. Results obtained after 4 and 8 weeks on placebo were not significantly different from those obtained after the diet run-in period, indicating no carryover effects among the different drugs used in the whole study (data not shown).

Despite only a small increase in the mean level of HDL-C (6%, 7%, 5%) and no change in the mean apoA-I concentration, the HDL-subpopulation profile changed significantly on each dose of atorvastatin. There were significant increases in the large LpA-I -1 (24%, 39%, 26%) and pre-1 (51%, 61%, 63%) subpopulations, while the small LpA-I:A-II -3 particles were slightly but significantly decreased by 6%, 5% on the two higher doses of the drug. Previously, we demonstrated that in normolipidemic, healthy male subjects the concentrations of the -1 HDL subpopulations and HDL-C were highly correlated (r = 0.846 P < 0.001) (18). We also found that in CHD subjects the HDL-C/-1 ratio was 36% higher compared with matched controls due to 35% lower -1 and only 14% lower HDL-C in the CHD group compared with controls. These results indicated that in CHD patients the concentrations of the large LpA-I -1 subpopulation are disproportionately lower than in controls. The present data confirm earlier observations and clearly show that in this group of CHD patients, atorvastatin treatment in all administered doses not only normalized lipids but also significantly changed the HDL subpopulation profiles in the direction of that seen in normal individuals.

There is controversy in the literature about which HDL subpopulation(s) are anti-atherogenic and hence the best targets for pharmacological intervention in individuals with a high risk for CHD. In this study, we demonstrated that as a response to atorvastatin treatment, the concentration of the large LpA-I -1 HDL subpopulation increased at the expense of the small LpA-I:A-II -3 subpopulation. The concentration of the also LpA-I:A-II -2 particle was practically unaffected by the treatments.

We tested the influence of baseline lipid levels (lipid levels obtained on placebo treatment) on the response to treatment. Subjects were grouped according to HDL-C levels into low (HDL-C 40 mg/dl) and normal (HDL-C > 40 mg/dl) groups, or stratified and divided (at the median) into lower-LDL-C (mean 139 mg/dl) and higher-LDL-C (mean 229 mg/dl) groups (data not shown), and similarly by plasma TG levels into lower-TG (mean 120 mg/dl) and higher-TG (mean 254 mg/dl) groups. Subjects in the lower HDL-C, higher TG, and higher LDL-C groups had the most unfavorable HDL subpopulation profiles (lowest -1 and highest -3) on placebo. Moreover, subjects with the most unfavorable baseline lipid profiles benefited most from the treatment by decreasing total-C, LDL-C, and TG levels while increasing the concentrations of -1 HDL subpopulation more than subjects with better lipid values.

As the major effect of statins is reducing LDL-C, we investigated how changes in LDL-C influence changes in HDL. The high responder group, with an average 58% decrease in LDL-C, increased HDL-C by 4% and -1 by 33%, while the low responder group, with an average 31% decrease in LDL-C, increased HDL-C by 11% and -1 by 47%.

Data were also sorted by TG and separated at the median into low-responders with a mean decrease of 4% and high-responders with a mean decrease of 49%. HDL-C increased 4% and 11% in low and high responders, respectively. Interestingly, there were no differences in the responses of -1 HDL subpopulations between the two groups. The concentrations of -1 increased 40% in both groups on the treatment.

These data show that both lipid levels on placebo and lipid responses for treatment, except for the TG response, influenced the response of the large LpA-I HDL subpopulations (-1 and pre-1) to treatment. Our interpretation of these results is that decreased cholesterol synthesis but not lipolysis was responsible for the changes in the HDL subpopulation profile of these patients. Decreased CETP activity after treatment with atorvastatin, probably due to decreased concentrations of TG-rich particles, has been reported (37). As a result of decreased CETP activity, both the concentration and the size of HDL increase (unpublished data).

In conclusion, atorvastatin treatment, at all administered doses, restored a normal LDL-C level, significantly decreased the concentration of plasma TG, and tended to increase HDL-C concentration. Atorvastatin also changed the HDL-subpopulation profile significantly in a beneficial way. The responses of HDL-C and HDL subpopulation profile were not strongly dose-dependent. The magnitude of the response of HDL-C and the HDL subpopulation profile was dependent rather on baseline lipid profiles. Those with the worst baseline lipid profiles benefited the most from atorvastatin treatment, and that was generally true for all of the measured parameters.

	ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

 
This study was supported by Parke Davis/Pfizer (contract# 719-8469) New York, NY 10017; and by the National Institutes of Health/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL-64738). The authors wish to thank Dr. Julian Marsh for his critical review of the manuscript and Gerard Dallal for helping in statistical calculations.

Manuscript received January 22, 2002 and in revised form April 17, 2002. and in re-revised form June 27, 2002.

	REFERENCES

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

1. Gordon, T., W. P. Castelli, M. C. Hjortiand, W. E. Kannel, and T. R. Dawber. 1977. High density lipoprotein as a protective factor against coronary heart disease. The Framingham Study. Am. J. Med. 62: 707–714.[CrossRef][Medline]

2. Jacobs, D. R. (for Lipid Research Clinics Follow-up Study). 1985. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol and coronary heart disease cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality (abstr.) Circulation. 72 (suppl. III): 111–185.

3. Miller N. E, O. H. Forde, D. S. Thelle, and O. D. Mjos. 1977. The Tromso Heart Study. High-density lipoprotein and coronary heart disease: a prospective case-control study. Lancet. 1: 965–968.[Medline]

4. Enger, S. C., I. Hjermann, O. P. Foss, A. Helgeland, J. Holme, P. Leren, and K. R. Norum. 1979. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol and myocardial infarction or sudden coronary death: a prospective case-control study in middle-aged men of the Oslo study. Artery. 5: 170–181.[Medline]

5. Wilson, P. W. F., R. B. D'Agostino, D. Levy, A. M. Belanger, H. Shilershatz, and W. B. Kannel. 1998. Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories. Circulation. 97: 1837–1847.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Goldburt, U., S. Yaari, and J. H. Medalie. 1997. Isolated low HDL cholesterol as a risk factor for coronary heart disease mortality: a 21-year follow-up of 8000 men. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 17: 107–113.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Cheung, M. C., B. G. Brown, A. C. Wolf, and J. J. Albers. 1991. Altered particle size distribution of apolipoprotein A-I containing lipoproteins in subjects with coronary heart disease. J. Lipid Res. 32: 383–394.[Abstract]

8. von Eckardstein, A., Y. Huang, and G. Assmann. 1994. Physiological role and clinical relevance of high density lipoprotein subclasses. Curr. Opin. Lipidol. 5: 404–416.[Medline]

9. Puchois, P., A. Kandoussi, P. Fievet, J. L. Fourrier, M. Bertrand, E. Koren, and J. C. Fruchart. 1987. Apoliprotein A-I containing lipoproteins in coronary artery disease. Atherosclerosis. 68: 35–40.[CrossRef][Medline]

10. Campos, H., G. O. Roederer, S. Lussier-Cacan, J. Davignon, and R. M. Krauss. 1995. Predominance of large LDL and reduced HDL-2 cholesterol in normolipidemic men with coronary artery disease. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 15: 1043–1048.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Sweetnam, P. M., C. H. Bolton, I. W. Yarnel, D. Bainton, I. A. Baker, P. C. Elwood, and N. E. Miller. 1994. Associations of HDL2 and HDL3 cholesterol subfractions with the development of ischemic heart disease in British men. Circulation. 90: 769–774.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Asztalos, B. F., P. S. Roheim, R. L. Milani, M. Lefevre, J. R. McNamara, K. V. Horvath, and E. J. Schaefer. 2000. Distribution of ApoA-I-containing HDL subpopulations in patients with Coronary Heart Disease. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 20: 2670–2676.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Fruchart, J. C., and G. Ailhaud. 1992. Apolipoprotein A-containing lipoprotein particles: Physiological role, Quantification, and clinical significance. Clin. Chem. 38: 793–797.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Mowri, H. O., W. Patsch, L. C. Smith, A. M. Gotto, and J. R. Patsch. 1992. Different reactivities of high-density lipoprotein2 subfractions with hepatic lipase. J. Lipid Res. 33: 1269–1279.[Abstract]

15. Castro, G. R., and C. J. Fielding. 1988. Early incorporation of cell-derived cholesterol into pre-ß-migrating high-density lipoprotein. Biochemistry. 27: 25–29.[CrossRef][Medline]

16. Miida, T., M. Kawano, C. J. Fielding, and P. E. Fielding. 1992. Regulation of the concentration of preß high-density lipoprotein in normal plasma by cell membranes and lecithin-cholesterol acyltransferase activity. Biochemistry. 31: 11112–11117.[CrossRef][Medline]

17. Asztalos, B. F., C. H. Sloop, L. Wong, and P. S. Roheim. 1993. Two-dimensional electrophoresis of plasma lipoproteins: recognition of new apo A-I-containing subpopulations. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1169: 291–300.[Medline]

18. Asztalos, B. F., M. Lefevre, T. A. Foster, R. Tulley, M. Widhauser, L. Wong, and P. S. Roheim. 1997. Normolipidemic subjects with low HDL cholesterol levels have altered HDL subpopulations. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 17: 1885–1893.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19. Thompson, G. R. 1997. What targets should lipid-modulating therapy achieve to optimize the prevention of coronary heart disease? Atherosclerosis. 131: 1–5.[CrossRef][Medline]

20. Gould, A. L., J. E. Rossouw, N. C. Santanello, J. F. Heyse, and C. D. Furberg. 1998. Cholesterol reduction yields clinical benefit: impact of statin trials. Circulation. 97: 946–952.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Pedersen, T. R. 2001. Pro and Con: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol lowering is and will be the key to the future of lipid management. Am. J. Cardiol. 87(suppl): 8B–12B.[Medline]

22. Olsson, A. G. 2001. Statin therapy and reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol: initial clinical data on the potent new statin rosuvastatin. Am. J. Cardiol. 87(suppl): 33B–36B.[Medline]

23. Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. 1993. Summary of the second report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult Treatment Panel II). J. Am. Med. Assoc. 269: 3015 3023.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

24. Prevention of coronary heart disease in clinical practice: recommendations of the Second Joint Task Force of European and Other Societies on Coronary Prevention. 1998. Eur. Heart J. 9: 1434–1503.

25. Person, T. A., W. E. Boden. 2000. The imperative to raise low levels of high density lipoprotein cholesterol - a better clinical strategy in the prevention and treatment of coronary artery disease. Am. J. Cardiol. 86: 1L–4L.[Medline]

26. Asztalos, B. F., K. V. Horvath, J. R. McNamara, P. S. Roheim, J. J. Rubinstein, E. J. Schaefer. 2002. Comparing the effects of five different statins on the HDL subpopulation profiles of coronary heart disease patients. Atherosclerosis. 164: 361–369.[CrossRef][Medline]

27. McNamara, J. R., and E. J. Schaefer. 1987. Automated enzymatic standardized lipid analyses for plasma and lipoprotein fractions. Clin. Chim. Acta. 166: 1–8.[CrossRef][Medline]

28. Warnick G. R., J. Benderson, and J. J. Albers. 1982. Dextran sulfate-Mg procedure for quantitation of high density lipoprotein cholesterol. Clin. Chem. 28: 1379–1388.[Free Full Text]

29. Nguyen, T., and G. R. Warnick. 1989. Improved methods for separation of total HDL and subclasses. Clin. Chem. 35: 1086–1090.

30. McNamara, J. R., T. G. Cole, J. H. Contois, C. A. Ferguson, J. M. Ordovas, and E. J. Schaefer. 1995. Immunoseparation method for measuring low-density lipoprotein cholesterol directly from serum evaluated. Clin. Chem. 41: 232–240.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

31. Contois, J. H., J. R. McNamara, C. J. Lammi-Keefe, P. W. F. Wilson, T. Massov, and E. J. Schaefer. 1996. Reference intervals for plasma apolipoprotein A-I determined with a standardized commercial immunoturbidometric assay: results from the Framingham Offspring Study. Clin. Chem. 42: 515–523.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

32. Johnson, R. F., S. C. Picket, and B. L. Barker. 1990. Autoradiography using storage phosphor technology. Electrophoresis. 11: 355–360.[CrossRef][Medline]

33. Executive summary of the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. 2001. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 285: 2486–2497.[Free Full Text]

34. The Expert Panel. 1988. Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Cholesterol in Adults. Arch. Intern. Med. 148: 36–69.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

35. Gordon, D. J., J. L. Probstfield, R. J. Garrison, J. D. Neaton, W. P. Castelli, J. D. Knoke, D. R. Jacobs, Jr., S. Bangdiwala, H. A. Tyroler. 1989. High density lipoprotein cholesterol and cardiovascular disease. Four prospective American studies. Circulation. 79: 8–15.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

36. Asztalos, B. F., M. E. Brousseau, J. R. McNamara, K. V. Horvath, P. S. Roheim, and E. J. Schaefer. 2001. Subpopulations of high density lipoproteins in homozygous and heterozygous Tangier disease. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 156: 217–225.

37. Guerin, M., T. S. Lassel, W. Le Goff, M. Farnier, and M. J. Chapman. 2000. Action of Atorvastatin in Combined Hyperlipidemia: Preferencial Reduction of Cholesterol Ester Transfer from HDL to VLDL1 Particles. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 20: 189–197.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

CiteULike

Complore

Connotea

Del.icio.us

Digg

Reddit

Technorati

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. S. Kostapanos, H. J. Milionis, T. D. Filippatos, L. G. Christogiannis, E. T. Bairaktari, A. D. Tselepis, and M. S. Elisaf Dose-dependent Effect of Rosuvastatin Treatment on HDL-subfraction Phenotype in Patients With Primary Hyperlipidemia Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, March 1, 2009; 14(1): 5 - 13. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. L. Vega and G. Schonfeld In Memoriam: Paul S. Roheim (1925-2008) J. Lipid Res., March 1, 2009; 50(3): 361 - 363. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Lamon-Fava, M. R. Diffenderfer, P. H. R. Barrett, A. Buchsbaum, N. R. Matthan, A. H. Lichtenstein, G. G. Dolnikowski, K. Horvath, B. F. Asztalos, V. Zago, et al. Effects of different doses of atorvastatin on human apolipoprotein B-100, B-48, and A-I metabolism J. Lipid Res., August 1, 2007; 48(8): 1746 - 1753. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Bach-Ngohou, K. Ouguerram, R. Frenais, P. Maugere, B. Ripolles-Piquer, Y. Zair, M. Krempf, and J. M. Bard Influence of Atorvastatin on Apolipoprotein E and AI Kinetics in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., October 1, 2005; 315(1): 363 - 369. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. F. Asztalos, M. de la Llera-Moya, G. E. Dallal, K. V. Horvath, E. J. Schaefer, and G. H. Rothblat Differential effects of HDL subpopulations on cellular ABCA1- and SR-BI-mediated cholesterol efflux J. Lipid Res., October 1, 2005; 46(10): 2246 - 2253. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Nambi and C. M. Ballantyne Fat, Fit, and Leading the Charge: The Evolution of Measuring High-Density Lipoprotein Subpopulations Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., October 1, 2005; 25(10): 2013 - 2015. [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. F. Asztalos, D. Collins, L. A. Cupples, S. Demissie, K. V. Horvath, H. E. Bloomfield, S. J. Robins, and E. J. Schaefer Value of High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Subpopulations in Predicting Recurrent Cardiovascular Events in the Veterans Affairs HDL Intervention Trial Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., October 1, 2005; 25(10): 2185 - 2191. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. G. Olsson, G. G. Schwartz, M. Szarek, W. J. Sasiela, M. D. Ezekowitz, P. Ganz, M. F. Oliver, D. Waters, and A. Zeiher High-density lipoprotein, but not low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels influence short-term prognosis after acute coronary syndrome: results from the MIRACL trial Eur. Heart J., May 1, 2005; 26(9): 890 - 896. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. F. Asztalos, L. A. Cupples, S. Demissie, K. V. Horvath, C. E. Cox, M. C. Batista, and E. J. Schaefer High-Density Lipoprotein Subpopulation Profile and Coronary Heart Disease Prevalence in Male Participants of the Framingham Offspring Study Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., November 1, 2004; 24(11): 2181 - 2187. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. F. Asztalos, K. V. Horvath, K. Kajinami, C. Nartsupha, C. E. Cox, M. Batista, E. J. Schaefer, A. Inazu, and H. Mabuchi Apolipoprotein composition of HDL in cholesteryl ester transfer protein deficiency J. Lipid Res., March 1, 2004; 45(3): 448 - 455. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Barzilai, G. Atzmon, C. Schechter, E. J. Schaefer, A. L. Cupples, R. Lipton, S. Cheng, and A. R. Shuldiner Unique Lipoprotein Phenotype and Genotype Associated With Exceptional Longevity JAMA, October 15, 2003; 290(15): 2030 - 2040. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. F. Asztalos, M. Batista, K. V. Horvath, C. E. Cox, G. E. Dallal, J. S. Morse, G. B. Brown, and E. J. Schaefer Change in {alpha}1 HDL Concentration Predicts Progression in Coronary Artery Stenosis Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., May 1, 2003; 23(5): 847 - 852. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Sviridov, B. Kingwell, A. Hoang, A. Dart, and P. Nestel Single session exercise stimulates formation of pre{beta}1-HDL in leg muscle J. Lipid Res., March 1, 2003; 44(3): 522 - 526. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Asztalos, B. F. Articles by Schaefer, E. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Asztalos, B. F. Articles by Schaefer, E. J. Social Bookmarking                      What's this?