J. Lipid Res. Please sign the JLR Guestbook
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tsimihodimos, V.
Right arrow Articles by Elisaf, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tsimihodimos, V.
Right arrow Articles by Elisaf, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Lipid Research, Vol. 43, 256-263, February 2002
Copyright © 2002 by Lipid Research, Inc.

Altered distribution of platelet-activating factor- acetylhydrolase activity between LDL and HDL as a function of the severity of hypercholesterolemia

Vasilis Tsimihodimosa, Sonia-Athena P. Karabinad, Afroditi P. Tambakid, Eleni Bairaktaric, George Miltiadousa, John A. Goudevenosb, Marios A. Carioloue, M. John Chapmanf, Alexandros D. Tselepisd, and Moses Elisafa
a Departments of Internal Medicine, Department of Chemistry, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece
b Cardiology, Department of Chemistry, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece
c Laboratory of Biological Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece
d Medical School, and Laboratory of Biochemistry, Department of Chemistry, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece
e Molecular Genetics Unit B-DNA Identification Laboratory, The Cyprus Institute of Neurology and Genetics, Nicosia, Cyprus
f Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherché, Unité 551, Hôpital de la Pitié, 83 Bd de l'Hôpital, 75651 Paris Cedex 13, France

Correspondence to: Alexandros D. Tselepis, To whom correspondence should be addressed., atselep{at}cc.uoi.gr (E-mail)


  ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Platelet-activating factor-acetylhydrolase (PAF-AH) is a lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 capable of hydrolyzing platelet-activating factor (PAF) and oxidatively modified phospholipids. We studied the plasma- and lipoprotein-associated PAF-AH activity in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia. Thirty-eight unrelated patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeteroFH), five patients with homozygous FH (HomoFH), and 33 patients with primary non-FH hypercholesterolemia (NonFH) participated in the study. In all patient groups the plasma PAF-AH activity was significantly elevated compared with 33 normolipidemic controls, the HomoFH having the highest and the NonFH patients showing the lowest enzyme activity. Gradient ultracentrifugation studies showed that this increase is not only due to the elevation in the plasma LDL but also to the increase in the PAF-AH activity associated with each LDL subfraction, being more profound in the small-dense LDL-5. Unlike LDL, no difference in the HDL-associated PAF-AH activity was observed among all groups. Consequently, an altered distribution of enzyme activity among apolipoprotein B (apoB)- and apolipoprotein A-I (apoA-I)-containing lipoproteins is observed in hypercholesterolemic patients, resulting in a significant decrease in the ratio of the HDL-associated PAF-AH to the total plasma enzyme activity compared with controls. This reduction is proportional to the increase of the plasma LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and consequently to the severity of the hypercholesterolemia.

Thus, the ratio of HDL-associated PAF-AH-total plasma enzyme activity may be useful as a potential marker of atherogenicity in subjects with primary hypercholesterolemia. — Tsimihodimos, V., S-A. P. Karabina, A. P. Tambaki, E. Bairaktari, G. Miltiadous, J. A. Goudevenos, M. A. Cariolou, M. J. Chapman, A. D. Tselepis, and M. Elisaf. Altered distribution of platelet-activating factor-acetylhydrolase activity between LDL and HDL as a function of the severity of hypercholesterolemia. J. Lipid Res. 2002. 43: 256–263.

Supplementary key words: familial hypercholesterolemia, low density lipoprotein, lipoprotein subspecies, high density lipoprotein, PAF-acetylhydrolase, polygenic hypercholesterolemia


  INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Platelet-activating factor (PAF) is a potent lipid mediator involved in inflammatory diseases (1) that may equally be implicated in atherogenesis (2). In plasma, PAF is rapidly hydrolyzed and converted to lyso-PAF by PAF-acetylhydrolase (PAF-AH) (EC 3.1.1.47), a Ca2+-independent phospholipase A2 (3). PAF-AH has a marked preference for phospholipids with short chain moieties at the sn-2 position and, with the exception of PAF, it can equally hydrolyze oxidized phospholipids containing an sn-2 polyunsaturated fatty acyl residue (4). Such phospholipids are formed during oxidative modification of LDL and potentially contribute to the biological activities of oxidized LDL (5) (6). PAF-AH could therefore act as a potent anti-inflammatory and anti-atherogenic enzyme. However, during the hydrolysis of oxidized phospholipids, PAF-AH liberates bioactive oxidized FFAs (7) and generates lysophosphatidylcholine, both of which are implicated in the biological actions of oxidized LDL (8). Thus, PAF-AH could equally play a pro-inflammatory and pro-atherogenic role. Consequently, the role of PAF-AH in inflammation and in atherogenesis is currently the subject of controversy.

PAF-AH in plasma circulates in active form complexed to lipoproteins, particularly with LDL and HDL (9). Thus, PAF-AH is also denoted as lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (8). In normolipidemic plasma (10) as well as in plasma from patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeteroFH) (11), the distribution of PAF-AH among LDL particle subspecies is heterogeneous, and the majority of enzyme activity is associated with small-dense LDL particles. The relationship of plasma PAF-AH activity to circulating levels of LDL in familial hypercholesterolemia is a subject of debate. We previously reported that the LDL subfractions of heteroFH patients carry significantly higher PAF-AH activity as compared with normolipidemic subjects, thereby resulting in a higher plasma enzyme activity (11). In contrast, other investigators showed that in homozygous FH (HomoFH) LDL-associated PAF-AH activity is about 3-fold lower than in normolipidemic control subjects, whereas the enzyme activity in plasma is in the normal range (12). The factors responsible for the differences in the LDL-associated and in plasma PAF-AH activity among HeteroFH and HomoFH patients remain indeterminate (13) (14). Furthermore, the relative distribution of the enzyme between atherogenic LDL and anti-atherogenic HDL may be of special relevance to the cardiovascular risk associated with this phospholipase.

We undertook the present study to compare, under the same experimental conditions, i) the plasma- and lipoprotein-associated PAF-AH activity in HomoFH patients with that in a HeteroFH population as well as in patients presenting with primary non-FH hypercholesterolaemia (NonFH), and ii) the relative distribution of PAF-AH associated with atherogenic LDL versus anti-atherogenic HDL particles as a function of the severity of hypercholesterolemia.


  MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Study population
Five unrelated HomoFH patients, 38 unrelated HeteroFH patients, and 33 NonFH patients attending the Lipid Clinic at the University Hospital of Ioannina participated in the study. The diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolemia was made according to recently proposed criteria (15) and was confirmed by appropriate genetic analysis. Patients with NonFH were selected from those followed up in our Lipid Clinic. These patients did not exhibit tendon xanthomata or a strong family history of dyslipidemia. No tendon xanthomata were observed in their first degree relatives either. Furthermore, appropriate genetic analysis, which included sequencing of all exons of the LDL receptor, excluded the existence of familial hypercholesterolemia in this patient group. No patient had any evidence of cardiovascular disease by history, clinical examination, or electrocardiogram. Thirty-three healthy volunteers with no history of hypercholesterolemia or coronary artery disease were used as controls. None of the participants were taking lipid-lowering drugs or any other medication known to affect lipid metabolism, including hormonal therapy, during the last 12 weeks. Individuals with hypertension (blood pressure >140/90 mmHg on repeated measurements), diabetes mellitus (fasting blood glucose >126 mg/dl), obesity (body mass index >30 kg/m2) or thyroid, hepatic, or renal disease as well as subjects known to ingest more than two alcoholic drinks daily or taking vitamin supplements were excluded from the study. All patients were advised on a standard low-cholesterol (<300 mg per day), low fat (less than 30% of total calories) diet and were asked to adhere to this diet for at least 6 weeks before sample collection. Blood samples were obtained after a 14 h overnight fast. All study participants gave informed consent for the investigation, which was approved by the Ethical Committee of the University Hospital of Ioannina.

DNA analysis
Whole blood was collected from all the subjects investigated and DNA was extracted from white blood cells. PCR was carried out using 50 ng DNA isolated from each individual. DNA analysis for the LDL receptor gene was performed as described previously (16).

Preparation of lipoprotein subfractions
Lipoproteins were fractionated by isopycnic density gradient ultracentrifugation using a Beckman SW 41 Ti rotor at 40,000 rpm for 44 h in a Beckman L7-65 ultracentrifuge at 15°C, as described by Chapman et al. (17). After ultracentrifugation, 24 fractions, 0.4 ml each, were collected and analyzed for their protein content. Subsequently, equal volumes of certain gradient fractions were pooled to constitute the lipoprotein subfractions, as follows: fractions 1 and 2 (VLDL+IDL; d < 1.019 g/ml); 3 and 4 (LDL-1; d = 1.019–1.023 g/ml); 5 and 6 (LDL-2; d = 1.023–1.029 g/ml); 7 and 8 (LDL-3; d = 1.029–1.039 g/ml); 9 and 10 (LDL-4; d = 1.039–1.050 g/ml); 11 and 12 (LDL-5; d = 1.050–1.063 g/ml); 13 to 16 (HDL-2; d = 1.063–1.100 g/ml); 17 to 22 (HDL-3; d = 1.100–1.167g/ml); 23 and 24 (VHDL; d = 1.167–1.190 g/ml). All subfractions were extensively dialyzed, in a 10 mM PBS buffer containing 2 mM EDTA, pH 7.4 at 4°C, filter-sterilized, and maintained at 4°C under nitrogen until analysis. Under these storage conditions, no oxidation has been reported to occur (18).

PAF-AH assay
PAF-AH activity was measured by the trichloroacetic acid precipitation procedure (10) using as a substrate 1-O-hexadecyl-2-[3H-acetyl]-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine ([3H]-PAF) (10 Ci/mmol; DuPont-New England Nuclear, Boston, MA) at a final concentration of 100 µM (10). Four µg of protein from each lipoprotein subfraction or 50 µl of either plasma diluted 1:50, v/v with HEPES buffer, pH 7.4, or the HDL-containing supernatant after treatment of plasma with magnesium chloride-dextran sulfate (diluted 1:3, v/v with HEPES) were mixed with HEPES in a final volume of 90 µl and used as the source of the enzyme. The reaction was performed for 10 min at 37°C and PAF-AH activity was expressed as nmol PAF degraded per min per mg of protein or ml of plasma.

Analytical methods
Serum total cholesterol and TG were determined on the Olympus AU560 Clinical Chemistry analyzer (Hamburg, Germany). Serum HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C) levels were measured with the above method in the supernatant, after treatment of serum with dextran sulfate-magnesium chloride for the precipitation of apolipoprotein B (apoB)-containing lipoproteins. Serum LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) levels were calculated using the Friedewald formula. Serum apoB, apolipoprotein A-I (apoA-I),and apolipoprotein E (apoE) were measured by immunonephelometry with the aid of a Behring Nephelometer BN100 and reagents (antibodies and calibrators) from Behring Diagnostics GmbH (Liederbach, Germany). Serum Lipoprotein [a] (Lp[a]) levels were measured by an enzyme immunoassay method (Macra Lp[a], Terumo Medical Corporation Diagnostic Division, Elkton, MD). The total cholesterol, TG, and phospholipid content in each lipoprotein subfraction were measured by enzymatic methods using the Bio-Merieux kits, whereas free cholesterol was measured by the Boehringer Mannheim kit. The protein content of the lipoprotein subfractions was measured by the bicinchoninic acid (BCA) method (Pierce). The lipoprotein mass of each subfraction was calculated as the sum of the mass of the individual lipid and protein components. Total LDL or HDL mass was calculated as the sum of the mass of corresponding subfractions (10).

Statistical analysis
Data were expressed as mean ± SD, except for Lp[a], which was expressed as the median and range. Statistical analyses were performed using ANOVA followed by least significant difference (LSD) test for comparisons between individual groups. Because of the skewed distribution of Lp[a], the nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test and the Kruskal-Wallis test were applied to discriminate for differences of this parameter between groups. Correlations between PAF-AH activity and lipid parameters were estimated using linear regression analysis and Spearman's rank correlation coefficients (for Lp[a]), while Yates's corrected chi-square test was used for differences in proportions. A P value of < 0.05 was considered to be significant.


  RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Characteristics of the subjects investigated
Genetic analysis in FH patients participating in the study revealed that all homozygous patients had the exon 12 G(1775)A mutation. Among the HeteroFH patients, 11 had the exon 11 G(1646)A mutation, eight had the exon 12 G(1775)A mutation, seven had the exon 6 C(858)A mutation, six had the exon 9 G(1285)A mutation, five had the exon 2 T(81)G mutation, and one had the exon 4 T(517)C mutation. The characteristics of all hypercholesterolemic patients and normolipidemic volunteers who participated in the study are shown in Table 1. All patient groups exhibited higher levels of serum total cholesterol, LDL-C, apoB, and apoE levels compared with the control subjects. Additionally, all the above parameters were significantly elevated in the HomoFH patients compared with the other patient groups, whereas higher levels were observed in HeteroFH patients, as compared with NonFH subjects. Serum HDL-C and apoA-I levels were significantly lower in the HomoFH patients compared with the other groups. All patient groups displayed higher Lp[a] levels compared to controls, with HomoFH having a significantly higher level than the other two patient groups.


 
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Biochemical and clinical parameters in homozygous and heterozygous FH patients, in polygenic NonFH hypercholesterolemic subjects and in normolipidemic controls

Plasma PAF-AH activity
As shown in Fig 1A, the total plasma PAF-AH activity (plasma-PAF-AH) in all patient groups was significantly higher than in the control group. Moreover, enzyme activity in HomoFH was significantly elevated compared with either HeteroFH or to NonFH patients. In addition, enzyme activity in HeteroFH was significantly higher than in NonFH patients. When plasma-PAF-AH was expressed per mg of apoB, the same phenomenon was observed except that no difference was observed between NonFH patients and control subjects (Fig 1B). This finding indicates that the apoB-containing lipoproteins of FH patients are enriched in PAF-AH activity. Plasma-PAF-AH in all study populations was positively correlated with plasma total cholesterol, LDL-C, apoB, and apoE levels, whereas a negative correlation was observed between plasma-PAF-AH and HDL-C, as well as with apoA-I levels ( Table 2). When the HeteroFH patients were subgrouped according to the type of mutation, no difference in the enzyme activity expressed either per ml of plasma or per mg of apoB was observed (data not shown).



View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. PAF-AH (PAF-acetylhydrolase) activity in plasma of patients with primary hypercholesterolemia and in normolipidemic controls. A: Expressed per ml of plasma; B: Expressed per mg of apoB. Enzymatic activity was determined by the trichloroacetic acid precipitation procedure using plasma at a final dilution 1:100 (v/v) as the source of the enzyme. Values are the mean ± SD. * P < 0.000 compared with all other groups, § P < 0.03 compared to controls, # P < 0.03 compared to HeteroFH, and {dagger} P < 0.001 compared with NonFH and controls.


 
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Correlation between plasma PAF-AH activity and lipid parameters

Unlike the plasma-PAF-AH, the HDL-associated enzyme activity (HDL-PAF-AH), in nmol/ml of plasma/min, was similar among the four groups (3.6 ± 1.1 for HomoFH, 3.9 ± 1.5 for HeteroFH, 3.2 ± 1.5 for NonFH, and 3.4 ± 1.5 for control subjects). As a consequence, an altered distribution of enzyme activity among apoB- and apoA-I-containing lipoproteins is observed in hypercholesterolemic patients, which is characterized by a significant decrease in the ratio of the HDL-PAF-AH to the plasma enzyme activity. This reduction was proportional to the severity of the hypercholesterolemia, being more profound in HomoFH patients ( Fig 2A). A significant decrease in the ratio of the HDL-PAF-AH to the LDL-C levels that was inversely correlated with the severity of hypercholesterolemia was also observed (Fig 2B). Finally, the same phenomenon was observed in the ratio of the HDL-PAF-AH to the total LDL mass (data not shown).



View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Bar graph showing the ratio of the HDL-associated PAF-AH activity versus the plasma enzyme activity (A), and versus the plasma LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) levels (B). Enzymatic activity was determined by the trichloroacetic acid precipitation procedure using either plasma at a final dilution 1–100 (v/v) or the HDL-containing supernatant after treatment of plasma with magnesium chloride-dextran sulfate (at a final dilution 1:6, v/v), as the source of the enzyme. Values represent the mean ± SD. * P < 0.01 compared with all other groups, § P < 0.05 compared with controls, # P < 0.001 compared with all other groups, and {dagger} P < 0.001 compared with controls.

Chemical composition and mass of individual plasma lipoprotein subfractions
The finding that the LDL of HomoFH and HeteroFH patients was enriched in PAF-AH activity (Fig 1B) was further investigated by determination of enzyme activity in individual lipoprotein subfractions. Isopycnic gradient ultracentrifugation was performed in plasma samples containing Lp[a] levels lower than 23 mg/dl (5 HomoFH, 28 HeteroFH, 27 NonFH, and 28 controls) because, as we have previously shown, Lp[a] levels higher than 30 mg/dl significantly affect PAF-AH activity migrated in fractions with density of d = 1.050–1.100 g/ml, (i.e., between subfractions LDL-5 and HDL-2) (19). No significant differences in the weight percentage chemical composition of corresponding lipoprotein subfractions were observed among the four groups (data not shown). By contrast, total LDL mass (calculated as the sum of the mass of individual LDL subfractions) was significantly higher in all patient groups compared with control subjects, with HomoFH having the highest value and the NonFH patients having the lowest one ( Table 3). These differences were mainly due to increases in the mass of the LDL-2 and LDL-3 subfractions in each patient group (Table 3). When the mass of each individual LDL subfraction was expressed as percentage of total LDL mass, then LDL-3 was the predominant subfraction in all groups ( Table 4). Furthermore, the percentage contribution of this subfraction to the total LDL fraction was significantly higher in the HomoFH and HeteroFH patients. In addition, it was associated with a significant decrease in the proportion of the dense LDL-5 subfraction in these two groups (Table 4).


 
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Plasma concentration of lipoprotein subfractions in normolipidemic controls, in polygenic hypercholesterolemic NonFH patients as well as in heterozygous and homozygous FH patients


 
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Mass distribution of individual lipoprotein subfractions in normolipidemic controls, in polygenic hypercholesterolemic NonFH patients as well as in heterozygous and homozygous FH patients

Total HDL mass in HomoFH and in HeteroFH patients (Table 3) was lower compared with the other groups, with HomoFH HDL mass being significantly lower than that in the HeteroFH patients. This observation is consistent with the lower HDL-C and apoA-I plasma levels in these patient groups (Table 1); such differences arose from the lower HDL mass present in all HDL subfractions (Table 3). Finally, no significant differences were detected in either total HDL mass or in the mass of individual HDL subfractions between NonFH patients and control subjects. When the mass of each individual HDL subfraction was expressed as a percentage of total HDL mass, HDL-3 was the predominant subfraction; no differences were observed in the percentage HDL subfraction distribution among all studied groups (Table 4).

PAF-AH activity in plasma lipoprotein subfractions
Among the apoB-containing lipoproteins, PAF-AH activity (expressed either per mg of protein or per ml of plasma) was preferentially associated with the dense LDL-5 subfraction in both patient and control groups. As shown in Fig 3, PAF-AH activity (expressed per mg of protein) in each subfraction was significantly higher in the HomoFH as well as in the HeteroFH patients as compared with that in the corresponding subfractions of the NonFH and control groups. Furthermore, HomoFH patients exhibited significantly higher activity in all subfractions as compared with HeteroFH patients. In NonFH patients, enzyme activity was significantly higher in the LDL-5 and LDL-1, as well as in the VLDL + IDL subfraction as compared with their counterparts in the control group. Finally, total plasma enzyme activity in all patient groups and in normolipidemic controls was positively correlated only with the PAF-AH activity associated with both the LDL-4 and LDL-5 subfractions (r = 0.56, P = 0.013).



View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. PAF-AH activity in all apoB-containing lipoprotein subfractions of patients with primary hypercholesterolemia and normolipidemic controls. ApoB-containing lipoproteins were subfractionated by isopycnic gradient ultracentrifugation and enzymatic activity was determined by the trichloroacetic acid precipitation procedure using four µg of protein from each lipoprotein subfraction. Values represent the mean ± SD. § P < 0.001 compared with values of the corresponding subfraction of all other groups, * P < 0.01 compared with values of the corresponding subfraction of NonFH and controls, and {dagger} P < 0.03 compared with values of the corresponding subfraction of controls.

In contrast to apoB-containing lipoproteins, no differences were observed in PAF-AH activity (expressed per ml of plasma) associated with each HDL subfraction among all studied groups (data not shown). This finding is in agreement with the observation that all studied groups had similar levels of total HDL-associated PAF-AH activity.


  DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Our present study reveals for the first time that PAF-AH activity in plasma, and that specifically associated with LDL particles, preferentially increases, relatively to enzyme activity associated with HDL, in parallel to the increase in the severity of hypercholesterolemia. This relationship was reflected by a progressive decrease in the ratio of HDL-associated-LDL-associated enzyme activity from normolipidemic subjects to NonFH patients, to HeteroFH patients, and to HomoFH hypercholesterolemic patients.

In accordance with previously published results by our group (11) and others (20), the present study suggests that one of the important factors that determines plasma levels of PAF-AH is the rate of removal of LDL from the circulation. Indeed, our results show that the higher plasma PAF-AH activity in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia is due i) to the elevated number of LDL particles in plasma of these patients, and ii) to the preferential enrichment of dense LDL subfractions with PAF-AH activity. Both observations could be attributed to the lower rate of LDL clearance, which is more profound in the HomoFH and less profound in NonFH patients (21). Consistent with this notion, and in accordance with previously published results (10) (11) (22), is the observation that among the LDL subspecies, PAF-AH is preferentially associated with small-dense LDL. These particles are more slowly removed from the circulation as compared with the larger, lighter LDL particles because of their reduced binding to cellular LDL receptors (23). The preferential association of PAF-AH with small-dense LDL particles is further supported by the present data that reveal that among all LDL subfractions, plasma PAF-AH activity is positively correlated only with that associated with dense LDL-4 and LDL-5 subfractions.

Although the slow rate of LDL clearance could explain both the higher plasma and LDL-associated PAF-AH activity observed in our patients, we cannot exclude the possibility that elevated LDL particle numbers in the circulation of hypercholesterolemic patients could enhance PAF-AH secretion from its cellular sources. Indeed, it is established that PAF-AH secretion from its main cellular sources (macrophages, liver cells) occurs continually, without the need for stimuli (24) (25). Additionally, it has been suggested that the cellular secretion of PAF-AH occurs independently of the secretion of LDL or other lipoprotein particles, and that the enzyme associates with lipoproteins in plasma (26). Consistent with this proposal are previous reports showing that plasma PAF-AH activity is normal in patients with abetalipoproteinemia and is associated with HDL, an indication that LDL is not essential for the existence of normal PAF-AH activity in plasma (27) (28). PAF-AH secretion from macrophages is, however, enhanced when plasma is present (24), and LDL may represent one of the plasma constituents responsible for this effect (Tselepis, unpublished observations). Consequently, the elevated LDL levels typical of hypercholesterolemic patients may influence the secretion of PAF-AH from macrophages. In addition, oxidatively modified LDL contains pro-inflammatory oxidized phospholipids and PAF (5) (29). As reported earlier, the secretion of PAF-AH by liver cells is enhanced in response to stimulation with PAF (30). Consequently, in addition to the macrophage enzyme, the high LDL levels characteristic of hypercholesterolemia may also induce the secretion of PAF-AH from the liver. Based on the above observations, we suggest that the higher enzyme activity per LDL particle found in hypercholesterolemic patients could be due not only to the lower rate of LDL clearance, but also to enhanced secretion of PAF-AH from its cellular sources.

It is well documented that patients with primary hypercholesterolemia exhibit premature atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease, mainly as a result of high plasma LDL levels (31). Our study shows that the increased plasma-PAF-AH in these patients constitutes a marker of the high plasma LDL levels and is related to the severity of hypercholesterolemia. Thus, plasma-PAF-AH may be considered as a marker of atherogenesis and cardiovascular risk. However, it is not known yet whether the increased PAF-AH activity promotes atherogenesis or whether it represents a defensive mechanism against enhanced plaque formation occurring in these patients. Comparison of data in clinical studies has revealed inconsistent findings concerning the plasma levels of PAF-AH activity in atherosclerotic disease. Thus, some studies have shown an elevation (11) (32), and others have reported lower enzyme activity as compared with controls (33) (34), whereas some studies have failed to detect any difference between patients with atherosclerotic disease and controls (12) (35) (36). Recent results from the West of Scotland Primary Prevention (WOSCOP) study suggest that the plasma levels of PAF-AH mass, which is proportional to its activity and mainly reflects the LDL-associated enzyme, represent an independent risk factor for coronary artery disease (37).

An important observation of our study is that increases in total plasma- and LDL-associated enzyme activity in all patient groups are not associated with any significant change in HDL-PAF-AH. Consequently, a significant alteration in the distribution of PAF-AH between LDL and HDL was observed, resulting in a decrease in the ratio of HDL-PAF-AH to plasma-PAF-AH, which was proportional to the increase in LDL-C levels and consequently to the severity of hypercholesterolemia. A similar phenomenon was observed for the ratio of the HDL-PAF-AH to plasma LDL-C levels or LDL mass, an observation consistent with our previously published data on HeteroFH patients (11). Several lines of evidence suggest that HDL protects LDL from oxidation, and inhibits the biological activity of oxidized LDL. These effects are at least partially mediated by HDL-associated PAF-AH activity (38), which may represent a pool of similar catalytic activities expressed by three different HDL-associated enzymes, PAF-AH, LCAT (39), and paraoxonase (40). The important anti-atherogenic role of the HDL-PAF-AH was further addressed in a recent study in apoE-/- mice, in vivo (41). This approach distinguishes PAF-AH activity associated with atherogenic LDL from that associated with anti-atherogenic HDL. It could also explain the discrepancy between the results of the WOSCOP study showing that the plasma levels of PAF-AH mass is an independent predictor for coronary artery disease (37), and those of other clinical studies, according to which the G994->T mutation in the PAF-AH gene that results in a loss of the enzyme activity, could be one of the genetic determinants for atherosclerotic disease in the Japanese population (42) (43). In these studies, the loss in enzyme activity probably reflects not only the LDL-associated enzyme but also HDL-associated PAF-AH activity, the lack of which could possibly be the major determinant for atherogenesis in this population.

In conclusion, our results show that in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia without clinical evidence for coronary artery disease, the plasma-PAF-AH, which mainly reflects the LDL-associated enzyme, is increased without any significant change in the HDL-PAF-AH. This alteration in the relative distribution of PAF-AH among LDL and HDL results in a decrease in the ratio of HDL-PAF-AH to plasma-PAF-AH, which is proportional to the increase of the plasma LDL-C levels, and consequently to the severity of the hypercholesterolemia. This ratio may be useful as a potential marker of atherogenicity in subjects with primary hypercholesterolemia.


  ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by research grants from the Greek Ministry of Research and Technology (PENED program 95 ED 656) and the European Community (BIOMED BMH4-CT98-3191 program). We gratefully acknowledge the technical assistance of Dr. M. Vini, Mr. C. Tzallas, and Mrs. E. Lourida.

Manuscript received July 17, 2001; and in revised form November 2, 2001

Abbreviations: BCA, bicinchoninic acid; HeteroFH, heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia; HomoFH, homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia; LSD, least significant difference; NonFH, polygenic hypercholesterolemia; PAF, platelet-activating factor; PAF-AH, PAF-acetylhydrolase


  REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

  1. Snyder, F. 1995. Platelet-activating factor and its analogs: metabolic pathways and related intracellular processes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1254:231-249.[Medline]

  2. Evangelou, A. M. 1994. Platelet-activating factor (PAF): implications for coronary heart and vascular diseases. Prost. Leukotr. Essent. Fatty acids. 50:1-28.

  3. Stafforini, D. M., McIntyre, T. M., Zimmerman, G. A., Prescott, S. M. 1997. Platelet activating factor acetylhydrolases. J. Biol. Chem. 272:17895-17898.[Free Full Text]

  4. Stemler, K. E., Stafforini, D. M., Prescott, S. M., McIntyre, T. M. 1991. Human plasma platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase. Oxidatively fragmented phospholipids as substrates. J. Biol. Chem. 266:11095-11103.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  5. Heery, J. M., Kozak, M., Stafforini, D. M., Jones, D. A., Zimmerman, G. A., McIntyre, T. M., Prescott, S. M. 1995. Oxidatively modified LDL contains phospholipids with platelet-activating factor-like activity and stimulates the growth of smooth muscle cells. J. Clin. Invest. 96:2322-2330.

  6. Watson, A. D., Leitinger, N., Navab, M., Faull, K. F., Horkko, S., Witztum, J. L., Palinski, W., Schwenke, D. C., Salomon, R. G., Sha, W., Subbanagounder, G., Fogelman, A. M., Berliner, J. A. 1997. Structural identification by mass spectroscopy of oxidized phospholipids in minimally oxidized low density lipoprotein that induced monocyte/endothelial interactions and evidence for their presence in vivo. J. Biol. Chem. 272:13597-13607.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  7. Macphee, C. H., Moores, K., Boyd, H., Dhanak, D., Ife, R. J., Leach, C. A., Leake, D. S., Milliner, K. J., Patterson, R. A., Suckling, K. E., Tew, D. G., Hickey, D. M. B. 1999. The lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2, Platelet activating factor acetylhydrolase, generates two bioactive products during the oxidation of low density lipoprotein: use of a novel inhibitor. Biochem. J. 338:479-487.

  8. Macphee, C. H., Milliner, K., Moores, K., Tew, D. G. 1996. The involvement of LDL-associated phospholipase A2 in atherogenesis. Pharmacol. Rev. Commun. 8:309-315.

  9. Stafforini, D. M., McIntyre, T. M., Carter, M. E., Prescott, S. M. 1987. Human plasma platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase: association with lipoprotein particles and role in the degradation of platelet -activating factor. J. Biol. Chem. 262:4215-4222.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  10. Tselepis, A. D., Dentan, C., Karabina, S-A. P., Chapman, M. J., Ninio, E. 1995. PAF-degrading acetylhydrolase is preferentially associated with dense LDL and VHDL-1 in human plasma. Catalytic characteristics and relation to the monocyte-derived enzyme. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 15:1764-1773.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  11. Karabina, S-A. P., Elisaf, M., Bairaktari, E., Tzallas, C., Siamopoulos, K. C., Tselepis, A. D. 1997. Increased activity of platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase in low-density lipoprotein subfractions induces enhanced lysophosphatidylcholine production during oxidation in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia. Eur. J. Clin. Invest. 27:595-602.[CrossRef][Medline]

  12. Napoli, C., Postiglione, A., Triggiani, M., Corso, G., Palumbo, G., Carbone, V., Ruocco, A., Ambrosio, G., Montefusco, S., Malorni, A., Condorelli, M., Chiariello, M. 1995. Oxidative structural modifications of low density lipoprotein in homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia. Atherosclerosis. 18:259-273.

  13. Napoli, C. 1998. Familial hypercholesterolaemia and platelet activating factor acetylhydrolase: difference between the homozygous and heterozygous form. Eur. J. Clin. Invest. 28:506-507.[Medline]

  14. Tselepis, A. D., Karabina, S-A. P., Elisaf, M. 1998. PAF-acetylhydrolase activity in familial hypercholesterolaemia. Eur. J. Clin. Invest. 28:508-509.

  15. Williams, R. R., Hunt, S. C., Schumacher, M. C., Hegele, R. A., Leppert, M. F., Ludwig, E. H., Hopkins, P. N. 1993. Diagnosing heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia using new practical criteria validated by molecular genetics. Am. J. Cardiol. 72:171-176.[CrossRef][Medline]

  16. Miltiadous, G., Elisaf, M., Bairaktari, H., Xenophontos, S. L., Manoli, P., Cariolou, M. A. 2001. Characterization and geographic distribution of the low density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) gene mutations in northwestern Greece. Hum. Mutat. 5:432-433.

  17. Chapman, M. J., Goldstein, S., Lagrange, D., Laplaud, P. M. 1981. A density gradient ultracentrifugal procedure for isolation of the major lipoprotein classes from human serum. J. Lipid Res. 22:339-358.[Abstract]

  18. Chancharme, L., Thérond, P., Nigon, F., Lepage, S., Couturier, M., Chapman, M. J. 1999. Cholesteryl ester hydroperoxide lability is a key feature of the oxidative susceptibility of small dense LDL. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 19:810-820.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  19. Karabina, S-A. P., Elisaf, M. C., Goudevenos, J., Siamopoulos, K. C., Sideris, D., Tselepis, A. D. 1996. PAF-acetylhydrolase activity on Lp(a) before and during Cu2+-induced oxidative modification in vitro. Atherosclerosis. 125:121-134.[CrossRef][Medline]

  20. Guerra, R., Zhao, B., Mooser, V., Stafforini, D. M., Johnston, J. M., Cohen, J. C. 1997. Determinants of plasma platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase: heritability and relationship to plasma lipoproteins. J. Lipid Res. 38:2281-2288.[Abstract]

  21. Brown, M. S., Goldstein, J. L., Receptor-mediated control of cholesterol metabolism,. 1976. Science. 191:150-154.[Free Full Text]

  22. McCall, M. R., La Belle, M., Forte, T. M., Krauss, R. M., Takanami, Y., Tribble, D. L. 1999. Dissociable and nondissociable forms of platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase in human plasma LDL: implications for LDL oxidative susceptibility. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1437:23-36.[Medline]

  23. Lund-Katz, S., Laplaud, P. M., Phillips, M. C., Chapman, M. J. 1998. Apolipoprotein B-100 conformation and partile surface charge in human LDL subspecies: implication for LDL receptor interaction. Biochemistry. 37:12867-12874.[CrossRef][Medline]

  24. Stafforini, D. M., Elstad, M. R., McIntyre, T. M., Zimmerman, G. A., Prescott, S. A. 1990. Human macrophages secrete platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase. J. Biol. Chem. 265:9682-9687.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  25. Tarbet, E. B., Stafforini, D. M., Elstad, M. R., Zimmerman, G. A., McIntyre, T. M., Prescott, S. M. 1991. Liver cells secrete the plasma form of platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase. J. Biol. Chem. 266:16667-16673.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  26. Imaizumi, T., D. M. Stafforini, Y. Yamada, G. A. Zimmerman, T. M. McIntyre, and S. M. Prescott. 1996. The fate of platelet-activating factor: PAF acetylhydrolase from plasma and tissues. In Advances in Lipobiology. R. Gross, editor. JAI Press Inc., Greenwich, CT. 141–162.

  27. Surya, I. I., Mommersteeg, M., Erkelens, D. W., Akkerman, J. W. 1991. PAF-acetylhydrolase predominantly present in LDL in healthy subjects, is associated with HDL in a patient with LDL deficiency. J. Lipid Mediators. 3:27-38.[Medline]

  28. Stafforini, D. M., Carter, M. E., Zimmerman, G. A., McIntyre, T. M., Prescott, S. M. 1989. Lipoproteins alter the catalytic behavior of the platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase in human plasma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 86:2393-2397.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  29. Liapikos, Th. A., Antonopoulou, S., Karabina, S-A. P., Tsoukatos, D. C., Demopoulos, C. A., Tselepis, A. D. 1994. Platelet-activating factor formation during oxidative modification of low-density lipoprotein when PAF-acetylhydrolase has been inactivated. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1212:353-360.[Medline]

  30. Satoh, K., Imaizumi, T., Kawamura, Y., Yoshida, H., Hiamoto, M., Takamatsu, S., Takamatsu, M. 1991. Platelet-activating factor (PAF) stimulates the production o PAF-acetylhydrolase by the human hepatoma cell line, HepG2. J. Clin. Invest. 87:476-481.

  31. Slack, J. 1969. Risks of ischemic heart-disease in familial hyperlipoproteinaemia states. Lancet. 2:1380-1382.[CrossRef][Medline]

  32. Satoh, K., Yoshida, H., Imaizumi, T., Takamatsu, S., Mizumo, S. 1992. Platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase in plasma lipoproteins from patients with ischemic stroke. Stroke. 23:1090-1092.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  33. Graham, R. M., Stephens, C. J., Sturm, M. J., Taylor, R. R. 1992. Plasma platelet-activating factor degradation in patients with severe coronary artery disease. Clin. Sci. 82:535-541.[Medline]

  34. Serebruary, V., Gurbel, P., Murugesan, S., Lowry, D., Strum, E., Svetlov, S. 1998. Depressed plasma platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase in patients presenting with acute myocardial infraction. Cardiology. 90:127-130.[CrossRef][Medline]

  35. Shohet, R., Anwar, A., Johnston, J., Cohen, J. 1999. Plasma platelet activating factor acetylhydrolase activity is not associated with premature coronary atherosclerosis. Am. J. Cardiol. 83:109-111.[CrossRef][Medline]

  36. Tselepis, A. D., Goudevenos, J. A., Tambaki, A. P., Michalis, L., Stroumbis, C. S., Tsoukatos, D. C., Elisaf, M., Sideris, D. A. 1999. Platelet aggregatory response to platelet activating factor (PAF), ex vivo, and PAF-acetylhydrolase activity in patients with unstable angina: effect of c7E3 Fab (abciximab) therapy. Cardiovasc. Res. 43:183-191.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  37. Packard, C. J., O'Reilly, D. S. J., Caslake, M. J., McMahon, A. D., Ford, I., Cooney, J., Macphee, C. H., Suckling, K. E., Krishna, M., Wilkinson, F. E., Rumley, A., Lowe, G. D. O., Docherty, G., Burczak, J. D. 2000. Lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 as an independent predictor of coronary heart disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 343:1148-1155.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  38. Navab, M., Berliner, J. A., Subbanagounder, G., Hama, S., Lusis, A. J., Castellani, L. W., Reddy, S., Shih, D., Shi, W., Watson, A. D., Van Lenten, B. J., Vora, D., Fogelman, A. M. 2001. HDL and the inflammatory response induced by LDL-derived oxidized phospholipids. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 21:481-488.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  39. Liu, M., Subbaiah, P. V. 1994. Hydrolysis and transesterification of platelet-activating factor by lecithin-cholesterol acyltransferase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 91:6035-6041.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  40. Rodrigo, L., Macness, B., Durrington, P. N., Hernandez, A., Macness, M. I. 2001. Hydrolysis of platelet-activating factor by serum paraoxonase. Biochem. J. 354:1-7.[CrossRef][Medline]

  41. Theilmeier, G., De Geest, B., Van Veldhoven, P. P., Stengel, D., Michiels, C., Lox, M., Landeloos, M., Chapman, M. J., Ninio, E., Collen, D., Himpens, B., Holvoet, P. 2000. HDL-associated PAF-AH reduces endothelial adhesiveness in apoE-/- mice. FASEB J. 14:2032-2039.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  42. Yamada, Y., Ichihara, S., Fujimura, T., Yokota, M. 1998. Identification of the G994 — T missense mutation in exon 9 of the plasma platelet activating factor acetylhydrolase gene as an independent risk factor for coronary artery disease in Japanese men. Metabolism. 47:177-181.[CrossRef][Medline]

  43. Yamada, Y., Yoshida, H., Ichihara, S., Imaizumi, T., Satoh, K., Yokota, M. 2000. Correlations between plasma platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase (PAF-AH) activity and PAF-AH genotype, age, and atherosclerosis in a Japanese population. Atherosclerosis. 150:209-216.[CrossRef][Medline]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. A. Gardner, E. C. Reichert, M. K. Topham, and D. M. Stafforini
Identification of a Domain That Mediates Association of Platelet-activating Factor Acetylhydrolase with High Density Lipoprotein
J. Biol. Chem., June 20, 2008; 283(25): 17099 - 17106.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
S. J. Robins, D. Collins, J. J. Nelson, H. E. Bloomfield, and B. F. Asztalos
Cardiovascular Events With Increased Lipoprotein-Associated Phospholipase A2 and Low High-Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol: The Veterans Affairs HDL Intervention Trial
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., June 1, 2008; 28(6): 1172 - 1178.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
V. G. Saougos, A. P. Tambaki, M. Kalogirou, M. Kostapanos, I. F. Gazi, R. L. Wolfert, M. Elisaf, and A. D. Tselepis
Differential Effect of Hypolipidemic Drugs on Lipoprotein-Associated Phospholipase A2
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., October 1, 2007; 27(10): 2236 - 2243.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
B. Zhang, Y. Uehara, S. Hida, S.-i. Miura, D. L. Rainwater, M. Segawa, K. Kumagai, K.-A. Rye, and K. Saku
Effects of reconstituted HDL on charge-based LDL subfractions as characterized by capillary isotachophoresis
J. Lipid Res., May 1, 2007; 48(5): 1175 - 1189.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
S. G. Tsouli, D. N. Kiortsis, E. S. Lourida, V. Xydis, L. D. Tsironis, M. I. Argyropoulou, M. Elisaf, and A. D. Tselepis
Autoantibody titers against OxLDL are correlated with Achilles tendon thickness in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia
J. Lipid Res., October 1, 2006; 47(10): 2208 - 2214.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Pharmacol. Rev.Home page
A. Kontush and M. J. Chapman
Functionally Defective High-Density Lipoprotein: A New Therapeutic Target at the Crossroads of Dyslipidemia, Inflammation, and Atherosclerosis
Pharmacol. Rev., September 1, 2006; 58(3): 342 - 374.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
W. Koenig, D. Twardella, H. Brenner, and D. Rothenbacher
Lipoprotein-Associated Phospholipase A2 Predicts Future Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease Independently of Traditional Risk Factors, Markers of Inflammation, Renal Function, and Hemodynamic Stress
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., July 1, 2006; 26(7): 1586 - 1593.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
E. C. Papavasiliou, C. Gouva, K. C. Siamopoulos, and A. D. Tselepis
PAF-acetylhydrolase activity in plasma of patients with chronic kidney disease. Effect of long-term therapy with erythropoietin
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., May 1, 2006; 21(5): 1270 - 1277.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
E. H. Yang, J. P. McConnell, R. J. Lennon, G. W. Barsness, G. Pumper, S. J. Hartman, C. S. Rihal, L. O. Lerman, and A. Lerman
Lipoprotein-Associated Phospholipase A2 Is an Independent Marker for Coronary Endothelial Dysfunction in Humans
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., January 1, 2006; 26(1): 106 - 111.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
I. Gazi, E. S. Lourida, T. Filippatos, V. Tsimihodimos, M. Elisaf, and A. D. Tselepis
Lipoprotein-Associated Phospholipase A2 Activity Is a Marker of Small, Dense LDL Particles in Human Plasma
Clin. Chem., December 1, 2005; 51(12): 2264 - 2273.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
D. N. Kiortsis, S. Tsouli, E. S. Lourida, V. Xydis, M. I. Argyropoulou, M. Elisaf, and A. D. Tselepis
Lack of Association Between Carotid Intima-Media Thickness and PAF-Acetylhydrolase Mass and Activity in Patients with Primary Hyperlipidemia
Angiology, July 1, 2005; 56(4): 451 - 458.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
S. Campo, M. A. Sardo, A. Bitto, A. Bonaiuto, G. Trimarchi, M. Bonaiuto, M. Castaldo, C. Saitta, S. Cristadoro, and A. Saitta
Platelet-Activating Factor Acetylhydrolase Is Not Associated with Carotid Intima-Media Thickness in Hypercholesterolemic Sicilian Individuals
Clin. Chem., November 1, 2004; 50(11): 2077 - 2082.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
A. Kontush, E. C. de Faria, S. Chantepie, and M. J. Chapman
Antioxidative Activity of HDL Particle Subspecies Is Impaired in Hyperalphalipoproteinemia: Relevance of Enzymatic and Physicochemical Properties
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., March 1, 2004; 24(3): 526 - 533.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
T. Kujiraoka, T. Iwasaki, M. Ishihara, M. Ito, M. Nagano, A. Kawaguchi, S. Takahashi, J. Ishi, M. Tsuji, T. Egashira, et al.
Altered distribution of plasma PAF-AH between HDLs and other lipoproteins in hyperlipidemia and diabetes mellitus
J. Lipid Res., October 1, 2003; 44(10): 2006 - 2014.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
A. Kontush, S. Chantepie, and M. J. Chapman
Small, Dense HDL Particles Exert Potent Protection of Atherogenic LDL Against Oxidative Stress
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., October 1, 2003; 23(10): 1881 - 1888.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
S. Benitez, J. L. Sanchez-Quesada, V. Ribas, O. Jorba, F. Blanco-Vaca, F. Gonzalez-Sastre, and J. Ordonez-Llanos
Platelet-Activating Factor Acetylhydrolase Is Mainly Associated With Electronegative Low-Density Lipoprotein Subfraction
Circulation, July 8, 2003; 108(1): 92 - 96.
[Abstract] [Full Text]