|
|
||||||||
Journal of Lipid Research, Vol. 43, 713-720, May 2002
Copyright © 2002 by Lipid Research, Inc.



* Lipids and Cardiovascular Epidemiology Unit, Institut Municipal d'Investigació Mèdica (IMIM)
Departament de Ciències Experimentals i de la Salut, Universitat Pompeu Fabra
Servei de Cardiologia, Hospital del Mar
** Laboratori de Referència, Barcelona, Spain
1 To whom correspondence should be addressed at Lipids and Cardiovascular Epidemiology Unit, Institut Municipal d'Investigació Mèdica (IMIM), Dr Aiguader 80, E-08003 Barcelona, Spain. e-mail: mtomas{at}imim.es
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Abbreviations: APO, aerobic power output; BMI, body mass index; CHD, coronary heart disease; HDL-C, serum HDL-cholesterol; LDL-C, serum LDL-cholesterol; MANOVA, multivariate analysis of variance; MPO, maximum power output; PA, physical activity; PON1, paraoxonase1; PON1 activity, Paraoxonase1 activity towards paraoxon; RER, respiratory-exchange ratio; TBARS, thiobarbituric acid reactive substances method; TC, serum total cholesterol; TG, serum triglycerides; VO2, oxygen uptake; VO2max, maximal oxygen uptake; VT, ventilatory anaerobic threshold
Supplementary key words bout of exercise exercise training PON1 genotypes oxidative stress
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Oxidative stress has been found to be linked to the development of atherosclerosis (7). In this respect, the balance between free radical generation and antioxidant activity seems to play a key role in the pathogenesis of CHD. Paraoxonase1 (PON1) is an antioxidant enzyme linked to the HDL-containing apolipoprotein (apo)A-I (8, 9) and apoJ (9). Several emerging lines of evidence suggest that PON1 is responsible for the antioxidant properties of HDL on LDL particle (10, 11). PON1 enzyme activity for paraoxon as a substrate is modulated at the PON1 locus (12), by the PON1-192 and PON1-55 polymorphisms, among others. The former comprises Q and R alleles (13), whose protein allozymes have been suggested to differ both in the PON1 activity and in their ability to confer protection against oxidative conditions (1417) (Q allele for lower PON1 activity and higher protection than R allele). The PON1-55 polymorphism, which comprises L and M alleles, seems to modulate PON1 mRNA (18) and protein levels (L allele corresponds to higher concentration than M allele) (19), probably due to a certain degree of linkage disequilibrium between PON1-55L and the -108C allele of the functional polymorphism at the promoter region (20), and to the different stability of each allozyme (21).
In contrast to regular PA, isolated bouts of exercise are considered to be a major source of free radical generation, oxidative stress, and lipid peroxidation (22). LDL oxidation may inactivate PON1 through interactions between a free sulphydryl group of PON1 and the oxidized LDL lipids (16).
To our knowledge, the role of PA on PON1 activity, particularly the effects of regular and a bout of PA, has not been yet established. The objectives of the present study were, firstly, to assess the effect of aerobic exercise training on PON1 activity in young healthy subjects and to determine whether this effect is dependent on the PON1-192 and PON1-55 polymorphisms, and secondly, to assess the effect of a bout of exercise on PON1 activity according to the training status and the PON1-192 and PON1-55 polymorphisms.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Intervention
A general scheme of the designed intervention is presented in Fig. 1
. An initial individual physical fitness assessment was performed. A week later, 30 min of acute aerobic exercise were performed at adequate individual intensity. Thereafter, a 16 week-training period was initiated. Another physical fitness assessment was carried out 1 week before ending the training period, and another acute aerobic exercise was performed at the end of the period.
|
Bout of aerobic exercise All the participants performed a bout of aerobic exercise 1 week after the physical fitness assessment, both before and after the training period. Participants cycled an ergometer for 30 min at the level corresponding to their APO. They warmed-up for 5 min at 25 or 50 watts (in the case of women or men, respectively), and achieved the APO, maintaining this power during the remaining 25 min.
This exercise was performed 3 hours after lunch. Each participant was requested to adhere to the same diet 3 days prior to both bouts of exercise.
Training period Participants were enrolled in an aerobic exercise training program, designed and monitored by a specialist in physical education, during a 16-week period. Initially the frequency of training sessions was four per week and the duration was 30 min per session. The frequency and duration of the sessions were progressively increased up to 5 days per week and 50 min per day during the first 8 weeks, and continued so for another 8 weeks. Only aerobic physical activities (running, swimming, aerobic games) were undertaken, and the intensity of training was adapted to the basal physical fitness of each participant. The training was performed in the installations of the Servei d'Activitat Física of the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
Blood sampling
A blood sample was drawn prior to each bout of exercise (basal). After the bout of exercise, blood samples were collected immediately after exercising (0 h), and at 0.5 h, 1 h, 2 h, and 24 h thereafter.
Laboratory methods
PON1 activity toward paraoxon
PON1 activity was measured after the reaction of paraoxon hydrolysis into p-nitrophenol and diethylphosphate catalysed by the enzyme. PON1 activity was determined from initial velocity of p-nitrophenol production (subtracting the spontaneous paraoxon hydrolysis) at 37°C and recorded at 405 nm by an autoanalyzer (Cobas-Mira Plus, Roche Diagnostica, Switzerland). Serum was added to a basal assay mixture to reach final concentrations of 5 mM Paraoxon, 1.9 mM CaCl2, 90 mM Tris-HCl (at pH 8.5), and 3.6 mM NaCl. Two strategies were followed to avoid spontaneous hydrolysis of diluted paraoxon solutions. First, a blank determination of basal assay mixture without serum was made. Second, 5 mM paraoxon basal assay mixture aliquots frozen at -40°C were used and thawed just before the beginning of each assay. Frozen aliquots of a serum pool were used as an internal control; these were thawed just before the beginning of the assay. At least one aliquot of serum pool was measured in triplicate every 24 samples. The serum pool was used to correct for inter-assay variations. A PON1 activity of 1 U/l was defined as 1 µmol of p-nitrophenol formed per min per liter of serum. The molar extinction coefficient of p-nitrophenol is 18,053 l mol-1 cm-1 at pH 8.5. The intra- and inter-assays coefficients of variation were 0.70% and 0.76%, respectively.
PON1-192 and PON1-55 genotypes determination Genomic DNA was isolated from white cells by the salting-out method (23). PCR for PON1-192 and PON1-55 polymorphisms were performed using primer sequences derived from published data (13). The amplification cycle was performed on a Perkin-Elmer Cetus 2400 Thermal Cycler with initial denaturation for 4 min at 94°C followed by 35 cycles of 30 s at 94°C, 1 min at 61°C, and 1 min at 72°C, and finally by 7 min of extension at 72°C. For PON1-192 polymorphism, PCR products were digested with AlwI for 4 h at 37°C, and the samples electrophoresed in 3% agarose gels for 75 min at 60 V. For PON1-55 polymorphism, PCR products were digested with Hsp92II and electrophoresed in the same conditions as described above.
Lipids and lipoproteins Serum total cholesterol (TC) and TG were measured by enzymatic methods. HDL cholesterol (HDL-C) was measured as cholesterol after precipitation of apoB-containing lipoproteins with phosphotungstic-Mg2+ (Boehringer Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany). LDL-C was calculated by the Friedewald's formula (24).
Oxidized LDL Oxidized LDL was determined in serum by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using two antibodies against the antigenic determinants of oxidized apoB molecule (ox-LDL, Mercodia AB, Uppsala, Sweden). Values were expressed in U/l. The intra- and inter-assays coefficients of variation were 2.8% and 10.7%, respectively.
PON1 activity, lipid, lipoprotein, and oxidized LDL levels were adjusted for plasma volume changes, as described elsewhere (25).
Other measurements
Weight and height were measured in underwear using a calibrated scale. BMI was calculated as the weight (in kg) divided by the squared height (in meters). Smokers were defined as those smoking more than one cigarette per day during the previous 3 months.
Statistical analysis
-Square test was used to test differences in categorical variables. Subjects were grouped by PON1-192 or -55 genotype, as QQ and R carriers, or LL and M carriers, respectively. Unpaired and paired Student's t-test were used to compare the mean of continuous variables according to PON1-192 or -55 genotype, and to training status, respectively. A multivariate ANOVA (MANOVA) for repeated measures was used to test for interactions on PON1 activity levels. To assess changes on PON1 activity after the bout of exercise with respect to basal values, paired Student's t-test was also used with the Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. P < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. PON1 activity is represented in the figures as the percentage of change with respect to basal point, in order to visually compare the activity of different genotypes. However, for statistical purposes, comparisons were performed using the absolute values.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
No significant change in PON1 activity due to training either in the overall study group or in subjects stratified by PON1-55 genotypes was observed at the basal point. However, an opposite effect of training on PON1 activity was found when subjects were classified according to PON1-192 genotypes. QQ subjects showed significantly increased PON1 activity levels after training, whereas a significant decrease was found in R carriers.
Oxidized LDL levels decreased after training, and this reduction was statistically significant in the overall and in the LL subject groups.
Effects of a bout of exercise
The effect of a bout of exercise on PON1 activity and oxidized LDL concentration was assessed comparing the levels at 0h, 0.5 h, 1 h, 2 h, and 24 h to the basal value. In the overall group, the PON1 activity time response pattern was similar before and after training (Fig. 2)
.
|
It is noteworthy that the PON1 activity time response pattern was different according to PON1-192 genotype (Figs. 3A, B) , but not to PON1-55 genotype (Fig. 3C, D). First, PON1 activity was significantly higher after than before training at all six points considered in QQ subjects, but conversely it was significantly lower in R carriers. This effect was not observed when stratifying by PON1-55 (except for the activity at 24 h in M carriers). Second, basal PON1 activity level recovery 24 h after the bout of exercise was different depending on the PON1-192 genotype. QQ subjects recovered the basal level 24 h after the bout of exercise, regardless of the training status, whereas R carriers reached it only after, but not before, training. To test for interactions among the three factors (training, acute exercise, and PON1-192 genotype) a MANOVA for repeated measures was carried out (Table 3). As expected, PON1-192 genotype had a significant effect on PON1 activity. A clear effect of a bout of exercise on PON1 activity was also observed; this effect differed according to the training level and the genotype. The effect of training was also different according to the genotype. The interaction among training, the bout of exercise, and genotype on PON1 activity was also tested and was not statistically significant (P = 0.091).
|
|
Mean basal point oxidized LDL concentration was lower after than before training. Training status was associated to an increase in oxidized LDL levels in the 2 h following the bout of exercise (Fig. 4) . Before training, a non-significant increase of oxidized LDL just after the bout of exercise was observed.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The present experimental study showed that training was not associated with increased basal PON1 activity levels in the overall study subjects. A previous report of a cross-sectional study showed significantly increased PON1 activity values in well-trained rugby players compared with sedentary controls (26). However, the different design and participant characteristics make it difficult to compare the two studies.
In our study, an increase in PON1 activity immediately after the bout of exercise was followed by a decrease in the following 2 h and a recovery at 24 h. One study performed in rats showed a similar effect: a single bout of PA inhibited serum PON1 activity in rats (27). An increase in oxidized LDL just after and during the 2 h following the bout of exercise was also found. These data support the idea that acute exercise induces oxidative stress by increasing lipid peroxidation which, in turn, decreases PON1 activity (22, 28).
The trained status was associated with a significant increase in PON1 activity just after the bout of exercise and a recovery of basal PON1 activity at 24 h. This finding suggests that training attenuates the effect of a bout of exercise on PON1 activity. It remains unclear whether the effect of exercise training on PON1 activity response to a bout of PA goes through direct or indirect mechanisms. A bout of exercise produced an increase in certain antioxidant gene transcription and a reduction in lipoperoxidation in trained rats (29, 30), but these effects were not observed in untrained specimens (31). In humans, exercise training appears to enhance antioxidant systems (22, 32, 33) and reduce lipid peroxidation (22), improving plasma oxidant status (34). The decrease in oxidized LDL levels after training observed in the present study is in accordance with that notion. Oxidized LDL levels were somewhat higher in the trained status after the bout of exercise than in the basal point. This supports the idea that the protection given by exercise training may not be sufficient to completely protect highly fit individuals against oxidative stress resulting from a bout of exercise (33). The global antioxidant activity, enhanced by exercise training, might indirectly mitigate the inhibition of PON1 caused by acute exercise-induced oxidative stress, and, as a result, PON1 activity may recover basal levels faster in trained status. Besides these effects, exercise training may also exert a direct action on the PON1 protein or PON1 carrier lipoprotein. PON1 enzyme is mainly linked to the HDL particle. However, no correlation was found between HDL-C levels and PON1 activity either in all subjects or in genotype groups at any time point. Therefore, it is unlikely that HDL-C changes explain changes in PON1 activity.
A major finding of this study is that the effects of a bout of exercise and of exercise training on PON1 activity differed depending on the PON1-192 genotype. There was an opposite trend between QQ and R carriers genotype in PON1 activity changes after training, not only at basal status, but at almost all time points considered after the bout of exercise. These changes were not statistically significant when analyzing by PON1-55 genotype, except for M carriers 24 h after the bout of exercise. Furthermore, before training only QQ subjects recovered basal PON1 activity at 24 h, whereas after training all subjects did, regardless of the PON1-55 genotype. Subjects of both PON1-55 genotypes reached basal PON1 activity levels 24 h after the bout whatever the training status was.
All these findings suggest that the response of PON1 activity to a bout of exercise was modulated by the previous training status and also by the PON1-192 genotype. In agreement with the notion that the PON1-192 polymorphism may influence the effects of PA, we previously found that PA was associated with a better lipid profile only in R carriers, whereas no association was observed in QQ subjects (35). However, at present it is difficult to explain the opposite effects of training on PON1 activity depending on PON1-192 genotype. The extent to which PON1 is inhibited by oxidized LDL lipids (28) seems to differ between the PON1-192 allozymes. Most of the studies (15) suggest that Q allozyme provides the best protection against oxidation in vitro, and its PON1 activity is less reduced in highly oxidative conditions. Therefore, exercise training may not provide enough protection to R carrier subjects against the oxidative stress resulting from a bout of exercise. On the other hand, smoking has been associated with decreased serum PON1 activity (36) and increased lipid peroxide generation. We previously described an interaction between smoking and the QQ genotype for the risk on myocardial infarction (37). However, in the present study smoking was not a confounding factor, since it was not associated with PON1 activity or with genotype.
Two hypotheses to explain the effect of differing genotype may be put forward. First, regular exercise produces repeated increases of free radicals after each exercise session which may act as a transcription inductor of endogenous antioxidant genes (30, 38) (PON1 or other antioxidant enzymes), but the greater susceptibility of the R allozyme to be inhibited would result in a decrease in this particular allozyme PON1 activity. And second, a linkage disequilibrium between the PON1-192 polymorphism and a polymorphism in the PON1 gene promoter or other region, which may modulate PON1 synthesis or activity and be more responsive to oxidative stress when linked to Q allele, cannot be ruled out. For instance, the A-162G polymorphism, located within a PON1 promoter region, which shows high homology to an interleukin-6 (IL-6)-responsive element, has recently been described to be in linkage disequilibrium with the PON1-192 (20). Acute exercise practice increases oxidized phospholipids, which in turn induce the secretion of the proinflammatory cytokine IL-6 leading to a decrease in PON1 activity and concentration in mice and HepG2 human cell (39). In this respect, the effect of IL-6 on PON1 expression might depend to a large extent on the polymorphism within IL-6-responsive element linked to PON1-192 polymorphism.
Little data about possible chronobiological and hormonal variations in PON1 activity is available at the moment. In this study, the two bouts of exercise performed by participants were carried out at the very same hour of the day. Hormone-replacement therapy increased serum arylesterase (40) and PON1 activity (Sentí M, unpublished data) in diabetic and non-diabetic postmenopausal women, respectively. In the same direction, estrogens have been shown to prevent vascular free radical production (41). In our study, no differences in PON1 activity or oxidized LDL according to sex were observed.
In summary, regular exercise was associated with an increase in PON1 activity in QQ subjects and with a decrease in R carriers. Increased PON1 activity immediately after a bout of exercise was subsequently followed by a decrease of activity. The recovery of the basal PON1 activity levels at 24 h was found in QQ subjects regardless of their training status and in trained R carriers, but not in untrained R carriers. Altogether, the results of the present study suggest that the effects of regular and acute exercise on PON1 activity levels are modulated by the PON1-192 polymorphism. The role of PON1-55 was much less pronounced.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
Manuscript received August 3, 2001 and in revised form January 21, 2002.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. S. Rector, S. O. Warner, Y. Liu, P. S. Hinton, G. Y. Sun, R. H. Cox, C. S. Stump, M. H. Laughlin, K. C. Dellsperger, and T. R. Thomas Exercise and diet induced weight loss improves measures of oxidative stress and insulin sensitivity in adults with characteristics of the metabolic syndrome Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, August 1, 2007; 293(2): E500 - E506. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Journal of Biological Chemistry |
| Molecular and Cellular Proteomics | ASBMB Today |