|
Advertisement | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Journal of Lipid Research, Vol. 43, 936-943, June 2002
PPAR
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(PPAR
) has a direct effect on islet function, we treated INS-1 cells, an insulinoma cell line, with a PPAR
adenovirus (AdPPAR
) as well as the PPAR
agonist clofibric acid. AdPPAR
-infected INS-1 cells showed PPAR
agonist- and fatty acid-dependent transactivation of a PPAR
reporter gene. Treatment with either AdPPAR
or clofibric acid increased both catalase activity (a marker of peroxisomal proliferation) and palmitate oxidation. AdPPAR
induced carnitine-palmitoyl transferase-I (CPT-I) mRNA, but had no effect on insulin gene expression. AdPPAR
treatment increased cellular triglyceride content but clofibric acid did not. Both AdPPAR
and clofibric acid decreased basal and glucose-stimulated insulin secretion. Despite increasing fatty acid oxidation, AdPPAR
did not increase cellular ATP content suggesting the stimulation of uncoupled respiration. Consistent with these observations, UCP2 expression doubled in PPAR
-treated cells. Clofibric acid-induced suppression of glucose-simulated insulin secretion was prevented by the CPT-I inhibitor etomoxir.
These data suggest that PPAR
-stimulated fatty acid oxidation can impair ß cell function.
Abbreviations: Ad, adenovirus; ETYA, 5,8,11,14-eicosatetrayonic acid; PPAR
, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
; PPRE, peroxisome proliferator response element; UCP2, uncoupling protein-2; VLDL, very low density lipoprotein
Supplementary key words lipotoxicity fatty acid oxidation type 2 diabetes ß cell failure peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor 
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Diabetes is a disorder of lipid as well as glucose metabolism, and abnormal lipid metabolism may contribute to relative ß cell failure (3). Plasma free fatty acids are elevated in insulin resistance long before ß cell failure causes hyperglycemia (4). This occurs because of two early manifestations of insulin resistance: decreased suppression of hormone sensitive lipase in adipocytes (promoting lipolysis from lipid stores) and decreased re-esterification of fatty acids (5). Fatty acids fuel the dyslipidemia of insulin resistance by promoting VLDL production. VLDL is the major substrate for lipoprotein lipase, which is expressed by pancreatic ß cells (6) and inversely related to insulin secretion (7). ß cells thus have two abundant sources of lipid that might promote insulin secretory failure: plasma free fatty acids and fatty acids provided by lipoprotein lipase-mediated hydrolysis of VLDL. Chronic exposure of islets (8), intact rats (9), and obese non-diabetic humans (10) to elevated concentrations of free fatty acids impairs ß cell function, but the mechanisms are unclear.
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
(PPAR
) is an attractive potential mediator of the effects of fatty acids on ß cell function. It is a ligand-activated nuclear transcription factor expressed at high levels in tissues adapted to metabolize fatty acids such as liver, heart, and kidney (11). Fatty acids are natural ligands for PPAR
, and its activation promotes fatty acid oxidation (12). PPAR
is known to be expressed at low levels in islets (13) but the direct effects of PPAR
on ß cell function are unknown. To test the hypothesis that PPAR
affects insulin secretion, we compared the effects of adenoviral-mediated expression of PPAR
with clofibric acid (a PPAR
ligand) in INS-1 cells, a rat insulinoma cell line.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
adenovirus
cDNA was subcloned into pAC-CMV. Ten micrograms of this construct was combined with XbaI-digested AdRR5 in 560 µl of HBS (10 mM HEPES, 137 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 0.7 mM Na2HPO4). Fifty microliters of 2.5 M CaCl2 was added, then the fine suspension was mixed with 293 cells grown in DMEM + 10% FBS. The suspension was removed the following day, and the medium was changed to DMEM + 2% FBS. One week later, cells were frozen and thawed three times, then spun at 200 g. Serial dilutions of the supernatant were combined with 2x MEM containing 1.2% agar, then layered onto 293 cells at 85% confluency. Plaques appeared 23 weeks later. Positive clones (as determined by PCR) were expanded and purified by a standard protocol (14). For this virus, two different controls, Adßgal (expressing the bacterial ß-galactosidase gene) and AdNull (the same replication-defective virus without an insert) were used. In some experiments, we also used a bicistronic green fluorescent protein (GFP)-PPAR
adenovirus (with a GFP-only virus as a control) generated as described (15). Transfection efficiency was 7090% for both the PPAR
and control virus.
Cell culture
INS-1 cells, a rat insulinoma cell line (16), were plated at 25 x 104 cells/cm2 in RPMI 1640 (containing 11 mM glucose) supplemented with 10% FBS, 1 mM pyruvate, 10 mM HEPES, 2 mM glutamine, 50 µM ß-mercaptoethanol, 100 IU/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. Media were changed every 2 to 3 days. Cells at 8090% confluence were infected with AdPPAR
or control viruses. Infections were performed at a titer of 109 pfu/ml, and virus-containing media remained in contact with cells for the duration of the experiment.
Clofibric acid (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) was dissolved in ethanol and used in most experiments at a final concentration of 500 µM. Control cells received an equivalent volume of the vehicle. The + enantiomer of etomoxir, an inhibitor of carnitine palmitoyltransferase-I (CPT-I), was used at a concentration of 100 µM.
Northern blotting, RT-PCR, and sequencing
RNA was extracted from INS-1 cells using reagents from Promega (Madison, WI). Ten to twenty micrograms of RNA was subjected to Northern blotting and probed using cDNAs for mouse PPAR
, rat liver CPT-I (CPT-Iß), and mouse pre-proinsulin. Probes were labeled with 32P-dCTP, hybridization was carried out for 1 h at 68°C in ExpressHyb solution (Clontech, Palo Alto, CA), and washes were performed according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Blots were then analyzed using either a Biorad GS 525 Phosphorimager (Biorad Laboratories, Hercules, CA) or conventional autoradiography. For RT-PCR, first strand cDNA synthesis was performed using total RNA primed with oligo(dT) and Superscript II reverse transcriptase (Life Technologies Inc., Rockville, MD). PCR (30 cycles of 94° for 1 min, 55° for 1 min, 72° for 1 min 30 sec) was conducted using primers derived from exons 6 and 8 of the mouse PPAR
gene (GenBank # X75292 and # X75294): upstream 5'-CGAAGCCT- ACCTGAAGAACT-3', downstream 5'-ACGTGCACAATCCCCTCTG-3'. The predicted 580 bp product of several reactions was extracted from pooled gel slices (using reagents from Millipore, Bedford, MA) and used as template in dye terminator cycle sequencing reactions.
Acyl-CoA oxidase reporter gene assay
INS-1 cells cultured in 12-well cluster dishes were infected with 109 pfu per well of AdPPAR
or the control virus AdNull. Three hours later, cells were transfected with p(ACO)3TKLuc, which contains three copies of the peroxisomal proliferator response element (PPRE) found in the ACO promoter (ACTGGAAACAGGA) upstream of the luciferase reporter gene. Cells were co-transfected with a ß-galactosidase plasmid to control for transfection efficiency. After overnight incubation, cells were washed and fed fresh medium in the presence or absence of 10 µM 5,8,11,14-eicosatetraynoic acid (ETYA) (Biomol, Plymouth Meeting, PA) or 250 µM oleic acid complexed with BSA (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). The cells were harvested 24 h later and luciferase and ß-galactosidase activities were assayed (12).
Catalase activity
As an index of peroxisome activation, the activity of the peroxisomal enzyme catalase was determined. Colorimetric catalase assays, based on the capacity of the enzyme to metabolize hydrogen peroxide, were performed exactly as described by Baudhuin and colleagues (17). Activity is expressed in arbitrary units calculated as the percent decrease in absorbance at 450 nm compared with assay blanks (with no cellular extract) and normalized for protein content.
Fatty acid oxidation
ß oxidation was quantified by adding [14C]palmitate to cells and measuring the generation of labeled CO2. INS-1 cells were cultured in 25 cm2 flasks. On the day of the assay, the medium was changed to glucose- and serum-free RPMI 1640. One hour later, the medium was changed to glucose- and serum-free RPMI 1640 containing 200 nCi/ml [14C]palmitate (American Radiolabeled Chemicals, St. Louis, MO) corresponding to a palmitate concentration of
4 pM. The flasks were capped with a rubber septum fitted with a center well containing filter paper soaked with 250 µl of 2 N NaOH. Reactions were terminated by injecting 2 ml of 6 N HCl through the septum. Flasks were kept horizontal for 15 min then placed upright for 12 h to trap liberated CO2 . Filters were then transferred to scintillation vials pre-filled with 1 ml of water and 62 µl of 2 N NaOH Aquasol II was added, the mixtures were shaken, chemiluminescence was allowed to subside, and the vials were counted in a scintillation counter.
Determination of triglyceride content
Cells were washed extensively, pelleted by low speed centrifugation, transferred to glass tubes, dried and weighed, then lipids were extracted with 2:1 (v/v) chloroform-methanol. The organic phase was dried under nitrogen gas, lipids were resuspended in reaction mixtures for the determination of triglyceride content (Sigma), and triglycerides were assayed using a colorimetric assay as described previously (7).
Insulin assay
INS-1 cells were cultured in 12-well cluster dishes and stimulated with glucose as previously described (7). On the day of the assay, cells were rinsed with 1 ml KRBH buffer (134 mM NaCl, 4.7 mM KCl, 1.2 mM KH2PO4, 1.2 mM MgSO4, 1 mM CaCl2, 10 mM HEPES pH 7.4, 2 mM NaHCO3, and 0.5% BSA), then incubated in 0.5 ml of glucose-free KRBH buffer for 1 h. The buffer was aspirated and the cells were incubated in either 0.5 ml glucose-free KRBH or KRBH containing 15 mM glucose for an additional hour. The buffer was then collected and assayed for insulin by radioimmunoassay using a rat insulin antibody (Linco Research, St. Charles, MO). Insulin results were normalized to cellular DNA content determined using a microfluorometer after adding 0.2 N NaOH to the cells and subjecting them to a freeze-thaw protocol.
ATP assay
ATP levels were determined within the linear response range of a luciferin-based assay (ApoGlow, BioWhittaker Inc., Rockland, ME). Cells were plated at a density of 10,000 cells/well of a 96-well plate and infected with AdPPAR
or control virus. Nucleotide releasing reagent (100 µl) was added to each well containing 100 µl of media, incubated for 5 min, then the resultant lysate was placed in a luminometer cuvette. Nucleotide monitoring reagent (20 µl) was added and samples were read over 1 sec.
UCP2 expression
Quantitative real-time PCR was performed essentially as described (18). Data were normalized to the level of GAPDH message in the same sample. Primers and probe for UCP2 were identical to those used by Young et al. (19): (upstream) 5'-TCA- TCAAAGATACTCTCCTGAAAGC-3', (downstream) 5'-TGACG- GTGGTGCAGAAGC-3', (Probe) 5'-FAM-TGACAGACGACCTC- CCTTGCCACT-TAMRA-3'. For protein detection, extracts were subjected to SDS-PAGE and Western blotting by standard techniques then probed with a polyclonal goat antibody to UCP2 (SC6525, Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., Santa Cruz, CA).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
expression in INS-1 cells
(AdPPAR
) and infected INS-1 cells, a model for glucose stimulated insulin secretion. Forty eight hours after infection, PPAR
mRNA was detected by Northern blotting using RNA from cells infected with AdPPAR
(Fig. 1A
, lane 3) but not in RNA from cells infected with the control virus Adßgal (Fig. 1A, lane 2) or mock-infected cells (lane 1). The failure to detect PPAR
message by Northern blotting in native INS-1 cells is expected. Levels of PPAR
mRNA are low in INS-1 cells and islets prompting the use of RT-PCR to document expression (13, 20). To confirm that PPAR
is expressed in native INS-1 cells, total RNA from these cells was subjected to RT-PCR. A fragment of the predicted size (580 bp) was detected (Fig. 1B, lane 2) that did not appear when the RT step was omitted from the PCR reaction (lane 3). Sequencing of this fragment confirmed its identity as rat PPAR
.
|
is transcriptionally active in INS-1 cells
expresses a functional nuclear receptor, we performed transactivation experiments in INS-1 cells using an acyl-CoA-oxidase (ACO)-luciferase heterologous promoter-reporter construct. Cells infected with either AdPPAR
or AdNull were transfected with p(ACO)3TKLuc, a luciferase reporter plasmid containing three copies of the PPRE from the ACO promoter. Oleate (a likely natural activator of PPAR
) and ETYA (an eicosanoid PPAR
ligand) were used to enhance responses. Infection with AdPPAR
increased luciferase activity
6-fold in INS-1 cells, a response that was amplified by either ETYA or oleate (Fig. 2)
.
|
was also capable of transactivating an endogenous target gene. The expression of CPT-I, rate-limiting for fatty acid oxidation, was determined by Northern blotting after AdPPAR
infection of INS-1 cells. CPT-I mRNA was difficult to detect despite prolonged exposure times in Adß-gal-infected cells (Fig. 3
, lane 1), but clearly present in AdPPAR
-treated cells (lane 2). In the same cells, PPAR
expression had no effect on insulin message levels (Fig. 3, bottom panel).
|
is involved in peroxisomal proliferation in rodents (21). After 48 h, catalase activity was greater (P < 0.05) in cells treated with AdPPAR
(Fig. 4A
, solid bars) than cells treated with Adßgal (Fig. 4A, open bars). In the absence of adenoviruses, catalase activity was greater (P < 0.01) after 48 h of treatment with clofibric acid (Fig. 4B, solid bars) as compared with vehicle treatment (Fig. 4B, open bars). Catalase induction after both AdPPAR
and clofibric acid treatment was time-dependent with increases notable after 12 h (not shown).
|
-treated cells (Fig. 5A
, solid bars) as compared with AdNull-treated cells (Fig. 5A, open bars). In INS-1 cells not treated with adenoviruses, clofibric acid treatment for 48 h increased palmitate oxidation (P < 0.05) as compared with vehicle-treated cells. These assays were performed using labeled palmitate in serum-free and glucose-free media. The same proportional effects (at lower levels of oxidation) were seen when fatty acid oxidation studies were done in the presence of glucose.
|
suppresses insulin secretion independent of triglyceride content
decreased basal insulin secretion by
50% and glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS) by
57% (each P < 0.05, Fig. 6A
, solid bars). Similar results were seen in seven independent experiments. In three independent experiments, parallel cells treated with AdPPAR
showed no effect on insulin message levels (Fig. 3). In the absence of adenoviruses, treatment with clofibric acid decreased basal insulin secretion by
31% and GSIS by
40% (each P < 0.05, Fig. 6B, solid bars). Similar results were seen in six independent experiments.
|
or clofibric acid (in the absence of adenoviruses). Triglyceride content was
157% higher in AdPPAR
-treated as compared with AdNull-treated cells (Fig. 6C, P < 0.05), but there was no difference between cells treated with clofibric acid (Fig. 6D, solid bar) and vehicle (Fig. 6D, open bar).
Effects on ATP content and UCP2 expression
The generation of ATP from glucose metabolism can simulate insulin secretion in normal islets. Fatty acid oxidation can also stimulate ATP production. PPAR
-induced fatty acid oxidation had no significant effect on ATP levels in INS-1 cells (Table 1), suggesting that PPAR
activates respiration that is uncoupled from oxidative phosphorylation. Consistent with this notion, PPAR
increased levels of UCP2 mRNA (Fig. 7A)
and protein (Fig. 7B) in INS-1 cells.
|
|
, clofibric acid induced catalase activity, increased fatty acid oxidation, and decreased insulin secretion, but unlike PPAR
, clofibric acid did not affect cellular triglyceride content. To determine if increased fatty acid oxidation is involved in the suppression of insulin secretion, INS-1 cells were treated with the specific CPT-I inhibitor etomoxir. This treatment decreased [14C]palmitate oxidation by 64% in cells not treated with clofibric acid (30,833 ± 5,481 dpm/flask without etomoxir; 11,234 ± 1,284 dpm/flask + 100 µM etomoxir; P < 0.05) and by 70% in cells treated with clofibric acid (45,814 ± 5,774 dpm/flask without etomoxir; 13,804 ± 302 + 100 µM etomoxir; P < 0.01). Consistent with a role for fatty acid oxidation in the suppression of insulin secretion, the decrease in glucose-stimulated insulin secretion caused by clofibric acid (Fig. 8B)
was not seen when both clofibric acid and etomoxir were added to cells (Fig. 8B Clo + Eto).
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
or with activation of endogenous PPAR
using clofibric acid, decreases insulin secretion. PPAR
induces the expression of UCP2 in insulinoma cells and does not increase intracellular ATP. The suppression of glucose-stimulated insulin secretion can be reversed by inhibition of fatty acid oxidation. Taken together, these findings suggest that excessive fatty acid oxidation may contribute to defects in ß cell function.
Uncoupling proteins disrupt the electrochemical gradient across the inner mitochondrial membrane, producing heat instead of ATP from respiration (23). PPAR
also induces UCP1 expression in brown fat (24) and UCP3 expression in the heart (19). The induction of UCP2 and suppression of insulin secretion in the current work are consistent with data showing that overexpression of UCP2 suppresses insulin secretion in normal islets (25) and that UCP2 deficiency improves insulin secretion in ob/ob mice (26). UCP2 enhances proton leak in isolated mitochondria from INS-1 cells (27), suggesting that PPAR
-mediated induction of UCP2 uncouples respiration and prevents a rise in ATP despite accelerated fatty acid oxidation.
If accelerated fatty acid oxidation decreases insulin secretion, decreasing fatty acid oxidation would be predicted to enhance insulin secretion. A recent human study has validated this prediction. Clayton and colleagues (28) described a subject with hypoglycemia and striking hyperinsulinemia in the setting of deficient short chain L-3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase activity, a key enzyme in the mitochondrial ß-oxidation spiral. These results complement studies in several systems (2931) showing that different inhibitors of CPT-I promote glucose-stimulated insulin secretion.
In Zucker diabetic fatty rats (fa/fa, animals with a mutation in the leptin receptor), ß cell failure is associated with islet lipid accumulation (32). Message levels for PPAR
, CPT-I, and ACO are decreased and fatty acid oxidation is suppressed in these islets. Some of these defects are reversed by overexpressing the leptin receptor in fa/fa islets (13). These indirect findings suggest that increasing PPAR
activity would be associated with improved ß cell function in Zucker diabetic islets. However, these islets may not be reflective of other models of insulin secretory failure since overexpression of UCP2 (which suppresses insulin secretion in normal islets, 25) improves insulin secretion in Zucker diabetic islets (33).
Glucose decreases PPAR
expression in ß cells (20). Glucose and fatty acids compete as respiratory substrates in many cells, and PPAR
regulates fatty acid oxidation, so glucose-induced PPAR
suppression suggests the existence of a glucose-fatty acid cycle in the ß cell. This issue is unresolved. Different groups report conflicting results regarding the effects of chronic fatty acid exposure on islet glucose metabolism (8, 34). Fatty acids do not have a sufficient effect on glucose metabolism in INS-1 cells to explain their effect on insulin secretion (35). Several lines of evidence implicate fatty acid metabolism in this process.
Fatty acids may be required for insulin secretion in the setting of starvation (36). Acute exposure to fatty acids increases insulin secretion (37, 38). Chronic exposure to fatty acids suppresses glucose-stimulated insulin secretion in insulinoma cells (39), as well as rat (8, 40), mouse (41), and human (42) islets. Fatty acids are PPAR
ligands, and induction of CPT-I by fatty acids is mediated by PPAR
(12). Our work extends these findings by providing direct evidence that PPAR
can affect insulin secretion.
While PPAR
promotes fatty acid oxidation, it also stimulates lipid uptake (4345). Increased islet neutral lipid content (46) does not explain our findings. Both PPAR
and clofibric acid suppress insulin secretion, but clofibric acid does so without affecting islet triglyceride content (Fig. 6). The reversal of insulin suppression by a fatty acid oxidation inhibitor (Fig. 8B) implicates excessive fatty acid oxidation in ß cell dysfunction.
Excess fatty acid oxidation could decrease cytosolic levels of long chain acyl-CoA (47), a signaling molecule that might promote insulin secretion through phospholipid metabolism or activation of protein kinase C (48). Tests of the long chain acyl-CoA hypothesis have provided conflicting results (49, 50). Excess fatty acid oxidation could also desensitize the ß cell to calcium fluxes. Glucose-stimulated insulin secretion is prompted by an increase in mitochondrial metabolism, leading to an increase in cytosolic calcium, the main trigger for insulin secretion. Repeated stimulation of mitochondria can alter calcium flux and suppress insulin secretion despite normal generation of ATP (51).
Yoshikasa and colleagues recently reported a striking decrease in glucose-stimulated insulin secretion and insulin content in rat pancreatic islets after treatment for 48 h with the PPAR
agonist bezafibrate (52). These results suggest that the effects of PPAR
on insulin secretion are not limited to insulinoma cells.
Given the complexities of ß cell function, it is difficult to extrapolate observations made in INS-1 cells to defects in insulin secretion in human type 2 diabetes. However, chronic exposure of islets to fatty acids, PPAR
ligands, causes ß cell dysfunction. Our results suggest a role for PPAR
-induced fatty acid oxidation in the suppression of insulin secretion. Future studies of lipid signaling molecules and mitochondrial calcium fluxes in PPAR
-treated cells could help clarify the mechanisms leading to ß cell failure in the setting of insulin resistance.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
Manuscript received October 2, 2001 and in revised form March 14, 2002.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
in disease of pancreatic ß cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 95: 889888903.
deficiency reduces insulin resistance and atherosclerosis in apoE null mice. J. Clin. Invest. 107: 10251034.[Medline]
in the adult rodent heart. FASEB J. 15: 833845.
gene in the pancreatic ß-cell. J. Biol. Chem. 46: 3579935806.
. J. Biol. Chem. 276: 3152131527.
and PPAR
activators direct a tissue-specific transcriptional response via a PPRE in the lipoprotein lipase gene. EMBO J. 15: 53365348.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. B Ropero, P. Juan-Pico, A. Rafacho, E. Fuentes, F J. Bermudez-Silva, E. Roche, I. Quesada, F. R. de Fonseca, and A. Nadal Rapid non-genomic regulation of Ca2+ signals and insulin secretion by PPAR{alpha} ligands in mouse pancreatic islets of Langerhans J. Endocrinol., February 1, 2009; 200(2): 127 - 138. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Holness, G. K. Greenwood, N. D. Smith, and M. C. Sugden PPAR{alpha} activation and increased dietary lipid oppose thyroid hormone signaling and rescue impaired glucose-stimulated insulin secretion in hyperthyroidism Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, December 1, 2008; 295(6): E1380 - E1389. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Arumugam, E. Horowitz, D. Lu, J. J. Collier, S. Ronnebaum, D. Fleenor, and M. Freemark The Interplay of Prolactin and the Glucocorticoids in the Regulation of {beta}-Cell Gene Expression, Fatty Acid Oxidation, and Glucose-Stimulated Insulin Secretion: Implications for Carbohydrate Metabolism in Pregnancy Endocrinology, November 1, 2008; 149(11): 5401 - 5414. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-C. Chuang, J.-Y. Cha, J. C. Garmey, R. G. Mirmira, and J. J. Repa Research Resource: Nuclear Hormone Receptor Expression in the Endocrine Pancreas Mol. Endocrinol., October 1, 2008; 22(10): 2353 - 2363. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Sun, L. Zhang, H. F. Gu, W. Han, M. Ren, F. Wang, B. Gong, L. Wang, H. Guo, W. Xin, et al. Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-{alpha} Regulates the Expression of Pancreatic/Duodenal Homeobox-1 in Rat Insulinoma (INS-1) Cells and Ameliorates Glucose-Induced Insulin Secretion Impaired by Palmitate Endocrinology, February 1, 2008; 149(2): 662 - 671. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. A. Martens, A. Vervoort, M. Van de Casteele, G. Stange, K. Hellemans, H. V. Van Thi, F. Schuit, and D. Pipeleers Specificity in Beta Cell Expression of L-3-Hydroxyacyl-CoA Dehydrogenase, Short Chain, and Potential Role in Down-regulating Insulin Release J. Biol. Chem., July 20, 2007; 282(29): 21134 - 21144. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Neschen, K. Morino, J. Dong, Y. Wang-Fischer, G. W. Cline, A. J. Romanelli, J. C. Rossbacher, I. K. Moore, W. Regittnig, D. S. Munoz, et al. n-3 Fatty Acids Preserve Insulin Sensitivity In Vivo in a Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-{alpha}-Dependent Manner Diabetes, April 1, 2007; 56(4): 1034 - 1041. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Kashemsant and C. B Chan Impact of uncoupling protein-2 overexpression on proinsulin processing J. Mol. Endocrinol., December 1, 2006; 37(3): 517 - 526. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Holness, G. K. Greenwood, N. D. Smith, and M. C. Sugden Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-{alpha} and Glucocorticoids Interactively Regulate Insulin Secretion During Pregnancy Diabetes, December 1, 2006; 55(12): 3501 - 3508. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. Nolan, M. S.R. Madiraju, V. Delghingaro-Augusto, M.-L. Peyot, and M. Prentki Fatty Acid Signaling in the {beta}-Cell and Insulin Secretion Diabetes, December 1, 2006; 55(Supplement_2): S16 - S23. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C Saleh, M. B Wheeler, and C. B Chan Endogenous islet uncoupling protein-2 expression and loss of glucose homeostasis in ob/ob mice. J. Endocrinol., September 1, 2006; 190(3): 659 - 667. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Bergeron, J. Yao, J. W. Woods, E. I. Zycband, C. Liu, Z. Li, A. Adams, J. P. Berger, B. B. Zhang, D. E. Moller, et al. Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor (PPAR)-{alpha} Agonism Prevents the Onset of Type 2 Diabetes in Zucker Diabetic Fatty Rats: A Comparison with PPAR{gamma} Agonism Endocrinology, September 1, 2006; 147(9): 4252 - 4262. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Ravnskjaer, M. Boergesen, L. T Dalgaard, and S. Mandrup Glucose-induced repression of PPAR{alpha} gene expression in pancreatic {beta}-cells involves PP2A activation and AMPK inactivation. J. Mol. Endocrinol., April 1, 2006; 36(2): 289 - 299. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Terauchi and T. Kadowaki Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors and Insulin Secretion Endocrinology, August 1, 2005; 146(8): 3263 - 3265. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Ravnskjaer, M. Boergesen, B. Rubi, J. K. Larsen, T. Nielsen, J. Fridriksson, P. Maechler, and S. Mandrup Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor {alpha} (PPAR{alpha}) Potentiates, whereas PPAR{gamma} Attenuates, Glucose-Stimulated Insulin Secretion in Pancreatic {beta}-Cells Endocrinology, August 1, 2005; 146(8): 3266 - 3276. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. W. Fariss, C. B. Chan, M. Patel, B. Van Houten, and S. Orrenius ROLE of MITOCHONDRIA in TOXIC OXIDATIVE STRESS Mol. Interv., April 1, 2005; 5(2): 94 - 111. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. L. Pappan, Z. Pan, G. Kwon, C. A. Marshall, T. Coleman, I. J. Goldberg, M. L. McDaniel, and C. F. Semenkovich Pancreatic {beta}-Cell Lipoprotein Lipase Independently Regulates Islet Glucose Metabolism and Normal Insulin Secretion J. Biol. Chem., March 11, 2005; 280(10): 9023 - 9029. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Gremlich, C. Nolan, R. Roduit, R. Burcelin, M.-L. Peyot, V. Delghingaro-Augusto, B. Desvergne, L. Michalik, M. Prentki, and W. Wahli Pancreatic Islet Adaptation to Fasting Is Dependent on Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor {alpha} Transcriptional Up-Regulation of Fatty Acid Oxidation Endocrinology, January 1, 2005; 146(1): 375 - 382. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Shimomura, H. Shimizu, M. Ikeda, S. Okada, M. Kakei, S. Matsumoto, and M. Mori Fenofibrate, Troglitazone, and 15-Deoxy-{Delta}12,14-prostaglandin J2 Close KATP Channels and Induce Insulin Secretion J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., September 1, 2004; 310(3): 1273 - 1280. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. B. Chan, M. C. Saleh, V. Koshkin, and M. B. Wheeler Uncoupling Protein 2 and Islet Function Diabetes, February 1, 2004; 53(90001): S136 - 142. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
T. J. Biden, D. Robinson, D. Cordery, W. E. Hughes, and A. K. Busch Chronic Effects of Fatty Acids on Pancreatic {beta}-Cell Function: New Insights From Functional Genomics Diabetes, February 1, 2004; 53(90001): S159 - 165. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. Sorhede Winzell, H. Svensson, S. Enerback, K. Ravnskjaer, S. Mandrup, V. Esser, P. Arner, M.-C. Alves-Guerra, B. Miroux, F. Sundler, et al. Pancreatic {beta}-Cell Lipotoxicity Induced by Overexpression of Hormone-Sensitive Lipase Diabetes, August 1, 2003; 52(8): 2057 - 2065. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. V. Medvedev, J. Robidoux, X. Bai, W. Cao, L. M. Floering, K. W. Daniel, and S. Collins Regulation of the Uncoupling Protein-2 Gene in INS-1 beta -Cells by Oleic Acid J. Biol. Chem., November 1, 2002; 277(45): 42639 - 42644. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Journal of Biological Chemistry |
| Molecular and Cellular Proteomics | ASBMB Today |