|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Journal of Lipid Research, Vol. 44, 265-270, February 2003
Copyright © 2003 by Lipid Research, Inc.
, inhibits aromatase cytochrome P450 expression in the ovary of mouse


* Departments of Medical Chemistry, Kochi Medical School, Nankoku, Kochi 783-8505, Japan
Anatomy, Kochi Medical School, Nankoku, Kochi 783-8505, Japan
Internal Medicine, Kochi Medical School, Nankoku, Kochi 783-8505, Japan
** Department of Biochemistry, School of Pharmacy, Tokyo University of Pharmacy and Life Science, Tokyo 192-0392, Japan
Published, JLR Papers in Press, November 4, 2002. DOI 10.1194/jlr.M200327-JLR200
1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. e-mail: todak{at}kochi-ms.ac.jp
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, could influence estrogen synthesis in vivo in the ovary of mice. As reported, chronic treatment of C57BL6/J female mice with various amounts of fenofibrate as a diet reduced the serum triglycerides level and induced hepatomegaly in a dose-dependent manner. Northern blot analyses using hepatic RNA confirmed the induction of classical PPAR
-target genes including acyl-CoA oxidase and lipoprotein lipase. The analyses using ovarian RNA revealed the suppression of gene expression for enzymes involved in steroidogenesis including CYP11A, CYP19, steroidogenic acute regulatory protein, and HDL receptor, but the CYP17 expression was evidently induced. Consistent with the suppression of CYP19 mRNA expression, the aromatase activity in the ovary was dose-dependently inhibited, resulting in significant decreases in the uterine size and bone mineral density. When PPAR
null mice were treated with dietary fenofibrate, neither hepatomegaly nor inhibition of ovarian aromatase activity was observed, rather the activity was enhanced.
These results demonstrate that fenofibrate inhibits ovarian estrogen synthesis by suppressing the mRNA expressions and that functional PPAR
is indispensable for the inhibitory action of the agent in vivo.
Supplementary key words peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors fenofibrate aromatase estrogen
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Administration of fibrates to rodents results in numerous hepatic alterations, including hepatomegaly, an increase in the number and size of peroxisomes, and an increase in the expression of genes encoding peroxisomal, mitochondrial, and microsomal fatty acid-metabolizing enzymes. These alterations in the liver cause reduction of lipid levels in the serum as well as in adipose tissues (3). Previously, we reported that bezafibrate or fenofibrate was effective in restoring hepatic steatosis due to estrogen-insufficiency in mice (46).
The pharmacological actions of fibrates have been found to be mediated through activation of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
(PPAR
), a member of the nuclear hormone receptor superfamily (3). Activated PPAR
binds as a heterodimer with the retinoid X receptor to a peroxisome proliferator-response element located in the promoter region of target genes, which results in transcriptional activation of the target (7) genes (8).
Apart from the genes coding for enzymes involved in fatty-acid metabolism, recent studies have demonstrated that activated PPAR
regulates the expression of genes for enzymes involved in steroid metabolism. Those include 17ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase IV, 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase I, and 3ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase V (911). Furthermore, progesterone production in human choriocarcinoma JEG-3 cells (12) and in Leydig cells (13) is reported to be inhibited by a PPAR
-mediated pathway.
To better understand the molecular mechanisms of the pleiotropic responses induced by activated PPAR
, we investigated its effects on the ovarian estrogen synthesis in vivo using mice. The data demonstrate that fenofibrate inhibits aromatase activity by suppressing the mRNA expression in a dose-dependent manner, and further that functional PPAR
is required for the agent to exhibit inhibitory action in vivo.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-32P]dCTP was purchased from ICN Biomedicals, Inc (Costa Mesa, CA). pBluescript SKII(-) was obtained from Stratagene (La Jolla, CA). All other chemicals were of analytical grade and obtained commercially.
Animals
Animal care and experiments were carried out in accordance with institutional animal regulations. PPAR
null mice (14) were obtained from the Jackson Laboratory. C57BL6/J and PPAR
null female mice were maintained on a 12 h light/dark cycle at 2225°C and given water and rodent chow diet with or without fenofibrate ad libitum.
The chow diets supplemented with fenofibrate were prepared by impregnation with fenofibrate, which was dissolved in acetone as described previously (15). C57BL6/J female mice at 7 weeks of age were divided into five diet groups and fed a diet containing various amounts of fenofibrate for 4 weeks: 0% (n = 6), 0.005% (n = 11), 0.02% (n = 14), 0.1% (n = 19), and 0.4% (n = 13). PPAR
null female mice at the same age were fed a normal diet with 0% (n = 5) or 0.1% (n = 5) fenofibrate for 4 weeks and used for analysis.
Aromatase activity
Four to six ovaries were used to prepare microsomal fractions (16). Aromatase activity in the fractions was measured by a tritiated water-release assay using 1ß-[3H]androst-4-ene-3,17-dione as a substrate as described previously (17). An inhibitor of aromatase, 4-androsten-4-ol-3,17-dione, was included at 10 µM. Aromatase activity was expressed as picomoles of [3H]water released per mg protein per h.
Histological examination
Ovaries from the mice treated with fenofibrate were fixed in a solution of 10% buffered formalin for 24 h, dehydrated in graded ethanol, and embedded in paraffin. Sections were cut 4 µm thick and stained with hematoxylin-eosin.
Measurement of plasma triglyceride concentration
Plasma was prepared from the blood samples collected from the tail vein of mice after they were fasted for 5 h. Concentrations of triglyceride were measured by colorimetric methods using 10 µl of the plasma with a kit.
Northern blots
Total RNA was prepared from the livers and ovaries using ISOGEN. Equal aliquots of total RNA (15 µg) were denatured with formaldehyde and formamide, subjected to electrophoresis in a 1.0% agarose gel, and transferred to a blotting membrane for hybridization (18). cDNA probes were prepared by PCR amplification using oligo d(T)-primed cDNA derived from ovarian RNA or hepatic RNA as a template with the following sets of primers: P450scc (CYP11A) (a 1,273-bp fragment with sense primer: 5'-TACGTGGCAGGGTCCAGTGCTGAGT-3', and antisense primer: 5'-GAAGTGGGTGGTATTTTGGCTTTTT-3'), P45017
(CYP17) (a 407-bp fragment with sense primer: 5'-TGGTGCACAATCCTGAGGTG-3', and antisense primer: 5'-AAAGGGTCGATCAGAAAGACCACCTTGGGG-3'), HDL receptor (a 604-bp fragment with sense primer: 5'-CCATGAAGCTGACCTACAACGAATCAA-3', and antisense primer: 5'-TCCTGGGAGCCCTTTTTACTACCACTC-3'), steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR) (a 484-bp fragment with sense primer: 5'-AAGCCAGCAGGAGAACGGGGACGAA-3', and antisense primer: 5'-TAGGACCTGGTTGATGATTGTCTTC-3'), PPAR
(a 720-bp fragment with sense primer: 5'-CCTGTCTGTCGGGATGTCACACAATGC-3', and antisense primer: 5'-TGCAACTTCTCAATGTAGCCTATGTTT-3'), lipoprotein lipase (LPL) (a 1,101-bp fragment with sense primer: 5'-GGCCGCAGCAGACGCAGGAAGAGATTT-3', and antisense primer: 5'-AAGAAGGAGTAGGTTTTATTTGTGGAA-3'), and 17ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (17ß-HSD) (a 765-bp fragment with sense primer: 5'-AAATAGCCATAGATGCTGGTTTCC-3', and antisense primer: 5'-TCATGTCCTCTGAAGTCAACTGAA-3'). The amplified products were cloned into the EcoRV site of pBluescript SKII(-). The cDNA fragments for acyl-CoA oxidase, P450arom(CYP19), FSH receptor, and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) were prepared as described previously (4, 19). The cDNA probes were labeled with [
-32P]dCTP using a Klenow fragment. The filters were hybridized with the indicated 32P-labeled probes (
1 x 106 cpm/ml) for 12 h at 42°C, washed three times with 0.1% (w/v) SDS/0.1x SSC at 50°C for 30 min, and exposed at -80°C to Fuji X-ray film (Fuji Photofilm Inc.) with intensifying screens for 1236 h. The quantification of the signals was done with BAS2000 (Fujifilm Inc. Tokyo, Japan). The results were normalized to the signal generated from GAPDH mRNA.
Radiographic analysis of the femur
Radiographs of the femurs were taken with a soft X-ray generator (model CMB-2; SOFTEX, Tokyo, Japan) (20). The bone mineral density (BMD) of the femurs was measured using a dual X-ray absorptiometer (model DCS-600R; Aloka, Tokyo, Japan), as reported previously (20).
Statistic analysis
Data are expressed as the means ± SEM. The significance of the differences was analyzed using the Student's t-test employing InStat software (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA). A P value less than 0.05 was considered significant.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
2-fold over that of the untreated mice by the treatment with more than 0.02% fenofibrate. Fenofibrate did not alter the expression level of PPAR
mRNA in the ovary. The expression of FSH receptor mRNA was not clearly influenced by fenofibrate as observed in the genes involved in steroidogenesis. These results demonstrate that fenofibrate does not affect the general gene expression levels, but it suppresses those involved in steroidogenesis.
|
|
|
Effects of fenofibrate on the liver, uterus, and ovary of PPAR
null mice
PPAR
null mice were similarly treated with 0.1% fenofibrate to examine whether the effects observed in the wild-type mice were exerted through the activation of the PPAR
pathway or not. The liver-body weight ratios in the control and fenofibrate-treated mice were 0.044 ± 0.004 and 0.04 ± 0.001 (n = 5), respectively, indicating no induction of hepatomegaly (Fig. 5A)
. The uterine weights were 111.3 ± 27.9 mg and 162.2 ± 34.8 mg for the control and treated mice, respectively, although the difference was not significant (Fig. 5B). Unexpectedly, the aromatase activity in the ovaries of the PPAR
null mice was stimulated
5.5-fold over the control level by dietary fenofibrate (Fig. 5C). The induction of steroidogenesis in PPAR
null mice by agonists for PPAR
has been reported recently (13). Nevertheless, our present findings strongly indicate that functional PPAR
is required for fenofibrate to inhibit the aromatase activity in the ovary of mice.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Agonists of PPAR
such as prostaglandin J2 or ciglitazone were shown to stimulate secretion of 17ß-estradiol in cultured rat granulosa cells (26). Nonetheless, the stimulatory effect of the agonists on the estrogen biosynthesis is still controversial, as selective ligands for PPAR
such as thiazolidinedione inhibited transcription of the CYP19 gene in cultured human adipose stromal cells (27) and in human ovarian granulosa cells (28). Furthermore, a study employing in situ hybridization demonstrated that PPAR
is a major subtype of PPARs expressed in the rat ovary (26). These studies, therefore, imply that fenofibrate might inhibit the mRNA expression and activity of aromatase not through the activation of PPAR
, but PPAR
. However, the results obtained with the PPAR
null mice indicate that functional PPAR
is obligatory for the inhibitory actions of fenofibrate in vivo. It remains to be clarified whether the drug acts directly on the ovary. A recent study has provided evidence to support the direct action of activated PPAR
on steroidogenic cells such as Leydig cells, where PPAR
inhibits steroidogenesis through suppression of the transport of cholesterol into the mitochondria (13). Alternatively, fenofibrate possibly modifies the hypothalamic-pituitary functions to inhibit the production of gonadotropin, which in turn causes the inhibition of estrogen synthesis in the ovary. The importance of PPAR
in the transcriptional regulation in the pituitary cells has been reported in an in vitro study (29). Other indirect effects of fenofibrate and/or its metabolized products on certain signaling molecules that might interfere with the transcription of Cyp19 in the ovary could also account for the phenomenon. Likewise, this possible indirect action of fenofibrate might explain the unexpected response of PPAR
null mice, in which the aromatase activity is significantly enhanced by the drug. As diminution in uterine size and loss of BMD are characteristic manifestations of estrogen insufficiency, as occurred in aromatase gene-knockout (ArKO) mice (19, 20), we assume that the symptoms observed in the mice treated with fenofibrate are ascribed to a suppression in estrogen synthesis. Nevertheless, it is possible that the drug acts directly on the uterus and bone, because the diminution in uterine size and loss of BMD are also observed in ArKO mice treated with fenofibrate (K. Toda, unpublished observations).
Administration of fibrates such as bezafibrate is proposed to be beneficial in continuing tamoxifen treatment for obese early breast cancer patients (30), because adjuvant tamoxifen often induces severe liver steatosis and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (31). In addition, tamoxifen is suggested to be an intrinsic estrogenic agonist, and a minimal but evident risk of endometrial cancer has been reported with adjuvant tamoxifen (32). Our present study supports the beneficial effects of a coadministration of PPAR
activators with antiestrogenic drugs or aromatase inhibitors for the treatment of estrogen-dependent diseases, because they not only activate fatty acid ß-oxidation in the liver, but also inhibit estrogen synthesis.
Apart from the clinical aspects, we should point out the possible disruption of the endocrine system by unintended activation of PPAR
, as ligands for PPAR
are found in diverse classes of chemical compounds, including commercially used plasticizers (e.g., phthalate esters), industrial solvents used as surfactants or wetting agents (e.g., trichloroethylene), herbicides (e.g., perfluorodecanoic acid), and naturally occurring chemicals (e.g., phytanic acid) (33, 34). Thus, unlimited exposure to these compounds might induce the suppression of estrogen synthesis, which results in unexpected side effects in vivo, including detrimental effects on the reproductive system.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
Manuscript received August 16, 2002 and in revised form October 28, 2002.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
agonists reduce 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 in the liver. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 279: 330336.[CrossRef][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Plummer, R. M. Sharpe, N. Hallmark, I. K. Mahood, and C. Elcombe Time-Dependent and Compartment-Specific Effects of In Utero Exposure to Di(n-butyl) Phthalate on Gene/Protein Expression in the Fetal Rat Testis as Revealed by Transcription Profiling and Laser Capture Microdissection Toxicol. Sci., June 1, 2007; 97(2): 520 - 532. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Yokoyama, B. Xin, T. Shigeto, M. Umemoto, A. Kasai-Sakamoto, M. Futagami, S. Tsuchida, F. Al-Mulla, and H. Mizunuma Clofibric acid, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor {alpha} ligand, inhibits growth of human ovarian cancer Mol. Cancer Ther., April 1, 2007; 6(4): 1379 - 1386. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Corton and P. J. Lapinskas Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors: Mediators of Phthalate Ester-Induced Effects in the Male Reproductive Tract? Toxicol. Sci., January 1, 2005; 83(1): 4 - 17. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Gennari, R. Nuti, and J. P. Bilezikian Aromatase Activity and Bone Homeostasis in Men J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 2004; 89(12): 5898 - 5907. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Journal of Biological Chemistry |
| Molecular and Cellular Proteomics | ASBMB Today |