|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Journal of Lipid Research, Vol. 44, 1713-1719, September 2003
Copyright © 2003 by American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
School of Dietetics and Human Nutrition, McGill University, Ste-Anne-de-Bellevue, Québec, Canada H9X 3V9
Published, JLR Papers in Press, May 1, 2003. DOI 10.1194/jlr.M300089-JLR200
1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. e-mail: jonesp{at}macdonald.mcgill.ca
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
These results show that intake of phytosterols in a low-fat beverage format is not efficacious for lipid level modification.
Abbreviations: CNRU, Clinical Nutrition Research Unit; LFPS, low-fat with phytosterols; NF, nonfat placebo; NFPS, nonfat with phytosterols; TC, total cholesterol
Supplementary key words cholesterol hypercholesterolemia placebo cardiovascular disease
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Phytosterols exert their cholesterol-lowering action by suppressing intestinal cholesterol absorption while partially suppressing cholesterol biosynthesis (9, 12, 13). While they are only partially absorbed into the circulation, phytosterol solubility and incorporation into intestinal micelles is an important aspect of phytosterol cholesterol-lowering efficacy. A previous study using phytosterols-safflower oil (4:1, v/v) in capsules did not show any reduction in cholesterol concentrations, probably due to matrix interference (4). Phytosterols thus require some fat for solubilization and cholesterol-lowering efficacy. More recently, however, other factors have been found that improve phytosterol solubility. One such factor, lecithin, results in reduced cholesterol absorption at lower phytosterol dosages (14).
In the majority of the previous trials, phytosterols have been provided in a fat matrix and fed as part of a regular or low-fat diet containing between 30% and 35% of energy as fat (15, 16). However, incorporating phytosterols into low-fat foods would be more recommendable in keeping with a heart-healthy diet. Few studies have examined the effects of phytosterols when provided in low-fat or nonfat foods (1720). These trials have all found reductions in TC and LDL cholesterol with consumption of low-fat foods containing plant sterols; however, weaknesses in study design prevent strong conclusions from being drawn regarding the efficacy of low- or nonfat foods enriched with phytosterols in reducing plasma lipid concentrations. In addition, no study has examined the hypocholesterolemic potential of phytosterol-enriched beverages.
The objective of this trial was thus to assess whether phytosterols, when provided in a low-fat or nonfat beverage, elicit a hypocholesterolemic response in mildly hypercholesterolemic subjects compared with a control diet in which volunteers were provided identical foods. The null hypothesis was that there would be no difference in plasma lipid or plant sterol concentrations across the three diets.
| EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Protocol and diets
Subjects were randomly allocated to one of six treatment sequences. Each treatment phase was of 21 days duration and separated by a 4 week washout period. Treatment phases were controlled feeding periods differing only in the type of beverage supplied, either nonfat placebo (NF), nonfat with phytosterols (NFPS), or low-fat (1% fat by weight) with phytosterols (LFPS). The nonfat beverages contained 85.8% water, 0.3% protein, less than 0.1% fat, 13.6% carbohydrates, and 0.2% fiber. Each serving of the nonfat beverages provided 220 kJ (52 kcal). The low-fat beverage contained the same protein, carbohydrate, and fiber content, but contained 1.0% fat and provided 238 kJ (61 kcal) per 100 g serving. The LFPS and NFPS test drinks were produced by adding plant sterol materials directly into beverages using a proprietary technique. Subjects consumed three 100 g beverages/day. The mixture of phytosterols provided in the beverages was derived from tall oil and contained
60% sitosterol, as well as some sitostanol and campestanol, with an overall phytosterol purity of >99%.
Diets were controlled and contained 35% of energy as fat, 15% as protein, and 50% as carbohydrate. Meals followed typical North American habits and included chicken breast and vegetables, pizza, ham sandwich, beef stir-fry, and spaghetti. Diets were provided as three isoenergetic meals and were served with the treatment beverage in equal dosages. All meals were prepared by the staff of the Mary Emily Clinical Nutrition Research Unit (CNRU) of McGill University. Each subject's weight-maintaining energy intake was individually calculated using the Mifflin equation (21) with an activity factor of 1.7. This factor is considered appropriate for weight maintenance in moderately active subjects (22). Subjects were required to consume all foods provided and nothing else. In addition, two meals per day were consumed under supervision at the CNRU, and the other meal was packed for subjects to consume outside of the CNRU.
Complete physical exams were conducted at screening and at the end of the entire study period to detect the presence of hematological or biochemical abnormalities. Brief physical exams were also conducted at the beginning and end of each treatment phase. A physician was available throughout the study in case subjects experienced discomfort.
Lipid and phytosterol analyses
Fasting blood samples were taken on Days 1, 2, 7, 14, and 21 of each treatment phase for determination of plasma lipid and phytosterol concentrations. Plasma was separated from red blood cells after 15 min of centrifugation at 520 g and stored at -80°C until analysis. Plasma TC, HDL cholesterol, and triacylglycerols were analyzed in duplicate using a VP Autoanalyzer and commercial enzymatic kits (Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, IL). HDL cholesterol concentrations were measured after precipitation of the apolipoprotein B lipoproteins with dextran sulfate and magnesium chloride (23). LDL cholesterol concentrations were calculated using the Friedewald equation (24).
Plasma phytosterol concentrations were analyzed in duplicate by gas-liquid chromatography of the nonsaponifiable materials extracted from plasma lipids, as reported previously (25). Briefly, 0.5 ml of plasma was saponified with 0.5 mol/l methanolic KOH at 100°C for 1 h and the nonsaponifiable materials extracted with petroleum ether. 5-
-Cholestane was used as the internal standard. Samples were injected into a gas-liquid chromatograph equipped with a flame ionization detector (HP 5890 Series II, Hewlett Packard, Palo Alto, CA) and a 30 m capillary column (SAC-5, Supelco, Bellefonte, PA). Detector and injector temperatures were set at 310°C and 300°C, respectively. Duplicate samples were analyzed isothermically at 285°C. Phytosterol peaks were identified by comparison with authenticated standards (Supelco).
Statistical analyses
Plasma lipid concentrations were analyzed using crossover repeated measures ANOVA with sequence, phase, subject, carry over, and dietary treatment as main effect variables. Baseline values were included as covariates in the analyses of posttreatment absolute values and change from baseline. When significant differences were found for main diet effect, Tukey posthoc tests were used to compare treatment means. Student's paired t-tests were used to compare baseline and endpoint values between each dietary treatment. Plasma phytosterol concentrations were analyzed using crossover ANOVA with sequence, subjects, phase, carry over, and treatment as main effects variables. Paired Student's t-test was used to compare baseline and endpoint values for plasma phytosterol and phytosterol-cholesterol ratio within dietary treatment phases. A P value of 0.05 was taken as statistically significant. All data are reported as means ± SEM.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
Plasma campesterol concentrations increased (P < 0.01) with consumption of LFPS diet versus NF and NFPS (Table 3). Values at endpoint were 31.5% higher (P < 0.01) relative to baseline with consumption of the LFPS diet. Similarly, plasma sitosterol concentrations increased (P < 0.01) with LFPS compared with NF and NFPS consumption. Endpoint concentrations were 37.7% higher (P < 0.01) than baseline for LFPS.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It is highly unlikely that the lack of efficacy of the phytosterol-containing functional beverages was due to weaknesses in study design. Diets were strictly controlled and identical in macronutrient composition. Furthermore, lack of compliance with the study protocol is improbable. All subjects consumed two meals per day under supervision at the CNRU, and thus at least two thirds of the total daily phytosterol dose was consumed. In addition, the lack of change in body weight suggests that subjects consumed all of the food provided and nothing else. However, there is still a chance that subjects substituted study foods for nonstudy foods. In that case, only 1.2 g of phytosterols would have been consumed. This level of plant sterols or lower has been shown to produce significant reductions in plasma LDL cholesterol concentrations (2628). Inappropriate dosage of phytosterols is therefore not likely. Each phytosterol-containing beverage provided 0.6 g of phytosterols for a total daily dose of 1.8 g, a quantity determined by our group (8, 9, 29, 30) and others (3, 6, 7, 11) to be sufficient to elicit a hypocholesterolemic response. This level of consumption of plant sterols, when dispersed in a fat matrix, has been shown to reduce TC and LDL cholesterol concentrations by an average of 10% and 13%, respectively (16).
Lack of adequate power to detect a difference between groups is also unlikely. Based on previous research from our group, a difference of 0.56 mmol/l in endpoint LDL cholesterol concentrations would have been expected between the phytosterol-containing diets and the control diet (8). Using the standard deviation obtained in this previous study, our sample size was sufficient to detect a difference of 0.48 mmol/l with 95% confidence and 80% power. It cannot be ruled out that a greater sample size may have permitted identification of statistically significant differences between treatment groups.
The significant decrease in HDL cholesterol concentrations with NF and NFPS, but not LFPS, was somewhat surprising since previous studies have not shown any effect of plant sterol or stanol consumption on HDL cholesterol concentrations (8, 9, 11, 30). However, nonsignificant differences in changes in TAG concentrations between diets may be partly responsible for this effect. Both NF and NFPS caused 2022% reductions (NS) in TAG, whereas LFPS reduced TAG by 6.7% (NS).
Most recent studies conducted to examine the lipid-lowering potential of phytosterols incorporated them into a fat matrix: margarine, butter, or dressing. Results from these trials have shown that phytosterol consumption decreases TC and LDL cholesterol concentrations by 3.4% to 11.6% for TC and 5.4% to 15.5% for LDL cholesterol (69, 31, 32). Lately, trials have been conducted to establish whether incorporation of phytosterols into low-fat spreads and dressings results in diminished cholesterol concentrations. Maki et al. (26) have reported lowering of TC concentrations by 5.2% and 6.6% with a 50% fat spread providing 1.1 g or 2.2 g phytosterols/day, respectively, compared with a control reduced-fat spread and LDL cholesterol lowering of 7.6 and 8.1%. However, in a trial comparing the effects of 3 g phytosterols/day in a reduced-fat spread versus 6 g phytosterols/day in a 28% fat dressing, and 9 g phytosterols/day provided in reduced-fat spread and dressing (33), there was no difference in cholesterol concentrations in any of the three groups compared with control. Reductions similar to those observed by Davidson et al. (33) had previously been observed when using mayonnaise as a vehicle for phytosterol administration (34, 35). These studies show a high degree of variability in response to phytosterols incorporated into reduced fat matrices.
More recent studies have examined the effects of phytosterols on plasma lipid concentrations when these were incorporated into low-fat or nonfat foods. Of the four studies conducted to date (1620), all have shown reductions in plasma lipid concentrations. The results of these studies suggest that the variety of functional foods that can be produced with phytosterols as a means of lowering circulating cholesterol concentrations can be increased to include low-fat food items. However, several weaknesses in study design prevent firm conclusions from being drawn. In the study by Nestel et al. (18), one third of the daily phytosterol dose, 0.8 g, was provided in margarine, and the rest incorporated in equal amounts in bread and breakfast cereals. Since 0.8 g phytosterols/day has been shown to be sufficient to elicit a hypocholesterolemic response (3436), it is possible that the margarine alone produced cholesterol-lowering with the other low-fat foods not contributing to the reductions observed. In the study by Tikkanen et al. (19), the fat content of the foods in which phytosterols were incorporated were not provided. In a third trial (20), significant reductions in TC and LDL cholesterol concentrations of 6.7% and 11.1%, respectively, relative to baseline were observed with consumption of a low-fat (1% fat by weight) yogurt enriched with 1 g of phytosterols. However, there is no mention of the results of a statistical comparison between the phytosterol-containing yogurt and the placebo, which caused a nonsignificant lowering of 2.3% and 4.9% in TC and LDL cholesterol concentrations, respectively. More substantial decreases in TC and LDL cholesterol concentrations of 8.7% and 13.7%, respectively, relative to placebo, were observed by Mensick et al. (17) when providing
3 g/day of esterified stanols in low-fat yogurts. However, since stanols were esterified, it is uncertain whether similar results would be obtained using free stanols. In the present trial, consumption of free sterols in low- and nonfat beverages did not lead to reductions in TC and LDL cholesterol concentrations relative to the control beverage. A previous report (37) showed decreased cholesterol absorption with consumption of 3 g/day nonesterified stanols in beverage format; however, the short duration of the feeding period, 4 days, prevented conclusions to be made regarding its efficacy in lowering plasma cholesterol concentrations.
There is thus some controversy regarding the true efficacy of nonfat and low-fat foods enriched in plant sterols in reducing plasma lipid concentrations. In the present trial, phytosterols were incorporated into beverages containing either no fat or 1 g of fat/serving. This quantity of fat may not have been sufficient to solubilize phytosterols. It has previously been shown that free sitostanols are not as effective in reducing cholesterol absorption as lecithin-coated sitostanols (14). Solubility of phytosterols is thus an important of determinant of plant sterol efficacy. Also, the use of a liquid as vehicle for phytosterols may not be optimal for their incorporation into micellar contents. Gastric emptying of liquid portions of a meal is more rapid than for solids (38). Liquid emptying is not affected by the presence of solid foods or fats in the meals, whereas gastric emptying of the oil phase is altered by both the quality and quantity of dietary fats (38). Thus, plant sterols consumed in solid foods have more time to be thoroughly mixed with gastrointestinal contents, which may in turn provide better access to mixed micelles in the small bowel.
Consumption of only the LFPS but not NFPS resulted in elevations in plasma plant sterol concentrations in the present trial. From previous controlled feeding studies, it would have been expected that both phytosterol-containing diets would increase plasma plant sterol concentrations (8, 30). Since there was no increase in plasma phytosterol concentrations with NFPS consumption, it is possible that fat may have been necessary to promote micellar absorption of phytosterols. In the case of the LFPS diet, perhaps the fat content enabled some phytosterol absorption, but at a level too low to activate mechanisms that lower cholesterol absorption. Thus, there may exist a threshold level for phytosterol absorption to elicit cholesterol lowering, which was not attained with these low- and nonfat phytosterol formulations.
In conclusion, this study shows that unesterified phytosterols, when provided in low-fat and nonfat beverages, do not lead to greater reductions in TC and LDL cholesterol compared with a control diet. The cholesterol-lowering potential of phytosterols may thus depend upon previous dispersion into a fat matrix and on the physical nature of the food. Alternatively, esterification may be necessary for the cholesterol-lowering action of phytosterols when they are incorporated into liquids. Results from this trial show that, despite changes in plasma phytosterol levels, incorporation of plant sterols in a beverage format is not effective in promoting cholesterol reductions compared with a control beverage. It is therefore important that previous data concerning the cholesterol-lowering efficacy of plant sterols not be liberally applied to all new phytosterol formulations. Research is thus warranted to determine the efficacy of such new products.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
Manuscript received February 24, 2003 and in revised form April 17, 2003. and in re-revised form June 25, 2003.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
I. Rudkowska, S. S. AbuMweis, C. Nicolle, and P. J.H. Jones Cholesterol-Lowering Efficacy of Plant Sterols in Low-Fat Yogurt Consumed as a Snack or with a Meal J. Am. Coll. Nutr., October 1, 2008; 27(5): 588 - 595. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Hansel, C. Nicolle, F. Lalanne, F. Tondu, T. Lassel, Y. Donazzolo, J. Ferrieres, M. Krempf, J.-L. Schlienger, B. Verges, et al. Effect of low-fat, fermented milk enriched with plant sterols on serum lipid profile and oxidative stress in moderate hypercholesterolemia Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, September 1, 2007; 86(3): 790 - 796. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. S. AbuMweis, C. A. Vanstone, N. Ebine, A. Kassis, L. M. Ausman, P. J. H. Jones, and A. H. Lichtenstein Intake of a Single Morning Dose of Standard and Novel Plant Sterol Preparations for 4 Weeks Does Not Dramatically Affect Plasma Lipid Concentrations in Humans J. Nutr., April 1, 2006; 136(4): 1012 - 1016. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Richelle, M. Enslen, C. Hager, M. Groux, I. Tavazzi, J.-P. Godin, A. Berger, S. Metairon, S. Quaile, C. Piguet-Welsch, et al. Both free and esterified plant sterols reduce cholesterol absorption and the bioavailability of {beta}-carotene and {alpha}-tocopherol in normocholesterolemic humans Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, July 1, 2004; 80(1): 171 - 177. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. C. Hayes, A. Pronczuk, and D. Perlman Nonesterified Phytosterols Dissolved and Recrystallized in Oil Reduce Plasma Cholesterol in Gerbils and Humans J. Nutr., June 1, 2004; 134(6): 1395 - 1399. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Journal of Biological Chemistry |
| Molecular and Cellular Proteomics | ASBMB Today |