|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Journal of Lipid Research, Vol. 45, 496-506, March 2004
Copyright © 2004 by American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

* Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425
Research and Development, Ralph H. Johnson Veterans Administration Medical Center, Charleston, SC 29401
Published, JLR Papers in Press, December 1, 2003. DOI 10.1194/jlr.M300347-JLR200
1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. e-mail: hannun{at}musc.edu
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This study demonstrates strict structural requirements for interaction of ceramide with CAPP, and disclose ceramide as a very specific regulator of CAPP. The studies also begin to define features that transform ceramide analogs into inhibitors of CAPP.
Abbreviations: PP1, protein phosphatase-1; PP2A, protein phosphatase-2A
Supplementary key words protein phosphatase-2A protein phosphatase-1 ceramide-activated protein phosphatase
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, cathepsin D, and ceramide-activated protein phosphatase (CAPP) (1018). Initially, CAPP was identified as a member of the 2A class of serine-threonine phosphatases (1719). Subsequently, two serine-threonine phosphatases, protein phosphatase-1 (PP1) and protein phosphatase-2A (PP2A), have been shown to be ceramide responsive in vitro and in vivo (1619). PP2A is found primarily as a heterotrimeric enzyme in cells containing a catalytic subunit (PP2Ac), an A subunit, and a B subunit (possible role in intracellular targeting). PP1 is primarily purified as a heterodimeric enzyme in cells bound to a number of described subunits (e.g., nuclear inhibitor of protein phosphatase-1, pyrimidine tract-binding protein-associated splicing factor). Whether all forms of PP1 and PP2A are activated by ceramide remains to be determined, but the catalytic subunits of these serine-threonine protein phosphatases are now collectively termed ceramide-activated protein phosphatases.
Several in vitro substrates have now been described for CAPPs, including Bcl-2, protein kinase C
, c-jun, SR proteins, and AKT/PKB (2025). Additional studies also suggest that these substrates are dephosphorylated in response to exogenous ceramides or ceramide-inducing agonists (21, 23). Nevertheless, it is not fully established that these substrates are directly dephosphorylated by CAPP in vivo. A key parameter in determining the specificity and significance of CAPP regulation by ceramide is the study of the specificity of the interaction of these phosphatases with ceramide.
In this study, we examined the structural requirements within the ceramide molecule necessary for both the activation and association with CAPPs. The results disclose that even slight modifications to the sphingoid backbone greatly decrease the ability of the lipid to interact with and activate CAPP. Thus, the present study shows a high degree of specificity for ceramide by these serine-threonine protein phosphatases, and lends further evidence for the significance of the interaction of ceramide with PP1 and PP2A.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
All stereoisomers of C6-ceramide were prepared from their corresponding sphingosines as described previously (2628). Sphingosines of specific stereochemical foundations [IUB nomenclature: D-erythro-(2S,3R); L-threo-(2S,3S)] and the key intermediates N- and 1,3-O-protected sphingosines were utilized as basic substrates in the synthesis of the target compounds. Starting from a known configurationally stable chiral auxiliary (Garner's aldehyde prepared from L-serine), we synthesized (2S)-sphingosines, 4,5-dihydro-sphingosines and 4,5-dehydro-sphingosines (2931). Starting from D-serine, we had access to all remaining 2R-isomers (2931). (2S, 3R, 4Z)-sphingosine, (2S, 3R, 4E)-1-O-methylsphingosine, (2S, 3R, 4E)-3-O-methylsphingosine, and (2S, 3R, 4E)-N-methyl-sphingosine, as well as all C16-ceramide analogs (see Table 2), were synthesized following a previously described procedure (32, 33). D-myristoylaminophenylpropanol (D-MAPP), L-MAPP and their C6-analogs were synthesized as previously described (34). Analogs of C6-ceramide and C6- and C16-serinol listed in Tables 1 and 2 were prepared in our laboratory and characterized as shown below.
|
|
6.25 (d, J = 7.4, NH), 4.58 (m, 1H, 3-H), 4.11(dd, J = 11.4, 3.7, 1-H), 4.03 (m, 1H, 2-H), 3.73 (dd, J = 11.3, 3.5, 1-H), 2.23 [m, 4H, C(6)H2 and COCH2], 1.63 (m, 2H, COCH2CH2), 1.49 [m, 2H, C(7)H2], 1.25 (m, 24H, CH2), 0.86 (t, 6H, J = 7.0, CH3). EI-MS (CH3OH; relative intensity, %) m/z 813.2 ([2M + Na]+, 100), 613.2 ([2M + Na + H - COC5H11]+, 65), 396.2 ([MH]+, 38), 378.3 ([MH - H2O]+, 20). Calculated for C24H45NO3 m/z 395.3.
Synthesis of (2S, 3S, 4R)-N-hexanoyl-phytosphingosine (phyto-C6-ceramide)
This compound was prepared from (2S, 3S, 4R)-phytosphingosine and hexanoyl chloride following a general acylation procedure described previously (28, 32, 33). The crude product was purified by flash column chromatography (elution with CHCl3-MeOH, 10:1, v/v) following crystallization from ethyl acetate-acetone (1:1, v/v) to give a pure phyto-C6-ceramide as a white microcrystalline powder (mp 8890°C, 68% yield). TLC, CHCl3-MeOH, 10:1, v/v; Rf 0.41; CH2Cl2-MeOH, 9:1, v/v; Rf 0.40 (35, 45). EI-MS (CH3OH; relative intensity, %) m/z 853.8 ([2M + Na]+, 35), 416.3 ([MH]+, 100), 398.4 ([MH - H2O]+, 22). Calculated for C24H49NO4 m/z 415.4.
Synthesis of (2S, 3R, 4Z)-N-hexanoyl-sphingosine (D-erythro-cis-C6-ceramide)
This compound was prepared from (2S, 3R, 4Z)-sphingosine and hexanoyl chloride following a general acylation procedure described previously (28, 32, 33). The crude product was purified by flash column chromatography (elution with CHCl3-MeOH, 94:6, v/v) and isolated as a waxy semisolid (65% yield). TLC, CHCl3-MeOH, 10:1, v/v; Rf 0.57. 1H-NMR (CDCl3),
6.21 (d, J = 7.1, NH), 5.60 (dtd, J = 11.3, 9.0, 1.0, 5-H), 5.49 (ddt, J = 11.2, 9.2, 1.5, 4-H), 4.62 (dd, J = 8.5, 4.2, 3-H), 4.1 (dd, J = 11.1, 3.6, 1-H), 3.84 (m, 1H, 2-H), 3.70 (dd, J = 11.2, 3.5, 1-H), 2.21 (t, J = 7.5, COCH2), 2.2 (m, 2H, C(6)H2), 1.65 (m, 2H, C(7)H2), 1.26 (m, 26H, CH2), 0.90 (t, 6H, J = 7. 1, CH3). EI-MS (CH3OH; relative intensity, %) m/z 817.6 ([2M + Na]+, 100), 398.3 ([MH]+, 35), 380.3 ([MH - H2O]+, 10). Calculated for C24H47NO3 m/z 397.4.
Synthesis of (2S, 3R, 4E)-1-O-methylN-hexanoyl-sphingosine (1-O-methyl-D-erythro-C6-ceramide)
This compound was prepared from (2S, 3R, 4E)-1-O-methyl-sphingosine and hexanoyl chloride following the general acylation procedure described previously (28, 32, 33). The crude product was purified by flash column chromatography (elution with CHCl3-MeOH, 96:4, v/v) and was isolated as a waxy semisolid (62% yield). TLC, CHCl3-MeOH, 10:1, v/v; Rf 0.65. 1H-NMR (CDCl3):
6.12 (d, J = 6.7, NH), 5.85 (dtd, J = 11.8, 7.9, 1.6, 5-H), 5.45 (ddt, J = 11.2, 9.6, 1.3, 4-H), 4.13 (m, 1H, 3-H), 4.02 (m, 1H, 2-H), 3.69 (m, 1H, 1-H), 3.553.46 (m, 1H, 1-H), 3.32 (s, 3H, OCH3), 2.20 (m, 2H, COCH2), 2.08 [m, 2H, C(6)H2], 1.65 (m, 2H, COCH2CH2), 1.24 (m, 26H, CH2), 0.87 (t, 6H, J = 7.0, CH3). EI-MS (CH3OH; relative intensity, %) m/z 845.0 ([2M + Na]+, 100), 637.1(75), 411.9 (MH+, 25), 394.1 ([MH - H2O]+, 73), 264.2 ([MH - CH3OH - H2O - COC5H11]+, 8). Calculated for C25H49NO3 m/z 411.4.
Synthesis of (2S, 3R, 4E)-3-O-methyl-N-hexanoyl-sphingosine (3-O-methyl-C6-ceramide)
This compound was prepared from (2S, 3R, 4E)-3-O-methyl-sphingosine and hexanoyl chloride following the same general acylation procedure (28, 32, 33). The crude product was purified by flash column chromatography (elution with CHCl3-MeOH, 96:4, v/v) and isolated as a waxy white semisolid (60% yield). TLC, CHCl3-MeOH, 10:1, v/v; Rf 0.61. 1H-NMR (CDCl3),
6.18 (d, J = 7.7, NH), 5.74 (dtd, J = 11.1,8.9, 1.0, 5-H), 5.35 (ddt, J = 11.2, 9.2, 1.5, 4-H), 3.95 (m, 1H, 1-H), 3.90 (m, 1H, 2-H), 3.83 (dd, J = 7.8, 3.7, 3-H), 3.55 (m, 1H, 1-H), 3.25 (s, 3H, OCH3), 2.21 (t, 2H, J = 7.6, COCH2), 2.06 [q, J = 7.1, C(6)H2], 1.62 (m, 2H, COCH2CH2), 1.35 [m, 2H, C(7)H2], 1.21 (m, 24H, CH2), 0.87 (t, 6H, J = 7.1, CH3). EI-MS (CH3OH; relative intensity, %) m/z 877.4 ([2M + 2Na]+, 12), 845.1 ([2M + Na]+, 100), 637.1(15), 434.2([M + Na]+, 15), 411.7 ([MH]+, 8), 380.1(12), 264.2([MH - CH3OH - H2O - COC5H11]+, 5). Calculated for C25H49NO3 m/z 411.4.
Synthesis of (2S, 4E)-3-keto-C6-ceramide (3-keto-C6-ceramide)
This compound was prepared from D-erythro-C6-ceramide by the selective oxidation of its secondary hydroxyl group following the procedure described for the N-acetyl derivative (28, 32, 33). The crude product was purified by flash column chromatography (elution with CHCl3-MeOH, 96:4, v/v) as a waxy semisolid (55% yield). TLC, CHCl3-MeOH, 10:1, v/v; Rf 0.63. 1H-NMR (CDCl3)
= 7.10 (dt, J = 15.7, 7.1, 5-H), 6.70 (d, J = 6.2, NH), 6.24 (d, J = 15.8, 4-H), 4.87(m, 1H, 2-H), 3.95 (m, 1H, 1-H), 3.80 (m, 1H, 1-H), 2.24 [m, 4H, C(6)CH2, COCH2], 1.62 (m, 2H, CH2), 1.47 (m, 2H, CH2), 1.24 (m, 24H, CH2), 0.88 (t, 6H, J = 7.0, CH3). EI-MS (CH3OH; relative intensity, %) m/z 813.4 ([2M + Na]+, 100), 396.2([MH]+, 25). Calculated for C24H45NO3 m/z 395.3.
Synthesis of (2S, 3R, 4E)-N-methyl-N-hexanoyl-sphingosine (N-Me-D-erythro-C6-ceramide)
This compound was prepared from (2S, 3R, 4E)-N-methyl-sphingosine and hexanoyl chloride following a general acylation procedure described previously (28, 32, 33). The crude product was purified by flash column chromatography (elution with CHCl3-MeOH, 96:4, v/v) as a waxy semisolid (58% yield). TLC, CHCl3-MeOH, 10:1, v/v; Rf 0.58. 1H-NMR (CDCl3); mixture of two conformers,
= 5.60 (m, 1H, 5-H), 5.42 (m, 1H, 4-H), 4.41 (m, 0.45H, 2-H), 4.11 (t, 0.55H, J = 10.1,3-H), 4.77 (t, 0.45H, J = 10.4, 3-H), 4.0 (dd, 0.45H, J = 3.4, 10.77, 1-H), 3.93 (dd, 0.55H, J = 3.0, 8.1, 1-H), 3.84 (m, 1.45H, 1-H, 2-H), 3.76 (dd, 0.55H, J = 9.0, 10.4, 1-H), 2.95 (s, 1.60H, NCH3), 2.79 (s, 1.40H, NCH3), 2.45 (m, 0.9H, COCH2), 2.32 (m, 1.1H, COCH2), 2.0 [m, 2H, C(6)H2], 1.6 (m, 2H, COCH2CH2), 1.28 (m, 26H, CH2), 0.88 (t, 6H, J = 7.0, CH3); EI-MS (CH3OH; relative intensity, %): m/z 1,256.5 ([3M + Na]+, 7), 845.3 ([2M + Na]+, 100), 823.3 ([2M + H]+, 8), 412.3 (MH+, 10), 394.4 ([MH - H2O]+, 8). Calculated for C25H49NO3 m/z 411.4.
Synthesis of (2S, 3R, 4E)-N-[2-(1,3-dihydroxy-4E-octadecene)]N'-hexane-urea (D-erythro-C6-urea-ceramide)
This compound was prepared following the procedure described previously (28, 32, 33). To a solution of (2S, 3R, 4E)-sphingosine (84.0 mg, 0.28 mmol) in anhydrous acetonitril (4 ml) and anhydrous chloroform (3 ml), hexyl isocyanate (0.082 ml, 0.56 mmol) was added, and the mixture was stirred at room temperature under nitrogen for 2 h. After evaporation of the solvents under a reduced pressure, the residue was purified by flash column chromatography (elution with CHCl3-MeOH, 50:4, v/v) following crystallization from acetone-ethyl acetate (1:1, v/v) to give a pure urea isoster of C6-ceramide as a white microcrystalline powder (mp 9597°C, 89.1 mg, 75% yield); TLC, CHCl3-MeOH, 10:1, v/v; Rf 0.58. 1H-NMR (MeOD-CDCl3),
5.38 (dtd, J = 15.3, 6.5, 1.3, 5-H), 5.35 (ddt, J = 15.3, 6.7, 1.2, 4-H), 3.77 (m, 1H, 3-H), 3.40 (m, 2H, 1-H, 2-H), 3.35 (dd, J = 10.1, 3.5, 1-H), 2.80 (m, 2H, NHCH2), 1.72 [m, 2H, C(6)H2], 1.18 (m, 2H, NHCH2CH2), 1.0 (m, 28H, CH2), 0.60 (t, 6H, J = 7.1, CH3). EI-MS (CH3OH; relative intensity, %) m/z 875.4 ([2M + Na]+, 40), 853.4 ([2M+H]+, 55), 427.1 (MH+, 92), 409.3 ([MH - H2O]+, 100). Calculated for C25H50N2O3 m/z 426.3.
Synthesis of N-hexanoyl-serinol (C6-serinol)
This compound was prepared from serinol and hexanoyl chloride following a general acylation procedure described previously (28, 32, 33). The crude product was purified by flash column chromatography (elution with CHCl3-MeOH, 10:1.5, v/v) following crystallization from acetone-ethyl acetate (1:1, v/v) to give a pure C6-serinol as white needles (65% yield, mp 100101°C). TLC, CHCl3-MeOH, 10:1, v/v; Rf 0.22. 1H-NMR (MeOD),
3.95 (q, 1H, J = 5.6, 2-H), 3.64 (d, 4H, J = 5.2, 1-H), 2.21 (t, 2H, J = 7.5, COCH2), 1.60 (m, 2H, COCH2CH2), 1.31 (m, 24H, CH2), 0.90 (t, 3H, J = 7.0, CH3). EI-MS (CH3OH; relative intensity, %) m/z 400.8 ([2M + Na]+, 100), 303.6([2M + Na+H-COC5H11]+, 80), 212.0 ([M + Na]+, 12) 190.0([MH]+, 9). Calculated for C9H19NO3 m/z 189.1.
Synthesis of N-hexadecanoyl-serinol (C16-serinol)
This compound was prepared from serinol and palmitoyl chloride following a general acylation procedure described previously (28, 32, 33). The crude product was purified by flash column chromatography (elution with CHCl3-MeOH, 10:1.5, v/v) following crystallization from acetone-ethanol (2:1, v/v) to give a pure C16-serinol as white needles (mp 126126.5°C, 65% yield); [mp 125.5126°C (36)]. TLC, CHCl3-MeOH, 10:1, v/v; Rf 0.28. 1H-NMR (MeOD),
3.90 (q, 1H, J = 5.2, 2-H), 3.60 (d, 4H, J = 5.4, 1-H), 2.20 (t, 2H, J = 7.6, COCH2), 1.59 (m, 2H, COCH2CH2), 1.28 (m, 24H, CH2), 0.89 (t, J = 7.2, CH3). EI-MS (CH3OH; relative intensity, %) m/z 681.0 ([2M + Na]+, 100), 658.7 ([2M + H]+, 50), 330.1([MH]+, 42). Calculated for C19H39NO3 m/z 329.3.
Serine-threonine protein phosphatase assays
Myelin basic protein (MBP) was labeled in a 0.5 ml reaction containing 1 mg of MBP, 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 90 mM MgCl2, 4 mM ATP, 5 mM DTT, 10 mM ß-mercaptoethanol, 2 µCi [32P-
]ATP, and 125 U of protein kinase A. After the components were mixed, the reaction was incubated at 37°C for 2 h. MBP was purified by TCA precipitation and acetone wash as described (35). Phosphatase assay reactions were carried out in 1.5 ml polypropylene tubes in a reaction volume of 100 µl. Ceramides were added to tubes containing PP2Ac purified from rabbit skeletal muscle (Promega Corporation) (10 mU), 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 100 µM MnCl2, and 150 mM NaCl with the ethanol concentration not exceeding 1%. Components were preincubated for 10 min at 30°C. Reactions were initiated with 0.005 µl of [32P]MBP (1 mg/ml) in buffer A. After 10 min at 30°C, the assay was terminated by the addition of 375 µl 60% TCA (ice-cold) followed by the addition of 275 µl fatty acid-free BSA (0.9 mg/ml). After 10 min incubation on ice, reactions were centrifuged at 10,000 g for 15 min at 4°C, 250 µl of the supernatant was subjected to ß counting, and data were then collected. Human recombinant PP1c
(from Escherichia coli expression) (Calbiochem) and rabbit PP2A trimer from skeletal muscle (Calbiochem) were assayed as described for PP2Ac. For PP1c
, 1 unit of activity was defined as the amount of enzyme that will hydrolyze 1.0 nmol of p-nitrophenyl phosphate per min at 30°C, pH 7.0. For PP2A trimer and catalytic subunit, 1 unit of activity was defined as the amount of enzyme that will hydrolyze 1.0 nmol of phosphorylase per min at 30°C, pH 7.0.
Ceramide binding assays
In initial studies, we evaluated several methods for ceramide binding, such as lipid-protein overlay assays (35), mixed-vesicle sucrose-loaded vesicle assay (36, 37), and [14C]lipid precipitation assays (38, 39). The lipid-protein overlay assay failed to demonstrate ceramide binding, likely due to low-affinity binding. Protein kinase C also failed to bind diacylglycerol (a neutral lipid with properties similar to ceramide) using this approach. We find that the lipid-protein overlay assay is most useful for high-affinity lipid-protein interactions. With the other binding assays evaluated (mixed vesicles and ceramide precipitation), the nonspecific binding was too high for evaluation of ceramide interaction with PP2A. A large multilamellar vesicle assay (LMV assay) has been used to evaluate the binding of phosphatidylcholine to cytosolic phospholipase A2 and the binding of phosphatidylserine to phosphotyrosine phosphatase-MEG2 (40, 41). Following the published procedure for the LMV assay, vesicles for ceramide and ceramide analogs were produced as described for other lipids (40) by drying 68.3 µl of a 1 mg/ml D-erythro-C16 ceramide or ceramide analogs in solution under nitrogen per reaction. A solution (100 µl per reaction) of 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4) and 150 mM NaCl was added, and the lipid was vortexed vigorously for 2 min. Ceramide or ceramide analogs (100 µl) were mixed with buffer A [200 µl of 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, and 100 µM MnCl2]. The binding reaction was initiated by the addition of 100 µl of 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, and 100 µM MnCl2 containing 0.2 µg of PP2Ac. After a 5 min incubation at room temperature, the reaction was centrifuged at 10,000 g for 10 min and the supernatant discarded. Laemmli buffer (200 µl) was added to the lipid pellet and resolved on 10% polyacrylamide gels (SDS-PAGE) under denaturing conditions and then transferred to 0.20 µm polyvinylidene difluoride membranes. After blocking overnight at 4°C with 5% nonfat milk in phosphate-buffered saline/0.05% Tween 20 and washing, the membranes were incubated with anti-human PP2Ac antibody (C20) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) for 2 h at room temperature. The membranes were washed extensively in phosphate-buffered saline/0.05% Tween 20 (washing buffer). Bands were visualized using the appropriate horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse IgG antibody and the ECL Western blotting detection system (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
8.5 µM (Fig. 3)
. This inhibition of PP2Ac was not stereospecific, inasmuch as L-erythro-dihydro C6 ceramide inhibited the enzyme to a similar extent with an indistinguishable dose response (Fig. 3). Thus, the inhibition of PP2Ac by dihydroceramide demonstrates less specificity in protein-lipid interaction than does the activation by ceramide.
|
|
|
|
|
demonstrate the same structural requirements of the ceramide molecule for activation
The structural specificity of ceramide was also determined for the closely related enzyme, PP1c
, also a CAPP (16). Indeed, PP1c
demonstrated the same structural specificity for ceramide as PP2Ac (Table 1). Thus, to date, both CAPPs demonstrate the same specificity for ceramide, which is not unexpected, given the very high homology between the two proteins.
Structural requirements of the ceramide molecule for binding to PP2Ac
The question remained as to why small changes in the ceramide molecule completely abrogated the ability of ceramide to activate CAPPs. Are the structural analogs unable to bind CAPP, or do the structural variants interact with CAPP, but additional contact between each functional group of the ceramide molecule with CAPP is necessary to induce a configurational change leading to an increase in phosphatase activity? To begin to answer these questions, we adopted a vesicle binding assay for naturally occurring long-chain ceramide (D-erythro-C6 ceramide did not form large multilamellar structures) used previously for evaluating binding of phospholipids to proteins (40). In these studies, PP2Ac was incubated with various ceramides, and the enzyme associated with the ceramide particles was quantitated by Western blot analysis. Figure 8
and Table 2 show the relative binding efficiencies to PP2Ac of selected ceramide analogs. The LMV assay is mainly a qualitative measure of binding, but notably, structural analogs that had no effect on PP2Ac activity (D-erythro-dehydro C16 ceramide, phyto C16 ceramide, D-erythro-urea C16 ceramide, and 1-O-methyl C16 ceramide) demonstrated greatly reduced binding compared with D-erythro-C16 ceramide. These results demonstrate that the inability of these analogs to affect PP2Ac activity is due to an inability to interact with the enzyme.
|
Effects of ceramide analogs on activation of PP2Ac by D-erythro-C6 ceramide
To determine whether ceramide analogs that bind PP2Ac affect the responsiveness of the enzyme for natural ceramide, we examined the effects on CAPP activity of a ceramide analog (D-erythro-C6 urea ceramide) that had no effect on PP2Ac activity and demonstrated low binding efficiency, and a ceramide analog (D-erythro-dihydro C6 ceramide) that on its own inhibited PP2Ac and demonstrated binding efficiency similar to that of natural ceramide. These two analogs were co-added with various doses of D-erythro-C6 ceramide. D-erythro-C6 urea ceramide had no effect on ceramide-induced activation of PP2Ac (Fig. 9)
. On the other hand, D-erythro-dihydro C6 ceramide reduced the basal as well as the ceramide-induced activity of PP2Ac, but did not affect the total fold change in the increase in PP2Ac activity by ceramide (Fig. 9).
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The results presented in this study demonstrate that many of the unique structural features of ceramide are necessary for activation of serine-threonine protein phosphatases. A strict requirement for the structure of the natural (2S, 3R, 4E) ceramide for activation of the phosphatases was demonstrated. This explains the lack of activation by diacylglycerol that has been previously demonstrated (17, 18, 43). Specifically, the 4-5-trans double bond within the sphingoid backbone was found to be necessary. In fact, saturation of the 4-5 double bond of ceramide to dihydroceramide produced an inhibitory compound. This suggests a role for the dihydroceramide desaturase of the de novo ceramide pathway in regulating the activity of serine-threonine phosphatases, such that the action of the desaturase converts dihydroceramide, an inhibitor of CAPP, to ceramide, an activator of CAPP. Hydroxylation of the C4 carbon (production of phytoceramide) also greatly reduced the activation of serine-threonine protein phosphatases, as did further desaturation of the C4-C5 double bond to dehydroceramide. Furthermore, the 4-5 double bond of ceramide must be in the trans configuration, inasmuch as 4,5-cis-D-erythro-C6 ceramide had no effect on CAPP activity. Thus, this 4-5-trans double bond is absolutely required for orientating the ceramide molecule for interaction/activation of CAPPs. The necessity of the amide group, as well as the primary and secondary hydroxyl groups, was also examined, and O-methyl analogs of ceramide had no effect on serine-threonine protein phosphatase activity. Thus, for activation to occur, serine-threonine protein phosphatases must interact with ceramide at several points on the molecule, suggesting a complex interaction via a hydrogen bonding network system between the sphingoid backbone, possibly through a "binding pocket" within the enzyme, reflecting the appropriate requirement for the natural ceramide structure (Fig. 10) . The binding data support this hypothesis by demonstrating the necessity of an intact sphingoid backbone to interact with PP2Ac for activation of the enzyme to occur, because the lack of activation (or inhibition) correlated well with reduced binding to PP2Ac.
|
Additional data demonstrated that dihydroceramide had no effect on the ceramide dose response, only on the total basal and stimulated activity. This finding suggests that dihydroceramide may interact with PP2Ac through a site different from the activating ceramide binding site. Alternatively, the lack of stereospecificity for the inhibition of the PP2Ac by dihydroceramide may suggest two separate domains for interaction of ceramide and dihydroceramide with PP2Ac, i.e., a domain for nonspecific hydrophobic interactions with the sphingoid base (e.g., sphingosine or dihydrosphingosine) and fatty acid chains, and a domain for specific interaction with the sphingosine backbone. On the other hand, this latter hypothesis is somewhat argued against by two lines of evidence: first, a lack of inhibition was observed in other ceramide analogs, such as 1-O-methyl ceramide and 3-keto ceramide; and second, 3-keto dihydroceramide inhibited PP2Ac to the same extent as did dihydroceramide (C. E. Chalfant et al. unpublished observations). Thus, the inhibition is specific for the dihydroceramide form. This interaction with CAPP does lack the strict specificity for the sphingoid backbone that activation requires, because methylation of the secondary hydroxyl group and changes in stereochemistry have no effect on the ability of dihydroceramide to inhibit CAPP. Interestingly, differences in inhibition profiles between PP2Ac and the trimeric form of PP2A were observed. Unlike PP2Ac, the trimeric form of PP2A was significantly inhibited by other ceramide analogs with modifications to the 4-5 double bond (e.g., D-erythro-dehydro C6 ceramide and D-erythro-C6 phytoceramide). Furthermore, trimeric PP2A was also inhibited by D-erythro-MAPP and L-erythro-MAPP as well as all of the primary and secondary hydroxyl analogs. Inasmuch as trimeric PP2A is the natural form of the enzyme, these data likely represent the "true" nature of the enzyme and this inhibition is via interaction with either the A subunit or the B subunit. It is also of interest that D-MAPP and L-MAPP inhibit PP2A, because D-MAPP is an inducer of apoptosis, in which PP2A has been reported to play a role. On the basis of the data presented in this study, the increase in cellular endogenous ceramide produced in response to the inhibition of ceramidases by D-MAPP would overcome this inhibition.
A very curious set of results emerged when comparing the structural requirements of ceramide for the activation of serine-threonine protein phosphatases and the requirements for interaction with neutral ceramidase, one of few ceramide-interacting proteins that has been examined extensively for its interaction with ceramide. We find that the structural requirements are very similar (32, 33). For example, neutral ceramidase requires the 4-5-trans-double bond, the primary and secondary hydroxyl, and the NHCO amide group for substrate recognition (32). This raises the interesting possibility that both proteins, which do not show significant sequence homology, may share similar ceramide-interacting domains. Obviously, additional ceramide-interacting enzymes need to be examined for structural specificity (both allosteric and catalytic interactions), and specific domains in the proteins need to be identified.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
Manuscript received August 8, 2003 and in revised form November 4, 2003.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. A. Novgorodov, T. I. Gudz, and L. M. Obeid Long-chain Ceramide Is a Potent Inhibitor of the Mitochondrial Permeability Transition Pore J. Biol. Chem., September 5, 2008; 283(36): 24707 - 24717. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. H. Zeidan, R. W. Jenkins, and Y. A. Hannun Remodeling of cellular cytoskeleton by the acid sphingomyelinase/ceramide pathway J. Cell Biol., April 21, 2008; 181(2): 335 - 350. [Abstract] [Full Text] |