J. Lipid Res.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Originally published In Press as doi:10.1194/jlr.M300453-JLR200 on February 1, 2004

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
M300453-JLR200v1
45/4/742    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sprong, T.
Right arrow Articles by van Deuren, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sprong, T.
Right arrow Articles by van Deuren, M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Lipid Research, Vol. 45, 742-749, April 2004
Copyright © 2004 by American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

Human lipoproteins have divergent neutralizing effects on E. coli LPS, N. meningitidis LPS, and complete Gram-negative bacteria

Tom Sprong*,{dagger}, Mihai G. Netea*,{dagger}, Peter van der Ley§, Trees J. G. Verver-Jansen*,{dagger}, Liesbeth E. H. Jacobs*,{dagger}, Anton Stalenhoef*, Jos W. M. van der Meer*,{dagger} and Marcel van Deuren1,*,{dagger}

* Department of General Internal Medicine, University Medical Centre St. Radboud, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
{dagger} Nijmegen University Centre for Infectious Diseases, University Medical Centre St. Radboud, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
§ National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands

Published, JLR Papers in Press, February 1, 2004. DOI 10.1194/jlr.M300453-JLR200

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. e-mail: m.vandeuren{at}aig.umcn.nl


   ABSTRACT
TOP
 ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The use of lipoproteins has been suggested as a treatment for Gram-negative sepsis because they inhibit lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-mediated cytokine production. However, little is known about the neutralizing effects of lipoproteins on cytokine production by meningococcal LPS or whole Gram-negative bacteria. We assessed the neutralizing effect of LDLs, HDLs, and VLDLs on LPS- or whole bacteria-induced cytokines in human mononuclear cells. A strong inhibition of Escherichia coli LPS-induced interleukin-1ß (IL-1ß), tumor necrosis factor-{alpha}, and IL-10 by LDL and HDL was seen, whereas VLDL had a less pronounced effect. In contrast, Neisseria meningitidis LPS, in similar concentrations, was neutralized much less effectively than E. coli LPS. Effective neutralization of meningococcal LPS required a longer interaction time, a lower concentration of LPS, or higher concentrations of lipoproteins. The difference in neutralization was independent of the saccharide tail, suggesting that the lipid A moiety accounted for the difference. Minimal neutralizing effects of the lipoproteins were observed on whole E. coli or N. meningitidis bacteria under all conditions tested.

These results indicate that efficient neutralization of LPS depends on the type of LPS, but a sufficiently long interaction time, a low LPS concentration, or high lipoprotein concentration also inhibited cytokines by the less efficiently neutralized N. meningitidis LPS. Irrespective of these differences, whole bacteria showed no neutralization by lipoproteins.

Supplementary key words Gram-negative sepsis • lipopolysaccharide • low density lipoprotein • high density lipoprotein • very low density lipoprotein • cytokines • mononuclear cells • Escherichia coli • Neisseria meningitidis


   INTRODUCTION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Lipopolysaccharide (LPS), a major structural and functional component of the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria, is considered to be a major pathogenic element in Gram-negative septicemia (1). LPS interacts with a variety of cells to induce a wide array of inflammatory mediators. Among these, the proinflammatory cytokines interleukin-1ß (IL-1ß) and tumor necrosis factor-{alpha} (TNF-{alpha}) and the antiinflammatory cytokine IL-10 are key factors in the development of shock and disseminated intravascular coagulation (2).

Fulminant meningococcal sepsis (FMS) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, especially in children and young adults. In addition, it is the prototypical Gram-negative sepsis syndrome, in which LPS concentrations may become extremely high and correlate with cytokine levels, morbidity, and mortality (3, 4).

LPS is composed of a polysaccharide tail to which the lipid portion (lipid A) is attached via 2-keto-3-deoxyoctanate (KDO). Lipid A, a glucosamine-derived phospholipid, is considered to be the toxic moiety of LPS and is responsible for many of the biological effects of LPS (5).

In the past, various strategies have been explored to combat the deleterious effects of LPS during sepsis. However, none of these anti-LPS strategies has shown a benefit on outcome (6–9); thus, the search for a LPS-neutralizing treatment modality continues. Lipoproteins have been shown to bind LPS and to neutralize LPS-induced cytokine production (10). Also, in animal models of sepsis, the administration of lipoproteins was found to be beneficial (11, 12), and LPS infusion experiments in humans showed that the inflammatory response is inhibited by infusion of lipoproteins (13, 14). For these reasons, lipoprotein infusion during septicemia has been advocated as an adjunctive therapy. FMS especially, being the prototypical LPS-mediated disease, has been suggested as a candidate disease for treatment with lipoproteins.

To date, most investigators assessing the effect of lipoproteins have used LPS derived from Enterobacteriaceae species (Escherichia coli or Salmonella typhimurium). However, the LPSs are a heterogeneous group of molecules with interspecies differences in the length and position of the acyl chains in the lipid A portion of the LPS, the length and polarity of the polysaccharide tail, and the formation of supramolecular structures (5, 15, 16). These differences in LPS have been shown to modulate the capacity to induce cytokines (17–19), and it is likely that these differences also affect the interaction with lipoproteins. In addition, LPS is not the only component of Gram-negative bacteria that induces cytokines (20–22). Therefore, the question is to what extent an adjunctive therapy that targets only LPS, such as lipoproteins, will inhibit cytokine production by complete bacteria.

In the present study, we addressed these questions by comparing the inhibitory effect of lipoproteins on cytokine induction by LPS of E. coli and Neisseria meningitidis in human mononuclear cells. In addition, we assessed the cytokine-inhibiting capacity of lipoproteins on whole E. coli and N. meningitidis bacteria.


   MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
LPSs and meningococci
E. coli 055:B5 TCA and phenol-extracted LPS were obtained from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO). E. coli K12, D31m4 rough (Re) LPS consisting of lipid A(KDO)2 and lacking the polysaccharide tail was purchased from List Biological Laboratories (Campbell, CA). The lipid A of E. coli LPS is a hexaacyl phospholipid with the fatty acyl acids asymmetrically distributed (23). Meningococcal LPS was isolated by the phenol/water extraction method as described by Westphal and Jann (24). H44/76 LPS was isolated from strain H44/76 (25). Meningococcal H44/76rfaC LPS [lipid A(KDO)2] was isolated from the isogenic mutant rfaC of strain H44/76, as described by Stojiljkovic et al. (26). Similar to E. coli LPS, meningococcal LPS has a hexaacyl lipid A; however, in the lipid A of the meningococcal LPS, the fatty acids are symmetrically distributed (27). Whereas E. coli LPS has a polysaccharide tail, meningococcal LPS has an oligosaccharide tail (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1. Characteristics of the different lipopolysaccharide types

 
The commercial E. coli LPS was contaminated with protein (8.5%, by Lowry assay) and nucleic acid (6.1%, by spectrophotometry). The meningococcal LPS was not contaminated with protein, and the nucleic acid content was 4.4%. LPS was suspended in culture medium before use.

E. coli ATCC 35218 is an international reference strain. N. meningitidis H44/76 was isolated from a patient with invasive disease (25). Stationary-phase bacteria grown in liquid medium were used, and bacteria were heat-inactivated (1 h, 56°C).

Molarity of the LPS solutions
Measurement of KDO was used to estimate the molarity of the LPS solutions. KDO was measured by spectrophotometry, as described by Weissbach and Hurwitz (28).

Lipoproteins and lipoprotein-depleted plasma
Lipoproteins (VLDL, LDL, and HDL) and lipoprotein-depleted plasma (LPDP) were prepared from fresh EDTA plasma by sequential ultracentrifugation as described previously (29) under pyrogen-free conditions using pyrogen-free materials. Lipoproteins prepared in this manner were previously shown to be endotoxin-free by limulus amebocyte lysate (LAL) assay. Lipoproteins were dialyzed for 24 h against 0.05 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, containing 5 µM EDTA, with one exchange of the buffer (LPDP is the fraction of plasma that is obtained after removing the lipid fractions). Lipoproteins were isolated before each experiment from different donors. The concentration of total lipid in the lipoprotein fractions was determined based on total cholesterol as a quantitating unit. Cholesterol in the different lipoprotein fractions was measured by spectrophotometry using a commercially available kit and a Hitachi 747 apparatus (Roche Diagnostics, Almere, The Netherlands). Before use, the lipoproteins were diluted 1:1 in LPDP (unless otherwise stated). Average concentrations of lipoprotein in which the LPS or bacteria were preincubated were 376 mg/l (0.60 mmol/l cholesterol) for LDL, 130 mg/l (0.22 mmol/l cholesterol) for HDL, and 378 mg/l (0.20 mmol/l cholesterol) for VLDL. For experiments using a higher concentration of lipoproteins, the lipoproteins were concentrated approximately five times by additional ultracentrifugation of the separate lipoprotein fractions.

Human peripheral blood mononuclear cells
Blood for the isolation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) was drawn in 10 ml EDTA anti-coagulated tubes (Vacutainer System; Becton Dickinson, Rutherford, NJ) from healthy human volunteers. Informed consent was obtained before each experiment, and the guidelines of the local ethics committee were followed in the conduct of these experiments. PBMCs were isolated by density gradient centrifugation over Ficoll-Hypaque (Pharmacia Biotech AB, Uppsala, Sweden). The cells from the interphase were aspirated, washed three times in sterile PBS, and resuspended in culture medium RPMI 1640 (Dutch modification; Flow Labs, Irvine, UK) supplemented with L-glutamine (2 mmol), pyruvate (1 mmol), and gentamicin (50 mg/ml).

Assay procedure
Fifty microliters of the lipoprotein diluted in LPDP or LPDP alone was preincubated with the stimuli (50 µl) for a certain time period. Then, the preincubated mixture was added to 100 µl of 5 x 106 PBMCs on 200 µl 96-well plates at 37°C and 5% CO2 and incubated for 24 h. The supernatant was obtained by centrifugation and stored at -20°C until required for the cytokine assays. LPDP alone significantly enhanced LPS or whole bacteria-induced cytokine production in PBMCs compared with culture medium.

Cytokine assays
Levels of IL-1ß and TNF-{alpha} were determined by radioimmunoassay as described by Drenth et al. (30). The lower limit of detection was 80 pg/ml for both cytokines. IL-10 was determined by a commercially available ELISA kit (Pelikine compact; Sanquin, Amsterdam, The Netherlands).

Statistics and calculations
Statistical analysis was performed using an unpaired two-sided t-test; P < 0.05 was considered significant. Two-way ANOVA was performed to compare concentration curves (GraphPad Prism; GraphPad Software, Inc.). To calculate the inhibition of cytokines by the lipoproteins, cytokine production in the presence of the lipoprotein diluted in LPDP was expressed as a percentage of production in the presence of LPDP alone.


   RESULTS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Cytokine induction by N. meningitidis LPS and E. coli LPS
A molarity-based comparison of cytokine induction by N. meningitidis and E. coli LPS (TCA-extracted) in PBMCs, based on assay for KDO, showed that meningococcal LPS is more potent in the induction of IL-1ß and TNF-{alpha} than is E. coli LPS, especially at concentrations of less than 1 pmol/ml (Fig. 1) . The minimal concentrations to induce significant IL-1ß and TNF-{alpha} production were 0.0001 pmol/ml for meningococcal LPS and 0.001 pmol/ml for E. coli LPS. Phenol-extracted E. coli LPS was approximately as potent in the induction of IL-1ß and TNF-{alpha} as TCA-extracted LPS (data not shown). Based on these data, in subsequent experiments LPS was used at concentrations of 0.14 pmol/ml (equivalent to ~0.6 ng/ml meningococcal LPS and 1 ng/ml E. coli LPS) unless otherwise stated.



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 1. Cytokines induced by E. coli and N. meningitidis lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Dose-response curves for interleukin-1ß (IL-1ß) and tumor necrosis factor-{alpha} (TNF-{alpha}) induced by E. coli and N. meningitidis LPS in human mononuclear cells based on molar concentrations of LPS (2-keto-3-deoxyoctanate assay). N. meningitidis LPS was more potent in the induction of IL-1ß and TNF-{alpha} than was E. coli LPS. Medians and interquartile ranges are presented (n = 5).

 
Effect of lipoproteins on cytokines by E. coli and N. meningitidis LPS
The effect of the preincubation of equimolar concentrations of E. coli or N. meningitidis LPS with the lipoproteins LDL, HDL, and VLDL for 8 h on IL-1ß, TNF-{alpha}, and IL-10 production in PBMCs is shown in Fig. 2 . Lipoproteins did not induce cytokine production in the absence of stimulus, suggesting minimal contamination of the lipoprotein fractions with LPS. E. coli LPS-induced cytokine production was diminished by LDL to values of ~20% of production in LPDP; HDL was slightly less effective in the inhibition of cytokine production, whereas VLDL had only a minimal effect. Notably, meningococcal LPS-induced cytokine production was inhibited to a significantly lesser extent by LDL and HDL than cytokine production by E. coli LPS. LDL reduced the N. meningitidis LPS-induced cytokine production to only 50–60% of control production for IL-1ß and IL-10, whereas TNF-{alpha} production was not inhibited at all. HDL inhibited N. meningitidis-induced cytokines less efficiently than LDL, and the effect of VLDL was minimal.



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 2. Inhibition of LPS-induced cytokines by lipoproteins. Effect of preincubation of LPS (0.14 pmol/ml) with LDL, HDL, or VLDL for 8 h on IL-1ß, TNF-{alpha}, and IL-10 induction by human mononuclear cells. LDL and HDL effectively inhibited E. coli LPS but not N. meningitidis LPS. Results are expressed as percentages of production in lipoprotein-depleted plasma (LPDP). Means and SEM are presented (n = 5). * P < 0.05 for the comparison of E. coli LPS with N. meningitidis LPS by unpaired t-test.

 
Next, we investigated the kinetics of LPS neutralization by LDL or HDL using different preincubation times of lipoprotein with LPS and different lipoprotein concentrations (Fig. 3) . We found that inhibition of E. coli LPS-induced IL-1ß by LDL was dependent on the preincubation time and that for maximal inhibition, 4–8 h of preincubation was required. Of importance, the inhibition of N. meningitidis LPS-induced IL-1ß production by LDL, compared with E. coli LPS, required much longer preincubation times to achieve noticeable inhibition, and maximal inhibition was seen only after 24 h of preincubation (Fig. 3). The results for TNF-{alpha} and HDL showed a similar pattern, although inhibition by HDL was less efficient.



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 3. Influence of preincubation time (t) on LPS neutralization. Effect of preincubation of LPS (0.14 pmol/ml) with LDL (0.6 mmol/l) for various time periods on IL-1ß production in human mononuclear cells. Inhibition of LPS-induced cytokine by LDL was time-dependent, the interaction of N. meningitidis LPS with LDL was slower than that of E. coli LPS, and relatively high LDL concentrations were necessary to inhibit IL-1ß production. Results are expressed as percentages of production in LPDP. Means and SEM are presented (n = 3).

 
For LDL, we investigated the importance of LPS concentration on lipoprotein neutralization (Fig. 4) . The experiments showed that TNF-{alpha} production was inhibited significantly better by E. coli LPS than by N. meningitidis LPS (P < 0.05 by two-way ANOVA). However, the effectiveness of inhibition by LDL is dependent on the concentration of LPS; at high concentrations, both LPS types showed minimal inhibition, whereas at the lowest concentration tested, both LPS types were inhibited to a large extent. Results for IL-1ß showed a similar pattern.



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 4. Inhibition of TNF-{alpha} at various LPS concentrations. Inhibition of LPS-induced TNF-{alpha} production in human mononuclear cells by LDL (0.6 mmol/l) after stimulation with a concentration range of E. coli or N. meningitidis LPS (0.014–140 pmol/ml). LDL was preincubated with the different LPS types for 8 h. Results are expressed as percentages of production in LPDP. N. meningitidis LPS was significantly (P < 0.05) better inhibited by LDL than was E. coli LPS (two-way ANOVA). Means and SEM are presented (n = 3).

 
In addition, the influence of preincubation with lipoproteins at concentrations encountered in normal physiological, nonseptic conditions was investigated. By additional ultracentrifugation, lipid concentrations of 1.1 mmol/l for VLDL, 3.43 mmol/l for LDL, and 1.18 mmol/l for HDL were achieved. Concentrated LDL and HDL inhibited TNF-{alpha} by both LPS types effectively and to the same extent, whereas concentrated VLDL also inhibited TNF-{alpha} but to a lesser extent than LDL or HDL (Fig. 5) . Results for IL-1ß showed a similar pattern.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 5. Influence of concentrated lipoproteins on LPS-induced cytokine production. Effect of preincubation of E. coli or N. meningitidis LPS for 8 h with concentrated lipoprotein fractions on cytokine induction in human mononuclear cells. Lipoproteins were concentrated approximately five times, and the lipid concentrations in which the LPS was preincubated after concentration were 1.1 mmol/l for VLDL (VLDL-C), 3.43 mmol/l for LDL (LDL-C), and 1.18 mmol/l for HDL (HDL-C). Means and SEM are presented (n = 3).

 
Influence of lipid A composition and the saccharide tail
To investigate whether the observed differences in lipoprotein-dependent inhibition of E. coli and N. meningitidis LPS-induced cytokines were dependent on the lipid A part or the saccharide tail of the LPS molecule, variants of the LPS lacking the polysaccharide tail were used. E. coli Re K12, D31m4 LPS was approximately equipotent to E. coli 055:B5 LPS, and N. meningitidis H44/76rfaC LPS was approximately equipotent to N. meningitidis H44/76 LPS. IL-1ß, TNF-{alpha}, and IL-10 produced by E. coli Re K12, D31m4 LPS were inhibited by LDL (Fig. 6) and HDL (data not shown) to a similar extent as that produced by E. coli 055:B5 LPS. No difference was found in the weak inhibitory effect of LDL on cytokine production between N. meningitidis H44/76 and N. meningitidis H44/76rfaC LPS. Thus, these data suggest that the differences in lipoprotein-dependent inhibition of cytokine production between E. coli LPS and meningococcal LPS are not caused by the different lengths of the saccharide tails of the LPS but by differences in the lipid A part of the LPS molecule.



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 6. Effect of the saccharide tail of LPS on inhibition by lipoproteins. Effect of preincubation of various types of LPS (~0.14 pmol/ml) with LDL (0.6 mmol/l) for 8 h on IL-1ß, TNF-{alpha}, and IL-10 by human mononuclear cells. E. coli 055:B5 and E. coli K12, D31m4 Re LPS types were inhibited equally by LDL, whereas both meningococcal LPS types were less effectively inhibited. Results are expressed as percentages of production in LPDP. Means and SEM are presented (n = 5). Differences were tested for significance using an unpaired t-test. n.s., not significant.

 
Effect of lipoproteins on cytokines by E. coli or N. meningitidis whole bacteria
Because LPS is not the only cytokine-inducing moiety of Gram-negative bacteria, we assessed whether the lipoprotein fractions were capable of inhibiting the cytokine response by PBMCs to complete Gram-negative bacteria. In these experiments, the E. coli LPS-induced cytokine response was inhibited by LDL or HDL. In contrast, IL-1ß, TNF-{alpha}, and IL-10 induced by E. coli and N. meningitidis complete bacteria were not, or were only minimally, inhibited by the lipoproteins LDL, HDL, or VLDL (Fig. 7) . Because the amount of cytokines induced by these whole bacteria was significantly higher than the amount induced after stimulation with LPS, we tested the capacity of lipoproteins to inhibit a lower concentration of bacteria or the capacity of a higher concentration of LDL to inhibit cytokine production. Even at the lowest concentration of bacteria tested (104/ml), no effect of VLDL, LDL, or HDL was seen on TNF-{alpha}, IL-1ß, or IL-10 production (Fig. 8 shows the results for LDL and TNF-{alpha}). In addition, concentrated LDL (3.43 mmol/l) did not lead to more inhibition of bacteria-induced cytokines (Fig. 9) .



View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 7. Inhibition of whole bacteria-induced cytokines by lipoproteins. Effect of preincubation of E. coli LPS (0.14 pmol/ml) or E. coli and N. meningitidis complete bacteria (0.6 x 106) with LDL, HDL, or VLDL for 4 h on IL-1ß, TNF-{alpha}, and IL-10 by human mononuclear cells. LDL and HDL effectively inhibited E. coli LPS but not E. coli or N. meningitidis whole bacteria. Results are expressed as percentages of production in LPDP. Means and SEM are presented (n = 5). * P < 0.05 for the comparison of E. coli LPS with the complete bacteria by unpaired t-test.

 


View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 8. Inhibition of LPS-induced TNF-{alpha} production in human mononuclear cells by LDL (0.6 mmol/l) after stimulation with a concentration range (104 to 107 bacteria/ml) of whole E. coli or N. meningitidis bacteria. LDL was preincubated with the different bacteria for 8 h. Results are expressed as percentages of production in LPDP. No effect of LDL on TNF-{alpha} production by E. coli or N. meningitidis bacteria was seen. Means and SEM are presented (n = 3).

 


View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 9. Influence of concentrated lipoproteins on whole bacteria-induced cytokine production. Effect of preincubation of E. coli or N. meningitidis (0.6 x 106 bacteria/ml) LPS for 8 h with concentrated LDL on cytokine induction in human mononuclear cells. LDL was concentrated approximately five times; the LDL concentration at which the LPS was preincubated was 3.43 mmol/l. LDL indicates unconcentrated LDL (0.6 mmol/l), and LDL-C indicates concentrated LDL (3.43 mmol/l). Means and SEM are presented (n = 3).

 

   DISCUSSION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
In the present study, we showed that at equimolar concentrations of E. coli or N. meningitidis LPS, the in vitro neutralizing effect of lipoproteins on cytokine production by N. meningitidis LPS was reduced in comparison with that by E. coli LPS. The neutralizing effect on E. coli LPS was shown to be time-dependent and saturable. By increasing the interaction time between the lipoproteins and LPS, increasing the lipoprotein concentration, or increasing the LPS concentration, the dissimilarity in the neutralizing effect of the lipoproteins disappeared. The difference in the extent of inhibition of LDL and HDL on both types of LPS is likely to be caused by the difference in the lipid A portion of the LPS molecule. Of importance, cytokine induction by whole E. coli or N. meningitidis bacteria was not influenced by lipoproteins.

A quantitative comparison of the biological effects of different LPS types on a weight basis may yield incorrect results because LPS from different bacteria have different molecular weights, largely because of the highly variable length of the saccharide tail. To avoid this pitfall, we assessed the molar concentration of the E. coli LPS and meningococcal LPS batches by determination of KDO, a highly conserved part of LPS (molecular mass 238 Da) (5, 28), and used equimolar concentrations of LPS in all comparative experiments. In accordance with previously reported data on the bioactivity of LPS (31, 32), the molarity-based dose-response curve showed that at concentrations of less than 1 pmol/ml, meningococcal LPS is ~10 times more potent in the induction of IL-1ß and TNF-{alpha} than is E. coli LPS.

The protective effect of the lipoproteins LDL and HDL in models of Gram-negative infection and lethal endotoxemia is well documented, and the inhibition of LPS-induced proinflammatory cytokine production, through binding of LPS by the lipoproteins, is thought to be a key element in this process (10–14). In the present study, we tested whether cytokine induction by the LPS isolated from N. meningitidis, the bacterium that causes the prototypical Gram-negative sepsis syndrome, is inhibited by lipoproteins in a similar manner as the prototypical LPS isolated from E. coli.

The concentrations of LPS used in the current in vitro experiments (0.14 pmol or 0.6 ng/ml) were chosen to be in the range of concentrations of LPS (as determined by LAL assay) seen in the bloodstream during meningococcal sepsis, which range from 0.05 ng/ml to more than 10 ng/ml (4). In E. coli sepsis, LPS levels are generally lower (33, 34). As earlier determinations showed that meningococci contain ~1 ng LPS/106 bacteria in the outer membrane (20), the concentration of bacteria (0.6 x 106) was chosen to match the concentrations of LPS used. This bacterial concentration is in agreement with the amount of bacteria found during meningococcal sepsis (2.2 x 104/ml to 1.6 x 108/ml) (35).

Lipoprotein plasma concentrations are altered during sepsis or meningitis: LDL and HDL cholesterol decreased (to ~0.8–1.4 mmol/l for LDL and 0.2–0.4 mmol/ml for HDL), whereas VLDL cholesterol was increased to a median concentration of 2.3 mmol/ml (36, 37). Thus, the concentrations of LDL and HDL used for this study are in range with the concentrations of these lipoproteins as they occur in septic conditions. For some experiments, the lipoproteins were further concentrated approximately five times to also investigate their detoxifying capacity at concentrations that are seen under normal physiological, nonseptic conditions. As VLDL increases during sepsis, we could only study this lipoprotein at concentrations that are seen in healthy individuals.

Confirming earlier observations (38), we found that preincubation of E. coli LPS with LDL as well as HDL inhibited the cytokine response, whereas VLDL had a less pronounced effect. However, at identical molar concentrations and incubation times, N. meningitidis LPS was neutralized much less efficiently than E. coli LPS.

The neutralizing effect of LDL and HDL was dependent on the preincubation time of the LPS with the lipoproteins and the concentration of LPS or lipoproteins. Whereas E. coli was inhibited significantly after relatively short preincubation times of 1–4 h, for meningococcal LPS, maximal inhibition was only seen after 24 h of preincubation. Using a fixed preincubation time (8 h) and a fixed concentration of LDL, the extent of inhibition was influenced by the concentration of LPS. Over the complete range of concentrations tested, E. coli LPS was significantly better neutralized by LDL than was N. meningitidis LPS (as assessed by two-way ANOVA). However, at the highest concentration tested, E. coli LPS also showed minimal inhibition, whereas at the lowest concentration tested, both LPS types were neutralized to a large extent. To investigate the impact of higher concentrations of lipoproteins on LPS detoxification, we maximally concentrated the lipoprotein fractions by additional ultracentrifugation. In this way, lipoprotein fractions approximately five times more concentrated were obtained, and the final concentration of lipoprotein in the PBMC system now equaled concentrations seen under physiological, nonseptic conditions. At these higher concentrations of lipoprotein, both LPS types were inhibited equally and to a large extent by LDL and HDL after 8 h of preincubation. Thus, irrespective of the difference in neutralization seen at low concentrations of lipoproteins, this suggests that at physiological concentrations both E. coli and N. meningitidis LPSs are neutralized by the lipoproteins effectively. VLDL had a less pronounced neutralizing effect on cytokines, although it cannot be excluded that at even higher concentrations, as seen during sepsis, the effect of VLDL is also increased. Taken together, these results indicate that the efficient neutralization of LPS depends on the type of LPS, but a sufficiently long interaction time, a low concentration of LPS, and a high concentration of lipoproteins will also inhibit cytokines by a less efficiently neutralized LPS. Our results emphasize the concept that lipoproteins might be important for E. coli LPS-mediated disease. However, because during severe meningococcal sepsis, LPS concentrations are much higher, the time period from the onset of disease to admission is very short (4), and concentrations of LDL and HDL are decreased, it is unlikely that lipoproteins play an important role in neutralizing LPS during this type of infection.

The main molecular differences between E. coli LPS and N. meningitidis LPS are the size and structure of the saccharide tail and the position and distribution of the six acyl chains on the glucosamine backbone. To investigate which of these differences determine the neutralization by lipoproteins, we measured the effect of lipoproteins on cytokine induction by two types of E. coli and N. meningitidis LPS that are completely devoid of a saccharide tail, i.e., E. coli Re K12, D31m4 LPS and N. meningitidis H44/76rfaC LPS. This showed that the neutralizing action of lipoproteins is independent of the presence of the saccharide tail. Thus, the lipid A part, with its asymmetrical hexaacylated conformation in E. coli LPS and its symmetrical distribution of the six acyl chains in N. meningitidis LPS, accounts for the divergent effect. The bioactivity and receptor affinity of an LPS molecule is suggested to be determined by the three-dimensional conformation of the lipid A, possibly altering the bioactivity and receptor affinity of the LPS molecule (19). For LPS-lipoprotein interactions, Levine and colleagues (12) have proposed the "leaflet insertion" model, in which the fatty acyl acids of the lipid A portion of LPS are inserted into the lipid monolayer of the lipoproteins, inactivating the "toxic moiety" of LPS. We presume that the lower degree of neutralization of meningococcal LPS by lipoproteins is caused by the symmetrical lipid A structure interacting more slowly with the lipoprotein lipid monolayers.

LPS is generally considered to be the pathogenic component of Gram-negative bacteria (1). However, recently, it has been shown that non-LPS components of Gram-negative bacteria also highly influence cytokine production (20–22). Therefore, we studied whether lipoproteins affect cytokine production after stimulation with whole bacteria, even at relatively low bacterial concentrations or high (physiological, nonseptic) lipoprotein concentrations. This was not the case. This finding indicates that whole bacteria, in contrast to isolated LPS, in which neutralization by lipoproteins depends on the interaction time and concentration of LPS or lipoprotein, are impervious to neutralization by lipoproteins. We assume that LPS, anchored tightly in the outer membrane of the Gram-negative bacterium, interacts less easily with the lipoproteins than isolated LPS. In addition, it can be speculated that bacterial components, other than LPS, of E. coli or N. meningitidis that are not inhibited by lipoproteins may account for the absent cytokine-inhibitory effect of lipoproteins on whole Gram-negative bacteria. The data presented seemingly contradict the findings in animal models, in which lipoprotein administration did reduce cytokines and outcome after the administration of whole E. coli or after cecal ligation and puncture (39, 40). Therefore, further investigation is needed on the immune-modulating mechanisms of lipoproteins during Gram-negative sepsis.

In conclusion, LDL and HDL inhibit cytokines by E. coli LPS, but N. meningitidis LPS shows reduced neutralization by human lipoproteins. However, a sufficiently long interaction time, a low LPS concentration, or higher lipoprotein concentration also inhibits cytokines by this less efficiently neutralized LPS. In contrast, lipoproteins do not have a neutralizing effect on whole E. coli or N. meningitidis bacteria. This raises questions about the rationale for adjuvant treatment of meningococcal and other types of Gram-negative sepsis with lipoproteins.


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
The authors thank P. Demacker for advice on lipoprotein isolation.

Manuscript received October 30, 2003 and in revised form January 16, 2004.


   REFERENCES
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
  1. Hurley, J. C. 1995. Endotoxemia: methods of detection and clinical correlates. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 8: 268–292.[Abstract]

  2. Morrison, D. C., and J. L. Ryan. 1987. Endotoxins and disease mechanisms. Annu. Rev. Med. 38: 417–432.[Medline]

  3. Van Deuren, M., P. Brandtzaeg, and J. W. M. Van der Meer. 2000. Update on meningococcal disease with emphasis on pathogenesis and clinical management. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 13: 144–166.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  4. Brandtzaeg, P., A. Bjerre, R. Ovstebo, B. Brusletto, G. B. Joo, and P. Kierulf. 2001. Neisseria meningitidis lipopolysaccharides in human pathology. J. Endotoxin Res. 7: 401–420.[CrossRef]

  5. Luderitz, O., K. Tanamoto, C. Galanos, G. R. McKenzie, H. Brade, U. Zahringer, E. T. Rietschel, S. Kusumoto, and T. Shiba. 1984. Lipopolysaccharides: structural principles and biologic activities. Rev. Infect. Dis. 6: 428–431.[Medline]

  6. McCloskey, R. V., R. C. Straube, C. Sanders, S. M. Smith, and C. R. Smith. 1994. Treatment of septic shock with human monoclonal antibody HA/1A. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ann. Intern. Med. 121: 1–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  7. Angus, D. C., M. C. Birmingham, R. A. Balk, P. J. Scannon, D. Collins, J. A. Kruse, D. R. Graham, H. V. Dedhia, S. Homann, N. MacIntyre, and the E5 Study Investigators. 2000. E5 murine monoclonal antiendotoxin antibody in Gram-negative sepsis: a randomized controlled trial. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 283: 1723–1730.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  8. J5 Study Group. 1992. Treatment of severe infectious purpura in children with human plasma from donors immunized with Escherichia coli J5: a prospective double-blind study. J. Infect Dis. 165: 695–701.

  9. Levin, M., P. A. Quint, B. Goldstein, P. Barton, J. S. Bradley, S. D. Shemie, T. Yeh, S. S. Kim, D. P. Cafaro, P. J. Scannon, and B. P. Giroir. 2000. Recombinant bactericidal/permeability-increasing protein (rBPI21) as adjunctive treatment for children with severe meningococcal sepsis: a randomised trial. rBPI21 Meningococcal Sepsis Study Group. Lancet. 356: 961–967.[CrossRef][Medline]

  10. Flegel, W. A., A. Wolpl, D. N. Mannel, and H. Northoff. 1989. Inhibition of endotoxin-induced activation of human monocytes by human lipoproteins. Infect. Immun. 57: 2237–2245.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  11. Netea, M. G., P. N. Demacker, B. J. Kullberg, O. C. Boerman, I. Verschueren, A. F. Stalenhoef, and J. W. M. van der Meer. 1996. Low-density lipoprotein receptor-deficient mice are protected against lethal endotoxemia and severe Gram-negative infections. J. Clin. Invest. 97: 1366–1372.[Medline]

  12. Levine, D. M., T. S. Parker, T. M. Donnely, A. Walsh, and A. L. Rubin. 1993. In vivo protection against endotoxin by plasma high density lipoprotein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 90: 12040–12044.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  13. Pajkrt, D., J. E. Doran, F. Koster, P. G. Lerch, B. Arnet, T. van der Poll, J. W. ten Cate, and S. J. H. van Deventer. 1996. Antiinflammatory effects of reconstituted high-density lipoprotein during human endotoxemia. J. Exp. Med. 184: 1601–1608.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  14. Harris, H. W., J. A. Johnson, and S. J. Wigmore. 2002. Endogenous lipoproteins impact the response to endotoxin in humans. Crit. Care Med. 30: 23–31.[CrossRef][Medline]

  15. Seydel, U., A. B. Schromm, R. Blunck, and K. Brandenburg. 2000. Chemical structure, molecular conformation, and bioactivity of endotoxins. Chem. Immunol. 74: 5–24.[Medline]

  16. Brandenburg, K. 1993. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy characterization of the lamellar and nonlamellar structures of free lipid A and Re lipopolysaccharides from Salmonella minnesota and Escherichia coli. Biophys. J. 64: 1215–1231.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  17. Gangloff, S. C., N. Hijiya, A. Haziot, and S. M. Goyert. 1999. Lipopolysaccharide structure influences the macrophage response via CD14-independent and CD14-dependent pathways. Clin. Infect. Dis. 28: 491–496.[Medline]

  18. Hirschfeld, M., J. J. Weis, V. Toschakov, C. A. Salowski, M. J. Cody, D. C. Ward, N. Qureshi, S. M. Michalek, and S. N. Vogel. 2001. Signalling by Toll-Like Receptor 2 and 4 agonists results in differential gene expression in murine macrophages. Infect. Immun. 69: 1477–1482.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  19. Netea, M. G., M. van Deuren, B. J. Kullberg, J. M. Cavaillon, and J. W. M. van der Meer. 2002. Does the shape of lipid A determine the interaction of LPS with Toll-like receptors? Trends Immunol. 23: 135–139.[CrossRef][Medline]

  20. Sprong, T., N. Stikkelbroeck, P. van der Ley, L. Steeghs, L. van Alphen, N. Klein, M. G. Netea, J. W. M. van der Meer, and M. van Deuren. 2001. Contributions of Neisseria meningitidis LPS and non-LPS to proinflammatory cytokine response. J. Leukocyte Biol. 70: 283–288.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  21. Uronen, H., A. J. Williams, G. Dixon, S. R. Andersen, P. Van der Ley, M. Van Deuren, R. E. Callard, and N. Klein. 2000. Gram-negative bacteria induce proinflammatory cytokine production by monocytes in the absence of lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Clin. Exp. Immunol. 22: 312–315.

  22. Ingalls, R. R., E. Lien, and D. T. Golenbock. 2001. Membrane-associated proteins of a lipopolysaccharide-deficient mutant of Neisseria meningitidis activate the inflammatory response through Toll-like receptor 2. Infect. Immun. 69: 2230–2236.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  23. Raetz, C. R. H. 1987. Structure and biosynthesis of lipid A of Escherichia coli. In Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium Cellular and Molecular Biology. F. C. Neidhart, editor. American Society of Microbiology, Washington, DC. 498–503.

  24. Westphal, O., and J. K. Jann. 1965. Bacterial lipopolysaccharide extraction with phenol-water and further application of the procedure. Methods Carbohydr. Chem. 5: 83–91.

  25. Holten, E. 1979. Serotypes of Neisseria meningitidis isolated from patients in Norway during the first six months of 1978. J. Clin. Microbiol. 9: 186–188.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  26. Stojiljkovic, I., V. Hwa, J. Larson, L. Lin, M. So, and X. Nassif. 1997. Cloning and characterization of the Neisseria meningitidis rfaC gene encoding alpha-1,5 heptosyltransferase I. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 151: 41–49.[Medline]

  27. Kulshin, V. A., U. Zahringer, B. Lindner, C. E. Frasch, C. M. Tsai, B. A. Dmitriev, and E. T. Rietschel. 1992. Structural characterization of the lipid A component of pathogenic Neisseria meningitidis. J. Bacteriol. 174: 1793–1800.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  28. Weissbach, A., and B. Hurwitz. 1959. The formation of 2-keto-3-deoxyheptonic acid in extracts of Escherichia coli B. J. Biol. Chem. 234: 705–709.[Free Full Text]

  29. Demacker, P. N. M., H. E. Vos-Janssen, A. P. Jansen, and A. Van't Laar. 1977. Evaluation of the dual precipitation method by comparison with the ultracentrifugation methods for the measurement of lipoproteins in serum. Clin. Chem. 23: 1238–1244.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  30. Drenth, J. P., S. H. Van Uum, M. Van Deuren, G. J. Pesman, J. Van der Ven Jongekrijg, and J. W. M. Van der Meer. 1995. Endurance run increases circulating IL-6 and IL-1ra but downregulates ex vivo TNF-alpha and IL-1 beta production. J. Appl. Physiol. 79: 1497–1503.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  31. Baldwin, G., G. Alpert, G. L. Caputo, M. Baskin, J. Parsonnet, Z. A. Gillis, C. Thompson, G. R. Siber, and G. R. Fleisher. 1991. Effect of polymyxin B on experimental shock from meningococcal and Escherichia coli endotoxins. J. Infect. Dis. 164: 542–549.[Medline]

  32. Cavaillon, J. M., and N. Haeffner-Cavaillon. 1986. Polymyxin-B inhibition of LPS-induced interleukin-1 secretion by human monocytes is dependent upon the LPS origin. Mol. Immunol. 23: 965–969.[CrossRef][Medline]

  33. van Deventer, S. J., H. R. Buller, J. W. Ten Cate, A. Sturk, and W. Pauw. 1988. Endotoxaemia: an early predictor of septicaemia in febrile patients. Lancet. 8586: 605–609.

  34. Casey, L. C., R. A. Balk, and R. C. Bone. 1993. Plasma cytokine and endotoxin levels correlate with survival in patients with the sepsis syndrome. Ann. Intern. Med. 119: 771–778.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  35. Hackett, S. J., M. Guiver, J. Marsh, J. A. Sills, A. P. J. Thomson, E. B. Kaczmarski, and C. A. Hart. 2002. Meningococcal bacterial DNA load at presentation correlates with disease severity. Arch. Dis. Child. 86: 44–46.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  36. Henter, J. I., L. A. Carlson, M. Hansson, P. Nilsson-Ehle, and E. Ortqvist. 1993. Lipoprotein alterations in children with bacterial meningitis. Acta Paediatr. 82: 694–698.[Medline]

  37. van Leeuwen, H. J., E. C. Heezius, G. M. Dallinga, J. A. van Strijp, J. Verhoef, and K. P. van Kessel. 2003. Lipoprotein metabolism in patients with severe sepsis. Crit. Care Med. 31: 1359–1366.[CrossRef][Medline]

  38. Netea, M. G., P. N. M. Demacker, B. J. Kullberg, L. E. H. Jacobs, T. J. G. Verver-Jansen, O. C. Boerman, A. F. H. Stalenhoef, and J. W. M. Van der Meer. 1998. Bacterial lipopolysaccharide binds and stimulates cytokine-producing cells before neutralization by endogenous lipoproteins can occur. Cytokine. 10: 766–772.[CrossRef][Medline]

  39. Hubsch, A. P., A. T. Casas, and J. E. Doran. 1995. Protective effect of reconstituted high density lipoprotein in rabbit Gram-negative bacteraemia models. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 126: 548–558.[Medline]

  40. Read, T. E., C. Grunfeld, Z. L. Kumwenda, M. C. Calhoun, J. P. Kane, J. R. Feingold, and J. H. Rapp. 1995. Triglyceride rich lipoproteins prevent septic death in rats. J. Exp. Med. 182: 267–272.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 GlycobiologyHome page
C. M. Kahler, A. Datta, Y.-l. Tzeng, R. W. Carlson, and D. S. Stephens
Inner core assembly and structure of the lipooligosaccharide of Neisseria meningitidis: capacity of strain NMB to express all known immunotype epitopes
Glycobiology, April 1, 2005; 15(4): 409 - 419.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
M. B. Fessler, S. K. Young, S. Jeyaseelan, J. G. Lieber, P. G. Arndt, J. A. Nick, and G. S. Worthen
A Role for Hydroxy-Methylglutaryl Coenzyme A Reductase in Pulmonary Inflammation and Host Defense
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., March 15, 2005; 171(6): 606 - 615.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
M300453-JLR200v1
45/4/742    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sprong, T.
Right arrow Articles by van Deuren, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sprong, T.
Right arrow Articles by van Deuren, M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Journal of Biological Chemistry 
 Molecular and Cellular Proteomics   ASBMB Today