J. Lipid Res.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1194/jlr.D300035-JLR200 on January 16, 2004

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
D300035-JLR200v1
45/4/773    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rainwater, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Gamboa, I. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rainwater, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Gamboa, I. O.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Lipid Research, Vol. 45, 773-775, April 2004
Copyright © 2004 by American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology


Methods

Improved method for making nondenaturing composite gradient gels for the electrophoretic separation of lipoproteins

David L. Rainwater1, Perry H. Moore, Jr. and Israel O. Gamboa

Department of Genetics, Southwest Foundation for Biomedical Research, PO Box 760549, San Antonio, TX 78245-0549

Published, JLR Papers in Press, January 16, 2004. DOI 10.1194/jlr.D300035-JLR200

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. e-mail: david{at}darwin.sfbr.org


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 REFERENCES
 
Nondenaturing gradient gel electrophoresis continues to be used widely for resolution and characterization of lipoprotein subclasses. Methods for making such gels in the laboratory have been published, but occasionally samples do not display uniform mobilities for all lanes in a laboratory-made gel.

To help overcome this limitation, we recommend a modification

Supplementary key words gradient gel electrophoresis • lipoprotein separation • human • baboon

Extensive literature supports the hypothesis that knowledge of lipoprotein size distributions provides a more detailed indication of lipoprotein metabolism and a more accurate prediction of cardiovascular disease risk (1). Lipoprotein size distributions have been measured by a number of physicochemical methods, perhaps most commonly by gradient gel electrophoresis. Previously, we have described a highly reproducible method designed to make nondenaturing acrylamide gradient gels for the electrophoretic separation of plasma HDLs (2) and LDLs (3). More recently, we described a composite gradient gel that enabled the simultaneous analysis of both LDLs and HDLs (4). Estimates of peak diameter and fractional absorbance made from the composite gel were strongly correlated with those made using the respective dedicated gel formats (4). Recently, however, we began to notice that the gels have run unevenly on occasion; that is, samples appeared to run different distances depending on location in the gel (generally, samples in the outside lanes tended to run faster than those in the interior lanes, leading to a "frowning" appearance). The problem was observed in the LDL portion of the gradient and did not seem to affect mobilities of HDLs in the areas of higher acrylamide concentrations.

In a previous study, Rhigetti et al. (5) reported that convective flows are imprinted in the final gel structure, but this effect can be minimized by use of a sucrose gradient during the gelling process. Accordingly, we modified our published protocol and tested whether the addition of a sucrose gradient might solve the problem of differential mobilities for different lanes in a gel.

Composite acrylamide gradient gels were made exactly as described previously (4) except that, to some high limit solutions, we added sucrose (10 g/l). The two types of gels will be referred to as -sucrose and +sucrose. Briefly, the gradient was made with two solutions: a low limit solution (3% acrylamide with 4% cross-linker) and a high limit solution (31% acrylamide with 5.5% cross-linker and ±10% sucrose). Gels were cast in groups of 16 and allowed to polymerize for 3 h prior to storage at 4°C for no more than 1 month before use. Serum and plasma samples from baboons and humans, respectively, were subjected to electrophoresis at 3,000 v · h (using electrophoresis chambers supplied by CBS Scientific) and staining with Sudan black B. These samples were run as part of ongoing studies in this laboratory. Following restoration of the original gel shape and size in the electrophoresis buffer, we subjected the gels to densitometry using an LKB-Ultroscan XL laser densitometer with GelScan XL software.

Studies involving samples from humans were approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, and all subjects gave written informed consent. Studies involving samples from baboons were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Southwest Foundation for Biomedical Research, which is certified by the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care International.

LDLs show considerable interindividual and interspecies variation in mobility. Therefore, to assess within-gel variation, we measured in each lane the relative mobility of a slow refractile band that is observed in both human and baboon samples (6). This refractile band was chosen because its size is similar to that of smaller LDLs (~20 nm in diameter), and because its mobility behavior corresponds to that of LDL in the lane. Figure 1 illustrates this correspondence in lanes from a -sucrose gel having similar size LDLs (the refractile band is designated aMG in the figure). The panel from a +sucrose gel illustrates the considerable interindividual variation of LDL mobility that is often observed.



View larger version (129K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Human plasma samples run on -sucrose and +sucrose gels. Plasma samples were run as described in the text and detected with Sudan black B. Indicated are the LDL and HDL regions and the faint refractile band (labeled aMG).

 
The refractile band is probably due to a large molecular size protein, such as {alpha}2-macroglobulin (7). We tested that {alpha}2-macroglobulin occurs in this location by immunoblotting procedures. A series of different baboon and human samples (loaded in an alternating pattern) were subjected to electrophoresis in a +sucrose gel. Proteins from the gradient gel were transferred to nitrocellulose paper as described (8) and detected using a polyclonal antibody directed against human {alpha}2-macroglobulin (Fitzgerald Industries International) and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (Vector Laboratories) with staining by 3-amino-9-ethyl-carbazole and H2O2 (9). The antiserum detected a major band in each baboon and human sample; the bands were identical in size (i.e., mobility) and occurred in the location of the refractile band (data not shown), consistent with the suggestion that the refractile band may in fact be {alpha}2-macroglobulin (6, 7).

In the present study, we measured the distance (in millimeters) from gel top to the refractile band (detected as a small peak in the absorbance profile) in each sample lane across the gel using the GelScan XL software. We made such a measurement for all samples in 200 gels, half -sucrose and half +sucrose gels. To avoid the possibility of chamber-specific consistency, we only made measurements of the lanes from one gel (of four) from each electrophoretic run. The 200 gels were derived from a total of 54 separate gel castings. On average, the 20 nm refractile band ran 28.2 mm (SD = 1.6 mm, N = 2133 lanes measured) into the gel in this gradient. Analysis of migration distance in an interior lane from each of the gels revealed no difference between gel types (means were 28.2 mm and 28.0 mm for -sucrose and +sucrose, respectively; P = 0.56 by ANOVA). In contrast to the +sucrose gels, however, the -sucrose gels appeared to show a substantially greater range of migration distances across the lanes of a gel. To quantify this difference between gel types, we calculated the difference between the mobility extremes of the refractile band for each of the 200 gels (i.e., within-gel mobility difference). The average within-gel mobility differences for the two types of acrylamide gradients were 1.64 ± 0.08 mm for -sucrose and 0.85 ± 0.05 mm for +sucrose gels. ANOVA indicated this was a significant difference (P < 0.001). Figure 2 shows a frequency histogram of within-gel mobility difference for -sucrose and +sucrose gels and illustrates the approximately 50% improvement when we used sucrose in the gradient.



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Frequency histogram for within-gel mobility difference of a 20 nm refractile band occurring in sample lanes from 100 -sucrose (black bars) and 100 +sucrose gels (gray bars). Following electrophoresis, the distance from gel top to the refractile band (detected as a small absorbance peak) in each lane was determined using the GelScan XL software. Within-gel mobility difference was calculated as the difference between the two extremes of migration distance for each of the 200 gels.

 
In conclusion, our extensive experience with the two gel types suggests that the inclusion of a 0–10% sucrose gradient during the formation of an acrylamide gradient generates significantly superior gels in terms of within-gel consistency of mobility for a large refractile protein.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
This work was supported by Grants HL-28972 and HL-45522 from the National Institutes of Health. The authors are grateful for the technical assistance of Jennifer Espinoza.

Manuscript received November 3, 2003 and in revised form January 7, 2004.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 REFERENCES
 
  1. Roheim, P. S., and B. F. Asztalos. 1995. Clinical significance of lipoprotein size and risk for coronary atherosclerosis. Clin. Chem. 41: 147–152.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  2. Rainwater, D. L., D. W. Andres, A. L. Ford, W. F. Lowe, P. J. Blanche, and R. M. Krauss. 1992. Production of polyacrylamide gradient gels for the electrophoretic resolution of lipoproteins. J. Lipid Res. 33: 1876–1881.[Abstract]

  3. Singh, A. T. K., D. L. Rainwater, S. M. Haffner, J. L. VandeBerg, W. R. Shelledy, P. H. Moore, Jr., and T. D. Dyer. 1995. Effect of diabetes on lipoprotein size. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 15: 1805–1811.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  4. Rainwater, D. L., P. H. Moore, Jr., W. R. Shelledy, T. D. Dyer, and S. H. Slifer. 1997. Characterization of a composite gradient gel for the electrophoretic separation of lipoproteins. J. Lipid Res. 38: 1261–1266.[Abstract]

  5. Righetti, P. G., A. Bossi, M. Giglio, A. Vailati, T. Lyubimova, and V. A. Briskman. 1994. Is gravity on our way? The case of polyacrylamide gel polymerization. Electrophoresis. 15: 1005–1013.[CrossRef][Medline]

  6. Cheng, M-L., C. M. Kammerer, W. F. Lowe, B. Dyke, and J. L. VandeBerg. 1988. Method for quantitating cholesterol in subfractions of serum lipoproteins separated by gradient gel electrophoresis. Biochem. Genet. 26: 657–681.[Medline]

  7. Dangerfield, W. G., and J. J. Pratt. 1970. An investigation of plasma lipoproteins by polyacrylamide electrophoresis. Clin. Chim. Acta. 30: 273–278.[CrossRef][Medline]

  8. Rainwater, D. L. 1998. Electrophoretic separation of LDL and HDL subclasses. In Lipoprotein Protocols [Methods Molec. Biol., Vol. 110]. J. M. Ordovas, editor. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. 137–151.

  9. Rainwater, D. L., and G. S. Manis. 1988. Immunochemical characterization and quantitation of lipoprotein (a) in baboons. Development of an assay depending on two antigenically distinct proteins. Atherosclerosis. 73: 23–31.[CrossRef][Medline]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
D. L Rainwater, M. C Mahaney, J. L VandeBerg, and X. L. Wang
Vitamin E dietary supplementation significantly affects multiple risk factors for cardiovascular disease in baboons
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, September 1, 2007; 86(3): 597 - 603.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
B. Zhang, Y. Uehara, S. Hida, S.-i. Miura, D. L. Rainwater, M. Segawa, K. Kumagai, K.-A. Rye, and K. Saku
Effects of reconstituted HDL on charge-based LDL subfractions as characterized by capillary isotachophoresis
J. Lipid Res., May 1, 2007; 48(5): 1175 - 1189.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
D300035-JLR200v1
45/4/773    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rainwater, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Gamboa, I. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rainwater, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Gamboa, I. O.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Journal of Biological Chemistry 
 Molecular and Cellular Proteomics   ASBMB Today