|
Advertisement | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Journal of Lipid Research, Vol. 45, 1030-1039, June 2004 Formation and antiproliferative effect of prostaglandin E3 from eicosapentaenoic acid in human lung cancer cells
* Pharmaceutical Development Center, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77054 Published, JLR Papers in Press, March 1, 2004. DOI 10.1194/jlr.M300455-JLR200
1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. e-mail: rnewman{at}mdanderson.org
We investigated the formation and pharmacology of prostaglandin E3 (PGE3) derived from fish oil eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) in human lung cancer A549 cells. Exposure of A549 cells to EPA resulted in the rapid formation and export of PGE3. The extracellular ratio of PGE3 to PGE2 increased from 0.08 in control cells to 0.8 in cells exposed to EPA within 48 h. Incubation of EPA with cloned ovine or human recombinant cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) resulted in 13- and 18-fold greater formation of PGE3, respectively, than that produced by COX-1. Exposure of A549 cells to 1 µM PGE3 inhibited cell proliferation by 37.1% (P < 0.05). Exposure of normal human bronchial epithelial (NHBE) cells to PGE3, however, had no effect. When A549 cells were exposed to EPA (25 µM) or a combination of EPA and celecoxib (a selective COX-2 inhibitor), the inhibitory effect of EPA on the growth of A549 cells was reversed by the presence of celecoxib (at both 5 and 10 µM). This effect appears to be associated with a 50% reduction of PGE3 formation in cells treated with a combination of EPA and celecoxib compared with cells exposed to EPA alone. These data indicate that exposure of lung cancer cells to EPA results in a decrease in the COX-2-mediated formation of PGE2, an increase in the level of PGE3, and PGE3-mediated inhibition of tumor cell proliferation.
Abbreviations: AA, arachidonic acid; BHT, butylated hydroxytoluene; calcein AM, acetoxymethyl ester of calcein; COX, cyclooxygenase; DAPI, 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole; DHA, docosahexaenoic acid; EPA, eicosapentaenoic acid; LC/MS/MS, liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry; NHBE, normal human bronchial epithelial; PGE3, prostaglandin E3 Supplementary key words
Prostaglandins, which are generated by cyclooxygenase (COX) metabolism of arachidonic acid (AA), play a pivotal role in maintaining cell development and homeostasis of various diseases, especially inflammation and cancer [as reviewed in ref. (1)]. In contrast to a large body of evidence indicating that -6 polyunsaturated fatty acids such as AA promote the growth of tumor cells, -3 fatty acids [eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)] have actually been shown to inhibit tumor cell proliferation [as reviewed in ref. (2)]. Epidemiologic studies have shown an inverse relationship between blood levels of n-3 fatty acids derived from fish oils and the risk of prostate and lung cancers (35). However, molecular mechanisms for the pharmacologic anticancer activity of EPA have not been fully elucidated. A number of studies have suggested that the anticancer activities of both EPA and DHA are associated with their ability to inhibit the synthesis of 2-series prostaglandins, especially prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) production [as reviewed in ref. (6)]. In contrast to DHA, however, EPA can actually function as a substrate for COX and result in the synthesis of unique 3-series prostaglandin compounds (7). To date, studies reporting the formation of 3-series prostaglandins by EPA have been performed using normal cells or tissues (8, 9). Fischer and Weber (10), for example, provided the first evidence of in vivo formation of thromboxane A3 and prostaglandin I3 in humans fed fish oil. In addition, studies conducted in humans have shown that PGE3 levels increased by 10-fold in urine after ingestion of cod liver oil (40 ml/day) for 12 weeks (11). In contrast to PGE2, the biological activity of PGE3 has received little attention. The effect of PGE3 on cell growth has been reported only in normal murine mammary epithelial (12) and 3T3 fibroblast cells (13). Both studies showed that PGE2 and PGE3 stimulated the growth of normal cells but that PGE3 was much less potent than PGE2. A more recent study has suggested that PGE3, unlike PGE2, is not mitogenic to 3T3 fibroblasts (13). To date, however, the ability of cancer cells or even purified COX enzymes to form PGE3 from EPA has not been evaluated. Furthermore, the biochemical pharmacology of PGE3 in human cancer cells has not been investigated. In consideration of the documented higher level of expression of COX-2 in tumor cells than in normal cells (14), we sought to investigate a) the capability of human lung cancer A549 cells as well as cloned COXs to form PGE3 using EPA as a substrate, b) the relative effects of PGE2 and PGE3 on human lung cancer cell proliferation, and c) the possible involvement of PGE3 as an important factor in EPA-mediated changes in tumor cell growth. In this study, we found that the level of PGE3 was significantly increased after exposing A549 cells to EPA. The ability of cloned human recombinant COX-2 enzyme to form PGE3 from EPA was much greater than that of COX-1 enzyme. In contrast to PGE2, PGE3 inhibited the growth of human lung tumor cells but not normal human bronchial epithelial (NHBE) cells. In addition, PGE3 antagonized the effect of PGE2 on cancer cell growth. Furthermore, the inhibitory effect of EPA on the growth of A549 cells was partially blocked by celecoxib (5 and 10 µM), and this effect was correlated with a reduced formation of PGE3 in these cells.
Reagents PGE2, PGE3, PGE2-d4, anti-COX-1, and anti-COX-2 antibodies were obtained from Cayman Chemical Co. (Ann Arbor, MI). Acetoxymethyl ester of calcein (calcein AM) and 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) fluorescent dyes were purchased from Molecular Probes (Eugene, OR). PGE2 and PGE3 were dissolved in ethanol/DMSO (1:1, v/v) and added directly to cell culture at a 1:1,000 ratio. We purchased methyl-[3H]thymidine (specific activity, 6.7 Ci/mmol) from Perkin-Elmer (Boston, MA). Unless otherwise indicated, all other chemicals were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO). All solvents were HPLC grade (Fisher Scientific Co., Fair Lawn, NJ).
Cell cultures
PGE2 and PGE3 synthesis The production of PGE2 or PGE3 by cloned COX-1 (ovine) or COX-2 (ovine or human recombinant) enzymes (Cayman Chemical Co.) was measured by incubation of 10 or 50 µM AA or EPA, respectively, with enzymes (15 U) in 0.1 M Tris-HCl buffer, pH 8.0, containing 5 mM EDTA, 2 mM phenol, and 1 µM hematin. The reaction was stopped by the addition of 1 N citric acid before extraction of prostaglandins.
Prostaglandin extraction and analysis Prostaglandins in the cell culture medium were extracted using a solid-phase method. Aliquots of 10 µl of 10% BHT and 20 µl of PGE2-d4 were added to 1 ml of cell culture medium. The solution was applied to a Sep-Pak C18 cartridge (Waters Corp., Milford, MA) that had been preconditioned with methanol and water. Prostaglandins were eluted with 1 ml of methanol. The eluate was evaporated under a stream of nitrogen, and the residue was dissolved in 200 µl of methanol/10 mM ammonium acetate buffer (70:30, v/v), pH 8.5.
The extracted prostaglandins were quantitated by the LC/MS/MS method described by Yang et al. (15). Briefly, LC/MS/MS was performed using a Quattro Ultima tandem mass spectrometer (Waters Corp., Milford, MA) equipped with an Agilent HP 1100 binary pump HPLC inlet (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA). The prostaglandins were separated using a 2 x 150 mm Luna 3 µ phenyl-hexyl analytical column (Phenomenex, Torrance, CA). The mobile phase consisted of 10 mM ammonium acetate, pH 8.5, and methanol. The column temperature was maintained at 50°C, and samples were kept at 4°C during the analysis. Individual analytes were detected using electrospray negative ionization and multiple reaction monitoring monitoring of the transitions m/z 351
Cell proliferation assay
Western blotting
Cell viability and DNA staining
Statistical analysis
Formation of PGE3 The anticancer effect of EPA has been linked to the inhibition of COX activity and consequently reduced levels of PGE2 both in vitro and in vivo (17, 18). We have previously shown that a clinically achievable plasma level of EPA (100 µM) (19) results in more than a 50% reduction in PGE2 formation in lung cancer cells (15). Because EPA is a substrate for COX (7), we determined the capacity of lung cancer cells to form PGE3 from the -3 fatty acid EPA. When A549 cells were exposed to EPA (10 and 50 µM) for 48 h, the concentration of PGE3 in the cell culture medium significantly increased to as high as 7.98 ± 1.36 ng/5 million cells compared with that in the control group (0.44 ± 0.021 ng/5 million cells; P < 0.001) (Fig. 1A)
. This increase of extracellular PGE3 was concentration dependent. When A549 cells were exposed to 50 µM EPA for 48 h, the extracellular ratio of PGE3 to PGE2 increased from 0.08 in control cells to 0.8 in treated cells (Fig. 1A, inset). The increase in the ratio of PGE3 over PGE2 was also concentration dependent.
As shown in Fig. 1B, exposure of A549 cells to 50 µM EPA for 30 min resulted in a rapid 13-fold increase in extracellular PGE3 level, from 0.85 ± 0.12 ng/5 million cells in control cells to 12.68 ± 0.77 ng/5 million cells in treated cells. After incubation with EPA for 4 h, the intracellular level of PGE3 increased from 0.33 ± 0.021 ng/5 million cells in control cells to 0.88 ± 0.11 ng/5 million cells in treated cells, whereas the extracellular level of PGE3 reached 24.94 ± 4.62 ng/5 million cells. These data suggest that A549 human lung cancer cells are able to rapidly produce and export high amounts of PGE3. The extracellular peak level of PGE3 occurred at 6 h, after which it declined; by 48 h, levels of PGE3 had decreased by at least 50% from the peak concentration (Fig. 1B). We next asked whether the production of PGE3 in A549 cells was the result of COX-1, COX-2, or both enzymes (A549 cells express both COX-1 and COX-2 protein) (20). Cloned ovine COX-1 and human recombinant COX-2 were used to test for the formation of PGE2 or PGE3 using AA and EPA, respectively, as substrates. As shown in Fig. 2A , both COX-1 and COX-2 enzymes produced PGE2 with comparable efficiency using 10 µM AA as a substrate, a finding previously reported by other investigators (21, 22). In contrast, the formation of PGE3 from EPA was at least three times greater with COX-2 than with COX-1 (Fig. 2B). With 10 µM EPA, the relative efficiency of the enzymes using this substrate to form PGE3 was human recombinant COX-2 (61.9 ± 14.2 ng/15 U enzymes) > ovine COX-2 (46.9 ± 8.5 ng/15 U enzymes) > ovine COX-1 (3.4 ± 1.0 ng/15 U enzymes). Overall, the total production of PGE2 was 15- and 3-fold higher with both COX-1 and COX-2 enzymes, respectively, than the total production of PGE3 by these enzymes.
The relative ability of A549 cells to form PGE2 from AA while simultaneously being exposed to EPA was then determined. The level of PGE2 in cells treated with both AA and EPA (50 µM each) decreased by 35% in comparison with that in cells treated with AA alone (50 µM). It was interesting that the formation of PGE3 was similar in cells treated either with EPA alone (50 µM) or with AA plus EPA (50 µM each) (Fig. 3) .
EPA and COX-2 protein expression Because the levels of PGE3 increased rapidly after A549 cells were exposed to EPA, the data suggested to us that the expression of COX-2 protein might be induced. Therefore, we examined the relative abilities of EPA and AA to induce COX-2 protein. A549 cells were exposed to 50 µM EPA for 2, 4, 6, 16, and 24 h, and induction of COX-2 protein was determined by Western blot analysis. Unexpectedly, the expression of COX-2 protein was not increased until 16 h. Figure 4 shows that 24 h of exposure of cells to EPA (25 and 50 µM) induced COX-2 protein expression in A549 cells in a concentration-dependent manner. Interestingly, DHA and AA (50 µM) also induced the expression of COX-2 protein in A549 cells. Expression of COX-1 protein, however, was not altered (data not shown).
Inhibition of PGE3 formation by celecoxib but not SC-560 To further confirm that PGE3 was enzymatically generated either by cloned enzymes or by cancer cells, the formation of PGE3 by EPA in the presence of either celecoxib, a selective COX-2 inhibitor, or SC-560, a selective COX-1 inhibitor, in A549 cells was tested. Celecoxib (5 and 10 µM) significantly reduced PGE3 levels to 4.25 ± 0.40 and 3.25 ± 0.35 ng/5 million cells, respectively, from the control cell level of 6.92 ± 0.24 ng/5 million cells (P < 0.05). The inhibition of PGE3 formation by celecoxib in A549 cells was concentration dependent. In comparison, SC-560 up to 0.5 µM, a concentration known to inhibit 95% of COX-1 activity (23), had no effect on the production of PGE3 mediated by EPA (Fig. 5A) . We then tested the inhibitory effect of celecoxib on PGE3 formation with cloned COX-2 enzymes and found that celecoxib (10 µM) also inhibited the production of PGE3 by EPA by 72% (data not shown). The expression of COX-2 protein in EPA-treated cells in the presence of celecoxib was also examined. Interestingly, when cells were exposed to both EPA and celecoxib, the presence of celecoxib did not alter the expression of COX-2 protein compared with that in cells treated with EPA alone (Fig. 5B).
PGE3 and cancer cell proliferation Studies have suggested that PGE2 can stimulate colorectal cancer cell growth (16); thus, the effect of both PGE2 and PGE3 on human lung cancer cell proliferation was investigated. After A549 cells were exposed to either PGE2 or PGE3 for 24 h, PGE2 (1 µM) produced only a slight increase in cell proliferation, whereas PGE3 (1 µM) inhibited the growth of these cells by 37.1% (P < 0.05) (Fig. 6) . Addition of PGE3 to the PGE2-treated A549 cells also led to a significant reduction in cell proliferation compared with that in the cells treated with PGE2 alone (P < 0.05). The effect of PGE3 on A549 cell proliferation was concentration dependent. In contrast to that of A549 cells, exposure of NHBE cells to 1 µM PGE3 reduced the DNA synthesis of these cells by only 10%.
Celecoxib reversed EPA-induced cell death The role of PGE3 in EPA-induced cell death was further examined in A549 cells treated with EPA alone and a combination of EPA and selective COX inhibitors. A549 cells were exposed to EPA (25 µM), AA (25 µM), EPA and celecoxib (5 and 10 µM), and EPA and SC-560 (0.1 and 0.5 µM) for 24 h. Cell viability and apoptosis were detected by staining the cells with CAM and DAPI. Nuclear morphology was also recorded with a fluorescence microscope. When cells were exposed to EPA (25 µM) for 24 h, the majority of cells were rounded up and appeared to be undergoing apoptosis, as detected by staining with DAPI dye (Fig. 7 , upper panel). Interestingly, when the cells were exposed to the combination of EPA and celecoxib (Fig. 7, middle panel), cell death was reduced dramatically, as indicated by the increased viability of cells detected by calcein AM staining (green fluorescence) compared with treatment with EPA alone. In contrast, SC-560 only slightly affected EPA-induced cell death (Fig. 7, lower panel). Cell viability and apoptosis were additionally quantitated using a Biolumin 9600 well plate reader. Exposure of cells to 25 µM EPA led to a 63% reduction in cell viability (P < 0.05) and increased apoptotic cells by 5-fold (Fig. 8) (P < 0.001) compared with control cells. In contrast, exposure of cells to a similar concentration of AA did not affect the growth of A549 cells. Furthermore, when cells were exposed to EPA and celecoxib (5 and 10 µM), the number of apoptotic cells was significantly reduced by 38% and 56%, respectively, compared with treatment with EPA alone. The reversible effect of celecoxib on EPA-induced cell growth inhibition was concentration dependent. Interestingly, SC-560, a selective COX-1 inhibitor, did not block the inhibitory effect of EPA on A549 cell growth (Fig. 8). Taken together, these data suggest that the inhibitory effect of EPA on the growth of A549 cells might be at least partially associated with the formation of PGE3.
Studies have suggested that altered production of prostaglandins might be associated with the beneficial effects of the consumption of -3 fatty acids (24). In contrast to data from numerous studies with PGE2, little is known of the pharmacology of and cellular response to PGE3. Quantitation of PGE3 in biological matrices as well as within cell culture has been difficult, and this has hampered studies of the relative formation of this unique prostaglandin and its effects on the formation of PGE2 within normal and malignant cell populations. By applying a selective and sensitive LC/MS/MS method for the determination of PGE3, we previously showed that PGE3 is formed within 5 min of exposure of A549 cells to EPA (15). In the present study, we have demonstrated for the first time that both human lung cancer cells and cloned ovine COX-1 and COX-2 and human recombinant COX-2 enzymes are capable of generating PGE3 from EPA in a concentration- and time-dependent manner. In addition, we also found that PGE3 inhibited the proliferation of A549 human lung cancer cells but did not alter the growth of normal NHBE cells. Furthermore, addition of PGE3 to PGE2-treated cells resulted in the inhibition of cell proliferation in A549 cells. Our data also demonstrate that celecoxib can partially block EPA-induced cell death, which, in turn, is associated with a reduced formation of PGE3 in A549 cells. Increased expression of COX-2 protein and the consequent production of PGE2 have been implicated in the pathogenesis of several types of cancer, including colon, breast, and lung (25). In this study, we used A549 human lung cancer cells to examine the AA-mediated formation of PGE2 as well as the formation of PGE3 from EPA. Exposure of A549 cells to EPA led to an increase in intracellular PGE3 levels that peaked 2 h after the addition of substrate. It is clear that rapid transport of this 3-series prostaglandin occurred, which led to the maximal level of PGE3 at 4 h in the culture medium. Both the intracellular and extracellular levels of PGE3, however, were reduced at 6 h. One explanation for this phenomenon is that PGE3 may be unstable at 37°C. To test this hypothesis, PGE2 and PGE3 were incubated with DMEM-F12 medium only (i.e., without FBS or cells present). The levels of both prostaglandins declined after 6 h of incubation (data not shown), suggesting that thermal degradation of the prostaglandins had occurred. Additionally, PGE3 may be further metabolized by prostaglandin dehydrogenase (26). Low basal or endogenous levels of PGE3 in A549 cells were observed in cells that had not been exposed to EPA. The explanation for this lies in the fact that the FBS commonly added to our tissue culture medium contains a trace amount of EPA. We analyzed several lots of FBS sold for use in tissue culture and found low levels of EPA in FBS from two different commercial sources (data not shown). Although the low levels of EPA present in the FBS did not affect the findings of the reported studies, researchers who examine COX-related activity in cells in culture should be aware of EPA present in commercially supplied FBS. In prior investigations of the relative ability of COX to form 3-series prostaglandins, microsomal preparations from sheep vesicular glands were used that may have contained a relatively high content of COX-1 as opposed to COX-2 (27). To clarify the enzyme-specific production of the products, we examined the formation of both PGE2 and PGE3 from cloned COX-1 and COX-2 enzymes. The production of PGE2 by ovine COX-1 and human recombinant COX-2 exposed to AA was similar to that previously reported (21, 22). In contrast, the formation of PGE3 with human recombinant COX-2 was 5- to 18-fold higher than that from COX-1 enzyme. These data are consistent with those reported by Laneuville et al. (21) demonstrating that the rates of oxygenation of EPA are three times greater with intact cell and microsomal preparations of COX-2 than they are with comparable preparations of COX-1. In contrast to findings from studies showing that EPA (compared with AA) is a poor substrate for COX-1 and COX-2, as measured by the rate of oxygen uptake (27), our data suggest that the COX-2-mediated formation of PGE3 from EPA (61.91 ± 14.34 ng/15 U enzyme) was only slightly less than the formation of PGE2 from AA (90.11 ± 13.42 ng/15 U enzyme) using human recombinant COX-2. Taken together, our data demonstrate that EPA is a better substrate for human COX-2 than it is for COX-1 enzyme. It was previously shown that EPA and AA induce the expression of COX-2 protein and mRNA in keratinocytes (28) and macrophages (29). We also observed that EPA, DHA, and AA (50 µM) are all capable of inducing the expression of COX-2 protein in A549 cells in 24 h. In contrast to a previous study demonstrating that the induction of COX-2 expression in keratinocyte cells occurs within 3 h of treatment (28), we did not observe a significant induction of COX-2 expression by EPA in A549 cells until 16 h of treatment. This suggests that the rapid increase of PGE3 in A549 cells (peaking at 4 h) may result from the metabolism of EPA by both COX-1 and COX-2 enzymes in the cells. Even though the levels of COX-2 protein were increased by exposure of A549 cells to EPA, the relative formation of PGE2 by AA in those cells was actually reduced by exposure to EPA. The significance of the relative induction of COX-2 protein expression in the presence of COX-2 inhibitors, however, is unclear. For example, a number of in vivo studies have shown that ingestion of fish oil supplement (containing both EPA and DHA) inhibited colon or breast MDA-MB-231 tumor growth and that this anticancer effect may have been associated with the inhibition of expression of COX-2 protein at the tumor site (30, 31). In this study, the addition of AA did not alter the formation of PGE3 by EPA in A549 cells. Thus, even though the expression of COX-2 protein may increase within cells, the beneficial effects of EPA may involve both a decrease in the COX-2-mediated formation of PGE2 and the unaltered formation of PGE3, with its consequent effects on inhibition of tumor cell growth.
An important observation made in this study was the ability of PGE3 to inhibit the proliferation of A549 human lung cancer cells. When A549 tumor lung cells were exposed to both prostaglandins, PGE2 did not block the inhibitory effect of PGE3 on the proliferation of these cells. More interestingly, celecoxib at 5 µM, a concentration known to produce at least a 50% reduction in PGE2 formation in A549 cells (32), partially reversed EPA-induced cell death as indicated by DAPI staining. This observation correlates well with the reduction of PGE3 formation in cells treated with EPA and celecoxib. These results indicate that the inhibitory effect of EPA on tumor cell proliferation is attributable in part to the formation of PGE3, which actively functions as a suppressor of cell proliferation. Other mechanisms have been proposed to explain the cell growth inhibitory effect of EPA. Studies have indicated, for example, that dietary EPA and DHA can induce compositional changes in colonic mitochondrial membrane phospholipids that may, in turn, facilitate their inhibitory effect on cell proliferation as well as the induction of apoptosis in tumor cells (2, 33). To our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate that PGE3 produces antiproliferative effects on human nonsmall cell lung cancer cells. In contrast to other reports, we did not observe a significant stimulatory effect of PGE2 on the growth of either cancer or normal cells (12, 16). A potential explanation for this is that because the endogenous level of PGE2 within A549 cells is already relatively high ( In summary, we have found that A549 human lung cancer cells can produce and promptly export PGE3 using EPA as a substrate in a time- and concentration-dependent manner. Cloned ovine COX-1 and COX-2 and human recombinant COX-2 were all able to generate PGE3 when incubated with EPA. However, the ability of COX-2 to form PGE3 was much greater than that of COX-1. PGE3, unlike PGE2, inhibited the proliferation of human lung cancer cells and antagonized the effect of PGE2 on cell proliferation in A549 human lung cancer cells. Our newly developed LC/MS/MS analytical method allowed us to clearly determine the formation of PGE3 in both intact cells and cell-free systems. Therefore, the increased expression of COX-2 protein in cancer cells and the resulting increased production of PGE3 from EPA may provide a novel mechanism for the anticancer activity of fish oil that warrants further investigation.
This work was supported in part by National Cancer Institute Grants P01 CA-91844 and R21 CA-10241 and National Institutes of Health Grant CA-100140. Manuscript received November 6, 2003 and in revised form February 18, 2004.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Advertisement | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||