|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||




* Goodman Fielder Pty Ltd., North Ryde NSW 2113, Australia
Baker Medical Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Health Sciences and Nutrition, Adelaide, S.A., Australia
Published, JLR Papers in Press, May 16, 2004. DOI 10.1194/jlr.M400074-JLR200
1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. e-mail: peter.clifton{at}csiro.au
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
- and ß-carotene levels decreased by 1923%, lutein by 14%, and lycopene by 11%. Levels of
-carotene and lutein increased with extra fruit and vegetables. Only lycopene failed to increase during the washout phase. There were no significant changes in biochemical parameters. Serum LDL cholesterol lowering with 6.6 g/day ingested phytosterols was in the range seen with 1.63.2 g/day phytosterols. Lowering of plasma carotenoids was greater than that seen with lower phytosterol intake and was partially reversed by increased fruit and vegetable intake.
Supplementary key words low density lipoprotein cholesterol sitosterol campesterol
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Study design
All subjects, at both centers, undertook dietary interventions in a nonrandomized manner. The study was single blind, and foods were appropriately coded. Subjects were advised not to consume self-purchased phytosterol-enriched products at any time during the trial. Dietary interventions are listed in Table 1.
|
Measurements
The following measurements were made during the study.
Dietary intake was monitored using Victorian Anti-cancer Foundation diet assessment books (food frequency) during each intervention to determine compliance and assess micronutrient intake. Compliance was assessed by a daily record of the consumption of the supplied foods and the number of servings of fruit and vegetables consumed during the supplementation period. Food was supplied every 2 weeks at each visit.
The weight and height of subjects were determined at entry to the study. Subsequently, weight was measured at each visit to the clinic, which occurred every 2 weeks. Subjects were provided with the opportunity to report adverse events, if any, at each visit.
Subjects were requested to complete a daily checklist of foods consumed during the interventions.
Serum lipids (total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides) were determined on two consecutive days at the end of each period (weeks 2, 8, 14, and 16). LDL cholesterol levels were calculated.
Plasma carotenoids, plasma fat-soluble vitamins (A, D, and E), and plasma phytosterols were measured at the end of each period (weeks 2, 8, 14, and 16).
Biochemical and hematological parameters (used as indicators of the short-term safety of the high-phytosterol intake) were determined at the end of weeks 2, 8, 14, and 16. These parameters were full blood count, electrolytes, glucose, urea and creatinine, calcium, phosphate, liver function tests, clotting tests (prothrombin, partial thromboplastin test), and routine urinalysis.
Analyses
Serum lipids
Venous blood samples (20 ml) were collected in plain tubes after subjects fasted overnight (12 h). Serum was separated by low-speed centrifugation at 600 g for 10 min at 5°C (GS-6R centrifuge; Beckman, Fullerton, CA) and frozen at 20°C. At the end of the study, all samples from each subject were analyzed within the same analytic run. Total cholesterol and triacylglycerols were measured on a Cobas-Bio centrifugal analyzer (Roche Diagnostica, Basel, Switzerland) using enzymatic kits (Hofmann-La Roche Diagnostica, Basel, Switzerland) and standard control sera. Plasma HDL cholesterol concentrations were measured after precipitation of apolipoprotein B-containing lipoproteins by PEG 6000. The following modification of the Friedewald equation for molar concentrations was used to calculate LDL cholesterol (in mmol/l): LDL cholesterol = total cholesterol (triacylglycerol/2.18) HDL cholesterol. All other routine biochemistry and hematology was done at an accredited local pathology laboratory.
Plasma phytosterols
Plasma phytosterols were determined by gas chromatography based on a modification of the method described by Wolthers et al. (9). Briefly, 400 µl of plasma sample was saponified with 400 µl of 33% KOH at 60°C for 30 min, cooled, and extracted with hexane. The extract was evaporated to dryness with a stream of nitrogen, and the phytosterols were derivatized by treatment with 150 µl of SyLON BTZ (Supelco) for 30 min at 80°C. The silyl derivatives of the phytosterols were extracted into hexane and concentrated with a stream of nitrogen to 50 µl, and a 1 µl aliquot was injected onto the GC column (split ratio of 1:10). The gas chromatograph consisted of a DANI 6500 instrument equipped with a split/splitless injector and a flame ionization detector coupled to a DELTA computerized chromatography data system. The injector, detector, and oven temperatures were set at 275, 275, and 280°C, respectively. The capillary column used was a 60 m x 0.22 mm BPX5 (SGE Australia P/l). Plasma phytosterol concentrations were calculated from the standard curves using the ratio of the phytosterol peak area to the peak area of the internal standard (5ß-cholestan-3
-ol). The pure internal standard and lathosterol, campesterol, and sitosterol reference samples were obtained from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO).
Plasma carotenoids and vitamins A and E After subjects fasted overnight, blood samples were collected using EDTA as an anticoagulant. The plasma was separated by low-speed centrifugation, frozen immediately in liquid nitrogen, and then stored at 80°C until analysis. Plasma extractions and HPLC were performed according to the method of Yang and Lee (10). Minor modifications to this method were derived from Khachik et al. (11).
Sample preparation and analysis Only a small number of samples were processed at any one time to minimize the exposure to laboratory conditions. The lighting was minimal throughout sample preparation, and amber vials were used for the final extract storage. Samples had the internal standard added and an equal volume of ethanol. Vitamins and carotenoids were extracted with hexane, and the extract was evaporated to dryness under nitrogen. Extracts were then stored at 20°C. Mobile phase was used to redissolve the samples ready for HPLC analysis. All samples from each volunteer were extracted in duplicate and analyzed in one run by HPLC to minimize the effect of day-to-day variation.
Quality control
A standard reference material (National Institute of Standards and Technology product 968b) was initially tested after preparation of the standards. All vitamins and carotenoids at the high, medium, and low levels fell within the certified ranges. A quality control (QC) plasma was prepared for this study by pooling
20 ml of plasma that was mixed thoroughly, and 500 µl aliquots were transferred into storage vials and run with each batch of samples. QC plasma was stored at 80°C.
A Shimadzu LC 10 HPLC device fitted with a refrigerated autosampler and a SPD-M10Avp photodiode array detector with a class LC 10 chromatography workstation were used for analysis of the prepared samples. Isocratic separations of the fat-soluble vitamins and carotenoids were carried out on a Rainin (4.6 mm inner diameter x 250 mm length) C18 (5 µm spherical particles) reverse-phase column. The mobile phase was a mixture of acetonitrile (55%), methanol (22%), hexane (11.5%), and dichloromethane (11.5%) at a flow rate of 1.0 ml/min. Ammonium acetate (0.01%, w/v) was added to the mobile phase for stabilization of the carotenoids. Wavelengths of 292 nm (
-tocopherol and
-tocopherol acetate), 325 nm (retinol), 450 nm, and 472 nm (carotenoids) were monitored throughout each run.
Standards (trans-
- and -ß-carotene, lycopene, lutein, retinol,
-tocopherol, and
-tocopherol acetate) were obtained from Sigma Chemical Co. Solvents (hexane, methanol, acetonitrile, and dichloromethane) were all analytical HPLC grade, and the ethanol was 99.5% Univar absolute ethanol.
Statistical analysis
Repeated-measures ANOVA was calculated with treatment period as the within-subject factor and gender as the between-subject factor. Age, baseline LDL cholesterol and BMI, and change in weight were inserted into the model as covariates. Where there was a significant treatment effect detected by repeated measures, post hoc tests were used to locate differences using a Bonferroni correction to make allowance for the large number of tests performed. Analyses were performed with SPSS 10.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Significance was set at P < 0.05.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Compliance
Dietary compliance was excellent. Compliance scores (percentage eaten of all supplements required to be consumed) were as follows: bread, 98, 98, 97, and 86%; cereal, 99, 99, 98, and 88%; and margarine, 98, 97, 96, and 90% for the baseline period, period 1, period 2, and period 3, respectively. Additional fruit and vegetable intake (five total for each day) had an 84% compliance over the 6 weeks of period 2.
Dietary data
There were no significant changes between the four dietary periods for total dietary fat, saturated fat, or energy (Table 2). ß-Carotene intake increased by 24% (P < 0.001) and fiber intake increased by 3.3 g/day (P < 0.001) from period 1 to period 2 (the increased fruit and vegetable period).
|
|
|
Plasma carotenoids
Plasma carotenoids adjusted for total cholesterol and unadjusted are shown in Table 5. The data for
- and ß-carotene were highly skewed and kurtotic and required nonparametric analysis. The 26% decrease in adjusted ß-carotene levels and the 20% decrease in adjusted
-carotene levels were significant (P < 0.05). Only the
-carotene levels increased significantly with extra fruit and vegetable consumption. The ß-carotene levels increased upon the withdrawal of phytosterols to levels equivalent to those measured during the baseline period. Lutein levels decreased by 14% and also increased with extra fruit and vegetable consumption to levels equivalent to those observed during the baseline and washout periods.
-Tocopherol levels were only lower than baseline and washout levels during the period when extra fruit and vegetables were consumed. Lycopene levels decreased by 11% in period 1 and by 22% in period 2, suggesting either a time delay in the response to phytosterols or an adverse response to the increased fiber. During the washout period, the levels increased back toward the baseline value.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Despite a clear increase, the plasma phytosterol levels after dietary supplementation with phytosterols are still very similar to the range seen in normal subjects. In a study by Stalenhoef, Hectors, and Demacker (14) of 33 healthy control subjects, fasting plasma campesterol levels on their normal diet ranged from 1.5 to 9.7 µg/ml (mean, 5.2 µg/ml) and plasma sitosterol ranged from 0.8 to 6.6 µg/ml (mean, 3.6 µg/ml). In this group while taking phytosterols, the range of plasma phytosterols was 310 µg/ml (mean, 6.2 µg/ml) for campesterol and 210 µg/ml (mean, 5.0 µg/ml) for sitosterol. The increase in plasma sitosterol and campesterol with the phytosterols is
50% greater compared with the 39% and 71% increases reported by Weststrate and Meijer (3), but the intake used in that study (3.3 g/day) was approximately half of the intake used in this study. The phytosterol level is also 4-fold greater than that seen in our low-dose studies with 1.6 g/day (4, 12), so clearly the sterols in bread and cereals are bioavailable. Similarly, lathosterol is increased by 4-fold.
Plasma campesterol increased to a greater degree than sitosterol and was still higher than baseline after 2 weeks of washout despite there being a much lower amount of campesterol in the food. This suggests that campesterol kinetics are different from those of sitosterol, and indeed there is direct evidence now that this is so (15).
Although plasma plant sterol levels have been associated with coronary artery disease even after adjustment for total cholesterol levels, the effect size is very small (1%), and the authors themselves interpreted this as an association between cholesterol absorption and risk rather than a direct effect of the plant sterols (16), although this is still an open question.
The decrease in carotenoid levels when 6.6 g/day phytosterols was consumed was greater than with 1.6 g/day phytosterols consumed in milk in a previous study (12), with the difference ranging from 50% higher for ß-carotene to 400% higher for lycopene despite the decrease in LDL cholesterol being similar. However, the decrease in plasma carotenoid levels with 6.6 g/day phytosterols was no different from that reported in the literature for much lower levels (1.63.2 g/day) of phytosterol consumption in spreads (5, 17). Even as little as 1 g/d phytostanols has been reported to decrease lipid-standardized ß-carotene levels by 14.4% (18), which is very similar to the results seen in this study with a much larger amount. If one compares the 10 subjects who participated in both this trial with 6.6 g/day sterols and the previous trial with 1.6 d/day sterols, there is a clear dose-response effect, with 2- to 4-fold greater changes in lutein, lycopene, and
-carotene.
Over all studies, the magnitude of the change in ß-carotene, on average, is on the order of 10% after adjustment. This is negligible compared with seasonal changes of 70% for
- and ß-carotene (19). Dietary advice to eat five servings per day of fruit and vegetables (including one that is carotenoid-rich) can increase
-carotene by 32% in 4 weeks (4).
With the exception of
-carotene and lutein, the carotenoid levels did not return completely to baseline levels with advice to increase fruit and vegetable consumption, but they did recover upon withdrawal of phytosterols from the diet. This may have been attributable to increases in fiber, especially for lycopene, which is less efficiently transferred from the fat phase to the micellar phase than lutein (20).
The lack of response to extra fruit and vegetables by plasma ß-carotene levels in this study may be accounted for by the failure of the subjects to increase their intake of ß-carotene-rich vegetables. However, the observed high compliance of the subjects and the fact that
-carotene levels increased suggest that this was not the case. In contrast, a previous study (4) using 1.6 g/day phytosterols showed that the decrease of ß-carotene could be reversed by consumption of extra servings of fruit and vegetables. A much greater increase in dietary ß-carotene might be required to reverse the apparent depression of plasma ß-carotene levels caused by the higher phytosterol intake used in this study.
Low serum levels of ß-carotene have been associated with increased risk of cancer and cardiovascular disease (21, 22). However, in clinical intervention trials, supplementation of the diet with ß-carotene either had no benefit or caused harm (23). Furthermore, there is a suggestion that low ß-carotene concentrations may be a consequence of an underlying inflammatory process rather than being involved as a causative factor (24). Another interpretation from these studies is that ß-carotene itself is not protective and that carotenoid-rich fruit and vegetables may contain other protective factors or that an increased intake of ß-carotene may merely be a marker of a healthy lifestyle.
Clearly, high intakes of phytosterols that decrease all carotenoids and increase plant sterol levels could potentially nullify some of the effects of LDL cholesterol, but it is difficult to quantify exactly. From cohort studies and clinical intervention trials, the cholesterol-lowering effect of phytosterol-enriched spreads can be translated into cardiovascular disease risk conservatively of
1520% (25). From observational studies, the estimated benefit of consuming fruit and vegetables at the 90th percentile level is a reduction by 15% of the risk of heart disease compared with consumption at the 10th percentile level, so the decrease in carotenoids induced by plant sterols might potentially increase cardiac risk by 5% (26). Increased plasma plant sterols might increase the risk by 2% based on data from Rajaratnam, Gylling, and Miettinen (16), so on balance, the coronary risk might still be reduced by 813%. Animal studies with very high doses of phytosterols have shown beneficial effects on atherosclerosis (27). Levels of
- and ß-carotene measured in the Dutch population were 20% lower than the baseline levels in this study (3, 5), whereas the plasma lycopene levels have been reported to vary between 26 and 60% of Australian mean levels. This provides an appropriate framework for considering the magnitude of any public health risk given the changes in plasma carotenoids associated with the ingestion of phytosterols at the levels used in this study.
Conclusions
There appears to be no advantage gained by increasing total intake of phytosterols above 3.2 g/day with respect to any additional cholesterol lowering, but if an intake of 6.6 g/day was achieved on a regular basis, no adverse effects other than a modest decrease of plasma carotenoids and increase of plasma plant sterols would be seen, which potentially might reduce the protective effects of a decrease in cholesterol. Any long-term effects on the promotion of cancer would not be expected, especially given the experimental evidence that plant sterols may have growth-inhibitory effects (28), although no protection from colorectal cancer has been found with dietary sterols (29).
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
Manuscript received February 22, 2004 and in revised form April 12, 2004.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-cholest-7-en-3ß-ol) and other cholesterol precursors in serum in the study and treatment of disturbances of sterol metabolism, particularly cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis. J. Lipid Res. 32: 603612.[Abstract]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. G. Moruisi, W. Oosthuizen, and A. M. Opperman Phytosterols/Stanols lower cholesterol concentrations in familial hypercholesterolemic subjects: a systematic review with meta-analysis. J. Am. Coll. Nutr., February 1, 2006; 25(1): 41 - 48. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Journal of Biological Chemistry |
| Molecular and Cellular Proteomics | ASBMB Today |