J. Lipid Res. Please sign the JLR Guestbook
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1194/jlr.M700351-JLR200 on September 6, 2007

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
M700351-JLR200v1
48/12/2693    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jung, D.
Right arrow Articles by Moschetta, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jung, D.
Right arrow Articles by Moschetta, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Lipid Research, Vol. 48, 2693-2700, December 2007
Copyright © 2007 by American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

FXR agonists and FGF15 reduce fecal bile acid excretion in a mouse model of bile acid malabsorption

Diana Jung*, Takeshi Inagaki*,{dagger}, Robert D. Gerard{dagger},§, Paul A. Dawson**, Steven A. Kliewer*,{dagger}, David J. Mangelsdorf1,* and Antonio Moschetta1,*,{dagger}{dagger},§§

* Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Pharmacology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390-9050
{dagger} Department of Molecular Biology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390-9050
§ Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390-9050
** Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157
{dagger}{dagger} Consorzio Mario Negri Sud, 66030 Santa Maria Imbaro, Italy
§§ Clinica Medica A. Murri, University of Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy

Published, JLR Papers in Press, September 6, 2007.

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. e-mail: davo.mango{at}utsouthwestern.edu (D.J.M.); moschetta{at}negrisud.it (A.M.)


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Bile acid malabsorption, which in patients leads to excessive fecal bile acid excretion and diarrhea, is characterized by a vicious cycle in which the feedback regulation of bile acid synthesis is interrupted, resulting in additional bile acid production. Feedback regulation of bile acid synthesis is under the control of an endocrine pathway wherein activation of the nuclear bile acid receptor, farnesoid X receptor (FXR), induces enteric expression of the hormone, fibroblast growth factor 15 (FGF15). In liver, FGF15 acts together with FXR-mediated expression of small heterodimer partner to repress bile acid synthesis. Here, we show that the FXR-FGF15 pathway is disrupted in mice lacking apical ileal bile acid transporter, a model of bile acid malabsorption. Treatment of Asbt–/– mice with either a synthetic FXR agonist or FGF15 downregulates hepatic cholesterol 7{alpha}-hydroxylase mRNA levels, decreases bile acid pool size, and reduces fecal bile acid excretion. These findings suggest that FXR agonists or FGF15 could be used therapeutically to interrupt the cycle of excessive bile acid production in patients with bile acid malabsorption.

Supplementary key words bile acid metabolism • nuclear receptors • transporters • farnesoid X receptor • fibroblast growth factor 15

Abbreviations: ASBT, apical sodium-dependent bile acid transporter; CYP7A1, cholesterol 7{alpha}-hydroxylase; CYP8B1, sterol 12{alpha}-hydroxylase; FGF15, fibroblast growth factor 15; FXR, farnesoid X receptor; IBABP, ileal bile acid binding protein; SHP, small heterodimer partner; TCA, taurocholate; TßMCA, tauro-ß-muricholate


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Bile acids are anionic detergents synthesized from cholesterol in the liver that are released postprandially into the small intestine, where they facilitate the solubilization of fatty acids, cholesterol, and lipophilic vitamins. In the ileum, >95% of bile acids are reabsorbed by the apical ileal sodium-dependent bile acid transporter (ASBT; SLC10A2) (1) and returned to the liver as part of the cycle referred to as enterohepatic circulation (2). In humans, a reduction in intestinal bile acid reabsorption and subsequent increase in fecal bile acid excretion contributes to the chronic diarrhea and steatorrhea that occur in a number of different clinical contexts, including congenital diarrhea, idiopathic secretory diarrhea, Crohn's disease, postinfectious diarrhea, postvagotomy diarrhea, postgastrectomy syndrome, and short bowel syndrome. Although mutation of the ASBT gene is one cause for bile acid malabsorption in humans (3), in most cases the molecular mechanisms underlying the disruption of enterohepatic circulation are unknown. Asbt–/– mice were described recently and shown to recapitulate key aspects of bile acid malabsorption in humans (4). Asbt deletion eliminates the reabsorption of intestinal bile acids. As a consequence, Asbt–/– mice have increased fecal bile acid excretion, reduced bile acid pool size, increased bile acid synthesis, and alterations in bile acid pool composition (4).

Bile acids are intracellular ligands for the nuclear farnesoid X receptor (FXR; NR1H4) (5, 6), a transcriptional regulator of numerous genes involved in maintaining cholesterol and bile acid homeostasis (57). Among its many actions, FXR represses transcription of the gene encoding cholesterol 7{alpha}-hydroxylase (CYP7A1), the first and rate-limiting enzyme in the classic pathway of bile acid synthesis (8, 9). FXR represses CYP7A1 transcription through a bipartite mechanism involving coordinated actions in intestine and liver. In ileum, FXR induces the expression of fibroblast growth factor 15 (FGF15), a hormone that plays an overarching role in regulating bile acid homeostasis. In liver, FXR induces the expression of small heterodimer partner (SHP; NR0B2), an orphan nuclear receptor that binds to the CYP7A1 promoter through interactions with another orphan nuclear receptor, liver receptor homolog 1 (NR5A2) (10, 11). Induction of both FGF15 and SHP is required for the FXR-mediated repression of CYP7A1 and bile acid synthesis (12). FXR also represses the hepatic expression of sterol 12{alpha}-hydroxylase (CYP8B1), an enzyme controlling the ratio of the primary bile acids cholate and ß-muricholate in mice (13), and induces the expression of the bile acid export pump (ABCB11) (14, 15) and the ileal bile acid binding protein (IBABP) (5, 16, 17).

Bile acid malabsorption interrupts the normal feedback repression of bile acid synthesis, resulting in a vicious cycle of increased bile acid production. In the present study, we examined FXR signaling in Asbt–/– mice and tested whether FXR agonists and FGF15 can be used to restore feedback regulation in this genetic model of bile acid malabsorption.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Animals
Asbt–/– mice were generated previously (4) and maintained on a pure 129S6/SvEv strain background with matching wild-type mice in a temperature-controlled room (22–23°C) under a 12 h light/12 h dark cycle. Mice were maintained on a normal chow diet (Purina 5001; Harlan Teklad, Madison, WI). Twenty 12 week old male mice were treated by oral gavage with 100 mg/kg mouse body weight of a selective, synthetic FXR agonist, GW4064 (18) (a gift from Dr. Timothy Willson, GlaxoSmithKline) or vehicle [PEG 400/Tween 80 (4:1, v/v)] daily for 6 days. On the last day of treatment, mice were fasted for 2 h, then gavaged and euthanized after an additional 2 h. Bile was stored at –20°C, and liver, gallbladder, and small and large intestine were frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at –80°C until further analysis. All experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Research Advisory Committee at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center.

FGF15 adenovirus infections
FGF15 adenovirus was generated as described (12). Six 4–6 week old male mice were infected with adenovirus by injection into the jugular vein using a 3/10 ml syringe (Becton Dickinson Co., Franklin Lakes, NJ). Each mouse received 7.5 x 109 particles/g body weight in 0.1 ml of saline. Mice were euthanized at 5 days after injection, total RNA was prepared from the liver and ileum, and fecal bile acid measurements were performed.

Bile acid measurements
For fecal bile acid excretion, stools from individually housed wild-type and Asbt–/– mice were collected during the final 3 days of the study and then dried, weighed, and ground. Bile acids were extracted as described by Turley, Daggy, and Dietschy (19), and bile acid concentration was determined by an enzymatic assay. The bile acid pool size was determined as the total bile acid content of gallbladder, bile, and intestine. These tissues were removed and bile was extracted as described (19). The total bile acid content and the individual bile acid compositions were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (20) using the following bile salts as standards: tauro-ß-muricholate (TßMCA), tauroursodeoxycholate, taurohyodeoxycholate, taurocholate (TCA), glycocholate, taurochenodeoxycholate, taurodeoxycholate, glycochenodeoxycholate, glycodeoxycholate, and taurolithocholate.

Lipid measurements
Hepatic (0.2 g of liver) lipids were extracted according to Folch, Lees, and Sloane Stanley (21). Bile acids were quantified enzymatically using the 3{alpha}-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) method (22), and the bile acid hydrophobicity index was calculated according to Heuman (23). Serum and liver triglycerides were measured using a reagent from Thermo Trace, Ltd. (Melbourne, Australia), and glycerol standards from Sigma Chemical Co. Serum and liver cholesterol levels were measured using reagent from Roche and cholesterol standards from Sigma Chemical Co.

mRNA measurements
RNA extraction from liver was performed using the RNA STAT-60 reagent (Tel-Test B, Inc., Friendswood, TX). RNA was treated with RNase-free DNase (Roche) and reverse-transcribed (Superscript II; Invitrogen) using random hexamers (Roche) to a final concentration of 20 ng/µl. Gene-specific primers were designed using Primer Express Software (PE Biosystem). Primer sequences have been reported (12, 24) and are available upon request. Real-time quantitative PCR was performed as described previously (25) using SYBR Green I chemistry (SYBR Green PCR Master Mix; ABI) on the ABI Prism 7900HT Sequence Detection System. Each sample was run in triplicate with 25 ng of template and 150 nM of each primer. Relative fold changes were calculated using the comparative cycle times method with cyclophilin as the reference gene and the wild-type mice from each strain as the calibrators. All real-time quantitative PCR data were generated using RNA isolated from tissues of individual animals.

Statistics
Values are expressed as means ± SEM. Comparison between two groups was assessed by Student's t-test. Comparison between multiple groups was assessed using ANOVA, followed by a post hoc Newman-Keuls test (Primer of Biostatistic Software).


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
A synthetic FXR agonist restores FXR activity in Asbt–/– mice
Interruption of enterohepatic circulation in Asbt–/– mice results in increased fecal bile acid excretion and reduced bile acid pool size (4). Because bile acids are endogenous ligands for FXR, we analyzed whether Asbt–/– mice have reduced FXR activity in intestine and liver. In ileum, mRNA levels of the FXR target genes Fgf15 and Shp were reduced to below detection in Asbt–/– mice (Fig. 1 ). A decrease also was seen in Ibabp expression. In liver, Shp and Bsep mRNA levels were reduced significantly (Fig. 2 ). Consistent with decreased expression of Fgf15 in the intestine and Shp in the liver, hepatic Cyp7a1 and Cyp8b1 mRNA levels increased by 12-fold and 6-fold, respectively (Fig. 2). Thus, Asbt–/– mice have decreased FXR activation in both liver and intestine accompanied by loss of feedback regulation of Cyp7a1 and Cyp8b1.


Figure 1
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Effects of the synthetic farnesoid X receptor (FXR) agonist GW4064 on FXR target gene expression in ileum of wild-type and Asbt–/– mice. Quantitative PCR analysis was performed on mRNA from ileum of male mice (n = 10) treated for 6 days with vehicle (black bars) or GW4064 (white bars). Values were normalized to an internal standard using vehicle-treated wild-type mice as calibrators. Data represent means ± SEM and are plotted as fold change relative to vehicle-treated wild-type mice. Different lowercase letters indicate statistical significance (P < 0.05) between groups. ASBT, apical sodium-dependent bile acid transporter; FGF15, fibroblast growth factor 15; IBABP, ileal bile acid binding protein; SHP, small heterodimer partner.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Effects of GW4064 on FXR target gene expression in liver of wild-type and Asbt–/– mice. Quantitative PCR analysis was performed on mRNA from liver of male mice (n = 10) treated for 6 days with vehicle (black bars) or GW4064 (white bars). Values were normalized to an internal standard using vehicle-treated wild-type mice as calibrators. Data represent means ± SEM and are plotted as fold change relative to vehicle-treated wild-type mice. Different lowercase letters indicate statistical significance (P < 0.05) between groups. CYP7A1, cholesterol 7{alpha}-hydroxylase; CYP27AI, sterol 27-hydroxylase; CYP8B1, sterol 12{alpha}-hydroxylase.

 
To examine whether FXR activity can be restored by an FXR agonist that does not require ASBT for intestinal absorption, Asbt–/– mice were administered the selective, synthetic FXR agonist, GW4064. In ileum, GW4064 administration caused marked increases in Fgf15, Shp, and Ibabp expression (Fig. 1). In liver, GW4064 induced Shp and Bsep and suppressed Cyp7a1 and Cyp8b1 expression (Fig. 2). In experiments performed in parallel in wild-type mice, GW4064 had the expected effects, including induction of Fgf15 and Shp in ileum, induction of Shp and Bsep in liver, and repression of Cyp7a1 and Cyp8b1 in liver (Figs. 1, 2). These results demonstrate that GW4064 can restore the loss of FXR signaling in Asbt–/– mice.

GW4064 reduces bile acid pool size and alters bile composition in Asbt–/– mice
In agreement with previous work (4), basal fecal bile acid excretion was ~10-fold higher in Asbt–/– mice compared with wild-type mice (Fig. 3A ). GW4064 administration caused a substantial decrease (70%) in fecal bile acids in Asbt–/– mice but had no effect in wild-type mice. Although not addressed in this study, the discrepancy between decreased Cyp7a1 expression and unaltered fecal bile acid output in wild-type mice might be explained by an increased activity of the alternative, acidic pathway of bile acid synthesis. On the other hand, because intestinal bile acid absorption is compromised in Asbt–/– mice, the robust decrease in bile acid excretion caused by GW4064 should depend entirely on the downregulation of de novo bile acid synthesis in the liver. Indeed, treatment of Asbt–/– mice with GW4064 caused a 50% reduction in the bile pool size (Fig. 3B). A smaller, 15% decrease occurred in wild-type mice (Fig. 3B). The large decrease in the bile pool size caused by GW4064 in Asbt–/– mice is even more significant, considering that the basal bile acid pool size is already 62% smaller in these animals (Fig. 3B).


Figure 3
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. GW4064 decreases fecal bile salt excretion and bile acid pool size in Asbt–/– mice. Fecal bile acid excretion (A) and bile acid composition and pool size (B) were measured in male wild-type and Asbt–/– mice (n = 10) treated with vehicle (black bars) or GW4064 (white bars). The same mice used for Figs. 1, 2 were analyzed. Data represent means ± SEM. Different lowercase letters indicate statistical significance (P < 0.05) between groups. bw, body weight; TCA, taurocholate; TßMCA, tauro-ß-muricholate.

 
The changes in bile acid pool size caused by either the lack of ASBT or GW4064 treatment were accompanied by alterations in its composition. In the basal state, Asbt–/– mice had a decreased ratio of TßMCA to TCA (Fig. 3B) (4). These data are consistent with an increased expression of CYP8B1, which catalyzes a key step in the formation of TCA, in Asbt–/– mice. Treatment with GW4064, which reduces CYP8B1 levels, changed the TßMCA/TCA ratio from 0.11 to 0.19. Similarly, GW4064 administration to wild-type mice shifted the TßMCA/TCA ratio from 1.06 to 1.49 (Fig. 3B). Because TßMCA is more hydrophilic than TCA, GW4064 caused a significant decrease in the hydrophobicity index of the bile acid pool in both genotypes (from 0.07 ± 0.02 to –0.02 ± 0.01 in wild-type mice and from 0.19 ± 0.07 to 0.06 ± 0.03 in Asbt–/– mice; P < 0.05).

An estimation of the fractional turnover rate of bile acids can be calculated by dividing the daily fecal bile acid excretion by the bile acid pool size (4). As shown in Table 1 , the fractional turnover rate did not change after GW4064 treatment in wild-type animals. By contrast, the fractional turnover rate was increased by 24-fold in the Asbt–/– mice under basal conditions and was reduced by >60% after GW4064 administration. Although the large increase in fractional turnover rate in the Asbt–/– mice is consistent with increased Cyp7a1 expression and decreased intestinal bile acid absorption, the mechanism by which the FXR agonist reduced the turnover rate in Asbt–/– mice is not entirely known. Together, these data demonstrate that FXR activation reverses key pathological measurements of bile acid malabsorption in the Asbt–/– model of the disease.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1. Fractional turnover rate of bile acids in wild-type and Asbt–/– mice after vehicle or GW4064 treatment

 
Effects of FXR loss and gain of function on hepatic lipid metabolism in Asbt–/– mice
The FXR pathway regulates not only bile acid homeostasis but also cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations (13). Therefore, we examined the effect of GW4064 treatment on hepatic and serum lipid levels. There were no differences between wild-type and Asbt–/– mice in basal hepatic or serum triglyceride and cholesterol concentrations (Fig. 4 ). However, treatment with GW4064 led to significant decreases in liver triglyceride concentrations in both wild-type and Asbt–/– mice and a decrease in serum triglyceride levels in Asbt–/– mice (Fig. 4). Similar triglyceride-lowering effects of GW4064 have been reported previously (26). GW4064 significantly decreased serum cholesterol levels and caused a trend toward decreased hepatic cholesterol concentrations in Asbt–/– mice. Given the prominent role of bile acids in intestinal cholesterol absorption (27), the marked reductions in total bile acid pool size and bile acid hydrophobicity might account for the cholesterol-lowering actions of GW4064 in Asbt–/– mice.


Figure 4
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Lipid profiles in wild-type and Asbt–/– mice treated with GW4064. Mice were treated for 6 days with vehicle (black bars) or GW4064 (white bars) and analyzed for hepatic and serum triglyceride and cholesterol levels. The same mice used for Figs. 13 were analyzed. Data represent means ± SEM. Different lowercase letters indicate statistical significance (P < 0.05) between groups.

 
Effects of ASBT and FXR agonist on liver weight
Asbt–/– mice had a 32% reduction in body weight compared with wild-type mice (Table 2 ). Interestingly, despite their small size, Asbt–/– mice had a reduced liver-to-body weight ratio (Table 2). Because bile acids promote hepatocyte proliferation and liver regeneration through an FXR-dependent pathway (28), the small liver size in Asbt–/– mice could be related to their reduced bile acid pool. Neither wild-type mice nor Asbt–/– mice had changes in body weight after treatment with GW4064 (Table 2). However, treatment with GW4064 led to increased liver weight in both groups. The increase in liver weight in GW4064-treated Asbt–/– mice resulted in liver-to-body weight ratios comparable to those of wild-type mice (Table 2). These data reveal a role for FXR in regulating liver growth under conditions of impaired enterohepatic circulation.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2. Body weight, liver weight, and liver-to-body weight ratio in wild-type and Asbt–/– mice after vehicle or GW4064 treatment

 
FGF15 reduces fecal bile acid excretion in Asbt–/– mice
Asbt–/– mice had a pronounced reduction in gallbladder volume compared with wild-type mice under fasting conditions (0.07 ± 0.01 vs. 0.19 ± 0.04 µl/g body weight, respectively; P < 0.01). The smaller fasting gallbladder volume in Asbt–/– mice is likely a consequence of low mRNA levels of intestinal FGF15 (Fig. 2), which is required for gallbladder filling (29). Because FGF15 is also required for efficient FXR-mediated repression of bile acid synthesis, we tested whether FGF15 administration reverses excess fecal bile acid excretion in Asbt–/– mice. Infection of Asbt–/– mice with an FGF15-expressing adenovirus resulted in robust FGF15 mRNA levels in liver, and a corresponding decrease in Cyp7a1 mRNA was observed (Fig. 5A ). Significantly decreased serum cholesterol levels and a trend toward decreased hepatic cholesterol concentrations were observed in Asbt–/– mice infected with FGF15-expressing adenovirus (Fig. 5B). Also, fecal bile acid excretion was reduced by ~80% in mice infected with the FGF15-expressing adenovirus (Fig. 5C). Notably, there was no increase in liver weight of Asbt–/– mice after infection with FGF15-expressing adenovirus (data not shown), indicating that other FXR actions are required to promote liver growth.


Figure 5
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. FGF15 phenocopies the effects of an FXR agonist on bile acid metabolism in Asbt–/– mice. Six male Asbt–/– mice were injected in the jugular vein with either control adenovirus or an FGF15-expressing adenovirus (Adv-FGF15). A, B: Mice were euthanized at 5 days after injection and analyzed for mRNA expression analysis in the liver (A) and hepatic and serum cholesterol levels (B) by quantitative PCR. C: Feces were collected for 3 days before euthanasia for fecal bile acid excretion measurements. Data represent means ± SEM. Different lowercase letters indicate statistical significance (P < 0.05) between groups.

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
There is increasing evidence that bile acid malabsorption is a common cause of chronic diarrhea in conditions ranging from short bowel syndrome to inflammatory bowel disease. Bile acid malabsorption is generally treated with cholestyramine, a resin that sequesters bile acids in the intestine and thus protects the bowel from exposure to the increased levels of colonic bile acids seen in these patients. However, cholestyramine and other resins are unpalatable and have adverse side effects that include constipation, vitamin deficiency (30), and hypertriglyceridemia (31). Moreover, by sequestering bile acids in intestine, cholestyramine interrupts the normal feedback repression of hepatic bile acid synthesis, resulting in increased bile acid production.

In this study, we examined the potential therapeutic utility of FXR agonists and FGF15 in the Asbt–/– mouse model of bile acid malabsorption. Asbt–/– mice were unable to reabsorb bile acids in the ileum (4), resulting in impaired FXR activity in both intestine and liver. The changes in gene expression included marked decreases of Fgf15 and Shp in ileum and liver, respectively. Because both FGF15 and SHP are crucial components of the feedback regulatory loop, there was a corresponding increase in Cyp7a1 mRNA and bile acid synthesis in these mice. Notably, treatment of Asbt–/– mice with the synthetic FXR agonist GW4064 reactivated the FXR pathway, inducing the expression of Fgf15 in intestine and Shp in liver. This resulted in the suppression of Cyp7a1 followed by decreased bile acid pool size and fecal bile acid excretion. Downregulation of Cyp7a1 and reduction of fecal bile acid excretion were also accomplished by the introduction of FGF15 directly into the livers of Asbt–/– mice. Together, these data suggest that reactivation of the FXR-FGF15 signaling cascade may have important therapeutic potential in diseases associated with bile acid malabsorption.

This study also highlights the quantitative importance of FXR in suppressing de novo bile acid synthesis. Because Asbt–/– mice are unable to reabsorb bile acids in the intestine, the newly synthesized bile acids constitute the entire bile acid pool, whereas they account for only 5% of the bile acid pool in normal mice (2). Activation of FXR by GW4064 in Asbt–/– mice reduced the bile acid pool size by 50%. This was reflected in the fractional turnover rate of bile acids, which was decreased by >60% after GW4064 administration. To our knowledge, this is the first in vivo study showing the relative pharmacological importance of the repression of bile synthesis by FXR.

Activation of the FXR pathway via selective specific agonists has been proposed as a therapeutic tool in biliary diseases such as cholesterol gallstone disease (24) and cholestasis (32, 33). FXR agonists also protect the intestinal mucosa from bacterial infection and inflammatory insults (34). Recently, it was demonstrated that FGF15 is a key hormonal regulator of gallbladder filling (29), which would decrease the amount of intestinal bile acid during the interprandial cycles. These observations, together with our data on the Asbt–/– mice, support the potential therapeutic action of selective FXR agonists and FGF15 in the management of temporary or long-term clinical manifestations of bile acid malabsorption. Interestingly, in certain conditions, FXR agonists are able to decrease circulating and hepatic triglyceride levels (26), thus protecting against one of the major adverse side effects of cholestyramine and other resins (31), which are the actual major drugs in bile acid malabsorption.

In summary, we demonstrated that administration of either a synthetic FXR agonist or the hormone FGF15 breaks the cycle of increased bile acid synthesis in a mouse model of bile acid malabsorption. Administration of GW4064 also had the added benefit of inducing proteins such as IBABP and bile salt export pump that serve to protect the intestine and liver from excess bile acids. These findings raise the prospect of new strategies to treat patients with either temporary or long-term interruption of enterohepatic circulation by bile acid malabsorption.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
The authors thank Dr. Timothy Willson for supplying the synthetic FXR agonists; Drs. David Russell, Heidi Chamberlain-Shea, Joyce Repa, and Steven Turley for their criticisms and helpful discussions; Angie Bookout from the Mango/Kliewer laboratory for contributing to the in vivo studies; and Scott Clark for expertise in the HPLC measurements of bile salts. D.J.M. is an investigator at the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. D.J. is supported by the Walter and Gertrud Siegenthaler Foundation (Zurich, Switzerland). A.M. is supported by a New Unit Start Up Grant from the Italian Association for Cancer Research. This work was funded by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, the Robert Welch Foundation (Grants I-1275 and I-1558), and the National Institutes of Health (Grants DK-067158 and U19 DK-62434).

Manuscript received August 6, 2007 and in revised form August 29, 2007 and in re-revised form September 6, 2007.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
  1. Craddock, A. L., M. W. Love, R. W. Daniel, L. C. Kirby, H. C. Walters, M. H. Wong, and P. A. Dawson. 1998. Expression and transport properties of the human ileal and renal sodium-dependent bile acid transporter. Am. J. Physiol. 274: G157–G169.[Medline]

  2. Hofmann, A. F. 1999. The continuing importance of bile acids in liver and intestinal disease. Arch. Intern. Med. 159: 2647–2658.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  3. Oelkers, P., L. C. Kirby, J. E. Heubi, and P. A. Dawson. 1997. Primary bile acid malabsorption caused by mutations in the ileal sodium-dependent bile acid transporter gene (SLC10A2). J. Clin. Invest. 99: 1880–1887.[Medline]

  4. Dawson, P. A., J. Haywood, A. L. Craddock, M. Wilson, M. Tietjen, K. Kluckman, N. Maeda, and J. S. Parks. 2003. Targeted deletion of the ileal bile acid transporter eliminates enterohepatic cycling of bile acids in mice. J. Biol. Chem. 278: 33920–33927.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  5. Makishima, M., A. Y. Okamoto, J. J. Repa, H. Tu, R. M. Learned, A. Luk, M. V. Hull, K. D. Lustig, D. J. Mangelsdorf, and B. Shan. 1999. Identification of a nuclear receptor for bile acids. Science. 284: 1362–1365.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  6. Parks, D. J., S. G. Blanchard, R. K. Bledsoe, G. Chandra, T. G. Consler, S. A. Kliewer, J. B. Stimmel, T. M. Willson, A. M. Zavacki, D. D. Moore, et al. 1999. Bile acids: natural ligands for an orphan nuclear receptor. Science. 284: 1365–1368.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  7. Wang, H., J. Chen, K. Hollister, L. C. Sowers, and B. M. Forman. 1999. Endogenous bile acids are ligands for the nuclear receptor FXR/BAR. Mol. Cell. 3: 543–553.[Medline]

  8. Russell, D. W., and K. D. Setchell. 1992. Bile acid biosynthesis. Biochemistry. 31: 4737–4749.[CrossRef][Medline]

  9. Ishibashi, S., M. Schwarz, P. K. Frykman, J. Herz, and D. W. Russell. 1996. Disruption of cholesterol 7alpha-hydroxylase gene in mice. I. Postnatal lethality reversed by bile acid and vitamin supplementation. J. Biol. Chem. 271: 18017–18023.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  10. Goodwin, B., S. A. Jones, R. R. Price, M. A. Watson, D. D. McKee, L. B. Moore, C. Galardi, J. G. Wilson, M. C. Lewis, M. E. Roth, et al. 2000. A regulatory cascade of the nuclear receptors FXR, SHP-1, and LRH-1 represses bile acid biosynthesis. Mol. Cell. 6: 517–526.[CrossRef][Medline]

  11. Lu, T. T., M. Makishima, J. J. Repa, K. Schoonjans, T. A. Kerr, J. Auwerx, and D. J. Mangelsdorf. 2000. Molecular basis for feedback regulation of bile acid synthesis by nuclear receptors. Mol. Cell. 6: 507–515.[CrossRef][Medline]

  12. Inagaki, T., M. Choi, A. Moschetta, L. Peng, C. L. Cummins, J. G. McDonald, G. Luo, S. A. Jones, B. Goodwin, J. A. Richardson, et al. 2005. Fibroblast growth factor 15 functions as an enterohepatic signal to regulate bile acid homeostasis. Cell Metab. 2: 217–225.[CrossRef][Medline]

  13. Sinal, C. J., M. Tohkin, M. Miyata, J. M. Ward, G. Lambert, and F. J. Gonzalez. 2000. Targeted disruption of the nuclear receptor FXR/BAR impairs bile acid and lipid homeostasis. Cell. 102: 731–744.[CrossRef][Medline]

  14. Plass, J. R., O. Mol, J. Heegsma, M. Geuken, K. N. Faber, P. L. Jansen, and M. Muller. 2002. Farnesoid X receptor and bile salts are involved in transcriptional regulation of the gene encoding the human bile salt export pump. Hepatology. 35: 589–596.[CrossRef]

  15. Ananthanarayanan, M., N. Balasubramanian, M. Makishima, D. J. Mangelsdorf, and F. J. Suchy. 2001. Human bile salt export pump promoter is transactivated by the farnesoid X receptor/bile acid receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 276: 28857–28865.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  16. Grober, J., I. Zaghini, H. Fujii, S. A. Jones, S. A. Kliewer, T. M. Willson, T. Ono, and P. Besnard. 1999. Identification of a bile acid-responsive element in the human ileal bile acid-binding protein gene. Involvement of the farnesoid X receptor/9-cis-retinoic acid receptor heterodimer. J. Biol. Chem. 274: 29749–29754.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  17. Hwang, S. T., N. L. Urizar, D. D. Moore, and S. J. Henning. 2002. Bile acids regulate the ontogenic expression of ileal bile acid binding protein in the rat via the farnesoid X receptor. Gastroenterology. 122: 1483–1492.[CrossRef][Medline]

  18. Maloney, P. R., D. J. Parks, C. D. Haffner, A. M. Fivush, G. Chandra, K. D. Plunket, K. L. Creech, L. B. Moore, J. G. Wilson, M. C. Lewis, et al. 2000. Identification of a chemical tool for the orphan nuclear receptor FXR. J. Med. Chem. 43: 2971–2974.[CrossRef][Medline]

  19. Turley, S. D., B. P. Daggy, and J. M. Dietschy. 1994. Psyllium augments the cholesterol-lowering action of cholestyramine in hamsters by enhancing sterol loss from the liver. Gastroenterology. 107: 444–452.[Medline]

  20. Chiang, J. Y. 1991. Reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography assay of cholesterol 7 alpha-hydroxylase. Methods Enzymol. 206: 483–491.[Medline]

  21. Folch, J., M. Lees, and G. H. Sloane Stanley. 1957. A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipides from animal tissues. J. Biol. Chem. 226: 497–509.[Free Full Text]

  22. Turley, S. D., and J. M. Dietschy. 1978. Re-evaluation of the 3 alpha-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase assay for total bile acids in bile. J. Lipid Res. 19: 924–928.[Abstract]

  23. Heuman, D. M. 1989. Quantitative estimation of the hydrophilic-hydrophobic balance of mixed bile salt solutions. J. Lipid Res. 30: 719–730.[Abstract]

  24. Moschetta, A., A. L. Bookout, and D. J. Mangelsdorf. 2004. Prevention of cholesterol gallstone disease by FXR agonists in a mouse model. Nat. Med. 10: 1352–1358.[CrossRef][Medline]

  25. Bookout, A. L., and D. J. Mangelsdorf. 2003. Quantitative real-time PCR protocol for analysis of nuclear receptor signaling pathways. Nucl. Recept. Signal. 1: e012.[Medline]

  26. Watanabe, M., S. M. Houten, L. Wang, A. Moschetta, D. J. Mangelsdorf, R. A. Heyman, D. D. Moore, and J. Auwerx. 2004. Bile acids lower triglyceride levels via a pathway involving FXR, SHP, and SREBP-1c. J. Clin. Invest. 113: 1408–1418.[CrossRef][Medline]

  27. Wang, D. Q., S. Tazuma, D. E. Cohen, and M. C. Carey. 2003. Feeding natural hydrophilic bile acids inhibits intestinal cholesterol absorption: studies in the gallstone-susceptible mouse. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 285: G494–G502.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  28. Huang, W., K. Ma, J. Zhang, M. Qatanani, J. Cuvillier, J. Liu, B. Dong, X. Huang, and D. D. Moore. 2006. Nuclear receptor-dependent bile acid signaling is required for normal liver regeneration. Science. 312: 233–236.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  29. Choi, M., A. Moschetta, A. L. Bookout, L. Peng, M. Umetani, S. R. Holmstrom, K. Suino-Powell, H. E. Xu, J. A. Richardson, R. D. Gerard, et al. 2006. Identification of a hormonal basis for gallbladder filling. Nat. Med. 12: 1253–1255.[CrossRef][Medline]

  30. Hathcock, J. N. 1985. Metabolic mechanisms of drug-nutrient interactions. Fed. Proc. 44: 124–129.[Medline]

  31. Crouse, J. R., III. 1987. Hypertriglyceridemia: a contraindication to the use of bile acid binding resins. Am. J. Med. 83: 243–248.[CrossRef][Medline]

  32. Liu, Y., J. Binz, M. J. Numerick, S. Dennis, G. Luo, B. Desai, K. I. MacKenzie, T. A. Mansfield, S. A. Kliewer, B. Goodwin, et al. 2003. Hepatoprotection by the farnesoid X receptor agonist GW4064 in rat models of intra- and extrahepatic cholestasis. J. Clin. Invest. 112: 1678–1687.[CrossRef][Medline]

  33. Barbier, O., I. P. Torra, A. Sirvent, T. Claudel, C. Blanquart, D. Duran-Sandoval, F. Kuipers, V. Kosykh, J. C. Fruchart, and B. Staels. 2003. FXR induces the UGT2B4 enzyme in hepatocytes: a potential mechanism of negative feedback control of FXR activity. Gastroenterology. 124: 1926–1940.[CrossRef][Medline]

  34. Inagaki, T., A. Moschetta, Y. K. Lee, L. Peng, G. Zhao, M. Downes, R. T. Yu, J. M. Shelton, J. A. Richardson, J. J. Repa, et al. 2006. Regulation of antibacterial defense in the small intestine by the nuclear bile acid receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 103: 3920–3925.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. Rao, J. Haywood, A. L. Craddock, M. G. Belinsky, G. D. Kruh, and P. A. Dawson
The organic solute transporter {alpha}-{beta}, Ost{alpha}-Ost{beta}, is essential for intestinal bile acid transport and homeostasis
PNAS, March 11, 2008; 105(10): 3891 - 3896.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
M700351-JLR200v1
48/12/2693    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jung, D.
Right arrow Articles by Moschetta, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jung, D.
Right arrow Articles by Moschetta, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Journal of Biological Chemistry 
 Molecular and Cellular Proteomics   ASBMB Today