|
Advertisement | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Journal of Lipid Research, Vol. 49, 169-182, January 2008 ABCG1 and ABCG4 are coexpressed in neurons and astrocytes of the CNS and regulate cholesterol homeostasis through SREBP-2
* Department of Biological Chemistry, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095 Published, JLR Papers in Press, October 4, 2007.
1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. e-mail: pedwards{at}mednet.ucla.edu
Here, we describe the initial characterization of Abcg4–/– mice and identify overlapping functions of ABCG4 and ABCG1 in the brain. Histological examination of tissues from Abcg4+/–/nlsLacZ and Abcg1+/–/nlsLacZ mice demonstrates that coexpression of Abcg4 and Abcg1 is restricted to neurons and astrocytes of the central nervous system (CNS). Interestingly, Abcg4 mRNA is undetectable outside the CNS, in contrast with the broad tissue and cellular expression of Abcg1. We also used primary astrocytes, microglia, neurons, and macrophages to demonstrate that the expression of Abcg1, but not Abcg4, is induced after the activation of liver X receptor. Cellular localization studies demonstrated that both proteins reside in RhoB-positive endocytic vesicle membranes. Furthermore, overexpression of either ABCG1 or ABCG4 increased the processing of sterol-regulatory element binding protein 2 (SREBP-2) to the transcriptionally active protein, thus accounting for the observed increase in the expression of SREBP-2 target genes and cholesterol synthesis. Consistent with these latter results, we show that the expression levels of the same SREBP-2 target genes are repressed in the brains of Abcg1–/– and, to a lesser extent, Abcg4–/– mice. Based on the results of the current study, we propose that ABCG1 and ABCG4 mediate the intracellular vesicular transport of cholesterol/sterols within both neurons and astrocytes to regulate cholesterol transport in the brain.
Supplementary key words liver X receptor ATP binding cassette transporters G1 and G4 sterol-regulatory element binding protein 2 central nervous system Abbreviations: apoA-I, apolipoprotein A-I; CA, cornu ammonis; CNS, central nervous system; GFAP, glial fibrillary acidic protein; GFP, green fluorescent protein; LXR, liver X receptor; QPCR, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction; SREBP-2, sterol-regulatory element binding protein 2
ABC transporters G1 and G4 are two members of a large evolutionarily conserved superfamily of transmembrane proteins that are responsible for the translocation of a diverse array of compounds across specific cellular membrane bilayers that include the endoplasmic reticulum, mitochondria, peroxisomes, and plasma membrane (1, 2). In contrast to all other ABC transporters, the ABCG family is composed solely of half-transporters that have a unique structural organization in which the ABC binding cassette is located on the N-terminal side of the transmembrane region. Mammalian ABCG1 (3–5) and ABCG4 (6–8) were originally cloned in 1996 and 2001, respectively, and were found to encode proteins of 74 kDa that have 69% identity (82% similarity) at the amino acid level. Abcg1 mRNA has been reported to be broadly expressed in many tissues, including brain, eye, kidney, spleen, lung, liver, and intestine, as a result of its expression in many different cell types, including macrophages, epithelial cells, endothelial cells, and lymphocytes (5, 9, 10). Several studies have reported varying tissue expression patterns for Abcg4, wherein the mRNA has been detected in multiple tissues or conversely found only in the brain and eye (6–8, 11). Initial reports demonstrated that Abcg1 mRNA levels were highly induced either during the conversion of macrophages to lipid-loaded foam cells or after the activation of the liver X receptor (LXR) (12, 13). More recently, studies using macrophages derived from Abcg1–/– mice (10, 14), the knockdown of Abcg1 mRNA by RNA interference in macrophages (12, 15), or overexpression of ABCG1 in cultured cells (9, 15–19) have all demonstrated that ABCG1 promotes the efflux of cellular cholesterol to exogenous lipid acceptors. These acceptors include HDL, small unilamellar phospholipid vesicles, and phospholipid/apolipoprotein A-I (apoA-I) or apoE complexes but not lipid-poor apoA-I (10, 15–18). In contrast to ABCG1, very little is known about the physiological importance and function of ABCG4. Given the close similarity with ABCG1, most studies to date have focused on a role for ABCG4 in regulating cholesterol efflux. Engel et al. (11) originally reported that Abcg4 mRNA was not only expressed in primary human macrophages but the transcript levels were induced by >6-fold after the addition of LXR/retinoid X receptor agonists. In addition, transient overexpression of ABCG4 in various cell types has been shown to increase cholesterol efflux to HDL and/or phospholipid/apoA-I complexes (15, 16). However, the importance of ABCG4 in maintaining macrophage lipid homeostasis is not clear, as cholesterol efflux to HDL2 from Abcg4–/– macrophages was essentially the same as efflux from wild-type control macrophages (14). Studies performed with Abcg1–/– mice revealed a critical role for ABCG1 in maintaining overall lipid homeostasis in the lung. Abcg1–/– mice fed a high-fat/high-cholesterol diet for 9 weeks develop a rather remarkable pulmonary lipidosis that is characterized by massive lipid deposition of cholesteryl esters and cholesterol crystals within alveolar macrophages, consistent with a defect in cholesterol efflux from these cells (10). A similar pulmonary phenotype develops in chow-fed Abcg1–/– mice by 6 months (20). These latter studies identified a potentially important role for ABCG1 in the surfactant-secreting type 2 cells, as it was shown that type 2 cells in the lungs of Abcg1–/– mice accumulated enlarged and numerous lamellar bodies and the lungs contained excessive amounts of surfactant (20). Together, these data indicate that ABCG1 has an essential function in controlling overall lipid homeostasis in the lungs of mice and identify a critical role for the ABCG1 protein in type 2 pneumocytes as well as macrophages. In contrast, no detailed study describing the loss of ABCG4 function in mice has been reported to date, with the exception that Wang et al. (14) have shown that there is no significant difference in the rate of cholesterol efflux from Abcg4–/– or wild-type mouse macrophages. Several recent studies have begun to address the possible function of ABCG1 or ABCG4 in the brain. In situ hybridization experiments using adult and fetal brain tissue have shown that both Abcg4 and Abcg1 mRNAs are expressed in the same areas of the brain, but the resolution did not allow for the identification of specific cell types that express both transcripts (9, 21). Based on the cell culture model TR-CSFB3, it was proposed that ABCG4 and ABCG1 facilitate cholesterol efflux from the choroid plexus epithelial cells into the cerebrospinal fluid (22). Additional studies with primary rodent astrocytes, or with human astrocytoma or neuroblastoma cell lines, indicate that activation of LXR and its many target genes regulates cholesterol efflux to apoE (23, 24). In addition, overexpression of ABCG1 in Chinese hamster ovary or HEK293 cells was reported not only to increase cholesterol efflux but also to affect the cleavage of stably expressed amyloid precursor protein (25, 26). However, the physiological importance and function of ABCG1 or ABCG4 in regulating cholesterol homeostasis in the central nervous system (CNS) is still poorly understood. In the current study, we present the first detailed characterization of the Abcg4–/– mouse and provide a detailed study of the functions of ABCG4 and ABCG1 in the mouse brain. By analyzing both Abcg4+/–/nlsLacZ and Abcg1+/–/nlsLacZ knockin mice, we found that coexpression of these two ABC transporters is limited to neurons and astrocytes. Furthermore, we show that both proteins are localized within intracellular vesicles of primary neurons and astrocytes. Gain-of-function studies, using adenoviral expression of either ABCG1 or ABCG4 in primary mouse cultures of astrocytes or neurons, result in increased processing of sterol-regulatory element binding protein 2 (SREBP-2), activation of SREBP-2 target genes, and increased cholesterol synthesis. In addition, we show that many of these same SREBP-2 genes are repressed in the brains of Abcg1–/– and Abcg4–/– mice. To date, these changes in gene expression are the only phenotype we have observed in the CNS of these mice. Together, the results of the current study suggest that ABCG1 and ABCG4 function to regulate intracellular sterol transport in both astrocytes and neurons.
Cloning of mouse ABCG4 and ABCG1 cDNAs were generated from total mouse brain RNA (C57BL/6 mice) using SuperScript II (Invitrogen). Gene-specific primers were then used to PCR-amplify (Tgo high-fidelity DNA polymerase; Roche) sequences corresponding to the open reading frames for ABCG1 and ABCG4. The PCR products were TOPO TA-cloned (Invitrogen), sequenced, and found to match the known Refseqs for ABCG1 (NM_009593) and ABCG4 (NM_138955). The amino acid sequence of the cloned ABCG1 corresponds to that encoded by Abcg1-a mRNA, previously reported by Nakamura et al. (9). Expression plasmids were generated by subcloning the cDNAs for Abcg1 and Abcg4 into the HindIII/BamHI sites or the NheI/HindIII sites of pcDNA3.1 (+) (Invitrogen), respectively. A tandem three copy sequence of either the Hemagglutinin (HA) or the Flag epitope was inserted in-frame into 3' cloning sites (BamHI or HindIII) of the pcDNA3.1-mABCG1 or pcDNA-mABCG4 to give pcDNA3.1-mABCG1-HA or -Flag and pcDNA3.1-mABCG4-HA or -Flag. All other constructs reported in this study were generated from these original clones.
Production of adenovirus
Mice The Abcg4+/–/nlsLacZ mice on a C57BL/6 background (seven backcrosses) were obtained from Deltagen, Inc. (San Carlos, CA). Bases 1,622 to 1,647 of Abcg4 (Refseq NM_138955) were targeted with a Neo-IRES-nlsLacZ-cassette. Abcg4–/– mice were generated by crossing of the Abcg4+/– mice. All animal work was performed following National Institutes of Health guidelines, with all protocols approved by the Animal Resources Committee at the University of California, Los Angeles.
Histology and β-galactosidase staining
RNA isolation and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction
Isolation of mouse peritoneal macrophages and human monocyte-macrophages
Isolation of primary mouse astrocytes, hippocampal neurons, and microglia Primary astrocyte and microglia cultures were obtained by the method described by Saura, Tusell, and Serratosa (27). Briefly, the astrocyte monolayer was separated from the microglia by mild trypsinization (0.125% trypsin in 1:1 DMEM/F-12 medium with no serum) for 10–15 min until the astrocyte monolayer detached. The detached astrocytes were collected and pelleted by centrifugation at 50 g for 5 min at 4°C. New culture medium (astrocyte growth medium) was added and the cells were plated onto dishes/wells. After removal of the astrocyte monolayer, the microglia (which remain attached to the culture dish during the trypsin step) were refreshed with the original culture medium that had been collected and sterile-filtered through a 0.45 µm filter (Millipore GP express plus membrane) before separation of the astrocytes. Astrocytes and microglia isolated by this technique are >95% pure, as determined by staining for glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP). For gene expression studies, cells were incubated in medium containing 10% FBS after infection with adenovirus or before the addition of LXR agonist. Primary hippocampal neuron cultures were obtained from P0 C57BL/6 pups. The hippocampi were digested in 1.25 U/ml papain (Sigma) in L-15 medium (Gibco) for 30 min at 30°C and then washed twice in L-15 medium containing 1xB27 supplement (Gibco) to remove residual papain. The tissue was triturated (15–20 times) with a large-bore glass pipette, and the resulting single cells were suspended in Neurobasal-A+ medium supplemented with 5% equine serum, 1xB27 supplement, 0.5 mM glutamax (Gibco), FDU (21.4 µg/ml uridine and 8.7 µg/ml 5-fluoro-deoxy-uridine), and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. Cells (50,000–60,000 per well) were plated onto poly-L-lysine glass cover slips in 24-well dishes and used after 8–12 days. Where indicated, primary astrocytes and hippocampal neurons were infected with Ad-GFP, Ad-ABCG1-Flag, or Ad-ABCG4-Flag (1 x 107 plaque-forming units/ml culture medium) for 24 h before isolation of RNA or processing for immunofluorescence.
Cholesterol synthesis and cholesterol efflux Cholesterol efflux experiments from infected astrocytes were performed as described previously (20). Briefly, mouse primary astrocytes in quadruplicate were incubated in medium supplemented with 0.2% BSA containing [3H]cholesterol (2 µCi/ml) for 24 h. The cells were then washed and incubated in medium devoid of cholesterol for 1 h. Finally, fresh medium containing 0.2% BSA in the absence or presence of human HDL (50 µg/ml) was added, and the efflux of [3H]cholesterol to the medium was determined over a 4 h period. Percentage efflux was determined by dividing the [3H]cholesterol content of the medium by the [3H]cholesterol content of the medium plus cells.
Immunostaining and confocal microscopy
Cos-7 cells were transfected (500 ng DNA/well) at For colocalization studies, cells were cotransfected with pAc-RhoB-GFP and ABCG1-HA or ABCG4-Flag using Lipofectamine 2000. All images were taken on a Zeiss confocal microscope with an LSM 5 Pascal laser module at 63x magnification.
Western blot analysis To assess SREBP-2 maturation, cell lysates were prepared as described by Radhakrishnan et al. (28). Proteins (50 µg) were separated using SDS-PAGE and transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane. Both the precursor and nuclear forms of SREBP-2 were detected by Western blot with an antibody generated against amino acids 812–975 (Santa Cruz; SREBP-2 H-164) diluted 1:250 in 1x TBS containing 0.05% Tween 20 and 5% nonfat dried milk. Immune complexes were detected with anti-rabbit HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies (Bio-Rad) diluted 1:10,000. To compare the relative protein expression levels after GW3965 treatment or adenovirus transduction, cell lysates were prepared by scraping cell monolayers in 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 0.15 M NaCl, 0.2 mM EDTA, 0.2 mM MgCl2, and 1% Triton X-100 supplemented with a protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche; Complete protease inhibitor tablets). Ten micrograms of protein was separated on a 10% SDS-PAGE gel, and Western blot analysis was performed as described above. ABCG1 (74 kDa) was detected by antibodies raised against a peptide sequence between amino acids 300–400 (Novus; ABCG1 antibody NB400-132) at a dilution of 1:500 in 1x TBS containing 0.05% Tween 20 and 5% nonfat dried milk. To detect Flag-tagged protein (78 kDa), the anti-Flag M2 monoclonal antibody (Sigma) was used at a 1:1,000 dilution in 1x TBS containing 0.05% Tween 20 and 5% nonfat dried milk.
Statistics
Abcg1 and Abcg4 are coexpressed in neurons and astrocytes of the mouse CNS To identify those tissues and cell types that express both ABCG1 and ABCG4, we used Abcg1+/–/nlsLacZ and Abcg4+/–/nlsLacZ knockin mice. Importantly, β-galactosidase tagged with a nuclear localization sequence is under the control of the endogenous promoter of either the Abcg1 or Abcg4 gene, allowing for facile identification of cells that express ABCG1 or ABCG4. Staining of multiple tissue sections indicated that overlapping β-galactosidase activity was only observed in the brain and retina of Abcg4+/– and Abcg1+/– mice (Fig. 1A ) (data not shown). Gross examination of the β-galactosidase-stained brains indicated that Abcg1 and Abcg4 were both expressed in gray and white matter (Fig. 1A). Surprisingly, β-galactosidase expression was undetectable in any tissue outside the CNS of Abcg4+/– mice, including the macrophage- and lymphocyte-rich spleen (Fig. 1A) (data not shown). In contrast, many tissues, including the spleens of Abcg1+/– mice, expressed β-galactosidase (Fig. 1A) (10). As expected, β-galactosidase activity was not detected in tissues of control wild-type C57BL/6 mice (Fig. 1A).
The brain is a complex tissue that is composed primarily of two major cell types, glial cells and neurons. Astrocytes, microglia, and oligodendrocytes represent glial cells that make up 90% of all of the cells present in the brain. The vast majority of the remaining cells in the brain are composed of various classes of highly specialized neurons (29). To identify which of these cell types express Abcg1 and Abcg4, sagittal brain sections obtained from Abcg1+/– and Abcg4+/– mice were assayed for β-galactosidase activity (Fig. 1B). Detailed comparison of these stained tissue sections revealed that many different classes of neurons express both Abcg1 and Abcg4. Figure 1B shows that β-galactosidase-positive neurons include mitral cells and neurons of the glomeruli in the olfactory bulbs, the pyramidal cells in the cornu ammonis (CA) regions of the hippocampus, the granule cell neurons of the dentate gyrus, and Purkinje cells and granule cell neurons in the cerebellum of both genotypes. Interestingly, the granule cells of both the cerebellum and the olfactory bulb show greater staining intensity for β-galactosidase in Abcg1+/– mice compared with Abcg4+/– mice [Fig. 1B, compare areas denoted gr (granule cells) in the cerebellum and olfactory bulb panels]. Expression of β-galactosidase was also observed in neurons of the striatum and the cortex (Fig. 1B). In addition, β-galactosidase was also observed in scattered GFAP-positive astrocytes of both genotypes, as assessed by costaining with antibodies to β-galactosidase and GFAP (data not shown). One striking discrepancy in the expression between the two genotypes was observed in the epithelial cells of the choroid plexus. β-Galactosidase activity was high in the epithelial cells of Abcg1+/– mice but was undetectable in the corresponding cells of Abcg4+/– mice (Fig. 1B). These data are consistent with the expression of β-galactosidase in epithelial cells of the lung, liver, and kidney of Abcg1–/– mice (10) and the lack of expression of β-galactosidase in these same cells of Abcg4+/–/nlsLacZ mice (data not shown). We also used QPCR to quantify the relative endogenous expression of Abcg1 and Abcg4 mRNAs in multiple tissues of C57BL/6 mice. The data in Fig. 1C show that, in contrast to Abcg1 mRNA, which is detected in multiple tissues, including brain, retina, lung, liver, kidney, and spleen, Abcg4 mRNA expression is limited to the brain and retina and is undetectable in tissues such as the lung, liver, kidney, and spleen. Thus, the mRNA expression data are entirely consistent with the results obtained after β-galactosidase staining of tissues from Abcg4+/–/nlsLacZ and Abcg1+/–/nlsLacZ mice (Fig. 1A, B). We conclude that the expression of ABCG4 is limited to the cells of the brain and retina and that ABCG1 is expressed in multiple tissues, including cells of the CNS.
Expression of Abcg1, but not Abcg4, is regulated by LXR
To rule out the possibility that the induction of Abcg4 mRNA by LXR is macrophage-specific, isolated primary mouse and human macrophages were treated with vehicle or GW3965 for 24 h. In agreement with numerous other studies, LXR activation resulted in robust induction of Abcg1 mRNA levels in both mouse and human cells (Fig. 2D, E). In contrast, Abcg4 mRNA levels were undetectable in primary mouse or human macrophages even after the activation of LXR with GW3965 (Fig. 2D, E). RNA isolated from mouse brain or human retina served as positive controls for the QPCR (Fig. 2D, E). These data unambiguously demonstrate that coexpression of Abcg1 and Abcg4 is limited to neurons and astrocytes and that, unlike Abcg1, Abcg4 expression is unchanged after the activation of LXR.
ABCG1 and ABCG4 reside within intracellular vesicles of neurons and astrocytes Immunostaining of infected neurons with anti-Flag antibody demonstrated that both ABCG1 and ABCG4 were present in intracellular vesicles (Fig. 3A ). Costaining with antibodies to Tau, a microtubule-associated protein, indicated that the majority of the punctated Flag-positive vesicles were present in neuronal processes and the cell body (Fig. 3A). Relatively few of the ABCG1-positive vesicles were identified within Map2-positive dendritic processes (Fig. 3B), suggesting that in the steady state most of the ABCG1-positive vesicles are found in axons of neurons. Furthermore, costaining of infected neurons with antibodies to Flag and synaptophysin, a marker for presynaptic vesicles, identified two distinct nonoverlapping vesicle populations, indicating that ABCG1 does not reside on presynaptic vesicle membranes (Fig. 3C). Preliminary results indicate that epitope-tagged ABCG4, like ABCG1, does not colocalize to MAP-2 processes or synaptophysin-positive presynaptic vesicles (data not shown).
Similar localization studies were performed using primary mouse astrocytes infected with adenovirus expressing epitope-tagged ABCG1 and ABCG4. Confocal microscopy localized both ABCG1 and ABCG4 to intracellular vesicles in the infected (GFP-positive) cells (Fig. 3D). These data indicate that in the steady state both ABCG1 and ABCG4 reside in intracellular vesicles in primary astrocytes and hippocampal neurons. Neither protein was detected on the plasma membrane of either cell type.
ABCG1 and ABCG4 reside in the same endosomes
ABCG1 and ABCG4 regulate SREBP-2 maturation and cholesterol biosynthesis in astrocytes and neurons The demonstration that ABCG1 and ABCG4 are found on intracellular vesicles, together with the data supporting a role for these two proteins in cholesterol efflux, suggested that these proteins might facilitate the vesicular transport of sterols. To identify those pathways that are affected by ABCG1 and ABCG4, we infected both primary mouse astrocytes and neurons with adenoviruses that express GFP or GFP and either ABCG1-Flag or ABCG4-Flag. RNA was isolated from two independent cell preparations and infections and used to probe gene expression arrays (Illumina Mouse-6 expression BeadChip version 1.1). Pathway analysis of the microarray data showed that, compared with control cells, expression of either ABCG1 or ABCG4 in astrocytes or neurons caused the induction of many genes involved in cholesterol biosynthesis (data not shown). Gene expression analysis by QPCR validated the microarray data confirming that expression of ABCG1 (Fig. 5A ) or ABCG4 (Fig. 5B) in astrocytes induced the expression of Srebp-2 mRNA and SREPB-2 target genes, including HMG-CoA reductase (Hmgr), HMG-CoA synthase (Hmgs), squalene synthase (Sqs), farnesyl diphosphate synthase (Fpps), low density lipoprotein receptor (Ldlr), Insig-1, and StarD4, but not apoER2, a member of the LDL-related family of receptors (Fig. 5A, B). Furthermore, the expression of apoE or the LXR target gene Abca1 was unaffected in these same samples, demonstrating that the changes observed are specific to SREBP-2 target genes (data not shown). Induction of these genes was unexpected, as the infected cells were cultured in the presence of 10% FBS and thus were exposed to high levels of exogenous cholesterol. Such conditions are known to normally repress the expression and processing of SREBP-2 and the subsequent activation of cholesterogenic genes (33, 34).
To determine whether the changes in gene expression that occur in infected astrocytes were paralleled by changes in cholesterol synthesis, we infected primary mouse astrocytes with adenovirus and after 24 h incubated the cells in medium supplemented with [14C]acetate. Quantification of the [14C]cholesterol synthesized during a 4 h period indicated that ABCG1 and ABCG4 overexpression stimulated cholesterol synthesis by 2.5- and 7-fold, respectively (Fig. 5C, D). These latter data suggest that the expression of ABCG1 or ABCG4 in astrocytes increases the concentration of the SREBP-2 precursor protein and/or the processed transcriptionally active N-terminal nuclear fragment of SREBP-2. As shown in the upper panel of Fig. 5E, infection of astrocytes with adenovirus expressing either ABCG1 or ABCG4 resulted in a small increase in the SREBP-2 precursor protein (lanes 3, 4 for ABCG1 and lanes 5, 6 for ABCG4) compared with cells expressing GFP alone (lanes 1, 2). The mature nuclear, N-terminal fragment of SREBP-2 was undetectable in astrocytes infected with adenovirus expressing GFP and cultured in medium supplemented with 10% FBS (Fig. 5E, lower panel, lanes 1, 2), consistent with the repression of SREBP-2 processing under these conditions. Upon overexpression of ABCG1 or ABCG4, a robust increase in the level of the nuclear form of the SREBP-2 protein was observed (Fig. 5E, lower panel, lanes 3, 4 for ABCG1 and lanes 5, 6 for ABCG4). The finding that the processing of SREBP-2 was increased so markedly after the expression of either ABCG1 or ABCG4 likely accounts for the relatively small increase in the level of the precursor SREBP-2 in these cells (Fig. 5E, upper panel) as it is rapidly converted into the mature transcriptionally active form. Together, these data provide direct evidence that enhanced expression of either ABCG1 or ABCG4 results in increased processing of SREBP-2 to the mature transcriptional active form. In Fig. 5F, we compared the expression of ABCG1 protein in mouse astrocytes. The data show that ABCG1 protein is undetectable in cells cultured in medium containing FBS, is highly induced after the activation of LXR, and that adenoviral infection results in a further increase in protein levels. In other studies, we have observed similar supraphysiological levels of expression of epitope-tagged ABCG1 or ABCG4 after transient transfection of cells with plasmids or adenoviral infection (data not shown). The lower panel of Fig. 5F demonstrates that Flag-tagged ABCG1 and ABCG4 proteins are expressed at roughly equal levels after adenoviral infection of astrocytes. As expected, overexpression of ABCG1-Flag or ABCG4-Flag in astrocytes also results in a small but significant increase in cholesterol efflux to HDL (Fig. 6A , B).
The expression of cholesterogenic genes is reduced in the brains of Abcg1–/– and Abcg4–/– mice Based on the observation that genes involved in cholesterol homeostasis were specifically induced in primary mouse astrocytes or neurons after overexpression of ABCG1 or ABCG4, we predicted that these same mRNAs might be repressed in the brains of Abcg1–/– and Abcg4–/– mice. The results in Fig. 7A confirm this prediction, as many genes involved in cholesterol synthesis and homeostasis are reduced significantly in the brains of Abcg1–/– mice compared with their wild-type littermates. Altered gene expression is less pronounced in the brains of Abcg4–/– mice, because only farnesyl diphosphate synthase and the LDL receptor mRNA levels were decreased significantly (Fig. 7B). The brain expression of apoER2, fatty acid synthase (Fas), a critical gene involved in fatty acid synthesis, or Cyp46A (data not shown) was unchanged, indicating that the loss of ABCG1 or ABCG4 function does not lead to global changes in lipid biosynthetic genes (Fig. 7A, B).
In the current study, we demonstrate that, although ABCG1 is widely expressed in many tissues and cell types, coexpression of ABCG1 with ABCG4 is restricted to neurons and astrocytes. In addition, studies with Abcg4+/–/nlsLacZ and Abcg1+/–/nlsLacZ mice fail to identify cells that express ABCG4 in the absence of ABCG1. Based on both β-galactosidase staining of tissue sections and quantification of mRNAs in primary mouse cultures, it is clear that basal expression of both genes is significantly higher in neurons compared with astrocytes. Furthermore, ligand activation of LXR induced the mRNA expression of Abcg1 to nearly equivalent levels in both neurons and astrocytes but failed to alter the mRNA expression of Abcg4. A third major cell type in the brain, the microglia, are derived fromcirculating monocytes and represent the resident macrophages in this organ. Interestingly, microglia, like human and mouse macrophages, fail to express Abcg4 mRNA but exhibit significant induction of Abcg1 after activation of LXR. Together, these data indicate that only neurons and astrocytes express both Abcg1 and Abcg4 mRNAs and that Abcg1, but not Abcg4, is a bona fide LXR target gene. Immunolocalization studies indicate that ABCG4 and ABCG1 colocalize to intracellular RhoB-positive vesicles. Furthermore, adenoviral expression of either ABCG1 or ABCG4 in primary mouse astrocytes increased the level of the processed nuclear SREBP-2, thereby activating the transcription of numerous target genes that include StarD4, Insig-1, and many of the genes involved in cholesterol synthesis. To our knowledge, previous studies have not linked the overexpression of either ABCG1 or ABCG4 to changes in SREBP-2 activation or increased SREBP-2 target gene expression. Importantly, we show that many of the same genes that are induced in primary cells after overexpression of ABCG1 are repressed in the brains of Abcg1–/– mice (Fig. 7). The finding that in the brains of Abcg4–/– mice the repression of SREBP-2 target genes is less pronounced suggests that ABCG1 may have a more critical role in regulating cholesterol homeostasis in the cells of the CNS. The regulation of SREBP-2 processing has been elucidated in a series of elegant studies published by Goldstein, DeBose-Boyd, and Brown (34). These investigators have shown that when sterol levels are increased in the endoplasmic reticulum, SREBP-2 is retained in this compartment as a result of the formation of a SREBP/SCAP/INSIG complex. Conversely, depletion of sterols from the endoplasmic reticulum destabilizes the interaction between SCAP and INSIG, allowing the SREBP-2/SCAP complex to be transported to the Golgi in COPII vesicles. After sequential cleavage of the precursor SREBP-2 in the Golgi by two different proteases, the mature, soluble, N-terminal fragment of SREBP-2 translocates to the nucleus, where it activates target genes involved in cholesterol synthesis and uptake (34). The data in Fig. 5 show clearly that SREBP-2 processing is increased after overexpression of either ABCG4 or ABCG1, consistent with a decrease in sterol levels in the endoplasmic reticulum. Whether ABCG1 and ABCG4 function directly at the endoplasmic reticulum or cause an increase in the transport of cholesterol from the endoplasmic reticulum to vesicles of the endocytic pathway through additional proteins such as StarD4 will require further study. However, the current studies demonstrate that ABCG1 and ABCG4 are able to regulate SREBP-2 processing and cholesterol synthesis and to promote cholesterol efflux to HDL from within an endocytic compartment (Figs. 3–6). There are several explanations for how ABCG1 or ABCG4, which localize to intracellular vesicles, can promote the efflux of cholesterol at the plasma membrane to exogenous sterol acceptors. One possibility is that the increase in cholesterol efflux from cells is the result of the endocytic recycling of cholesterol from intracellular membranes back to the plasma membrane, a process known to occur in part by an ATP-dependent vesicular process (35) (Fig. 8 ). Alternatively, efflux may be a result of the direct transport of sterol to the plasma membrane from either the endoplasmic reticulum or another cellular compartment (35). Nonetheless, an earlier study demonstrated that overexpression of ABCG1 in baby hamster kidney cells led to an increase in the cholesterol content of the plasma membrane (19). That study lends support to the idea that some portion of the cholesterol transport mediated by ABCG1 can reach the plasma membrane, where it may desorb to a broad array of exogenous sterol acceptors that include HDL, LDL, phospholipid vesicles, or phospholipid vesicles containing either apoE or apoA-I (9, 10, 15, 16, 18, 25), but not to lipid-poor apoA-I (10, 15). The finding that multiple diverse acceptors function to remove cholesterol from cells in an ABCG1-dependent process is consistent with the desorption of sterol from the plasma membrane to these lipid acceptors. However, we cannot exclude the possibility that some very small fraction of ABCG1 or ABCG4, which is below the level of detection, is localized at the plasma membrane of astrocytes or neurons. Interestingly, studies with non-CNS-derived cells have reported that ABCG1 protein is localized only to intracellular membranes (12, 18) or to both intracellular membranes and the plasma membrane (14, 17, 19).
Support for the importance of ABCG1 or ABCG4 in the regulation of cholesterol homeostasis in the brain is provided by the in vivo findings that many of the genes involved in cholesterol synthesis and transport are repressed in the brains of Abcg1–/– and, to a lesser extent, Abcg4–/– mice (Fig. 7). Repression of many of these same genes has also been shown to occur in the brains of Cyp46A–/– mice. These mice are unable to synthesize 24-hydroxycholesterol from cholesterol and thus are defective in one pathway necessary for the efflux of sterols from the brain into the blood (36). However, Cyp46A mRNA levels are unchanged in the brains of Abcg4–/– and Abcg1–/– mice, suggesting that this enzyme does not play a role in the observed phenotype noted in the current study. Based on the current studies, we propose that there are two pathways that control intracellular vesicular cholesterol transport in the CNS: the ABCG1-dependent pathway, which is regulated by LXR and thus is responsive to changes in cellular cholesterol content through the production of oxysterol ligands for LXR; and the ABCG4-dependent pathway, which is constitutive and is unresponsive to LXR (Fig. 8). Studies with Abcg1–/–/Abcg4–/– double knockout mice will be required to further assess the overall importance of both transporters in regulating cholesterol homeostasis in the CNS.
The authors thank Dr. Dean Bok at the University of California, Los Angeles for providing human retina RNA for QPCR analysis and Dr. Noam Zelcer at the University of California, Los Angeles for help with astrocyte cultures. The authors thank Dee Bojanic for QPCR analysis of human macrophages and retina. P.T.T. was supported by a National Institutes of Health Predoctoral Fellowship (National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Award T32 69766). This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants NIH-30568 and NIH-68445 (to P.A.E.), by a grant from the Laubisch Fund, and by an HDL Pfizer Award (to P.A.E.). Manuscript received August 14, 2007 and in revised form September 19, 2007 and in re-revised form September 28, 2007.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Advertisement | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||