|
Advertisement | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Journal of Lipid Research, Vol. 49, 464-472, February 2008
Increased expression of LXR
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(LXR
) in the gallstone patients were increased by 51, 59, and 102%, respectively, and significantly correlated with the molar percentage of biliary cholesterol and cholesterol saturation index (CSI). The mRNA and protein levels of the hepatic scavenger receptor class B type I (SR-BI) were increased, and a significant correlation was found between the protein levels and the CSI. No differences were recorded between the two groups concerning the hepatic synthesis of cholesterol, bile acids, and esterification of cholesterol. Our results suggest that the upregulation of ABCG5/ABCG8 in gallstone patients, possibly mediated by increased LXR
, may contribute to the cholesterol supersaturation of bile. Our data are consistent with the possibility that increased amounts of biliary cholesterol may originate from plasma HDL cholesterol by enhanced transfer via SR-BI.
Supplementary key words scavenger receptor class B type I hepatocyte nuclear factor 4
acyl-coenzyme A:cholesterol acyltransferase 2 nuclear receptors ATP binding cassette G5 ATP binding cassette G8 bile acids cholesteryl esters liver X receptor 
Abbreviations: apoA-I, apolipoprotein A-I; CSI, cholesterol saturation index; CYP7A1, cholesterol 7
-hydroxylase; FXR, farnesoid X receptor; GS, gallstone patients; GSF, gallstone-free controls; HMGCR, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase; HNF4A, hepatocyte nuclear factor 4
; LXR
, liver X receptor
; MTTP, microsomal triglyceride transfer protein; PGC1
, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
coactivator 1
; SR-BI, scavenger receptor class B type I; SREBP, sterol-regulatory element binding protein
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Gallstone disease can be viewed as the terminal outcome of different metabolic disorders caused by diverse genetic and environmental factors. It is a multifactorial disease, and the causes of gallstones are heterogeneous and mostly intrahepatic. The critical element for gallstone formation is supersaturation of bile with cholesterol (3).
Early studies attempted to define enzymatic defects in the liver contributing to the cholesterol supersaturation of bile. The activity of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase (HMGCR; the rate-limiting enzyme for de novo synthesis of cholesterol) was shown to be increased in gallstone patients (4). Conversely, the activities of cholesterol 7
-hydroxylase (CYP7A1; the rate-limiting enzymes for bile acid synthesis) and ACAT (the enzyme catalyzing cholesterol esterification) were both decreased in gallstone patients (4, 5). However, larger studies of different populations could not confirm these results (6, 7). Recently, in a study in Chilean Hispanics and Mapuche Indians, a surrogate marker of bile acid synthesis was measured in the plasma of gallstone patients that suggested increased CYP7A1 activity (8).
The identification and characterization of the ATP binding cassette (ABC) transporters for cholesterol, bile acids, and phospholipids has brought new insights to our understanding of gallstone disease. ABCG5 and ABCG8 appear to function as a heterodimer for the secretion of cholesterol into the bile canaliculus (9). As shown previously in mice (10, 11), both the Abcg5 and Abcg8 genes are targets for the liver X receptor
(LXR
) and could be induced by LXR
agonists. ABCB11 (12) (also known as BSEP, for bile salt export pump) is a major bile acid transporter, and ABCB4 (also known as MDR3, for multiple drug-resistant transporter 3) is a phospholipid transporter. In animal models, either overexpression of Abcg5/Abcg8 (9) or depletion of Abcb11 (13) or Abcb4 (14) modifies biliary lipid secretion and, in some cases, leads to the supersaturation of bile with cholesterol. As with most of the studies performed in mice, the role of ABC transporters in the pathogenesis of cholesterol gallstones is not well understood in humans.
In this study, we attempted to identify some of the molecular defects in hepatic cholesterol and bile acid metabolism involved in the pathogenesis of cholesterol gallstone disease. We studied a group of normolipidemic, nonobese Chinese patients who had neither diabetes mellitus nor signs of insulin resistance. Our present results suggest that in these humans, supersaturation of bile is associated with an increased expression of ABCG5/ABCG8 and LXR
. We also observed an increased expression of scavenger receptor class B type I (SR-BI), which mediates the hepatic uptake of cholesterol from HDL (15) that is directed to biliary cholesterol secretion.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Procedure for sample collection
Patients were fasted overnight before surgery, which was performed between 9 and 10 AM. After opening the abdomen, or after the application of pneumoperitoneum, a wedge biopsy of
0.5–1.0 g was taken from the right lobe of the liver, snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at –70°C. Criteria for a functioning gallbladder consisted of i) the presence of dark concentrated bile in the gallbladder and ii) no evidence of impacted stones in the neck of the cystic duct at operation. After clamping the cystic duct, bile from the gallbladder was obtained by aspiration. All of the cholecystectomies were performed without any complications. Participation in the study did not result in prolonged hospitalization, and no serious adverse events were reported.
Analysis of plasma lipids
Plasma total cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, apolipoprotein A-I (apoA-I), and apoB were analyzed with an automated bioanalyzer (Roche Hitachi Modular P800) and corrected by dilution with the addition of EDTA (2%). LDL cholesterol in plasma was calculated according to Friedewald's equation. Lipoproteins were separated by size-exclusion chromatography as described previously (16).
Analysis of biliary lipids and bile acid composition
Biliary cholesterol, total bile acids, and phospholipids in gallbladder bile were measured as described previously (17). The cholesterol saturation index (CSI) was calculated using Carey's critical table (18).
Analysis of liver lipids
Crude liver homogenates were prepared as described previously (7) and extracted in chloroform-methanol (2:1, v/v). Hepatic cholesterol concentrations were then assayed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (7). Unesterified lathosterol was determined by isotope dilution-mass spectrometry using a deuterium-labeled internal standard (19). Hepatic triglycerides were determined in liver lipid extracts by colorimetric enzymatic methods (TG Roche/Hitachi, Roche Diagnostic GmbH, Mannheim, Germany). Protein content was determined according to Lowry's method.
Assay of microsomal ACAT1 and ACAT2 activity
Total ACAT enzymatic activity was determined in hepatic microsomes, including a 30 min preincubation with a cholesterol-saturated solution of β-hydroxypropyl cyclodextrin before addition of the [14C]oleoyl-CoA, as described (20). In a parallel incubation, pyripyropene A, a specific ACAT2 inhibitor, was included in the preincubation and reaction mixtures at a concentration of 5 µmol/l to separately identify ACAT1 and ACAT2 activities (20).
Relative RNA expression level measurements
Hepatic total RNA was extracted with Trizol® (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and reverse-transcribed into cDNA (Omniscript; Qiagen, Inc., Valencia, CA). Real-time quantitative PCR assays were performed in triplicate using SYBR-Green (MedProbe, Oslo, Norway). Primers (primer sequences are available on request) were designed using Primer Express 2.0, all with sequences crossing exon-exon boundaries. Data were calculated by the delta-Ct method, expressed in arbitrary units, and were normalized by the signals obtained from the same cDNA for cyclophilin A. The fold change for each mRNA expression level in the GS was expressed relative to the obtained value in the GSF, the mean value of which was arbitrarily set at 1.
Western blot analysis
Twenty micrograms of liver membranes from each patient sample was separated on a 10% SDS-PAGE gel and then transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes (Invitrogen). After blocking in 5% nonfat dry milk in PBST (PBS with 0.05% Tween-20), the nitrocellulose membranes were incubated overnight at 4°C with rabbit anti-SR-BI (1:3,000; Abcam, Ltd., Cambridge, UK) in 5% nonfat milk powder in PBST. After washing with PBST, donkey anti-rabbit IgG F(ab')2 antibodies were added (1:50,000; Amersham Bioscience AB, Uppsala, Sweden). The signals were detected using the SuperSignal chemiluminescence kit (Pierce Biotechnology, Inc., Rockford, IL) and a Fuji BAS 1800 analyzer (Fuji Photo Film Co.) and quantified by Image Gauge software (Science Lab 98, version 3.12; Fuji Photo Film Co.). After cleaning the membranes by stripping, they were further blotted with rabbit anti-β-actin (1:3,000, Abcam) as a loading control. Data are expressed as arbitrary units and normalized to β-actin expression.
Statistics
Data are reported as means ± SEM. Student's t-test was used to compare the differences of variables between GS and GSF (Statistica 7 .0 software; StatSoft, Inc., Tulsa, OK). Variables were correlated with Spearman's rank test. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
ABCG5 and ABCG8 correlate with biliary cholesterol
ABCG5 and ABCG8 mRNAs were significantly increased in GS compared with GSF [+51% for ABCG5 (P < 0.01) and +59% for ABCG8 (P < 0.01)] (Fig. 2A
), and their mRNA levels correlated very well (r = 0.89, P < 0.05) (Fig. 2B), confirming their likely coexpression in human liver in vivo (21). ABCG5 and ABCG8 expression also correlated positively with the biliary cholesterol molar percentage (r = 0.57 and r = 0.54, P < 0.05) and the CSI (r = 0.54 and r = 0.55, P < 0.05).
|
was 102% higher in GS compared with GSF (P < 0.01) (Fig. 2A). It correlated with both ABCG5 (r = 0.58, P < 0.05) (Fig. 2C) and ABCG8 (r = 0.59, P < 0.05) mRNA levels and also with the biliary cholesterol molar percentage (r = 0.45, P < 0.05) and the CSI (r = 0.43, P < 0.05) (Fig. 2D). In contrast, the expression of ABCB11 and ABCB4, measured as mRNA abundance, did not differ significantly between GS and GSF, as was also the case for 17 other genes involved in various aspects of the regulation of hepatic lipid metabolism (Fig. 2E).
Bile supersaturation in cholesterol may originate from a SR-BI-mediated pathway
To further elucidate the possible mechanisms behind the bile cholesterol supersaturation and the increased expression of ABCG5 and ABCG8, we examined genes considered to be key players in the regulation of the hepatic free cholesterol levels. The liver HDL receptor SR-BI displayed 38% higher levels of mRNA in GS compared with GSF (P < 0.05) (Fig. 2A). This was paralleled by a 74% increase of the SR-BI protein (P < 0.05) (Fig. 3A
, B). The protein expression of SR-BI correlated significantly with the mRNA levels (r = 0.46, P < 0.05). In addition, the protein expression of SR-BI correlated with both the molar percentage of biliary cholesterol (r = 0.56, P < 0.05) (Fig. 3C) and the CSI (r = 0.52, P < 0.05) (Fig. 3D). No differences were seen in the mRNA of the genes for LDL receptor, LDL receptor-related protein, apoA-I, ABCA1, Niemann-Pick C1-like 1 protein, and HMGCR (Fig. 2E). Within the hepatocytes, the rate of cholesterol esterification has been proposed to determine the levels of free cholesterol available for biliary secretion and could, if so, be coupled to the pathogenesis of gallstone disease (5, 7). However, neither the activity nor the mRNA level of ACAT2 differed between GS and GSF (Fig. 3E).
|
(HNF4A) was 43% greater in the GS (P < 0.05) (Fig. 2A), and a positive correlation of HNF4A mRNA was found with CYP7A1 mRNA (r = 0.40, P < 0.05) and cholesterol 27
-hydroxylase mRNA (r = 0.34, P < 0.05), but no correlation was seen with cholesterol 12
-hydroxylase mRNA. A strong positive correlation was also observed between HNF4A and ABCG5 (r = 0.73, P < 0.05), between HNF4A and ABCG8 (r = 0.74, P < 0.05), and between HNF4A and SR-BI (r = 0.64, P < 0.05). No differences in farnesoid X receptor (FXR), small heterodimer partner, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
coactivator 1
(PGC1
), HNF1A, LXRβ, sterol-regulatory element binding protein 1c (SREBP1c), and SREBP2 mRNA levels were found between the two groups (Fig. 2E). | DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
expression, and a pronounced increase (102%) in the mRNA of LXR
was seen in GS, consistent with the possibility that in humans, as in mice, both ABCG5 and ABCG8 are transcriptionally regulated by LXR
. Therefore, our data suggest that this nuclear receptor may have played a role in the pathogenesis of gallstone disease in our Chinese patients, although no correlations were found between two other LXR-regulated genes (ABCA1 and SREBP1c) and LXR
.
In the human ABCG5/ABCG8 transgenic mouse model, a correlation between the hepatic mRNA levels of these transmembrane transporters and biliary cholesterol was reported (22). Evidence for the correlation between ABCG5/ABCG8 expression and biliary cholesterol secretion in humans has also been found in patients with sitosterolemia, a disease caused by mutations in either ABCG5 or ABCG8 (23), in whom biliary cholesterol secretion was markedly diminished (24). It has been proposed that pathways independent of ABCG5 and ABCG8 also exist and contribute to cholesterol secretion into bile (21). Our findings are in agreement with recent studies of inbred mice challenged with a lithogenic diet (25, 26). In this case, the expression of Abcg5 and Abcg8 was increased, the level of biliary cholesterol was higher, and gallstone formation occurred. In mice, Abcg5 and Abcg8 colocalized with the murine Lith 9 gene locus. Furthermore, the murine Abcg5 and Abcg8 expression was induced by LXR
(10, 11), and this gene colocalized with murine Lith 1 (27). Treatment of gallstone-resistant AKR mice with synthetic LXR
agonists induced gallstone formation, apparently as a result of an increased expression of ABCG5 and ABCG8, which in turn enhanced biliary cholesterol secretion (28). However, it should be recognized that the bulk of data obtained on the transcriptional regulation by LXR has been generated in rodent models or cell systems, either by depletion of the LXR gene or by pharmacological treatment with LXR agonists. In this case, some discrepancies between the observations in human liver and the observations from other experimental models are not unexpected. Limitations in sample size and in the opportunity for experimental manipulation of human subjects may also play a role in the interpretation, although overall, the similarities identified between studies in mice and humans are encouraging.
In gallstone-susceptible C57L mice, synthetic FXR ligands are reported to prevent gallstone formation by inducing the expression of ABCB11 and ABCB4 (29). However, our gallstone patients did not show any differences in FXR, ABCB11, and ABCB4 expression, in agreement with our findings on concentrations of biliary bile acids and phospholipids and consistent with the unchanged CYP7A1 expression. These observations do not conflict with the proposed role for FXR in gallstone disease in that they do not exclude the possibility of FXR as a successful therapeutic target in humans aimed at reduction of the supersaturation of cholesterol in bile.
The increased expression of the HDL receptor SR-BI observed in our GS suggests that enhanced uptake of HDL cholesterol may have contributed to the increase of biliary cholesterol. This finding is consistent with our previous observations, in which we reported free cholesterol in HDL to be in rapid equilibrium with biliary cholesterol (30). Furthermore, in patients with a bile fistula, cholesterol from the HDL particles was more rapidly incorporated into biliary cholesterol than cholesterol from LDL particles (31). In complete agreement with the present report is the finding that Srb1 expression regulates biliary cholesterol secretion in mice but not the secretion of phospholipids or bile acids (32, 33).
We did not observe any differences in plasma HDL cholesterol between GS and GSF, an observation consistent with another large study in Chinese gallstone patients (34). The increased SR-BI protein expression observed in GS was not paralleled by a decrease in HDL cholesterol. This would not be an expected finding if the major determinant of plasma HDL cholesterol levels is the hepatic expression of ABCA1, as was indicated by studies of ABCA1 liver-specific conditional knockout mice (35).
The excess in biliary cholesterol could also have originated from the de novo synthesis of cholesterol in liver, but neither HMGCR expression nor the hepatic levels of lathosterol showed any differences between GS and GSF, a finding consistent with observations by others (7, 36). Nevertheless, cholesterol de novo synthesis cannot be completely excluded, because in patients with a bile fistula, a condition that greatly induces bile acid synthesis, it was found that
30% of biliary cholesterol represents newly synthesized cholesterol (31, 37).
Another mechanism that might contribute to an increase in biliary cholesterol is a decrease in cholesterol esterification, leading to higher levels of free cholesterol available for secretion into the bile. However, our data do not support this hypothesis, as neither differences in hepatic ACAT2 activity between GS and GSF nor differences in free cholesterol concentrations in whole liver homogenates from GS and GSF were observed. Furthermore, previous observations suggested that cholesterol levels did not differ within the microsomal membrane in patients with and without gallstones (7).
Conversion of cholesterol into bile acids is one key mechanism for the disposal of excessive cholesterol from the body. Increased bile acid synthesis, measured as an increase in plasma 7
-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one, was observed in Chilean gallstone patients (38). It was suggested that this change could be secondary to increased intestinal losses of bile acids. The Chilean gallstone patients also had increased levels of triglycerides in plasma and liver, together with increased hepatic activity of the microsomal triglyceride transfer protein (MTTP). In contrast, we found no differences between our groups in CYP7A1 and MTTP expression or in plasma and hepatic triglyceride levels. This discrepancy may be an indication that gallstone disease is not attributable to a single metabolic defect. The types of gallstone-free patients selected for the reference group (gallstone-free controls) likely affect the outcome of all studies of gallstone disease, because for ethical reasons, an ideal reference group of completely healthy subjects cannot be studied. In our study and in the study of Chilean patients, the reference groups were quite different. In our study, patients with gallbladder polyps were included among the gallstone-free controls. The increased levels of deoxycholic acid in the bile of these patients might be related to their disease, because an increase in deoxycholic acid has been described to be associated with an enhanced induction of gallbladder polyps in hamsters (39). However, in Asian subjects, a higher level of deoxycholic acid in healthy liver transplant donors has also been reported, suggesting that differences in biliary bile acid composition may exist between control groups of different ethnicity (40). In the Chilean study (38), the majority of the patients enrolled in the reference group underwent surgical procedures because of gastrointestinal cancer. All of the preoperative procedures, including the particular liquid or semiliquid diets and the "intestinal preparation" (i.e., eventual laxative and prophylactic antibiotic therapy), given to those patients before the surgical procedures could have influenced the outcome in unknown ways. Another limitation of the mechanistic studies performed in humans is the relatively small sample size. Thus, in our study as in other studies, a risk that some differences may be missed cannot be excluded.
Finally, in our GS, we found an increased expression of HNF4A, which is a nuclear receptor that regulates the tissue-specific expression of many genes in the liver and other organs originating from the endoderm (41). In addition to the correlation between the expression of HNF4A and SR-BI, as was reported previously (42), we found a correlation between the expression of HNF4A and of ABCG5 and ABCG8. Recently, a regulatory element for HNF4A was identified in the human ABCG5/ABCG8 promoter region that could strongly regulate the expression of these two genes (43). A correlation between HNF4A and PGC1
and a decrease in the expression of the latter cofactor was described in a small number of Italian gallstone patients compared with patients with gastrointestinal cancer or with liver donors (44). We could not confirm these findings, but the ethnicity of our patients was different, as was that of the control group in our study. Another unexpected finding in our study was the significant correlation between the expression of HNF4A and the expression of LXR
(r = 0.43, P < 0.05). The possibility that altered HNF4A activity contributes to the pathogenesis of gallstone disease, as in our nonobese, normolipidemic Chinese subjects, is intriguing and should be addressed in future studies.
In conclusion, in our study of normolipidemic, nonobese Chinese gallstone patients, the supersaturation of the bile with cholesterol was associated with an increased expression of the canalicular transporters ABCG5 and ABCG8, which was possibly induced by the increased expression of hepatic LXR
. Our data also suggest that excess biliary cholesterol in gallstone patients may be derived, at least in part, from the plasma HDL cholesterol taken up via the hepatic HDL receptor SR-BI.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
mura for kindly donating pyripyropene A, and Dr. Elisabeth Berg for assistance with the statistical analyses. The authors are also very grateful to Dr. Ingemar Björkhem and Dr. Steve Meaney for constructive criticism of the manuscript. This work was supported by the Swedish Research Council, by National Institutes of Health Grant HL-49373, by the Swedish Medical Association, by the Swedish Heart-Lung and Throne Holst Foundations, by the Ruth and Richard Julin Foundation, by the Karolinska Institute, and by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants No30271272 and No30672042). Manuscript received June 27, 2007 and in revised form October 15, 2007.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Journal of Biological Chemistry |
| Molecular and Cellular Proteomics | ASBMB Today |