|
Advertisement | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Papers In Press, published online ahead of print February 1, 2009 J. Lipid Res., doi:10.1194/jlr.P800013-JLR200
Journal of Lipid Research, Vol. 50, 334-341, February 2009
The relationships of cholesterol metabolism and plasma plant sterols with the severity of coronary artery disease1,
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Supplementary key words cholesterol absorption cholesterol synthesis phytosterols campesterol sitosterol cholestanol lathosterol
Abbreviations: ABCG5, ATP-binding cassette transporter G5; ABCG8, ATP-binding cassette transporter G8; ANOVA, analysis of variance; APOE, apolipoprotein E; BMI, body mass index; CAD, coronary artery disease; FS, Friesinger Score; GCMS, gas chromatography and mass spectrometry; GLM, general linear model; LURIC, Ludwigshafen risk and cardiovascular health
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Sitosterolaemia, a rare genetic disorder, is characterized by up to 100-fold elevated plasma plant sterols (4, 5). Special excretion proteins, the ATP-binding cassette transporter G5 (ABCG5) and the ATP-binding cassette transporter G8 (ABCG8), which are expressed in the intestine and in the liver, are defective in patients with sitosterolaemia. These transporters eliminate plant sterols and thus protect against the accumulation of plant sterols in the body (6, 7). Due to the fact that patients suffering from sitosterolaemia develop severe premature atherosclerosis,plant sterols have been suspected to be atherogenic (5). This raises the question if moderately elevated plasma plant sterols are harmful in the general population as well. Clinical studies concerning this issue have been controversial (3, 8–17).
Efforts to examine a possible link between plant sterols and coronary artery disease (CAD) have to consider that plasma plant sterols are surrogate markers for cholesterol absorption (18, 19). Plasma cholesterol is either derived from uptake in the intestine or from endogenous synthesis (20). The individual balance of cholesterol absorption and synthesis is an heritable trait with the ABCG5 and ABCG8 as well as the Niemann-Pick Type C1 Like 1 genes being involved (6, 7, 21–24). Importantly, changes in cholesterol homeostasis have also been suggested to be associated with CAD and mortality (8–10, 14–16).
To investigate the relationships of cholesterol metabolism and plasma plant sterols with CAD, we measured cholestanol (not a plant sterol, but a marker of cholesterol absorption) (19), campesterol and sitosterol (plant sterols and markers of cholesterol absorption), and lathosterol (marker of cholesterol synthesis) (18, 19, 25) in 2,440 well-characterized patients in whom the coronary status was assessed by angiography (26).
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
CAD was assessed by angiography with maximum luminal narrowing estimated by visual analysis. The severity of CAD was quantified with the Friesinger Score (FS) (27). Diabetes mellitus was diagnosed according to the criteria of the American Diabetes Association (28). Furthermore, individuals with a history of diabetes or treatment with oral antidiabetics or insulin were considered diabetic. Hypertension was diagnosed if the systolic and/or diastolic blood pressure exceeded 140 and/or 90 mmHg or if there was a history of hypertension, also evident through the use of antihypertensive drugs.
Subjects included in the study were numbered by the order of recruitment. Measurement of cholestanol, campesterol, sitosterol, and lathosterol was performed in a total of 2,440 LURIC participants that were randomly selected.
Laboratory procedures
The standard laboratory methods have been described (26). Fasting blood samples collected before angiography were kept frozen at –80°C between the day of blood draw and the day of analysis. Plasma total cholesterol and triglycerides were determined enzymatically (26). Cholestanol, campesterol, sitosterol, and lathosterol were quantified in plasma using a recently published gas chromatography and mass spectrometry (GCMS)-based method (29).
Instruments and analytical method A Thermo Trace 2000 gas chromatograph coupled to a Fisons MD 800 quadrupole mass spectrometer was used with Helium as carrier gas. Noncholesterol sterols were analyzed applying electron ionization GCMS with single-ion-monitoring mode.
Sample preparation A 100 µl portion of a solution containing epicoprostanol as internal standard and butylated hydroxytoluene as antioxidant was admixed to 100 µl of plasma. Kept at 75°C, the samples were hydrolyzed in ethanolic KOH-solution. After liquid-phase extraction, solid-phase purification, and derivatisation to trimethylsilylethers, the samples were subjected to GCMS-analysis.
Apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotyping was performed by allele-specific restriction analysis with AflIII and HaeII as described (30). Three groups comprising carriers of at least one APOE 2 allele (APOE 2/2, APOE 2/3, APOE 2/4), APOE 3/3 homozygotes, and the remaining individuals (APOE 3/4 or APOE 4/4) were formed. Data on the APOE genotype were available in 2,437 of the 2,440 subjects.
Statistical analysis
The FS was broken down to four (A–D) categories of severity of CAD (A = FS 0–1, B = FS 2–4, C = FS 5–8, and D = FS 9–15). The clinical and biochemical characteristics of the study participants were expressed as numbers and percentages of subjects in the cases of categorical variables and as means ± SD or means with interquartile ranges in the cases of continuous variables. Comparisons among the four groups of the FS were analyzed using the
2-test or univariate analysis of variance (ANOVA). Adjusted P values were calculated with logistic regression or general linear models (GLMs) with covariates as indicated (Table 1
). Ratios of noncholesterol sterols to cholesterol were calculated to standardize for the variation of plasma cholesterol. Additionally, ratios of absorption sterols to lathosterol were formed. Crude noncholesterol sterols, their ratios to cholesterol, and absorption sterol to lathosterol ratios were transformed logarithmically. Pearson correlations between noncholesterol sterols and cholesterol were computed. In addition, Pearson correlations among noncholesterol sterol to cholesterol ratios were calculated. Using GLMs in which those factors not under examination were included as covariates, the effects of sex, age, body mass index (BMI), diabetes, hypertension, and statin use on noncholesterol sterol to cholesterol ratios were studied (Table 2
). Multivariate GLMs were generated to examine the relationships of the FS with uncorrected noncholesterol sterols, noncholesterol sterol to cholesterol ratios, and absorption marker to lathosterol ratios. Furthermore, the impact of the APOE genotype on the associations of noncholesterol sterol to cholesterol ratios and absorption sterol to lathosterol ratios with the FS was examined (data not shown). Analyses were performed in the whole group (Table 3
), in the subgroup of patients who did not receive statins (Table 4
), in the subgroup of statin users (see supplementary table), and in the subgroup of nondiabetics (data not shown). All statistical tests were two-sided, and P < 0.05 was considered significant. The SPSS 15.0 statistical package (SPSS Inc.) was used.
|
|
|
|
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Plasma noncholesterol sterol concentrations
The absolute mean plasma concentrations ± SD of campesterol, sitosterol, cholestanol, and lathosterol were 7.57 ± 4.50 µMol/l, 3.87 ± 2.33 µMol/l, 7.22 ± 3.01 µMol/l, and 7.00 ± 4.81 µMol/l, respectively. All noncholesterol sterols were positively correlated with total cholesterol (r = 0.360, P < 0.001; r = 0.350, P < 0.001; r = 0.507, P < 0.001; and r = 0.436, P < 0.001 for campesterol, sitosterol, cholestanol, and lathosterol, respectively). There was a strong positive correlation between the ratios of campesterol and sitosterol to cholesterol (r = 0.879, P < 0.001). An increase in the ratio of cholestanol to cholesterol ratio went in parallel with high plant sterol to cholesterol ratios (r = 0.475, P < 0.001 and r = 0.454, P < 0.001 for campesterol and sitosterol, respectively). The lathosterol to cholesterol ratio was inversely correlated with the ratios of campesterol, sitosterol, and cholestanol to cholesterol (r = –0.306, P < 0.001; r = –0.247, P < 0.001; r = –0.350, P < 0.001, respectively), revealing the expected reciprocal relationship between cholesterol absorption and synthesis.
The relationships of noncholesterol sterol to cholesterol ratios with clinical parameters
We examined the relationships of noncholesterol sterol to cholesterol ratios with sex, age, components of the metabolic syndrome, and the use of statins. BMI and statin use were strongly correlated with the noncholesterol sterol to cholesterol ratios. In the subgroup with high BMI (>26 kg/m2 and >27 kg/m2 in males and females, respectively), absorption marker ratios were decreased (P < 0.001), and the lathosterol to cholesterol ratio was increased (P < 0.001). Statin users had higher plant sterol to cholesterol ratios than nonusers (P < 0.001), whereas the cholesterol biosynthesis was suppressed, as expected (P < 0.001). The cholestanol to cholesterol ratio was slightly elevated in subjects taking statins (P = 0.105). Provided that patients did not receive insulin treatment, type 2 diabetes was significantly associated with high synthesis and low absorption of cholesterol. Individuals older than 60 years had decreased noncholesterol sterol to cholesterol ratios compared with those younger than 60. Hypertension was associated with increased lathosterol to cholesterol ratio (P < 0.01), and male gender was correlated with elevated campesterol to cholesterol ratio (P = 0.006) (Table 2).
The relationships of uncorrected noncholesterol sterols, noncholesterol sterol to cholesterol ratios, and absorption sterol to lathosterol ratios with the severity of CAD
The relationships of cholesterol homeostasis with the FS were similar in users of statins (see supplementary table) and subjects who did not take lipid-lowering drugs (Table 4). In the entire cohort, high FS was significantly associated with increased cholestanol and campesterol to cholesterol ratios (P = 0.006 and P = 0.026, respectively), and decreased lathosterol to cholesterol ratio (P < 0.001). The association of the sitosterol to cholesterol ratio with the severity of CAD did not reach statistical significance in the whole group (Table 3). In agreement, uncorrected cholestanol, lathosterol, and campesterol were significantly associated with the FS, and the relationship of uncorrected sitosterol with the severity of CAD did not reach statistical significance in the entire cohort (data not shown). Increased ratios of absorption sterols to lathosterol were correlated with high FS (P < 0.001) (Table 3). After exclusion of statin users, the relationship of the FS with cholestanol and lathosterol to cholesterol ratios (P = 0.014 and P = 0.001, respectively), and cholestanol, campesterol, and sitosterol to lathosterol ratios (P < 0.001, P = 0.002, and P = 0.003, respectively) remained significant. Due to lower sample size compared with the whole group, the association of the campesterol to cholesterol ratio with the FS was not significant in individuals who did not take statins (Table 4). In statin users, the FS was inversely correlated with the lathosterol to cholesterol ratio (P = 0.010) and positively related to the ratios of cholestanol, campesterol, and sitosterol to lathosterol (P = 0.021, P = 0.025, and P = 0.033, respectively). The relationships of absorption marker to cholesterol ratios with the FS did not reach statistical significance in the subgroup of statin users (data not shown). When subjects with type 2 diabetes were exluded from the entire cohort, high absorption and low synthesis of cholesterol were consistently associated with an increased severity of CAD and even the relationship of the sitosterol to cholesterol with the FS reached statistical significance (data not shown). The APOE genotype had no influence on the associations of the FS with noncholesterol sterol to cholesterol ratios and absorption sterol to lathosterol ratios in the whole group and in the subgroups of statin users, of subjects not receiving lipid-lowering drugs, and of nondiabetics (data not shown).
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Up to now, no large study has been published investigating the relationship of cholesterol homeostasis with CAD diagnosed by angiography. Nonetheless, the matter seems of interest because not only the synthesis but also the absorption of cholesterol is amenable to pharmacological manipulation. Furthermore, there is an ongoing discussion if moderately increased plasma plant sterols represent a cardiovascular risk factor.
Most clinical trials conducted so far report positive associations between plasma plant sterols and CAD (8–11, 14–17). However, there has been no consensus on the interpretation of data. Several authors have proposed pro-atherogenic effects of enhanced cholesterol absorption, whereas others have suggested special perils of elevated plasma plant sterols. In two well-performed studies, the Dallas Heart Study (3) and the European Prospective Investigation of Cancer–Norfolk study (13), plasma plant sterols were not adversely related to CAD. The results of the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam suggesting beneficial effects of high plasma plant sterols were not adjusted for BMI (12).
Our study provides a large and reliable body of data on the relationships of cholesterol homeostasis and plasma plant sterols with CAD. In contrast to previous work, we measured noncholesterol sterols in 2,440 persons who all underwent coronary angiography (26). Hence, an exact classification of the coronary status was available.
The plasma concentrations of noncholesterol sterols were in agreement with data published previously (3, 13). Confounding due to the consumption of plant sterol or stanol ester margarines can be ruled out because patients were recruited before those functional foods were brought onto the market in Germany. We were able to confirm the reported associations of noncholesterol ratios with the use of statins (31), BMI (32), and type 2 diabetes (33). In opposition to the plant sterol ratios, the cholestanol ratio was only slightly elevated in users of statins compared with subjects who did not take lipid-lowering drugs. However, this observation has also been made in a subgroup of the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (34). Male gender was correlated with increased campesterol to cholesterol ratio in our study and a previous work (13).
In the entire cohort, high ratios of cholestanol and campesterol to cholesterol, and of absorption sterols to lathosterol were associated with an increased severity of coronary atherosclerosis. By contrast, the lathosterol to cholesterol ratio was decreased in subjects with high FS compared with individuals without CAD. The sitosterol to cholesterol ratio did not significantly correlate with the FS in the whole group but reached statistical significance in the subgroup of nondiabetics. These results were also confirmed by subgroup analysis in individuals with statins and in those without lipid-lowering drugs.
Data on the relationships of the APOE genotype with cholesterol absorption and synthesis are controversial (35, 36). Additional adjustment for APOE variants did not affect the associations of cholesterol homeostasis with the severity of CAD.
Our findings are in support of previous studies reporting high absorption and low synthesis of cholesterol to be associated with CAD. We think the repeatedly observed positive correlation of plasma plant sterols with CAD reflects atherogenic effects of increased intestinal cholesterol uptake.
The fact that plant sterols have been detected in atherosclerotic plaques does not conflict with the interpretation of our results. Of note, plant sterols obviously do not accumulate in plaques disproportionately to cholesterol (37, 38). Indeed, plant sterols may exert harmful effects when they are up to 100-fold elevated (5) but this apparently does not apply to variation within or close to their physiological range. The existence of very effective secretion pumps for plant sterols in the intestine and the liver underlines that these compounds are unwanted by the human body (6, 7). However, because of this efficient protective mechanism plant sterols are probably not able to promote atherogenesis in nonsitosterolaemic subjects.
The pathophysiological mechanisms underlying the associations between cholesterol homeostasis and CAD are not fully understood. With the use of statins, a reduction in coronary events can be achieved in subjects with hypercholesterolaemia (39). The well-established effectiveness of statin treatment in lowering plasma total and LDL cholesterol depends on baseline cholesterol metabolism. Statins suppress the synthesis of cholesterol considerably less efficiently in subjects with low synthesis and high absorption of cholesterol (31). In consequence, coronary events have not been reduced by the use of statins in those patients with high cholesterol absorption (40).
However, baseline cholesterol metabolism not only predicts the risk of future coronary events in patients under statin regimen, but also in those who do not take lipid-lowering drugs. It seems improbable that an increased absorption in particular of plant sterols promotes atherogenesis. More likely, a higher cholesterol lifetime burden, as suggested previously (16), might link detrimental changes in cholesterol homeostasis to CAD. In support of this hypothesis, polymorphisms in the ABCG5 gene, which plays an important role in intestinal cholesterol uptake, were associated with the response to dietary cholesterol (41).
Evidence suggests that high intestinal cholesterol uptake might increase the risk of coronary atherosclerosis. Thus, subjects with increased cholesterol absorption, particularly those in whom total and LDL cholesterol goals are not reached by the use of statins alone, might have benefit from cholesterol absorption inhibitors. These are ezetimibe (42, 43) and plant stanol or sterol margarines (44–47). However, definite recommendations for the use of cholesterol absorption inhibitors in addition to statins will require large prospective studies with hard cardiovascular end points. To this date, these data are not available but clinical trials are ongoing. In a recently published study, however, carotid intima-media thickness surprisingly was not reduced by an ezetimibe plus simvastatin regimen compared with simvastatin alone (43). Yet, ezetimibe was found to inhibit the development of atherosclerosis in mice (48). Concerns about the safety of plant sterol margarines with regard to atherogenesis are not warranted (49). The physiological plasma plant sterol concentration is usually less than 1 mg per decilitre (3, 13). Due to the regular intake of plant sterol containing functional foods plasma plant sterol concentration is forced up by about the factor two only (50). However, patients with sitosterolaemia, who develop severe premature atherosclerosis, have up to 100-fold elevated plasma plant sterols (4, 5). In addition, the administration of plant sterols and stanols has been shown to be effective in the prevention of coronary atherosclerosis in animal models (51, 52) and to be associated with increased carotid artery compliance in a recent clinical study (53). Of note, a reduction in LDL cholesterol of approximately 10% can be achieved by the regular intake of plant sterol or stanol containing functional foods (44–47).
It is a limitation of our study that systematic information on the dietary habits of our subjects has not been available. To compensate for this drawback, we have additionally measured cholestanol, which is an absorption marker less dependent on vegetable food intake than plant sterols. In agreement with the campesterol to cholesterol ratio, increased cholestanol to cholesterol ratio was associated with high FS. Moreover, previous work has supported the view that even vegetarian lifestyle does not have major effects on the plasma plant sterol concentration (54). Furthermore, we cannot exclude the possibility that sample storage for up to 10 years may have affected plasma sterol concentrations. However, sterols stored at –80 degrees were proven stable in a set of samples over 10 years in a study published previously (12).
In conclusion, we provide evidence that high absorption and low synthesis of cholesterol is associated with a more severe CAD. Prospective clinical studies investigating if the use of cholesterol absorption inhibitors will reduce cardiovascular risk are needed.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
Submitted on
March 12, 2008
This article has been cited by other articles:
Revised on
July 29, 2008 and in re-revised form September 2, 2008.
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
M. E. Greenberg, J. D. Smith, and E. Sehayek
Moderately Decreased Cholesterol Absorption Rates Are Associated With a Large Atheroprotective Effect
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol,
November 1, 2009;
29(11):
1745 - 1750.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
E. E. Kenny, A. Gusev, K. Riegel, D. Lutjohann, J. K. Lowe, J. Salit, J. B. Maller, M. Stoffel, M. J. Daly, D. M. Altshuler, et al.
Systematic haplotype analysis resolves a complex plasma plant sterol locus on the Micronesian Island of Kosrae
PNAS,
August 18, 2009;
106(33):
13886 - 13891.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
This Article ![]()
![]()
Abstract
![]()
Full Text (PDF)
![]()
Supplemental Data
![]()
All Versions of this Article:
P800013-JLR200v1
50/2/334
most recent![]()
Alert me when this article is cited
![]()
Alert me if a correction is posted
![]()
Citation Map
![]()
Services ![]()
![]()
Email this article to a friend
![]()
Similar articles in this journal
![]()
Similar articles in PubMed
![]()
Alert me to new issues of the journal
![]()
Download to citation manager
![]()
Request Permissions ![]()
Citing Articles ![]()
![]()
Citing Articles via HighWire
![]()
Citing Articles via Google Scholar
![]()
Google Scholar ![]()
![]()
Articles by Silbernagel, G. ![]()
Articles by März, W. ![]()
Search for Related Content
![]()
PubMed ![]()
![]()
PubMed Citation
![]()
Articles by Silbernagel, G.
![]()
Articles by März, W.
![]()
Social Bookmarking ![]()
![]()
What's this?
HOME
HELP
FEEDBACK
SUBSCRIPTIONS
ARCHIVE
SEARCH
TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASBMB Journals
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Molecular and Cellular Proteomics
ASBMB Today