|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Journal of Lipid Research, Vol. 46, 2182-2191, October 2005
Copyright © 2005 by American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
Cardiovascular Center for Excellence in Drug Discovery, GlaxoSmithKline, King of Prussia, PA 19406-0939
Published, JLR Papers in Press, July 16, 2005. DOI 10.1194/jlr.M500116-JLR200
1 Present address of P. H. E. Groot, N. J. Pearce, J. W. Yates, and C. Stocker: Cardiovascular Center for Excellence in Drug Discovery, GlaxoSmithKline, Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, SG1 2NY, UK.
2 Present address of D. d'Epagnier, and K. O. Morasco: Department of Laboratory Animal Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, King of Prussia, PA 19406, USA.
3 Present address of M. Burgert: Department of Statistical Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, King of Prussia, PA 19406, USA.
4 Present address of J. L. Collins: Discovery Research, GlaxoSmithKline, 5 Moore Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27707, USA.
5 To whom correspondence should be addressed. e-mail: michael.c.jaye{at}gsk.com
Liver X receptor (LXR) nuclear receptors regulate the expression of genes involved in whole body cholesterol trafficking, including absorption, excretion, catabolism, and cellular efflux, and possess both anti-inflammatory and antidiabetic actions. Accordingly, LXR is considered an appealing drug target for multiple indications. Synthetic LXR agonists demonstrated inhibition of atherosclerosis progression in murine genetic models; however, these and other studies indicated that their major undesired side effect is an increase of plasma and hepatic triglycerides. A significant impediment to extrapolating results with LXR agonists from mouse to humans is the absence in mice of cholesteryl ester transfer protein, a known LXR target gene, and the upregulation in mice but not humans of cholesterol 7
-hydroxylase. To better predict the human response to LXR agonism, two synthetic LXR agonists were examined in hamsters and cynomolgus monkeys. In contrast to previously published results in mice, neither LXR agonist increased HDL-cholesterol in hamsters, and similar results were obtained in cynomolgus monkeys. Importantly, in both species, LXR agonists increased LDL-cholesterol, an unfavorable effect not apparent from earlier murine studies.
These results reveal additional problems associated with current synthetic LXR agonists and emphasize the importance of profiling compounds in preclinical species with a more human-like LXR response and lipoprotein metabolism.
Abbreviations: ABCG1, ATP binding cassette protein G1; apoE, apolipoprotein E; CETP, cholesteryl ester transfer protein; cyp7a, cholesterol 7
-hydroxylase; HDL-C, high density lipoprotein-cholesterol; LXR, liver X receptor; SCD, steroyl coenzyme A desaturase; SREBP, sterol-regulatory element binding protein
Supplementary key words liver X receptor low density lipoprotein cholesteryl ester transfer protein monkey hamster triglyceride atherosclerosis
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. A. Phelan, J. M. Weaver, D. J. Steger, S. Joshi, J. T. Maslany, J. L. Collins, W. J. Zuercher, T. M. Willson, M. Walker, M. Jaye, et al. Selective Partial Agonism of Liver X Receptor {alpha} Is Related to Differential Corepressor Recruitment Mol. Endocrinol., October 1, 2008; 22(10): 2241 - 2249. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Kotokorpi, E. Ellis, P. Parini, L.-M. Nilsson, S. Strom, K. R. Steffensen, J.-A. Gustafsson, and A. Mode Physiological Differences between Human and Rat Primary Hepatocytes in Response to Liver X Receptor Activation by 3-[3-[N-(2-Chloro-3-trifluoromethylbenzyl)-(2,2-diphenylethyl)amino]propyloxy]phenylacetic Acid Hydrochloride (GW3965) Mol. Pharmacol., October 1, 2007; 72(4): 947 - 955. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. M. Quinet, D. A. Savio, A. R. Halpern, L. Chen, G. U. Schuster, J.-A. Gustafsson, M. D. Basso, and P. Nambi Liver X Receptor (LXR)-beta Regulation in LXR{alpha}-Deficient Mice: Implications for Therapeutic Targeting Mol. Pharmacol., October 1, 2006; 70(4): 1340 - 1349. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Cuchel and D. J. Rader Macrophage Reverse Cholesterol Transport: Key to the Regression of Atherosclerosis? Circulation, May 30, 2006; 113(21): 2548 - 2555. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Duffy and D. J. Rader Emerging Therapies Targeting High-Density Lipoprotein Metabolism and Reverse Cholesterol Transport Circulation, February 28, 2006; 113(8): 1140 - 1150. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. U. Naik, X. Wang, J. S. Da Silva, M. Jaye, C. H. Macphee, M. P. Reilly, J. T. Billheimer, G. H. Rothblat, and D. J. Rader Pharmacological Activation of Liver X Receptors Promotes Reverse Cholesterol Transport In Vivo Circulation, January 3, 2006; 113(1): 90 - 97. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Journal of Biological Chemistry |
| Molecular and Cellular Proteomics | ASBMB Today |