|
Advertisement | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Papers In Press, published online ahead of print February 16, 2008 J. Lipid Res., doi:10.1194/jlr.D700041-JLR200
Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden 01307
Corresponding Author: schwudke{at}mpi-cbg.de
Accurate profiling of lipidomes relies upon quantitative and unbiased recovery of lipid species from analyzed cells, fluids or tissues and is usually achieved by two-phase extraction with chloroform. We demonstrated that methyl-tert-buthylether (MTBE) extraction allows faster and cleaner lipid recovery and is well suited for automated shotgun profiling. Because of MTBE low density, lipid-containing organic phase forms the upper layer during phase separation, which simplifies its collection and minimizes dripping losses. Non-extractable matrix forms a dense pellet at the bottom of the extraction tube and easily removed by centrifuging. Rigorous testing demonstrated that MTBE protocol delivers similar or better recoveries of species of most all major lipid classes, compared to golden standard Folch and Bligh and Dyer recipes.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Advertisement | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||