|
|
||||||||
Papers In Press, published online ahead of print June 16, 2003
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Department of Medicine (Gastroenterology), University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0813
Corresponding Author: hofmannaf{at}cs.com
5
Revised on June 4, 2003
Accepted on June 10, 2003
Physicochemical and physiological properties of 5
-cyprinol sulfate, the toxic bile salt of cyprinid fish
-cyprinol sulfate was isolated from bile of the Asiatic carp, Cyprinus carpio. 5
-Cyprinol sulfate was surface active and formed micelles; its critical micellization concentration (CMC) in 0.15 M Na+ using the maximum bubble pressure device was 1.5mM; by dye solubilization, its CMC was ~ 4 mM. At concentrations >1mM, 5
-cyprinol sulfate solubilized monooleylglycerol efficiently (2.1 moles per mole micellar bile salt). When infused intravenously into the anesthetized rat, 5
-cyprinol sulfate was hemolytic, cholestatic, and toxic. In the isolated rat liver, it underwent little biotransformation and was poorly transported (Tmax 0.5 [mu}mol/min-kg) as compared to taurocholate. 5
-Cyprinol, its bile alcohol moiety, was oxidized to its corresponding C27 bile acid and to allocholic acid (the latter then conjugated with taurine); these metabolites were efficiently transported. 5
-cyprinol sulfate inhibited taurocholate uptake in COS-7 cells transfected with rat asbt, the apical bile salt transporter of the ileal enterocyte. 5
-Cyprinol had limited aqueous solubility (0.3 mM) and was poorly absorbed from the perfused rat jejunum or ileum. Sampling of carp intestinal content indicated that 5
-cyprinol sulfate was present at micellar concentrations, and that it did not undergo hydrolysis during intestinal transit. These studies indicate that 5
-cyprinol sulfate is an excellent digestive detergent and suggest that a micellar phase is present during digestion in cyprinid fish.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. J. Reschly, N. Ai, S. Ekins, W. J. Welsh, L. R. Hagey, A. F. Hofmann, and M. D. Krasowski Evolution of the bile salt nuclear receptor FXR in vertebrates J. Lipid Res., July 1, 2008; 49(7): 1577 - 1587. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Moschetta, F. Xu, L. R. Hagey, G. P. van Berge-Henegouwen, K. J. van Erpecum, J. F. Brouwers, J. C. Cohen, M. Bierman, H. H. Hobbs, J. H. Steinbach, et al. A phylogenetic survey of biliary lipids in vertebrates, J. Lipid Res., October 1, 2005; 46(10): 2221 - 2232. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. D. Krasowski, K. Yasuda, L. R. Hagey, and E. G. Schuetz Evolution of the Pregnane X Receptor: Adaptation to Cross-Species Differences in Biliary Bile Salts Mol. Endocrinol., July 1, 2005; 19(7): 1720 - 1739. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| All ASBMB Journals | Journal of Biological Chemistry |
| Molecular and Cellular Proteomics | ASBMB Today |