J. Lipid Res.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


A more recent version of this article appeared on December 1, 2004

Papers In Press, published online ahead of print September 1, 2004
J. Lipid Res., doi:10.1194/jlr.M400289-JLR200
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Accepted Manuscript)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
M400289-JLR200v1
45/12/2339    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Raman, A.
Right arrow Articles by Schoeller, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Raman, A.
Right arrow Articles by Schoeller, D. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Submitted on July 30, 2004
Revised on August 26, 2004
Accepted on August 27, 2004

Validation of deuterium labeled fatty acids for the measurement of dietary fat oxidation during physical activity

Aarthi Raman, Stephane Blanc, Alexandra Adams, and Dale A. Schoeller

Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Wisconsin at Madison, Madison, WI 53706

Corresponding Author: dschoell{at}nutrisci.wisc.edu

Measurement of 13C-labeled fatty acid oxidation is hindered by the need for acetate correction, measurement of VCO2 in a controlled environment and frequent collection of breath samples. The use of deuterium labeled fatty acids may over come these limitations. Herein, d31-palmitate was validated against [1-13C]-palmitate during exercise. Thirteen subjects with BMI = 22.9  3 kg/m2 and % body fat = 19.6  11% were subjected to 2 or 4 hours of exercise at 25% VO2 max. The d31-palmitate and [1-13C]-palmitate were given orally, in a liquid meal at breakfast. The d3-acetate and [1-13C]-acetate were given during another visit for acetate sequestration correction. Recovery of d31-palmitate in urinary water at 9 h post-dose was compared to [1-13C]-palmitate recovery in breath. Cumulative recovery of d31-palmitate was 10.6  3% and that of [1-13C]-palmitate was 5.6  2%. The d3-acetate and [1-13C]-acetate recoveries were 85  4% and 54  4% respectively. When [1-13C]-acetate recovery was used to correct 13C data, the average % recovery differences were 0.4  3%. Uncorrected d31-palmitate and group-acetate corrected [1-13C]-palmitate were well correlated (y = 0.96x + 0; P <0.0001) when used to measure fatty acid oxidation during exercise. Thus d31-palmitate can be used in outpatient settings as it eliminates the need for acetate correction and frequent sampling.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
A. Bergouignan, D. A. Schoeller, S. Votruba, C. Simon, and S. Blanc
The acetate recovery factor to correct tracer-derived dietary fat oxidation in humans
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, April 1, 2008; 294(4): E645 - E653.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 All ASBMB Journals   Journal of Biological Chemistry 
 Molecular and Cellular Proteomics   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2004 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.