If you don't remember your password, you can reset it by entering your email address and clicking the Reset Password button. You will then receive an email that contains a secure link for resetting your password
If the address matches a valid account an email will be sent to __email__ with instructions for resetting your password
1 Z-Z. Fang and R-R. He contributed equally to this work.
Zhong-Ze Fang
Footnotes
1 Z-Z. Fang and R-R. He contributed equally to this work.
Affiliations
First Affiliated Hospital of Liaoning Medical University, Jinzhou 121001, ChinaJoint Center for Translational Medicine, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics Chinese Academy of Sciences and First Affiliated Hospital of Liaoning Medical University, Dalian 116023, ChinaLaboratory of Metabolism, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892
Joint Center for Translational Medicine, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics Chinese Academy of Sciences and First Affiliated Hospital of Liaoning Medical University, Dalian 116023, China
Joint Center for Translational Medicine, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics Chinese Academy of Sciences and First Affiliated Hospital of Liaoning Medical University, Dalian 116023, China
Joint Center for Translational Medicine, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics Chinese Academy of Sciences and First Affiliated Hospital of Liaoning Medical University, Dalian 116023, China
Joint Center for Translational Medicine, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics Chinese Academy of Sciences and First Affiliated Hospital of Liaoning Medical University, Dalian 116023, China
Joint Center for Translational Medicine, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics Chinese Academy of Sciences and First Affiliated Hospital of Liaoning Medical University, Dalian 116023, China
[S] The online version of this article (available at http://www.jlr.org) contains supplementary data in the form of three figures and one table. 1 Z-Z. Fang and R-R. He contributed equally to this work.
Increased levels of bile acids (BAs) due to the various hepatic diseases could interfere with the metabolism of xenobiotics, such as drugs, and endobiotics including steroid hormones. UDP-glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs) are involved in the conjugation and elimination of many xenobiotics and endogenous compounds. The present study sought to investigate the potential for inhibition of UGT enzymes by BAs. The results showed that taurolithocholic acid (TLCA) exhibited the strongest inhibition toward UGTs, followed by lithocholic acid. Structure-UGT inhibition relationships of BAs were examined and in vitro-in vivo extrapolation performed by using in vitro inhibition kinetic parameters (Ki) in combination with calculated in vivo levels of TLCA. Substitution of a hydrogen with a hydroxyl group in the R1, R3, R4, R5 sites of BAs significantly weakens their inhibition ability toward most UGTs. The in vivo inhibition by TLCA toward UGT forms was determined with following orders of potency: UGT1A4 > UGT2B7 > UGT1A3 > UGT1A1 ∼ UGT1A7 ∼ UGT1A10 ∼ UGT2B15. In conclusion, these studies suggest that disrupted homeostasis of BAs, notably taurolithocholic acid, found in various diseases such as cholestasis, could lead to altered metabolism of xenobiotics and endobiotics through inhibition of UGT enzymes.
Bile acids (BAs), the major end-products of cholesterol metabolism, play a key role in the solubilization, absorption, and transportation of dietary lipids in the intestine (
Bile acids metabolomic study on the CCl4- and α-naphthylisothiocyanate-induced animal models: quantitative analysis of 22 bile acids by ultraperformance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry.
). In humans, the most abundant BAs contain cholic acid (CA), chenodeoxycholic acid, deoxycholic acid, lithocholic acid (LCA), and ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) (
). Under normal conditions, BAs exist at low concentrations in the peripheral circulation. Various hepatic and intestinal diseases can significantly affect the total BA levels and disrupt the BA homeostasis. For example, cholestasis can disturb the bile secretory process, leading to the accumulation of toxic BAs in the liver (
Human UDP-glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs), endogenous membrane proteins located in endoplasmic reticulum, can conjugate various endogenous and exogenous compounds (
). BAs are substrates of UGTs, and UGT-catalyzed glucuronidation of BAs facilitate their hydrophilicity, increase their elimination from the liver, and decrease their potential for hepatic toxicity (
). For example, UGT1A3 can catalyze C24-glucuronidation of chenodeoxycholic acid, LCA, and hyodeoxycholic acid (HDCA) through forming acyl glucuronides (
As substrates for UGT enzymes, BAs might also exhibit inhibitory effects toward various UGT forms. Previous studies revealed that some BA components exhibit inhibitory effects toward 4-methylumbelliferone (4-MU) glucuronidation, including LCA, dehydrocholic acid (DHCA), and sodium chenodeoxycholate (CDCA) (
Bile acid inhibition of xenobiotic-metabolizing enzymes is a factor in the mechanism of colon carcinogenesis: tests of aspects of the concept with glucuronosyltransferase.
). However, the complete inhibition profile of BAs toward different UGT forms remains unclear. Additionally, the BA structure-UGT inhibition relationships are important to determine what structural basis of BAs affects their inhibition potentials toward different UGTs. Therefore, the present study evaluated the inhibition capability of various BAs toward UGT forms in liver and intestine. As previously described (
), recombinant UGT isoform-catalyzed 4-MU glucuronidation reactions were used to evaluate the inhibition potential of BAs toward UGTs except for UGT1A4, and where trifluoperazine (TFP) glucuronidation was performed as the standard reaction to evaluate the inhibition potential of BAs toward UGT1A4 activity.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Materials
4-MU, 4-methylumbelliferone-β-d-glucuronide (4-MUG), Tris-HCl, 7-hydroxycoumarin, azidothymidine (AZT) (purity ≥98%), TFP (purity ≥99%), estradiol (purity ≥98%), and uridine-5′-diphosphoglucuronic acid trisodium salt (UDPGA) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Recombinant human UGT isoforms (UGT1A1, UGT1A3, UGT1A4, UGT1A6, UGT1A7, UGT1A8, UGT1A9, UGT1A10, UGT2B7, and UGT2B15) expressed in baculovirus-infected insect cells were obtained from BD Gentest Corp. (Woburn, MA). HDCA, LCA, sodium taurochenodeoxycholate (TCDCA), taurocholic acid sodium salt hydrate, CDCA, taurolithocholic acid (TLCA), UDCA, CA, DHCA, sodium deoxycholate (DCA), sodium tauroursodeoxycholate (TUDCA), sodium taurodeoxycholate hydrate (TDCA), and glycocholic acid hydrate (GCA) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. The purity of these compounds was above 95%. All other reagents were of HPLC grade or of the highest grade commercially available.
Initial screening of BAs' inhibition toward the activity of recombinant UGTs
The inhibition capability of BAs toward all the UGT forms, except UGT1A4, was evaluated using recombinant UGT-catalyzed 4-MU glucuronidation as the probe reaction, as previously described (
). The incubation system (total volume 200 μl) contained recombinant UGTs, 5 mM UDPGA, 5 mM MgCl2, 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), and 4-MU in the absence or presence of different concentrations of various BAs. The incubation time used and protein concentration were previously determined to ensure the reaction rate within the linear range. The 4-MU concentration was equal to known Km or S50 values for each UGT form. The concentrations of 4-MU and recombinant UGTs, and incubation time are given in supplementary Table I. The incubation reaction was initiated through addition of UDPGA to the mixture after a 5 min preincubation at 37°C. The reactions were quenched by adding 100 μl acetonitrile with 7-hydroxycoumarin (100 μM) as internal standard. The mixture was centrifuged at 20,000 g for 10 min, and an aliquot of supernatant was transferred to an auto-injector vial for HPLC analysis. The HPLC system (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) contained a SCL-10A system controller, two LC-10AT pumps, a SIL-10A auto-injector, and a SPD-10AVP UV detector. Chromatographic separation was carried out using a C18 column (4.6 × 200 mm, 5 μm, Kromasil) at a flow rate of 1 ml/min and UV detector at 316 nm. The mobile phase consisted of acetonitrile (A) and water containing 0.5% (v/v) formic acid (B). The following gradient condition was used: 0–15 min, 95–40% B; 15–20 min, 10% B; 20–30 min, 95% B. The calculation curve was generated by peak area ratio (4-MUG/internal standard) over the concentration range of 4-MUG 0.1–100 mM. The curve was linear over this concentration range, with an r2 value >0.99. The limits of detection and quantification were determined at signal-to-noise ratios of 3 and 10, respectively. The accuracy and precision for each concentration was more than 95%.
Due to the low catalytic activity of UGT1A4 toward 4-MU glucuronidation, the UGT1A4-catalyzed TFP glucuronidation was performed to evaluate the inhibition potential of BAs toward UGT1A4 activity. TFP (40 μM, near its Km value), was incubated with recombinant UGT1A4 (0.1 mg/ml) at 37°C for 20 min in the absence or presence of BAs (
Selectivity of substrate (trifluoperazine) and inhibitor (amitriptyline, androsterone, canrenoic acid, hecogenin, phenylbutazone, quinidine, quinine, and sulfinpyrazone) “probes” for human UDPglucuronosyltransferases.
). 4-MU (50 μM) and TLCA (50 nM) were added to the medium. After a 1 h incubation at 37°C, the medium and cells were isolated. Methanol (v/v) 1:1 and 5 μM chlorpropamide as an internal standard were added to the medium, and 1 ml methanol with 5 μM chlorpropamide as an internal standard were added to extract the compounds in the cells. After centrifugation at 20,000 g for 10 min, the aliquot of supernatant was determined to detect the formation of 4-MUG.
BAs' inhibition toward human liver microsome-catalyzed azidothymidine and estradiol glucuronidation
Twenty-five donor pooled human liver microsomes (HLMs) were purchased from Research Institute for Liver Diseases (RILD, Shang Hai, China). For azidothymidine (AZT) glucuronidation, the typical incubation system (total volume 200 μl) contained 0.5 mg/ml HLMs, 5 mM UDPGA, 5 mM MgCl2, 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 50 μg/mg protein alamethicin, and AZT (concentration is corresponding to the Km value). The incubation time was 30 min. After centrifugation at 20,000 g for 10 min, aliquots of the supernatants were analyzed by HPLC (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan), equipped with a SCL-10A system controller, two LC-10AT pumps, a SIL-10A auto sampler, and a SPD-10AVP UV detector. A C-18 column (250 mm × 4.6 mm I.D., 5 μm, Kromasil) was used to separate AZT and its glucuronide. The mobile phase was acetonitrile (A) and 0.2% formic acid (B) at a flow rate of 1.0 ml/min, with an isocratic: 0–25 min 90% B. The detector wavelength was set at 260 nm. Because there was no standard for the AZT glucuronide, a standard curve of AZT was used to quantify glucuronide formation.
Estradiol (10 μM) was incubated with HLMs for 20 min, with the final protein concentrations of 0.25 mg/ml. Estradiol glucuronidation samples were analyzed on the Ultra Fast Liquid Chromatography (UFLC) system. A Shim-pack XR-ODS (50.0 mm × 2.0 mm I.D., 2.2 μm, Shimadzu) analytical column with an ODS guard column (5 mm × 2.0 mm I.D., 2.2 μm, Shimadzu) was used and kept at 40°C. The mobile phase consisted of acetonitrile (A) and 0.2% formic acid (B) at a flow rate of 0.3 ml/min, with a gradient: 0–9 min, 90% B–30% B; 9–12.5 min, 5% B; 12.5–16 min, balance to 90% B. The detector wavelength was set at 250 nm. A standard curve of the estradiol-3-O-glucuronide was used to quantify glucuronide formation.
In vitro-in vivo extrapolation
The reaction velocity was determined at different concentrations of substrates and inhibitors. The durations in the inhibition kinetic study were the same as the initial screening study. Dixon and Lineweaver-Burk plots were used for determination of inhibition kinetic type. The second plot of slopes from the Lineweaver-Burk plot versus inhibitor concentrations was used to calculate the Ki value. The in vivo inhibition magnitude is affected by both in vitro inhibition kinetic parameters (Ki) and in vivo concentrations of inhibitors. Therefore, the following equation was employed to predict in vivo situation.
The terms are defined as follows: AUCi/AUC is the predicted ratio of in vivo exposure of xenobiotics or endogenous compounds in control and disease situations, Ki is the reversible inhibition constant, and [I]in vivo is the in vivo concentration of BAs.
RESULTS
Structure-inhibition relationship of BAs toward UGT isoforms
The structures of tested BAs are listed in Fig. 1, and the inhibitory capabilities of these BAs toward different UGT forms is given in Table 1. Among the tested UGT enzymes, the activity of UGT1A6, UGT1A8, and UGT1A9 were not affected by various BAs. Among the tested BAs at 100 μM, TCDCA, taurocholic acid sodium salt hydrate, CDCA, UDCA, CA, DHCA, DCA, TUDCA, TDCA, and GCA exhibited no or weak inhibition toward all the tested UGT forms, with inhibition magnitudes less than 90%. HDCA exerted 90.5% inhibition toward UGT2B7-catalyzed 4-MU glucuronidation, and low inhibition toward other UGTs. LCA exhibited the strongest inhibition (more than 90%) toward UGT1A4 and UGT2B15. TLCA showed strong inhibition toward most of UGT forms, including UGT1A1 (94.6%), UGT1A3 (96.6%), UGT1A4 (100%), UGT1A7 (90.9%), UGT2B7 (98.3%), and UGT2B15 (94.7%).
TABLE 1Initial screening of BAs (100 μM) toward various important UGT forms
Bile Acids
UGT1A1
UGT1A3
UGT1A4
UGT1A6
UGT1A7
UGT1A8
UGT1A9
UGT1A10
UGT2B7
UGT2B15
HDCA
44.6 ± 0.4***
26.1 ± 6.8*
13.7 ± 0.5**
95.4 ± 2.1
47.8 ± 0.5***
84.0 ± 6.1*
50.4 ± 4.3*
52.5 ± 0.9***
9.5 ± 2.0**
34.6 ± 0.4***
LCA
21.1 ± 8.0***
16.4 ± 0.5*
0.0 ± 0.0***
19.9 ± 1.3**
30.0 ± 2.2***
64.3 ± 7.1**
65.2 ± 17.4
25.0 ± 0.3***
15.7 ± 1.9**
0.3 ± 0.0***
TCDCA
17.5 ± 6.7***
21.6 ± 1.3*
27.8 ± 2.1**
84.6 ± 1.6*
52.7 ± 3.3***
59.1 ± 20.0*
75.3 ± 1.1*
41.0 ± 8.2**
28.1 ± 2.0**
28.4 ± 1.1***
Taurocholic acid sodium salt hydrate
62.7 ± 6.1**
66.7 ± 17.3
73.8 ± 1.4
105.8 ± 0.4
94.1 ± 2.5
75.5 ± 8.1*
94.7 ± 6.2
71.9 ± 0.3**
69.3 ± 7.7*
70.2 ± 3.9*
CDCA
37.7 ± 8.4**
47.2 ± 8.0
20.2 ± 1.4**
92.9 ± 2.6
47.4 ± 12.7**
29.2 ± 3.1***
74.0 ± 1.2*
39.9 ± 2.3***
15.4 ± 2.1**
19.8 ± 1.0***
TLCA
5.4 ± 0.0***
3.4 ± 0.4*
0.0 ± 0.0***
52.4 ± 0.2**
9.1 ± 8.8***
24.1 ± 3.5***
54.4 ± 7.1*
14.8 ± 6.8***
1.7 ± 0.6**
5.3 ± 0.0***
UDCA
27.4 ± 0.4*
92.8 ± 49.8
25.3 ± 0.8**
85.0 ± 0.9*
45.7 ± 9.6**
29.8 ± 3.8***
54.5 ± 5.8*
57.6 ± 1.4***
46.2 ± 4.9*
54.1 ± 1.2**
CA
61.9 ± 0.2**
135.5 ± 18.8
73.0 ± 1.1
100.7 ± 1.0
103.4 ± 2.8
86.1 ± 3.2*
89.0 ± 3.7
74.4 ± 0.5**
83.2 ± 7.9
72.1 ± 0.2**
DHCA
76.4 ± 13.3
117.5 ± 30.2
80.7 ± 25.3
95.0 ± 0.7
80.9 ± 1.7**
87.1 ± 16.0
83.0 ± 3.5
90.5 ± 2.9*
81.0 ± 3.1
77.7 ± 1.1*
DCA
33.9 ± 2.3***
57.8 ± 11.8
43.8 ± 21.8*
90.3 ± 2.5
68.0 ± 3.7**
88.7 ± 32.5
67.5 ± 2.6*
39.1 ± 1.5***
45.8 ± 2.2*
35.4 ± 1.0***
TUDCA
10.6 ± 0.1***
49.1 ± 8.5
30.8 ± 4.6**
76.9 ± 2.4*
48.8 ± 11.1**
59.3 ± 0.6***
82.9 ± 9.1
38.2 ± 13.2**
26.1 ± 2.3**
25.3 ± 0.7***
TDCA
34.1 ± 0.1**
61.1 ± 8.8
41.1 ± 13.3
93.4 ± 1.1
60.4 ± 2.5***
74.7 ± 11.3
85.0 ± 0.5
50.8 ± 1.0*
33.4 ± 2.0*
40.7 ± 1.9***
GCA
65.4 ± 4.5**
143.2 ± 44.3
54.5 ± 10.3
91.6 ± 2.9
82.0 ± 15.0
80.9 ± 8.7
94.0 ± 4.8
75.7 ± 3.8**
48.4 ± 3.5*
63.4 ± 1.5**
The values shown are the residual activity, which was calculated using the following equation: % residual activity = (the activity at 100 μM BAs/the control activity at 0 μM BAs) × 100%. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, compared with control activity.
The structure-UGT inhibition relationship can be observed using the combination of the BAs' structures (Fig. 1) and the UGT inhibition results (Table 1). The substitution of hydrogen with hydroxyl group at the R1, R3, R4, R5 sites significantly weakens the inhibition toward most UGT forms. In comparison with the inhibition magnitude of LCA and TLCA toward UGT2B7, a conclusion can be drawn that the taurine conjugation of LCA can strengthen the inhibition potential toward UGT2B7.
To demonstrate the physiological significance of these observations, TLCA (50 nM) was added to the medium to investigate whether it could inhibit hepatocyte UGT-catalyzed 4-MU glucuronidation activity. The results showed significant inhibition of TLCA toward hepatocyte UGT-catalyzed 4-MU glucuronidation (supplementary Fig. I).
Different inhibition type and kinetic parameters of TLCA toward UGT forms
Due to the potent inhibition of TLCA toward many UGT forms, the inhibition kinetic type and parameters (Ki) were further investigated. Both Dixon and Lineweaver-Burk plots were employed to evaluate the inhibition type, and the second plot using the slopes obtained from Lineweaver-Burk plot versus the concentrations of TLCA was used to calculate the inhibition kinetic parameters (Ki). If the intersection point was located in the vertical axis and the second quadrant in the Lineweaver-Burk plot and Dixon plot respectively, the inhibition type was classified as competitive inhibition. If the intersection point was located in horizontal axis in both Dixon and Lineweaver-Burk plots, the inhibition type was classified as noncompetitive inhibition. The results show that TLCA competitively inhibited UGT1A1 (Fig. 2B, C), UGT1A3 (Fig. 3B, C), UGT1A4 (Fig. 4B, C), and noncompetitively inhibited UGT1A7 (Fig. 5B, C) and UGT1A10 (Fig. 6B, C). The inhibition of UGT2B7 (Fig. 7B, C) and UGT2B15 (Fig. 8B, C) was also best fit to competitive inhibition. The inhibition kinetic parameters (Ki) were calculated to be 2.4, 0.3, 0.03, 16.0, 12.9, 0.1, and 3.3 μM for the activity of UGT1A1 (Fig. 2D), UGT1A3 (Fig. 3D), UGT1A4 (Fig. 4D), UGT1A7 (Fig. 5D), UGT1A10 (Fig. 6D), UGT2B7 (Fig. 7D), and UGT2B15 (Fig. 8D), respectively.
Fig. 2Evaluation of TLCA's inhibition toward recombinant UGT1A1-catalyzed 4-MU glucuronidation. A: TLCA exhibited concentration-dependent inhibition toward recombinant UGT1A1-catalyzed 4-MU glucuronidation. B: Dixon plot of TLCA's inhibition toward recombinant UGT1A1-catalyzed 4-MU glucuronidation. C: Lineweaver-Burk plot of TLCA's inhibition toward recombinant UGT1A1-catalyzed 4-MU glucuronidation. D: Second plot of TLCA's inhibition toward recombinant UGT1A1-catalyzed 4-MU glucuronidation. The data point represents the mean of the duplicate experiments.
Two typical substrates, AZT and estradiol, were then selected as representative of xenobiotic and endogenous substrates to clarify the influence of TLCA toward the glucuronidation of these two compounds. The concentration-dependent inhibition of TLCA toward the glucuronidation of AZT and estradiol was also demonstrated (supplementary Fig. IIA, Fig. 3A). Furthermore, the competitive inhibition of TLCA toward the glucuronidation of AZT (supplementary Fig. IIB, C) and estradiol (supplementary Fig. IIIB, C) was demonstrated. The inhibition kinetic parameters (Ki) were calculated to be 0.3 and 2.2 μM for inhibition of TLCA toward AZT and estradiol glucuronidation (supplementary Figs. IID, IIID).
Prediction of in vivo metabolic disorders in humans
Due to the strongest inhibition potential of TLCA toward different UGT enzymes, changes in in vivo metabolism could be predicted based on the concentration of TLCA. The concentration of TLCA in serum obtained from mice with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy was reported to be 0.3 μM (
). Using this concentration in combination with the Ki values for the inhibition of TLCA toward 4-MU glucuronidation, the AUCi/AUC values were calculated to be 1.1, 2, 11, 1.02, 1.02, 4, and 1.1 for UGT1A1, UGT1A3, UGT1A4, UGT1A7, UGT1A10, UGT2B7, and UGT2B15, respectively. In humans, the TLCA concentration was reported to never exceed 25 nM (
). Using this maximum value, the AUCi/AUC values were calculated to be 1.01, 1.08, 1.83, 1.002, 1.002, 1.25, and 1.008 for UGT1A1, UGT1A3, UGT1A4, UGT1A7, UGT1A10, UGT2B7, and UGT2B15, respectively.
DISCUSSION
The inhibitory capability of BAs toward UGTs is difficult to study using conventional animal models due to the complexity of factors influencing activity in vivo. For example, the role of BA in the activation of nuclear receptors might interfere with the evaluation of BA inhibition toward UGT enzymes. The pregnane X receptor was found to be activated by LCA (
Ileal bile acid-binding protein, functionally associated with the farnesoid X receptor or the ileal bile acid transporter, regulates bile acid activity in the small intestine.
). All affected nuclear receptors regulate the expression and activity of different genes encoding UGT enzymes. For example, BAs can induce the activity of UGT2B4 via activation of FXR (
). The UGT2B4 promoter also contains a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)α response element, and can be activated by PPARα agonist fenofibrate (
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha induces hepatic expression of the human bile acid glucuronidating UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2B4 enzyme.
). To avoid these complex factors, a relatively simple in vitro UGT enzyme incubation system was utilized in the present study.
The detailed metabolic inhibition profile of BAs toward important UGT isoforms was clarified in the present study, and TLCA was demonstrated to be the strongest inhibitor toward most of UGT isoforms, followed by LCA, which is consistent with the reports in which LCA and TLCA were reported to be able to significantly induce the liver damage (
). LCA can be metabolized through UGT isoform-catalyzed glucuronidation elimination, so, the wide inhibition of LCA toward UGT isoforms was observed in the present study. TLCA has similar structure with LCA, and can enter the activity cavity. However, TLCA cannot be metabolized through glucuronidation by our present study (data not shown). Therefore, TLCA exhibited stronger inhibition than LCA. CA and GCA, at 100 μM, were found to increase the activity of UGT1A3 by 35 and 45%, respectively. Given that induced expression of UGT1A3 through nuclear receptors does not occur in the present in vitro system, the allosteric activation of CA and GCA toward UGT1A3 might be the potential reason. However, the detailed mechanism needs to be further investigated
According to the predicted values of AUCi/AUC, TLCA exhibited the strongest inhibition toward UGT1A4-catalyzed metabolic reaction. UGT1A4 is widely accepted to be the main UGT enzyme involved in the N-glucuronidation of primary, secondary, and tertiary amines located in the compounds. Xenobiotics catalyzed by UGT1A4 include nicotine, cotinine, and nitrosamines (
). The strongest inhibition of UGT1A4 by BAs might significantly affect the metabolism of these compounds. TLCA also exerted strong inhibition potential toward UGT2B7 and UGT1A3. These two UGT forms were also involved in the metabolism of BAs, thus inhibition of these two UGT forms by BAs could in turn affect BA metabolism. Additionally, these two UGT forms can also participate in the metabolism of many drugs, including AZT. Therefore, this substrate was selected to evaluate whether its glucuronidation could be affected by TLCA. Indeed, TLCA competitively inhibited HLM-mediated glucuronidation of AZT with a potent inhibition potential of Ki = 0.3 μM. In addition to the UGT1A4 isoform, BAs can inhibit other UGTs including UGT1A1, UGT1A7, UGT1A10, and UGT2B15. UGT1A1 plays a key role in the metabolism of two important endogenous compounds, bilirubin and estradiol. The inhibition of TLCA toward the glucuronidation of estradiol was also demonstrated in the present study. The accumulation of BAs was reported to potentiate colon carcinogenesis (
). Inhibition of UGT1A7 and UGT1A10 by TLCA could provide a possible link to the correlation of increased BAs and high risk of colon cancer. In the present study, two concentrations of TLCA were used to predict the in vivo situation due to the relatively few reports on the serum concentrations of TLCA. Information on the serum concentrations of TLCA in various diseases might reveal a better understanding of disease risk.
In conclusion, the present study details inhibition profiles of BAs toward UGT enzymes, and the BA structure-UGT inhibition relationships. In vivo risk was predicted based on the inhibition of TLCA toward UGTs due to the strongest inhibition of TLCA toward different forms of UGT. However, the influence of other BAs toward UGTs should not be neglected. It should also be noted that the present results should be considered in the context of the complex environment in vivo and in cells, such as the influence of BAs on nuclear receptors as summarized in Fig. 9. The disrupted homeostasis of BAs due to diseases (e.g., cholestasis) could inhibit UGT-catalyzed metabolism resulting in altered metabolism of xenobiotics and endogenous compounds.
Fig. 9Brief summary of the influence of elevated BAs toward hepatic metabolism of xenobiotics and endobiotics.
Bile acids metabolomic study on the CCl4- and α-naphthylisothiocyanate-induced animal models: quantitative analysis of 22 bile acids by ultraperformance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry.
Bile acid inhibition of xenobiotic-metabolizing enzymes is a factor in the mechanism of colon carcinogenesis: tests of aspects of the concept with glucuronosyltransferase.
Selectivity of substrate (trifluoperazine) and inhibitor (amitriptyline, androsterone, canrenoic acid, hecogenin, phenylbutazone, quinidine, quinine, and sulfinpyrazone) “probes” for human UDPglucuronosyltransferases.
Ileal bile acid-binding protein, functionally associated with the farnesoid X receptor or the ileal bile acid transporter, regulates bile acid activity in the small intestine.
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha induces hepatic expression of the human bile acid glucuronidating UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2B4 enzyme.
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81202586, 81274047 and No. 81102507) and the National Cancer Institute, Center for Cancer Research, Intramural Research Program. The authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Abbreviations:
AUC
area under the curve
AZT
azidothymidine
BA
bile acid
CA
cholic acid
CDCA
sodium chenodeoxycholate
DCA
sodium deoxycholate
DHCA
dehydrocholic acid
FXR
farnesoid X receptor
GCA
glycocholic acid hydrate
HDCA
hyodeoxycholic acid
HLM
human liver microsome
I.D.
inner diameter
LCA
lithocholic acid
4-MU
4-methylumbelliferone
4-MUG
4-methylumbelliferone-β-d-glucuronide
PPAR
peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
TCDCA
taurochenodeoxycholate
TDCA
sodium taurodeoxycholate hydrate
TFP
trifluoperazine
TLCA
taurolithocholic acid
TUDCA
sodium tauroursodeoxycholate
UDCA
ursodeoxycholic acid
UDPGA
uridine-5′-diphosphoglucuronic acid trisodium salt
35686-8&id=gr1.jpg){kind=link}
35686-8&id=gr2.jpg){kind=link}
35686-8&id=gr3.jpg){kind=link}
35686-8&id=gr4.jpg){kind=link}
35686-8&id=gr5.jpg){kind=link}
35686-8&id=gr6.jpg){kind=link}
35686-8&id=gr7.jpg){kind=link}
35686-8&id=gr8.jpg){kind=link}
35686-8&id=gr9.jpg){kind=link}